Literature DB >> 35274722

Phase I Trial of a Third Generation EGFR Mutant-Selective Inhibitor (D-0316) in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Hong Jian1, Kai Wang2, Ying Cheng3, Lieming Ding4, Yang Wang4, Zhe Shi5, Ling Zhang5, Yaolin Wang5, Shun Lu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: D-0316 is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR T790M mutation that progressed after prior treatment with the first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI.
METHODS: This phase I, open-label, multicenter clinical trial evaluated daily oral D-0316 administration in dose-escalation (25 to 150 mg; 17 patients) and dose-expansion (50, 100 mg; 67 patients) cohorts for safety, tolerability, anti-tumor activity, and pharmacokinetics.
RESULTS: D-0316 was well tolerated at daily doses of 25 to 150 mg and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were platelet count decreased, electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged, anemia, rash, low white blood cell count, hypertriglyceridemia, high cholesterol, headache, pruritus, cough, and aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) increased. Most of AEs were grade 1 or 2. In the 50 and 100 mg group, the overall response rate (ORR) was 33.3% and 45.5%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 86.7% and 93.9%, and the median PFS was 8.3 and 9.6 months, respectively. D-0316 exposure increased in proportion to dose from 25 to 150 mg. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 100 mg.
CONCLUSION: D-0316 is safe, tolerable, and effective for patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC with the EGFR T790M mutation who previously received EGFR-TKI. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03452150.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. The data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors. Please contact the authors about reuse rights of the original data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 EGFR T790M mutation; efficacy; epidermal growth factor receptor; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); phase I; safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35274722      PMCID: PMC8914503          DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


D-0316 is an orally available irreversible third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) that overcomes resistance mechanisms of the first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. D-0316 is safe, tolerable, and apparently effective for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that carries T790M mutation.

Discussion

The first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs are now used worldwide to treat advanced NSCLC; however, patients taking these drugs develop different degrees of acquired drug resistance and need to switch to new treatments. The present study was a first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of D-0316 in patients with advanced NSCLC. Our results showed that D-0316 was well tolerated at daily doses ranging from 25 to 150 mg and effectively controlled disease at 50 and 100 mg dose levels. At dose levels tested, D-0316 exposure increased with the dose proportionally with an apparent linear correlation, consistent with other third-generation EGFR-TKIs.[1,2] Only one dose-limiting toxicity occurred in a patient who received a 100 mg dose, and the MTD was not reached. The low rate of grade 3 or higher drug-related rash (0%), maculopapular rash (1.2%), and diarrhea (0%) was remarkably different from that observed in osimertinib studies, presumably due to the successful molecular design of D-0316 to block the formation of a key metabolite that is active against wild-type EGFR. Thus, the safety profile of D-0316 appeared to be different from other EGFR-TKIs,[3,4] in that the occurrence of rash, maculopapular rash, and diarrhea was significantly lower (34.5%, 1.2%, and 6.0%, respectively). Efficacy results of D-0316 are shown in Figure 1. The ORR of the 50 mg expansion dose group was 33.3% and that of the 100 mg expansion was 45.5%, and the DCR in 50 mg group (86.7%) was lower than in 100 mg group (93.9%). The efficacy in the 100 mg group is clinically significant, especially considering that 75.0% of patients in this group had extrathoracic metastases. More than 50% of patients in expansion groups had received more than one prior EGFR TKI or chemotherapy treatment, suggesting that D-0316 can be effective despite multiple lines of prior treatment. The efficacy results from this study are comparable to other third-generation EGFR TKIs’ early phase study results and warrant further evaluation in a larger population.
Figure 1.

Efficacy results of D-0316. (a) Changes of tumor lesion size of patients in the 50 mg and 100 mg expansion groups (waterfall plot). (b) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS in the 50 and 100 mg expansion groups.

Efficacy results of D-0316. (a) Changes of tumor lesion size of patients in the 50 mg and 100 mg expansion groups (waterfall plot). (b) Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS in the 50 and 100 mg expansion groups. The phase II extension of the present study uses a 100-mg QD regimen and is ongoing (NCT03861156). In addition, a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study is currently assessing the efficacy and safety of D-0316 versus Icotinib as a first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (NCT04206072). These two trials will also include more detailed analyses of patients with brain metastases. In summary, D-0316 is a third-generation irreversible TKI that is safe, tolerable, and apparently effective for patients who have locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR T790M mutation and who previously received a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. Further development of D-0316 may provide patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with a viable option for treatment.

Trial Information

Additional Details of Endpoints or Study Design

The study included a dose-escalation phase to determine the MTD, and a subsequent dose-expansion phase to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The first dose escalation used an accelerated escalation scheme with one patient because of the low possibility of toxicity at this low dose. Subsequent dose escalations were conducted using a 3 + 3 design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were evaluated after the first cycle completed. Radiological examinations were performed every 6 weeks after treatment initiation for efficacy assessment. Adverse events occurring in ≥10% of patients are shown. ∗NC/NA, no change from baseline/no adverse event.

Assessment, Analysis, and Discussion

The present study is the first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and PK of D-0316 in patients with advanced NSCLC. Our results showed that D-0316 was well tolerated at daily doses ranging from 25 to 150 mg and the MTD was not reached. The safety profile of D-0316 appeared to be different from other EGFR-TKIs,[3,4] in that the occurrence of rash and diarrhea was significantly lower (34.5% and 6.0%, respectively). In the FLAURA study of osimertinib, rash and diarrhea both occurred in 58% of patients.[5] Clinical trials evaluating the safety of other third-generation EGFR-TKIs (nazartinib and AC0010) also reported rash at a frequency of 62% and 48%, respectively, and diarrhea at a frequency of 45% and 75%, respectively, as the most common AEs.[6,7] In the present study, we observed platelet count decreased (57%, 48/84),electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged (45%, 38/84), and anemia (45%, 38/84) as the most common AEs from D-0316 treatment. The incidences of these AEs are similar in each dose group, suggesting no dose-effect correlation. Most of these events are grade 1 or 2, with grade 3 platelet count decreased occurred in 8.3% of patients (7/84; 2 in 50 mg and 5 in 100 mg group) and grade 3 electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged and anemia occurred in only one patient each. Most QT interval prolongations were observed in only one ECG measurement and not confirmed by another measurement. All these events recovered without study drug dose interruption or discontinuation. It was noted that the incidence of QT interval prolongation was much lower in another phase 2 study of D-0316 where confirmatory ECGs were performed. There have been some hematological AEs observed with other EGFR-TKIs, such as anemia reported in 59% of the FLAURA study population and 43% of the AURA3 study population, and platelet count decreased reported in 51% of the FLAURA study population and 46% of the AURA3 study population in osimertinib-treated patients.[8] Platelet count decrease was also reported as the major AE in another third-generation EGFR-TKI, TAS-121, with an occurrence of 67.2% of all grades and 13.4% of grade 3 or higher.[9] The exact mechanism of hematological toxicity caused by EGFR-TKI is unclear, but in our current study these events were mostly mild to moderate in severity or manageable with appropriate dose modification without the need to discontinue study treatments. Another noteworthy AE in the present study is headache, which occurred in 26.2% patients (22/84), and the only DLT observed during this study was a grade 3 headache (1.2%). Except for this case, all other headaches were grade 1 or 2. The occurrence of headache in the present study seemed to be higher than that in FLAURA study, which reported 12% for any grade headache and 0.4% for grade 3 or higher.[5] The mechanism of headache in our study is unknown but it may be related to relatively high level of central nervous system penetration by study drug D-0316. Besides osimertinib, which is approved in many countries for the treatment of NSCLC with T790M mutation, there are other third-generation EGFR TKIs in active clinical development.[10] Further comparison of the safety and efficacy between these EGFR TKIs and D-0316 needs to be explored in the future. Based on the reported results of osimertinib, its ORR in T790M+ patients reached 61%,[11] which seems to be higher than D-0316 ORR in the present study (45.5% in 100 mg group). However, only 52% of patients in the osimertinib study had extra thoracic metastases, while in the present study, we had 75.0% of patients with extra thoracic metastases. Furthermore, more than half of the current study population in our expansion groups had received more than one prior EGFR TKI or chemotherapy treatment, suggesting that D-0316 may still be effective despite multiple lines of prior treatment. The high tolerability and promising efficacy result of D-0316 warrants further clinical development to potentially provide patients with T790Mmutated NSCLC an additional choice of treatment, especially in areas where osimertinib is not approved or in patients with poor tolerance to osimertinib. Animal studies reported that oral administration of D-0316 led to significant concentrations in brain tissue with a brain/plasma concentration ratio of 12.6, which indicated the potential of D-0316 to cross the blood–brain barrier. Five of our patients had measurable intracranial lesions at baseline, and one patient achieved PR of this lesion (Figure 2). Twenty-five patients had non-measurable brain lesions, only eight (32%) of them experienced progression. During the treatment of D-0316, no patients with intracranial lesions had ever received radiotherapy. This is consistent with our observation that most patients in the expansion groups did not have disease progression in the brain and suggests that D-0316 may inhibit intracranial lesions. The efficacy of D-0316 on brain metastasis needs further evaluation in a prospective study of patients with advanced NSCLC and measurable intracranial lesions.
Figure 2.

An illustration of intracranial tumor response in a patient with a measurable brain lesion (circled) that measured as 29 mm (longest diameter) during screening and reduced to 18 mm (38% reduction), achieving PR. The patient received D-0316 at 100 mg/day.

An illustration of intracranial tumor response in a patient with a measurable brain lesion (circled) that measured as 29 mm (longest diameter) during screening and reduced to 18 mm (38% reduction), achieving PR. The patient received D-0316 at 100 mg/day. At dose levels tested, D-0316 exposure increased with the dose proportionally with an apparent linear correlation (Figure 3). Our efficacy data suggested the higher dose and increased exposure at 100 mg led to better anti-tumor effects. Although the MTD was not reached in the present study, dose groups 150 mg or higher were not expanded or explored further because of the apparent higher occurrence of AEs (Table 1). In the 150 mg group, the occurrence of drug-related grade 3 and higher AE, AE leading to drug discontinuation, dose interruption, and dose reduction all seemed to be more frequent than those in the 100 mg group. The drug exposure of D-0316 at 100 mg exceeded the efficacious exposure level of osimertinib at the approved dose of 80 mg. Considering the overall drug exposure and the risks and benefits of different doses, we suggest 100 mg as the RP2D, with an induction period at a lower dose to improve tolerance by patients in the first cycle of treatment and to ensure safety and efficacy during long-term treatment.
Figure 3.

Changes in blood concentration of D-0316 after single-dose treatment (a) and cycle 1 day 15 treatment (b).

Table 1.

Summary of adverse events (AEs) and the most common drug-related AEs by dose levels.

All AEs25 mg50 mg75 mg100 mg150 mgAll
(N = 1)(N = 34)(N = 4)(N = 42)(N = 3)(N = 84)
Any AE1 (100.0)33 (97.1)4 (100.0)41 (97.6)3 (100.0)82 (97.6)
Any drug-related AE1 (100.0)31 (91.2)4 (100.0)41 (97.6)3 (100.0)80 (95.2)
Any AE grades 3-51 (100.0)13 (38.2)016 (38.1)1 (33.3)31 (36.9)
Any drug-related AE grades 3-51 (100.0)5 (14.7)012 (28.6)1 (33.3)19 (22.6)
AE leading to drug discontinuation0 4 (11.8)0 9 (21.4)1 (33.3)14 (16.7)
AE leading to dose interruption0 4 (11.8)1 (25.0) 7 (16.7)1 (33.3)13 (15.5)
AE leading to dose reduction0 01 (25.0) 2 (4.8)1 (33.3) 4 (4.8)
Serious AE1 (100.0) 8 (23.5)011 (26.2)020 (23.8)
Serious drug-related AE01 (2.9)05 (11.9)06 (7.1)
Most common (≥10%) drug-related AEs
Platelet count decreased
 Any grade020 (58.8)2 (50.0)24 (57.1)2 (66.7)48 (57.1)
 Grades 3-502 (5.9)0 5 (11.9)0 7 (8.3)
Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged
 Any grade1 (100.0)13 (38.2)2 (50.0)18 (42.9)2 (66.7)36 (42.9)
 Grades 3-51 (100.0)0000 1 (1.2)
Anemia
 Any grade0 9 (26.5)1 (25.0)16 (38.1)1 (33.3)27 (32.1)
 Grades 3-501 (2.9)000 1 (1.2)
Rash
 Any grade1 (100.0)11 (32.4)015 (35.7)027 (32.1)
 Grades 3-5000000
White blood cell decreases
 Any grade0 6 (17.6)1 (25.0) 7 (16.7)1 (33.3)15 (17.9)
 Grades 3-5000000
Hypertriglyceridemia
 Any grade02 (5.9)1 (25.0)10 (23.8)1 (33.3)14 (16.7)
 Grades 3-5000 2 (4.8)0 2 (2.4)
Cholesterol high
 Any grade02 (5.9)1 (25.0)11 (26.2)014 (16.7)
 Grades 3-5000000
Headache
 Any grade02 (5.9)1 (25.0) 8 (19.0)2 (66.7)13 (15.5)
 Grades 3-5000 1 (2.4)0 1 (1.2)
Pruritus
 Any grade02 (5.9)2 (50.0) 7 (16.7)011 (13.1)
 Grades 3-5000000
Cough
 Any grade0 4 (11.8)0 6 (14.3)010 (11.9)
 Grades 3-5000000
AST elevation
 Any grade0 4 (11.8)1 (25.0) 5 (11.9)010 (11.9)
 Grades 3-5000000
ALT elevation
 Any grade02 (5.9)1 (25.0) 6 (14.3)0 9 (10.7)
 Grades 3–5000000

Abbreviations: AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase.

Changes in blood concentration of D-0316 after single-dose treatment (a) and cycle 1 day 15 treatment (b). Summary of adverse events (AEs) and the most common drug-related AEs by dose levels. Abbreviations: AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase. In summary, D-0316 is a third-generation irreversible TKI that is safe, tolerable, and apparently effective for patients who have locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR T790M mutation and who previously received a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI.
DiseaseLung cancer—NSCLC
Stage of disease/treatmentMetastatic/advanced
Prior therapy1 prior regimen
Type of studyphase I, dose escalation + dose expansion
Primary EndpointsSafety, Tolerability, Maximum tolerated dose
Secondary EndpointsRecommended phase II dose, PK, Preliminary efficacy
Investigator’s AnalysisActive and should be pursued further
Generic/working nameD-0316
Drug typeSmall molecule
Drug classEGFR
Dose25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 mg per flat dose
Routeoral (p.o.)
Schedule of administrationPatients received D-0316 once daily under fasting conditions in each 21-day cycle. A washout period of 7 days was set after the first day of D-0316 admission to collect PK samples.
Dose levelDose of drug: D-0316Number enrolledNumber evaluable for toxicity
25111
5023434
75344
10044242
150533
Generic/working name D-0316
Drug typeSmall molecule
Drug classEGFR
Dose50 mg per flat dose
Routeoral (p.o.)
Schedule of administrationPatients received D-0316 once daily under fasting conditions in each 21-day cycle.
Generic/working name D-0316
Drug type Small molecule
Drug class EGFR
Dose100 mg per flat dose
Routeoral (p.o.)
Schedule of administrationPatients received D-0316 once daily under fasting conditions in each 21-day cycle. Only part of the 100 mg group patients achieved a washout period of 7 days after the first day of D-0316 admission to collect PK samples.
Generic/working nameD-0316
Drug typeSmall molecule
Drug classEGFR
Dose25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 mg per flat dose
Routeoral (p.o.)
Schedule of administrationPatients received D-0316 once daily under fasting conditions in each 21-day cycle. Only dose escalation and part of the 100 mg group patients achieved a washout period of 7 days after the first day of D-0316 admission to collect PK samples.
Number of patients, male8
Number of patients, female9
StageM1a: n = 6
M1b: n = 2
M1c: n = 9
AgeMedian (range): 60 (37-74) years
Number of prior systemic therapiesMedian (range): at least one prior EGFR TKI therapy
Performance status: ECOG0—6
1—11
2—0
3—0
Unknown—0
Cancer types or histologic subtypesAdenocarcinoma 17
Number of patients, male11
Number of patients, female20
StageM1a: n = 5
M1b: n = 5
M1c: n = 21
AgeMedian (range): 61 (49-75) years
Number of prior systemic therapiesMedian (range): at least one prior EGFR TKI therapy
Performance status: ECOG0—10
1—21
2—0
3—0
Unknown—0
Cancer types or histologic subtypesAdenocarcinoma, 29; squamous carcinoma, 1; other, 1
Number of patients, male13
Number of patients, female23
StageM1a: n = 9
M1b: n = 1
M1c: n = 26
AgeMedian (range): 60.5 (34–75) years
Number of prior systemic therapiesMedian (range): at least one prior EGFR TKI therapy
Performance status: ECOG0—6
1—29
2—1
3—0
Unknown—0
Cancer types or histologic subtypesAdenocarcinoma, 36
Number of patients, male32
Number of patients, female52
StageM1a: n = 20
M1b: n = 8
M1c: n = 56
AgeMedian (range): 61 (34–75) years
Number of prior systemic therapiesMedian (range): at least one prior EGFR TKI therapy
Performance status: ECOG0—22
1—61
2—1
3—0
Unknown—0
Cancer types or histologic subtypesAdenocarcinoma, 82; squamous carcinoma, 1; other, 1
TitleTumor response
Number of patients screened155
Number of patients enrolled31
Number of patients evaluable for toxicity31
Number of patients evaluated for efficacy30
Evaluation methodRECIST 1.1
Response assessment PR n = 10 (33.3%)
Response assessment SD n = 16 (53.3%)
Response assessment PD n = 4 (13.3%)
(Median) duration assessments PFS8.3 months, CI: 5.6-18.0
TitleTumor response
Number of patients screened155
Number of patients enrolled36
Number of patients evaluable for toxicity36
Number of patients evaluated for efficacy33
Evaluation methodRECIST 1.1
Response assessment CR
Response assessment PR n = 15 (45.5%)
Response assessment SD n = 16 (48.5%)
Response assessment PD n = 2 (6.1)
(Median) duration assessments PFS9.6 months, CI: 6.9-not reached
TitleSafety
Number of patients screened187
Number of patients enrolled84
Number of patients evaluable for toxicity84
Number of patients evaluated for efficacy63
Evaluation methodCTCAE 4.03
Name∗NC/NA12345All grades
Platelet count decreased43%26%23%7%1%0%57%
Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged57%36%6%1%0%0%43%
Anemia67%29%4%1%0%0%33%
Rash68%32%0%0%0%0%32%
White blood cell decreased82%14%4%0%0%0%18%
Hypertriglyceridemia83%12%2%2%0%0%17%
Cholesterol high83%15%1%0%0%0%17%
Headache85%13%1%1%0%0%15%
Pruritus87%13%0%0%0%0%13%
Cough88%8%4%0%0%0%12%
Aspartate aminotransferase increased88%12%0%0%0%0%12%
Alanine aminotransferase increased89%10%1%0%0%0%11%

Adverse events occurring in ≥10% of patients are shown.

∗NC/NA, no change from baseline/no adverse event.

Dose levelDose of drug: D-0316Number enrolledNumber evaluable for toxicityNumber with a dose-limiting toxicityDose-limiting toxicity information
125110
25034340
375440
410042421
5150330
Number evaluated for toxicityDose of drug: D-0316Number with dose-limiting toxicityDose-limiting toxicity
1250
34500
4750
421001Grade 3 headache
31500
Dose levelDose of drug: D-0316, mgNumber enrolled C  max (nmol/L), GeoMean T  max (h) medianAUC0-24 (h × nmol/L), GeoMean T ½(h) meanAccumulation ratio, Geomean
Single dose251794130048
Single dose5031654275047
Single dose7541776272094
Single dose100143704560077
Single dose15033464520095
Cycle 1 Day 15251292457304.4
Cycle 1 Day 155031570411 1005.1
Cycle 1 Day 15753986418 4006.5
Cycle 1 Day 15100301230423 4004.5
Cycle 1 Day 1515031380425 7004.9
CompletionStudy completed
Investigator’s AssessmentActive and should be pursued further
  9 in total

Review 1.  Acquired resistance to EGFR targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Sun Min Lim; Nicholas L Syn; Byoung Chul Cho; Ross A Soo
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  Severe Aplastic Anemia during Osimertinib Therapy in a Patient with EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Ogata; Yuzo Yamamoto; Taishi Harada; Yoichi Nakanishi; Isamu Okamoto; Eiji Iwama; Koji Kato; Yoshinao Oda
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Pasi A Jänne; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Dong-Wan Kim; David Planchard; Yuichiro Ohe; Suresh S Ramalingam; Myung-Ju Ahn; Sang-We Kim; Wu-Chou Su; Leora Horn; Daniel Haggstrom; Enriqueta Felip; Joo-Hang Kim; Paul Frewer; Mireille Cantarini; Kathryn H Brown; Paul A Dickinson; Serban Ghiorghiu; Malcolm Ranson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Beyond Osimertinib: The Development of Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors For Advanced EGFR+ NSCLC.

Authors:  Misako Nagasaka; Viola W Zhu; Sun Min Lim; Michael Greco; Fengying Wu; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Phase I study of TAS-121, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

Authors:  Makoto Nishio; Haruyasu Murakami; Yuichiro Ohe; Toyoaki Hida; Hiroshi Sakai; Kazuo Kasahara; Fumio Imamura; Tomohisa Baba; Kaoru Kubota; Yukio Hosomi; Tsuneo Shimokawa; Hidetoshi Hayashi; Kazutaka Miyadera; Tomohide Tamura
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Soria; Yuichiro Ohe; Johan Vansteenkiste; Thanyanan Reungwetwattana; Busyamas Chewaskulyong; Ki Hyeong Lee; Arunee Dechaphunkul; Fumio Imamura; Naoyuki Nogami; Takayasu Kurata; Isamu Okamoto; Caicun Zhou; Byoung Chul Cho; Ying Cheng; Eun Kyung Cho; Pei Jye Voon; David Planchard; Wu-Chou Su; Jhanelle E Gray; Siow-Ming Lee; Rachel Hodge; Marcelo Marotti; Yuri Rukazenkov; Suresh S Ramalingam
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Tony S Mok; Yi-Long Wu; Myung-Ju Ahn; Marina C Garassino; Hye R Kim; Suresh S Ramalingam; Frances A Shepherd; Yong He; Hiroaki Akamatsu; Willemijn S M E Theelen; Chee K Lee; Martin Sebastian; Alison Templeton; Helen Mann; Marcelo Marotti; Serban Ghiorghiu; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Osimertinib: A third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with the acquired Thr790Met mutation.

Authors:  Meredith K Bollinger; Amanda S Agnew; Gerard P Mascara
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 1.809

Review 9.  Osimertinib making a breakthrough in lung cancer targeted therapy.

Authors:  Haijun Zhang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.