Literature DB >> 35274695

The Conceptual Framework for the International Food Policy Study: Evaluating the Population-Level Impact of Food Policy.

David Hammond1, Lana Vanderlee2, Christine M White1, Rachel B Acton1, Martin White3, Christina A Roberto4, Adrian Cameron5, Gary Sacks5, Sharon Kirkpatrick1, Joel Dubin6, Jean Adams3, Alejandra Jauregui7, James F Thrasher8.   

Abstract

An unhealthy diet is among the leading global causes of death and disability. Globally, a range of policies are being implemented to support healthy food choices at a population level, including novel polices in the areas of food marketing, nutrition labeling, and taxation of less healthy foods. There is a need to evaluate and inform the implementation of these policies, including their impacts on marginalized population subgroups. The International Food Policy Study (IFPS) consists of repeated cross-sectional surveys conducted in 5 high- and upper-middle-income countries: Australia, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In each country, approximately 4000 adults and 1200 children and youth (aged 10-17) were recruited from a global commercial panel to complete an online survey using consistent measures and methodologies across countries. The first annual IFPS surveys were conducted in 2017 with adults; annual surveys for young people aged 10-17 were launched in 2019 in the same countries, as well as in Chile. The design of the IFPS surveys creates a framework for evaluating "natural experiments" in food policies, including comparisons over time within countries implementing the policy and comparisons with countries in which the policy was not implemented. IFPS surveys have 3 primary areas of focus: 1) knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs associated with specific policies; 2) diet-related behaviors; and 3) dietary intake, including 24-hour dietary recalls for adults in 4 of the 5 countries. Surveys also assess food insecurity, income adequacy, sex and gender, race/ethnicity, and a range of other measures to assess trends among priority subgroups. Overall, the IFPS project has the potential to address important gaps in national monitoring surveys for dietary patterns, and to evaluate the impacts of novel food policies implemented in any of the 5 countries over the study period.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  between-country comparisons; dietary intake; food policy, nutrition policy; policy evaluation; quasi-experimental study

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35274695      PMCID: PMC9188864          DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxac042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.687


  66 in total

1.  Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data.

Authors:  Amy F Subar; Laurence S Freedman; Janet A Tooze; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Carol Boushey; Marian L Neuhouser; Frances E Thompson; Nancy Potischman; Patricia M Guenther; Valerie Tarasuk; Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.

Authors:  M Cecchini; L Warin
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them.

Authors:  Carlos A Monteiro; Geoffrey Cannon; Renata B Levy; Jean-Claude Moubarac; Maria Lc Louzada; Fernanda Rauber; Neha Khandpur; Gustavo Cediel; Daniela Neri; Euridice Martinez-Steele; Larissa G Baraldi; Patricia C Jaime
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  E-cigarette Marketing Regulations and Youth Vaping: Cross-Sectional Surveys, 2017-2019.

Authors:  David Hammond; Jessica L Reid; Robin Burkhalter; Vicki L Rynard
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Initial Development and Evaluation of the Food Processing Knowledge (FoodProK) Score: A Functional Test of Nutrition Knowledge Based on Level of Processing.

Authors:  Jasmin Bhawra; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Marissa G Hall; Lana Vanderlee; David Hammond
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Weight bias among professionals treating eating disorders: attitudes about treatment and perceived patient outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Janet D Latner; Kelly M King; Joerg Luedicke
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.861

7.  Iterative Development of an Online Dietary Recall Tool: INTAKE24.

Authors:  Emma Simpson; Jennifer Bradley; Ivan Poliakov; Dan Jackson; Patrick Olivier; Ashley J Adamson; Emma Foster
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Using natural experiments to improve public health evidence: a review of context and utility for obesity prevention.

Authors:  Melanie Crane; Erika Bohn-Goldbaum; Anne Grunseit; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-05-18

9.  Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fiona H McKay; Bronte C Haines; Matthew Dunn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.

Authors:  Emma Foster; Clement Lee; Fumiaki Imamura; Stefanie E Hollidge; Kate L Westgate; Michelle C Venables; Ivan Poliakov; Maisie K Rowland; Timur Osadchiy; Jennifer C Bradley; Emma L Simpson; Ashley J Adamson; Patrick Olivier; Nick Wareham; Nita G Forouhi; Soren Brage
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2019-08-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: Application and correlations in a real-life cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Francesco Salis; Simona Loddo; Francesca Zanda; Maria Monica Peralta; Luca Serchisu; Antonella Mandas
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.