Literature DB >> 35274176

Decreased muscle mass and strength affected spinal sagittal malalignment.

Masayuki Miyagi1, Gen Inoue2, Yusuke Hori3, Kazuhide Inage4, Kosuke Murata2, Ayumu Kawakubo2, Hisako Fujimaki2, Tomohisa Koyama2, Yuji Yokozeki2, Yusuke Mimura2, Shinji Takahashi3, Shoichiro Ohyama3, Hidetomi Terai3, Masatoshi Hoshino3, Akinobu Suzuki3, Tadao Tsujio5, Sho Dohzono5, Ryuichi Sasaoka6, Hiromitsu Toyoda3, Sumihisa Orita4,7, Yawara Eguchi4, Yasuhiro Shiga4, Takeo Furuya4, Satoshi Maki4, Eiki Shirasawa2, Wataru Saito2, Takayuki Imura2, Toshiyuki Nakazawa2, Kentaro Uchida2, Seiji Ohtori4, Hiroaki Nakamura3, Masashi Takaso2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Correction surgeries for spinal malalignment showed good clinical outcomes; however, there were concerns including increased invasiveness, complications, and impact on medico-economics. Ideally, an early intervention is needed. To better understand the patho-mechanism and natural course of spinal alignment, the effect of factors such as muscle mass and strength on spinal sagittal imbalance were determined in a multicenter cross-sectional study.
METHODS: After excluding metal implant recipients, 1823 of 2551 patients (mean age: 69.2 ± 13.8 years; men 768, women 1055) were enrolled. Age, sex, past medical history (Charlson comorbidity index), body mass index (BMI), grip strength (GS), and trunk muscle mass (TM) were reviewed. Spinal sagittal imbalance was determined by the SRS-Schwab classification. Multiple comparison analysis among four groups (Normal, Mild, Moderate, Severe) and multinomial logistic regression analysis were performed.
RESULTS: On multiple comparison analysis, with progressing spinal malalignment, age in both sexes tended to be higher; further, TM in women and GS in both sexes tended to be low. On multinomial logistic regression analysis, age and BMI were positively associated with spinal sagittal malalignment in Mild, Moderate, and Severe groups. TM in Moderate and Severe groups and GS in the Moderate group were negatively associated with spinal sagittal malalignment.
CONCLUSION: Aging, obesity, low TM, and low GS are potential risk factors for spinal sagittal malalignment. Especially, low TM and low GS are potentially associated with more progressed spinal sagittal malalignment. Thus, early intervention for muscles, such as exercise therapy, is needed, while the spinal sagittal alignment is normal or mildly affected.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Grip strength; Obesity; Spinal sagittal alignment; Trunk muscle mass

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35274176     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07151-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  21 in total

1.  Sagittal spinal alignment deviation in the general elderly population: a Japanese cohort survey randomly sampled from a basic resident registry.

Authors:  Masashi Uehara; Jun Takahashi; Shota Ikegami; Ryosuke Tokida; Hikaru Nishimura; Noriko Sakai; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Effect of corrective long spinal fusion to the ilium on physical function in patients with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ryo Kondo; Yu Yamato; Tetsuyuki Nagafusa; Takashi Mizushima; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Sho Kobayashi; Daisuke Togawa; Shin Oe; Kenta Kurosu; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Age-related variations in global spinal alignment and sagittal balance in asymptomatic Japanese adults.

Authors:  Kunio Yokoyama; Masahiro Kawanishi; Makoto Yamada; Hidekazu Tanaka; Yutaka Ito; Shinji Kawabata; Toshihiko Kuroiwa
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.448

4.  Complication rates associated with 3-column osteotomy in 82 adult spinal deformity patients: retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter consecutive series with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Eric Klineberg; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Renaud Lafage; Han Jo Kim; Richard Hostin; Gregory M Mundis; Munish Gupta; Barthelemy Liabaud; Justin K Scheer; Bassel G Diebo; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Michael P Kelly; Vedat Deviren; Robert Hart; Doug Burton; Shay Bess; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-02-17

5.  Factors influencing patient satisfaction after adult scoliosis and spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Kazunori Hayashi; Louis Boissière; Fernando Guevara-Villazón; Daniel Larrieu; Susana Núñez-Pereira; Anouar Bourghli; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroğlu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2019-05-10

6.  Physiological variations in the sagittal spine alignment in an asymptomatic elderly population.

Authors:  Tito Bassani; Fabio Galbusera; Andrea Luca; Alessio Lovi; Enrico Gallazzi; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Accuracy of the sagittal vertical axis in a standing lateral radiograph as a measurement of balance in spinal deformities.

Authors:  B J Van Royen; H M Toussaint; I Kingma; S D Bot; M Caspers; J Harlaar; P I Wuisman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position.

Authors:  G Duval-Beaupère; C Schmidt; P Cosson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  Surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity: Conceptual approach and surgical strategy.

Authors:  Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

10.  Are There Age- and Sex-related Differences in Spinal Sagittal Alignment and Balance Among Taiwanese Asymptomatic Adults?

Authors:  Kuang-Ting Yeh; Ru-Ping Lee; Ing-Ho Chen; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Cheng-Huan Peng; Kuan-Lin Liu; Jen-Hung Wang; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.