Literature DB >> 35274006

Proteome Analysis of Urinary Biomarkers in a Bovine IRBP-Induced Uveitis Rat Model via Data-Independent Acquisition and Parallel Reaction Monitoring Proteomics.

Weiwei Qin1,2, Xuyan Qin3, Lujun Li2, Youhe Gao2.   

Abstract

Uveitis, a group of intraocular inflammatory diseases, is one of the major causes of severe visual impairment among the working-age population. This study aimed to screen potential urinary biomarkers for uveitis based on proteome analysis. An experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) rat model induced by bovine interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) was used to mimic uveitis. In discovery phase, a total of 704 urinary proteins were identified via data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomic technique, of which 76 were significantly changed (34, 36, and 37 on days 5, 8, and 12, respectively, after bovine IRBP immunization). Gene Ontology annotation of the differential proteins indicates that acute-phase response, innate immune response, neutrophil aggregation, and chronic inflammatory response were significantly enriched. Protein-protein interaction network indicates that these differential urinary proteins were biologically connected in EAU, as a group. In validation phase, 17 proteins having human orthologs were verified as the potential markers associated with uveitis by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) targeted quantitative analysis. Twelve differential proteins changed even when there were no clinical manifestations or histopathological ocular damage. These 12 proteins are potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of uveitis to prevent the development of visual impairment. Five differential proteins changed at three time-points and showed progressive changes as the uveitis progressed, and another five differential proteins changed only on day 12 when EAU severity peaked. These 10 proteins may serve as potential biomarkers for prognostic evaluation of uveitis. Our findings revealed that the urinary proteome could sensitively reflect dynamic pathophysiological changes in EAU, and represent the first step towards the application of urinary protein biomarkers for uveitis.
Copyright © 2022 Qin, Qin, Li and Gao.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; data-independent acquisition (DIA); experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU); parallel reaction monitoring (PRM); urine proteome

Year:  2022        PMID: 35274006      PMCID: PMC8901606          DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.831632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Mol Biosci        ISSN: 2296-889X


Introduction

Uveitis is a group of intraocular inflammatory diseases that mainly involve the uvea, the blood vessel-rich pigmented middle layer of the wall of the eye. Uveitis carries a high risk of vision loss and usually affects people aged 20–50 years (Rothova et al., 1992; Gritz and Wong, 2004; Krishna et al., 2017). In developing countries, approximately 5–25% of irreversible blindness is caused by uveitis and its complications (Rao, 2013; Tsirouki et al., 2018). In addition to infectious agents, autoimmune reactions are one of the main causes of uveitis. For autoimmune uveitis, corticosteroids and immunomodulatory agents are the mainstay of treatment (Larson et al., 2011). However, there are some uveitis patients who fail to respond to treatment. And it is common for the recurrence to occur during the tapering phase of corticosteroid uses. In addition, long-term treatments may have several intraocular and systemic side effects, such as high intraocular pressure, sterile endophthalmitis, and nephrotoxicity (Jonas et al., 2003; Moshfeghi et al., 2003). The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of uveitis remain challenging even to experienced specialists (Herbort et al., 2009; Sève et al., 2017) because of the profound clinical overlap between uveitis entities induced by different etiologies, the limited availability of clinical specimens and the limited reliability/accuracy of currently available tests. Timely diagnosis of non-autoimmune uveitis, in particular infectious uveitis and masquerade syndrome, can be difficult. Therefore, the identification of noninvasive and accurate biomarkers for diagnosis and/or disease monitoring is of great clinical significance. If uveitis is diagnosed earlier, effective measures may be used to prevent vision loss. Urine is a promising resource for biomarker research and is attracting more and more attention. Without strict homeostatic regulation, urine can sensitively reflect changes in the body at an early stage (Gao, 2013; Li et al., 2014). Mass spectrometry-based proteomics have dramatically improved and emerged as a prominent tool in the field of biomarker studies. Many candidate biomarkers for uveitis have been reported primarily in the blood, tears, and aqueous humor (Curnow and Murray, 2006; Guo et al., 2015; Pepple et al., 2015; Walscheid et al., 2015). Urinary proteomic studies have identified many candidate biomarkers for autoimmune inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune myocarditis, and inflammatory bowel disease (Shao et al., 2011; Qin et al., 2019a). However, there have been limited studies of protein biomarkers for uveitis in urine compared with the wide application of urinary protein markers for other diseases. Experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) is a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease that targets the neural retina and related tissues (Caspi et al., 1986; Lee et al., 2014). It is an induced noninfectious type of uveitis, as opposed to a spontaneous, autoimmune disease model. The hallmarks of EAU are the onset of ocular inflammation, disruption of the retinal architecture, and partial to complete destruction of the photoreceptor cell layer (Caspi, 2003). It shares many common features in clinical and histological aspects with human uveitis (Agarwal et al., 2012). Susceptibility to EAU varies between rat strains. In this study, Lewis rats which develops characteristically severe uveitis were used. Others works in the same experimental context using Wistar Rat (Arroul-Lammali et al., 2012). The urine proteome is affected by multiple factors, such as age, diet, exercise, gender, medication, and daily rhythms (Wu and Gao, 2015). Animal models can be used to minimize the impact of many uncertain factors by establishing a direct relationship between a disease and corresponding changes in urine (Gao, 2014). This study aimed to identify potential urinary protein biomarkers related to uveitis by using the bovine IRBP-induced uveitis rat model. The experiment was conducted in two phases, as shown in Figure 1. In the discovery phase, a data-independent acquisition (DIA) approach was used to profile the proteome of urine from EAU rats and compared with that of controls. In the validation phase, the differentially changed proteins were validated by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) targeted quantitative analysis using a quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer.
FIGURE 1

Workflow of the study of urine proteome changes in experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) rats.

Workflow of the study of urine proteome changes in experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) rats.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Uveitis Induction

Fifty male Lewis rats (160–180 g) were purchased from Charles River China (Beijing, China). All animals were maintained on a standard laboratory diet under controlled indoor temperature (21 ± 2°C), humidity (65–70%) and 12 h light–dark cycle conditions. All experiments were performed using protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Qingdao Municipal Hospital Medical Ethics Committee. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations of the National Health Commission and the Ministry of Science and Technology. The Lewis rats were randomly divided into two groups: a control group (n = 25) and an EAU group (n = 25). EAU was induced according to the procedure described previously (Caspi, 2003). Briefly, rats in the EAU group were immunized with 30 µg of bovine IRBP peptide R16 (ADGSSWEGVGVVPDV, BGI, Beijing, China), emulsified 1:1 in complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States). The rats in the control group were given a subcutaneous injection of the same volume of CFA saline. The experiment was conducted in two phases, for details, see Figure 1. For the discovery phase, differentially changed urinary proteins were identified by DIA quantification in 32 independent samples from the control group (eight samples) and the EAU group on days 5, 8 and 12 (eight samples per time point); for the validation phase, the 32 remaining urine samples (8 from the control group and the others collected from the EAU group on days 5, 8 and 12, with 8 samples per time point) were evaluated by PRM targeted quantification.

Histological Analysis of EAU

For histopathology, three rats in the experimental group and three rats in the control group were randomly sacrificed at 8, 12 and 16 days after immunization injection. Their eyes were harvested and then quickly fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. The formalin-fixed tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned (4 mm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to reveal histopathological lesions.

Urine Collection and Sample Preparation

Urine samples were collected from the control and experimental groups at days 5, 8, 12 and 16 after immunization injection. Rats were individually placed in metabolic cages for 6 h. During urine collection, no food was provided to the rats to avoid urine contamination. After collection, the urine samples were immediately centrifuged at 2,000 g for 30 min at 4°C and then stored at −80°C. Urinary protein extraction: 0.5 ml urine was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 30 min at 4°C. Six volumes of prechilled ethanol were added after removing the pellets, and the samples were precipitated at 4°C overnight. Then, lysis buffer (8 mol/L urea, 2 mol/L thiourea, 50 mmol/L Tris, and 25 mmol/L DTT) was used to dissolve the pellets. The protein concentration of each sample was measured by the Bradford protein assay. Tryptic digestion: The proteins were digested with trypsin (Promega, United States) using filter-aided sample preparation methods (Wiśniewski et al., 2009). Briefly, 100 µg of the protein sample was loaded onto the 10-kD filter unit (Pall, United States). The protein solution was reduced with 4.5 mM DTT for 1 h at 37°C and then alkylated with 10 mM indoleacetic acid for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The proteins were digested with trypsin (enzyme-to-protein ratio of 1:50) for 14 h at 37°C. The peptides were desalted on Oasis HLB cartridges (Waters, United States) and lyophilized for trap column fractionation and LC-MS/MS analysis.

Spin Column Separation

A high-pH reversed-phase peptide fractionation kit (Thermo Pierce, United States) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A step gradient of increasing acetonitrile concentrations was applied to the column to elute bound peptides. Ten different fractions were collected by centrifugation, including the flow-through fraction, the wash fraction and eight step gradient sample fractions (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, 20 and 50% acetonitrile). The fractions were analyzed by LC-MS/MS.

LC-MS/MS Setup for DDA and DIA

An Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer was coupled with an EASY-nLC 1000 HPLC system (Thermo Scientific, Germany). For DDA-MS and DIA-MS modes, the same LC settings were used. The digested peptides were loaded onto a trap column (75 μm × 2 cm, 3 μm, C18, 100 Å). The eluent was transferred to a reversed-phase analytical column (50 μm × 250 mm, 2 μm, C18, 100 Å). The eluted gradient was 5–30% buffer B (0.1% formic acid in 99.9% acetonitrile; flow rate of 0.4 μl/min) for 60 min. The parameters were set as follows: the full scan was acquired from 350 to 1,550 m/z at 60,000, the cycle time was set to 3 s (top speed mode), the auto gain control (AGC) was set to 1e6, and the maximum injection time was set to 50 ms. MS/MS scans were acquired in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 15,000 with an isolation window of 2 Da and collision energy at 32% (HCD); the AGC target was set to 5e4, and the maximum injection time was 30 ms. For DIA-MS acquisition, the variable isolation window DIA method with 26 windows was developed (Supplementary Table S1). The full scan was set at a resolution of 60,000 over an m/z range of 350 to 1,200, followed by DIA scans with a resolution of 30,000, HCD collision energy of 32%, AGC target of 1e6 and maximal injection time of 50 ms. A quality control DIA analysis of the pooled sample was inserted after every 8 urine samples were tested.

LC-MS/MS Setup for PRM

Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer coupled with an EASY-nLC 1200 HPLC system was used. The peptides were loaded on a reversed-phase trap column (75 μm × 2 cm, 3 μm, C18, 100 Å, Thermo Scientific, Germany), and the eluent was then transferred to a reversed-phase analytical column (50 μm × 150 mm, 2 μm, C18, 100 Å, Thermo Scientific, Germany). The elution gradient consisted of 5–35% buffer B (0.1% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile; flow rate 0.3 μl/min) for 120 min. The MS/MS scans were acquired in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 30,000 with an isolation window of 1.6 Da and collision energy at 30% (HCD), the AGC target was set to 5e4, and the maximum injection time was 60 ms. For the PRM-MS method, thirty-two individual samples were analyzed in PRM mode. Finally, 150 peptides were scheduled, and the retention time (RT) segment was set to 8 min for each targeted peptide (Supplementary Table S2). The normalized collision energy was fixed to 30% and the quadrupole isolation window to 1.6 Da. The other parameters were the same as described in the last paragraph.

DIA Quantification Analysis

The raw data files acquired for the ten fractions in DDA mode were processed using Proteome Discoverer (version 2.3; Thermo Scientific, Germany) with SEQUEST HT against the SwissProt Rattus database (released in May 2019, containing 8086 sequences) appended with the iRT peptide sequences. The search parameters consisted of a parent ion mass tolerance of 10 ppm; fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.02 Da; fixed modification of carbamidomethylated cysteine (+58.00 Da); and variable modifications of oxidized methionine (+15.995 Da) and deamidated glutamine and asparagine (+0.984 Da). For other settings, the default parameters were used. The raw DIA-MS files were imported into Spectronaut Pulsar with the default settings. In brief, mass calibration was set to local mass calibration. Cross-run normalization was enabled to correct for systematic variance in LC-MS performance, and a local normalization strategy was used (Callister et al., 2006). Protein inference, which gave rise to the protein groups, was performed on the principle of parsimony using the ID picker algorithm as implemented in Spectronaut Pulsar (Zhang et al., 2007).

PRM Quantification Analysis

Skyline (version 19.1.0.193) (MacLean et al., 2010) was used to build the spectrum library and filter peptides for PRM analysis. For each targeted protein, 2‒6 associated peptides were selected using the following rules: i) identification in the untargeted analysis with a q value <1%, ii) completely digested by trypsin, iii) containing 8–18 amino acid residues, iv) exclusion of the first 25 amino acids at the N-terminus of proteins, and v) fixed carbamidomethylation of cysteine. Prior to individual sample analysis, pooled peptide samples were subjected to PRM experiments to refine the target list. Finally, forty-four proteins with 150 peptides (Supplementary Table S2) were scheduled. All of the PRM-MS data were processed with Skyline. Transition settings: precursor charges +2, +3; ion charge +1; ion type b, y, p; product ions from ion three to last ion −1; auto-select all matching transitions; ion match tolerance 0.02 m/z; pick 6 most intense product ions. Prior to the statistical analysis, the quantified protein intensities were normalized according to the summed intensity.

Bioinformatics Analysis

Bioinformatics analysis was carried out to better study the biological function of the differential proteins. GO analysis was performed on the differentially altered urinary proteins identified at the discovery phase (http://www.geneontology.org/) (Ashburner et al., 2000; Consortium, 2019). In this study, significant GO enrichment was defined at p < 0.05.

Data Availability.

All raw files were uploaded at www.iprox.org. URL: https://www.iprox.org/page/SSV024. html;url=15776233949742GmC; Passwords: yKSu.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of EAU Rats

An anterior chamber examination and histopathology analysis were performed to evaluate the progression of EAU in the Lewis rats (Figure 2). On day 8, there was no difference between the EAU and the control rats. Anterior chamber examination showed a translucent appearance, the pupil and iris blood vessels were clearly visible, and the vessels were not congested (Figure 2A). HE staining showed that the retina presented ordered retinal layers (Figure 2B). On day 12, there were obvious signs of uveitis compared with control rats. The eyeball appeared larger due to swelling and proptosis, the red reflex was absent and the pupil was obscured (Figure 2A). HE staining showed that the retinal architecture was disorganized, massive inflammatory cells infiltrated throughout the retina and choroid, and photoreceptor cells were damaged (Figure 2B). On day 16, mild vitritis and retinal folds were observed (Figure 2). These clinical manifestations and pathological changes revealed the successful generation of bovine IRBP-induced uveitis model. EAU severity peaked on day 12 after the immunization injection.
FIGURE 2

Clinical manifestations and histopathological ocular damage in EAU eyes. (A): Clinical appearance upon anterior chamber examination. (B): Hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) of retinal tissue (×20). Control: Normal control rat eye; Day 8: 8 days after bovine IRBP immunization; Day 12: 12 days after bovine IRBP immunization; Day 16: 16 days after bovine IRBP immunization.

Clinical manifestations and histopathological ocular damage in EAU eyes. (A): Clinical appearance upon anterior chamber examination. (B): Hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) of retinal tissue (×20). Control: Normal control rat eye; Day 8: 8 days after bovine IRBP immunization; Day 12: 12 days after bovine IRBP immunization; Day 16: 16 days after bovine IRBP immunization.

Dynamic Urine Proteome Changes in EAU Rats

To preliminarily investigate how the urine proteome changes with EAU progression, samples from the control group and from three time points in the EAU group (days 5, 8, and 12) were analyzed via the DIA workflow. A total of 704 proteins were identified with FDR < 0.01. Among these, 76 proteins significantly changed in EAU rats compared to control rats (1.5-fold change, adjust p < 0.05; Table 1). At day 5, 34 differential urinary proteins, 18 of which increased and 16 of which decreased, were identified. At day 8, 36 differential urinary proteins, 17 of which increased and 19 of which decreased, were identified. At day 12, 31 differential urinary proteins, six of which increased and nine of which decreased, were identified.
TABLE 1

Dynamic urine proteome changes in EAU rats identified by DIA LC-MS/MS.

UniProt IDProtein nameFold change
D5D8D12
Q62714Neutrophil antibiotic peptide NP-44.343.012.59
P02764Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein3.941.981.68
P30152Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin2.912.242.45
P06866Haptoglobin2.731.801.65
O55006Protein RoBo-12.531.971.79
P08932T-kininogen 22.481.711.63
P01048T-kininogen 12.181.731.77
O88766Neutrophil collagenase2.152.392.36
P07647Submandibular glandular kallikrein-90.600.650.63
Q62930Complement component C92.021.56
Q63515C4b-binding protein beta chain1.791.57
Q6IE51Serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 70.640.61
O54858Carboxypeptidase Z0.590.52
O54728Phospholipase B1, membrane-associated0.450.44
P62836Ras-related protein Rap-1A0.400.50
P16573Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 11.721.59
Q3KRD8Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 62.083.78
Q4KLZ6Triokinase/FMN cyclase1.561.57
Q63060Glycerol kinase1.671.67
P50115Protein S100-A81.601.94
P82995Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha0.100.08
P21744Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 40.610.63
P09006Serine protease inhibitor A3N1.88
D3ZTV3Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein FLRT21.82
P08721Osteopontin1.68
P41516DNA topoisomerase 2-alpha1.62
P08649Complement C41.61
P20059Hemopexin1.59
Q8K4D8Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A31.51
P19804Nucleoside diphosphate kinase B0.65
Q09030Trefoil factor 20.62
P49744Thrombospondin-40.56
Q64573Liver carboxylesterase 40.55
Q63355Unconventional myosin-Ic0.54
P40241CD9 antigen0.48
P34901Syndecan-40.34
Q99MZ8LIM and SH3 domain protein 10.34
Q03191Trefoil factor 30.33
P19132Ferritin heavy chain0.30
Q9WVH8Fibulin-50.29
Q8CJD3Zymogen granule membrane protein 162.08
Q9JLJ34-trimethylaminobutyraldehyde dehydrogenase1.89
Q99068Alpha-2-macroglobulin receptor-associated protein1.60
Q9QZ76Myoglobin0.63
D3ZUC6Protein TOPAZ10.64
O89117Beta-defensin 10.64
P35859Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein complex acid labile subunit0.62
Q99PW3Sialidase-10.62
P38438TGF-beta receptor type-20.61
P08753Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(k) subunit alpha0.57
P04073Gastricsin0.54
Q63207Coagulation factor X0.52
P17559Uteroglobin0.46
O88917Adhesion G protein-coupled receptor L10.40
P08723Prostatic spermine-binding protein0.22
Q6P6V0Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase3.98
P00731Carboxypeptidase A13.59
P50282Matrix metalloproteinase-92.55
Q63532Cornifin-A2.46
P51635Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member A12.40
Q5XI95Alcohol dehydrogenase 61.91
P62963Profilin-11.88
Q07936Annexin A21.74
Q5BJY9Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 181.73
Q920R3Acyl-CoA ()-desaturase1.73
Q5BKD0Inactive 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthase 1B1.69
P10247H-2 class II histocompatibility antigen gamma chain1.61
P61589Transforming protein RhoA1.58
P63095Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) subunit alpha isoforms short1.56
P04785Protein disulfide-isomerase1.53
Q793F9Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 4A1.53
P533697,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine triphosphatase1.53
Q6AYA5Transmembrane protein 106B1.51
P07171Calbindin0.62
Q4FZU2Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 6A0.59
P10760Adenosylhomocysteinase0.56
Dynamic urine proteome changes in EAU rats identified by DIA LC-MS/MS. The overlap of these 76 differential proteins identified in EAU rats is shown with a Venn diagram (Figure 3). Fifteen urinary proteins changed significantly both on days 5 and 8, when there were no clinical manifestations and histopathological ocular damage. This suggests the potential for these urinary proteins to be used for the early detection of uveitis. Among these differential proteins, nine proteins, such as DEF4, A1AG, NGAL, HPT, ROB1, KNT2, KNT1, MMP8 and KLK9, consistently changed on day 12 when EAU severity peaked.
FIGURE 3

Venn diagram of the differential urinary proteins on days 5, 8, and 12 in EAU rats compared with control rats.

Venn diagram of the differential urinary proteins on days 5, 8, and 12 in EAU rats compared with control rats.

Gene Ontology Analysis of Differential Proteins

Gene ontology (GO) functional annotation was performed on the 76 differential proteins identified in EAU rats in the discovery phase. Seventy-two proteins were annotated and classified as being involved in certain biological processes (Figure 4A).
FIGURE 4

GO enrichment analysis of the differential proteins at days 5, 8, and 12 in EAU rats. (A) Biological process; (B) Cellular component; (C) Molecular function.

GO enrichment analysis of the differential proteins at days 5, 8, and 12 in EAU rats. (A) Biological process; (B) Cellular component; (C) Molecular function. The GO enrichment analysis showed that defense response, innate immune response, neutrophil aggregation, were the main enriched biological processes at the three time points. While acute-phase response was enriched at days 5 and 8, chronic inflammatory response was only enriched at day 12. The differential proteins associated with these GO terms includes Protein S100-A8, Neutrophil antibiotic peptide NP-4, Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (NADP+), Annexin A2, Ras-related protein Rap-1A, Transforming protein RhoA, Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha, Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 and Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase. In the cellular component category, most of these differential proteins were extracellular space, extracellular exosome, blood microparticle and extracellular region proteins (Figure 4B). In the molecular function category, protein homodimerization activity, serine-type endopeptidase activity, antioxidant activity, GTP binding, carbohydrate binding, protein binding and integrin binding were overrepresented on days 5 and 8. Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor binding and protease binding were only overrepresented on day12 (Figure 4C).

Protein-Protein Interaction Network

To better understand the pathogenic mechanisms in EAU, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network for 76 differential proteins was constructed by STRING (Figure 5). The STRING PPI network analysis exhibited that the average node degree is 2.56, the average local clustering coefficient is 0.404, and the PPI enrichment p-value was less than 1.0e-16. The results indicates that these differential proteins have more interactions among themselves than what would be expected for a random set of proteins of the same size and degree distribution drawn from the genome. Such an enrichment indicates that the differential proteins are at least partially biologically connected, as a group. As shown in Figure 5, many proteins were at the core of the “traffic link,” such as Adh6, Rhoa, Mmp8, S100a8, Hp, and Lcn2, which suggests that they may play an important role in the development of EAU.
FIGURE 5

STRING PPI network analysis of the 76 differential proteins in EAU rats. The average node degree is 2.56, average local clustering coefficient is 0.404, and PPI enrichment p-value is < 1.0e-16.

STRING PPI network analysis of the 76 differential proteins in EAU rats. The average node degree is 2.56, average local clustering coefficient is 0.404, and PPI enrichment p-value is < 1.0e-16.

Validation of Differential Proteins in EAU Rats

Overall, 17 proteins having human orthologs (6 upregulated and 11 downregulated) were verified significantly altered at multiple time points (1.5-fold change, adjust p < 0.05) (Table 2). The trends of the corresponding proteins were consistent with the results from the DIA discovery phase. Twelve differential proteins changed on days 5 and 8, even when there were no clinical manifestations or histopathological ocular damage. These 12 proteins are potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of uveitis to prevent the development of visual impairment. Five differential proteins changed at three time-points and showed progressive changes as the uveitis progressed, and another five differential proteins changed only on day 12 when EAU severity peaked. These 10 proteins may serve as potential biomarkers for prognostic evaluation of uveitis.
TABLE 2

The details of differential urinary proteins validated by PRM analysis.

UniProt IDProtein nameHuman orthologsFold changeBiomarkers for diseasesUveitis-related
D5D8D12
O88766Neutrophil collagenaseP228942.201.952.40TNBS-induced colitis (Qin et al. 2019b)Yes
P30152Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalinP801882.062.913.54Kidney injury (Sauriasari et al. 2021), kidney toxicity (Tajima et al. 2019)
P06866HaptoglobinP007381.551.582.01Diabetic kidney disease (Liu et al. 2020; Zheng et al. 2021)Yes
P27590UromodulinP079110.610.490.54Medication-overuse headache
Q920A6Retinoid-inducible serine carboxypeptidaseQ9HB400.610.460.38
P02764Alpha-1-acid glycoproteinP027632.961.75Adult-onset Still’s disease (Sun et al. 2020), Lupus nephritis (Davies et al. 2021), hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (Zhan et al. 2020)Yes
P02767TransthyretinP027660.610.64Ovarian Cancer (Lee et al. 2019), hyperthyroidism (Benabdelkamel et al. 2021)
Q62930Complement component C9P027481.921.53Yes
P01048T-kininogen 1P010421.66
Q63530Phosphotriesterase-related proteinQ96BW50.630.33
P31211Corticosteroid-binding globulinP081850.66
P17164Tissue alpha-L-fucosidaseP040660.59
P23785GranulinsP287990.60Prostate cancer (Fujita et al. 2017)
P42854Regenerating islet-derived protein 3-gammaQ061410.56
P45479Palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1P508970.39
Q6DGG1Protein ABHD14BQ96IU40.50Renal transplantation (Navarrete et al. 2020)
Q9EPF2Cell surface glycoprotein MUC18P431210.60Yes

— Means does not reach the criteria (fold change-1.5, p < 0.05) compared with control group.

The details of differential urinary proteins validated by PRM analysis. — Means does not reach the criteria (fold change-1.5, p < 0.05) compared with control group.

Discussion

In this study, we first studied urinary protein candidate biomarkers for uveitis using DIA combined with PRM in experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) rats. In discovery phase, a total of 704 urinary proteins were identified via DIA proteomic technique, of which 76 were significantly changed (34, 36, and 37 on days 5, 8, and 12, respectively, after bovine IRBP immunization) (1.5-fold change, p < 0.05). GO analysis of the 76 differential proteins showed that the acute-phase response, innate immune response, neutrophil aggregation, and chronic inflammatory response were significantly enriched. The activity of neutrophils was increased, and there was intense neutrophil infiltration in the early stage of inflammation in uveitis (Leccese and Alpsoy, 2019; Salmaninejad et al., 2019). The acute inflammatory response, innate immune response and inflammatory response were significantly enriched at days 5 and 8. Activated innate immunity plays an important role in the pathogenesis of uveitis (Forrester et al., 2013). The PPI network of the differential proteins constructed by STRING revealed that such an enrichment indicates that the proteins are partially biologically connected in EAU as a group. These results suggest that urine proteome could sensitively reflect pathophysiological changes during the progression of EAU. After PRM-validation, 17 proteins having human orthologs were verified significantly changed consistent with the trend in the discovery phase. Of these, eight proteins were known disease biomarkers in urine as shown in Table 2. Based on the proteome analysis, we identified 12 differential proteins on days 5 and 8 with the potential as biomarker of the early diagnosis of uveitis. Because, there are no clinical manifestations and histopathological ocular damage on days 5 and 8. Among this early diagnosis panel, four proteins were previously reported to be associated with uveitis, including Neutrophil collagenase (MMP8), Haptoglobin (HPT), Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AN1G), and Complement component C9 (C9), Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) constitute a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases that function to maintain and remodel tissue architecture. Individual MMPs have been found to be expressed in all eye tissues (Sivak and Fini, 2002), and the expression of MMPs (MMP2, MMP8, MMP12, and MMP13) is positively associated with increased levels of corneal fibrosis and neovascularization (Wolf et al., 2019). In the aqueous humor of juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients with anterior uveitis, the levels of MMPs (MMP1, MMP3, MMP9) are significantly higher than those in controls (Bauer et al., 2018). In retinas from EAU rats, the expression of MMPs (MMP7, MMP8, MMP12) was increased compared with that in naive controls (Wallace et al., 1999). In addition, MMP8 has been found to be differentially changed in the urine of individuals with autoimmune inflammatory diseases, such as experimental autoimmune myocarditis (Zhao et al., 2018). In a trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis rat model, the level of MMP8 is reported to be elevated about 3-fold in urine (Qin et al., 2019a). HPT and C9 are reported to be closely associated with Behcet’s disease (BD). Serum C9 is significantly increased in BD patients with relapse (Lehner and Adinolfi, 1980); and higher serum HPT levels are detected in BD patients compared to controls, and there is no obvious difference between the quiescent and active stages (Mao et al., 2008; Yalcindag et al., 2008). And increased serum HPT is also observed in EAU rats compared to controls (Guo et al., 2015). Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein plays a key role in modulating the activity of the immune system during the acute-phase reaction. Interestingly, we also found it significantly increased in the tears of the active BDU eye compared to the contralateral quiescent eye (Liang et al., 2020). Five differential proteins changed at three time-points and showed progressive changes as the uveitis progressed, and another five differential proteins changed only on day 12 when EAU severity peaked. These 10 proteins may serve as potential biomarkers for prognostic evaluation of uveitis. Among these, cell surface glycoprotein MUC18 (CD146) was previously reported to be associated with uveitis. CD146 is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed at the junction of endothelial cells (Bardin et al., 2001). It plays an important role in angiogenesis and vessel remodeling (Bardin et al., 2001; Yan et al., 2003). In age-related macular degeneration patients, the serum CD146 level is significantly higher than that in controls (Liu et al., 2019). The presented work was a preliminary study, indicating the feasibility of urine as a potential diagnostic biomarker approach for uveitis. Uveitis is a common, sight-threatening inflammatory ocular disease and includes multiple heterogeneous clinical entities, such as Behcet disease (BD), sarcoidosis, Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada (VKH) and ankylosing spondylarthritis. However, only a small number of IRBP-induced EAU rats were included. We are well aware of the limited of EAU rat model and the lack of clinical validation, which is necessary for future study. To further evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of these differential proteins, urine samples from uveitis patients should be included in further studies. In addition, an in-depth profile of the urine proteome may provide a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of uveitis.

Conclusion

In summary, our results revealed that the urinary proteome could reflect dynamic pathophysiological changes in EAU. These differential proteins could be potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis or prognostic evaluation of uveitis. Which also provides valuable clues for investigating the pathogenic mechanisms of uveitis.
  56 in total

1.  Normalization approaches for removing systematic biases associated with mass spectrometry and label-free proteomics.

Authors:  Stephen J Callister; Richard C Barry; Joshua N Adkins; Ethan T Johnson; Wei-Jun Qian; Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; Richard D Smith; Mary S Lipton
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Elevated S100A8/A9 and S100A12 Serum Levels Reflect Intraocular Inflammation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis: Results From a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Karoline Walscheid; Arnd Heiligenhaus; Dirk Holzinger; Johannes Roth; Carsten Heinz; Christoph Tappeiner; Maren Kasper; Dirk Foell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Urine α-fetoprotein and orosomucoid 1 as biomarkers of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhu Zhan; Yalan Guan; Kenley Mew; Weiqiong Zeng; Mingli Peng; Peng Hu; Yixuan Yang; Yi Lu; Hong Ren
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Increased serum levels of soluble CD146 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Yan-Yao Liu; Yue Bin; Xing Wang; Hui Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  T cell lines mediating experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) in the rat.

Authors:  R R Caspi; F G Roberge; C G McAllister; M el-Saied; T Kuwabara; I Gery; E Hanna; R B Nussenblatt
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1986-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Incidence and prevalence of uveitis in Northern California; the Northern California Epidemiology of Uveitis Study.

Authors:  David C Gritz; Ira G Wong
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Behçet's disease: An immunogenetic perspective.

Authors:  Arash Salmaninejad; Mohammad Reza Zamani; Arezoo Gowhari Shabgah; Seyedmojtaba Hosseini; Fatemeh Mollaei; Nayyerehalsadat Hosseini; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 8.  Autoimmune and autoinflammatory mechanisms in uveitis.

Authors:  Richard W Lee; Lindsay B Nicholson; H Nida Sen; Chi-Chao Chan; Lai Wei; Robert B Nussenblatt; Andrew D Dick
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 9.  Current updates on protein as biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rani Sauriasari; Dhonna Dwi Safitri; Nuriza Ulul Azmi
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.565

10.  Serum haptoglobin levels in ocular Behçet disease and acute phase proteins in the course of Behçet disease.

Authors:  F N Yalcindag; A Yalcindag; O Caglayan; O Ozdemir
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.922

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.