| Literature DB >> 35273940 |
Yuan Tang1, Yi-Jun Chen1, Yun-Fei Shao2, Qiao Cao3.
Abstract
Recognizing that building work will continually encompass, to a certain degree, unfavorable ecological consequences, green building has been encouraged and advocated as a managerial concept to progress in the construction segment. This research created a conceptual model that analyzed whether sustainable transformational leadership (STL) supported sustainable innovation ambidexterity (SIA) in green building industries. This research model was based on organizational support theory, hope theory, social cognitive theory, and attribution theory. This paper aimed to observe the relationship between STL with SIA via the mediating effect of psychological capital (PC). Furthermore, it examined the impact of perceived organizational support (POS) on PC. Moreover, it further examined the relationship between STL and POS. Likewise, it investigated the mediating effect of PC on the relationship between POS and SIA. Finally, it examined POS as a mediator between the relationship of STL and PC. The data for this study were collected from 600 workers employed at green building businesses in China. A questionnaire was delivered to the workers of green building corporations. According to the findings, STL was discovered to have a positive impact on PC. Furthermore, POS had a significant impact on PC. Moreover, PC significantly influenced SIA. Finally, STL was found to be in a significant relationship with POS. The outcomes of this research are extremely beneficial particularly in the situation of developing economies. This research contributes to the existing knowledge that employees with STL exhibit high PC, POS, and SIA in green building industries.Entities:
Keywords: green building industries; perceived organizational support; psychological capital; sustainable innovation ambidexterity; sustainable transformational leadership
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35273940 PMCID: PMC8902066 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.814690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Operational definitions.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Transformational Leadership (STL) | STL is an exceptional leadership approach characterized by four qualities incorporating ideal inspiration, logical motivation, enthusiasm, and personalized attention. | ( |
| Psychological Capital (PC) | The knowledge of constructive subjective understanding, optimistic personal characteristics, and encouraging organizations guarantees to enhance the state of life and avoid the circumstances that occur when life seems to be pointless | ( |
| Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity (SIA) | sustainable innovation ambidexterity (SIA) has been divided into two components. The methodologies improving or upgrading the corporations' current sustainable resources and knowledge is known as sustainable exploitative innovation. In contrast, the practices employed to attain sustainable innovative knowledge and capabilities are known as sustainable exploratory innovation. | ( |
| Perceived Organizational Support (POS) | Perceived organizational support (POS) is described as a worker's awareness of their concern and welfare and the way they are appreciated by their company. | ( |
Figure 1Theoretical framework.
Construct validity and reliability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | ST1 | 0.715 | 1.555 | 0.877 | 0.543 |
| ST2 | 0.789 | 1.875 | |||
| ST3 | 0.728 | 1.690 | |||
| ST4 | 0.775 | 1.765 | |||
| ST5 | 0.671 | 1.544 | |||
| ST6 | 0.737 | 1.594 | |||
| POS | PO1 | 0.723 | 1.327 | 0.809 | 0.516 |
| PO2 | 0.608 | 1.172 | |||
| PO3 | 0.817 | 1.475 | |||
| PO4 | 0.711 | 1.333 | |||
| SE | SE2 | 0.731 | 1.422 | 0.830 | 0.549 |
| SE3 | 0.744 | 1.446 | |||
| SE4 | 0.738 | 1.524 | |||
| SE5 | 0.752 | 1.472 | |||
| OP | OP1 | 0.737 | 1.404 | 0.817 | 0.528 |
| OP2 | 0.694 | 1.539 | |||
| OP3 | 0.773 | 1.454 | |||
| OP5 | 0.701 | 1.310 | |||
| HO | HO3 | 0.800 | 1.578 | 0.834 | 0.557 |
| HO4 | 0.717 | 1.390 | |||
| HO5 | 0.691 | 1.340 | |||
| HO6 | 0.773 | 1.497 | |||
| RE | RE3 | 0.769 | 1.540 | 0.826 | 0.543 |
| RE4 | 0.713 | 1.843 | |||
| RE5 | 0.703 | 1.349 | |||
| RE6 | 0.762 | 1.497 | |||
| SEP | SEP1 | 0.702 | 1.528 | 0.872 | 0.533 |
| SEP2 | 0.780 | 2.001 | |||
| SEP3 | 0.751 | 1.870 | |||
| SEP4 | 0.719 | 1.552 | |||
| SEP5 | 0.745 | 1.745 | |||
| SEP6 | 0.678 | 1.717 | |||
| SET | SET1 | 0.708 | 1.497 | 0.867 | 0.567 |
| SET2 | 0.833 | 1.663 | |||
| SET3 | 0.778 | 1.431 | |||
| SET4 | 0.705 | 1.757 | |||
| SET5 | 0.734 | 2.066 | |||
| PC | SE | 0.832 | 1.466 | 0.903 | 0.700 |
| OP | 0.840 | 1.426 | |||
| HO | 0.826 | 1.446 | |||
| RE | 0.849 | 1.557 | |||
| SIA | SEP | 0.957 | 1.735 | 0.947 | 0.899 |
| SET | 0.940 | 1.682 |
STL, Sustainable transformational leadership; POS, Perceived organizational support; SE, Self-efficacy; OP, Optimism; HO, Hope; RE, Resilience; SEP, Sustainable exploratory innovation; SET, Sustainable exploitative innovation; PC, Psychological capital; SIA, Sustainable innovation ambidexterity.
Cross loadings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST1 | 0.715 | 0.427 | 0.333 | 0.329 | 0.294 | 0.416 | 0.467 | 0.472 |
| ST2 | 0.789 | 0.504 | 0.381 | 0.393 | 0.411 | 0.499 | 0.599 | 0.507 |
| ST3 | 0.728 | 0.481 | 0.345 | 0.262 | 0.290 | 0.370 | 0.557 | 0.477 |
| ST4 | 0.775 | 0.530 | 0.396 | 0.362 | 0.433 | 0.437 | 0.597 | 0.463 |
| ST5 | 0.671 | 0.426 | 0.282 | 0.257 | 0.172 | 0.292 | 0.510 | 0.537 |
| ST6 | 0.737 | 0.495 | 0.397 | 0.445 | 0.522 | 0.428 | 0.572 | 0.432 |
| PO1 | 0.398 | 0.723 | 0.395 | 0.453 | 0.406 | 0.452 | 0.537 | 0.393 |
| PO2 | 0.471 | 0.608 | 0.203 | 0.266 | 0.147 | 0.277 | 0.520 | 0.380 |
| PO3 | 0.553 | 0.817 | 0.461 | 0.483 | 0.460 | 0.477 | 0.567 | 0.464 |
| PO4 | 0.443 | 0.711 | 0.295 | 0.369 | 0.257 | 0.265 | 0.503 | 0.487 |
| SE2 | 0.430 | 0.456 | 0.731 | 0.486 | 0.475 | 0.475 | 0.456 | 0.337 |
| SE3 | 0.383 | 0.282 | 0.744 | 0.439 | 0.476 | 0.435 | 0.353 | 0.255 |
| SE4 | 0.311 | 0.381 | 0.738 | 0.463 | 0.439 | 0.458 | 0.336 | 0.254 |
| SE5 | 0.319 | 0.318 | 0.752 | 0.446 | 0.458 | 0.487 | 0.385 | 0.327 |
| OP1 | 0.320 | 0.389 | 0.403 | 0.737 | 0.433 | 0.370 | 0.374 | 0.319 |
| OP2 | 0.354 | 0.482 | 0.477 | 0.694 | 0.377 | 0.455 | 0.414 | 0.402 |
| OP3 | 0.378 | 0.423 | 0.464 | 0.773 | 0.446 | 0.465 | 0.452 | 0.363 |
| OP5 | 0.308 | 0.322 | 0.452 | 0.701 | 0.559 | 0.479 | 0.327 | 0.201 |
| HO3 | 0.357 | 0.383 | 0.524 | 0.565 | 0.800 | 0.510 | 0.420 | 0.348 |
| HO4 | 0.336 | 0.317 | 0.443 | 0.458 | 0.717 | 0.448 | 0.377 | 0.213 |
| HO5 | 0.298 | 0.276 | 0.446 | 0.352 | 0.691 | 0.477 | 0.258 | 0.168 |
| HO6 | 0.471 | 0.391 | 0.446 | 0.474 | 0.773 | 0.524 | 0.417 | 0.299 |
| RE3 | 0.436 | 0.407 | 0.511 | 0.461 | 0.493 | 0.769 | 0.448 | 0.351 |
| RE4 | 0.395 | 0.343 | 0.429 | 0.413 | 0.443 | 0.713 | 0.400 | 0.278 |
| RE5 | 0.417 | 0.446 | 0.457 | 0.435 | 0.530 | 0.703 | 0.424 | 0.344 |
| RE6 | 0.395 | 0.350 | 0.446 | 0.490 | 0.467 | 0.762 | 0.440 | 0.370 |
| SEP1 | 0.449 | 0.557 | 0.330 | 0.421 | 0.271 | 0.376 | 0.702 | 0.584 |
| SEP2 | 0.550 | 0.523 | 0.439 | 0.464 | 0.510 | 0.497 | 0.780 | 0.526 |
| SEP3 | 0.593 | 0.561 | 0.350 | 0.342 | 0.285 | 0.458 | 0.751 | 0.668 |
| SEP4 | 0.547 | 0.572 | 0.387 | 0.434 | 0.380 | 0.436 | 0.719 | 0.576 |
| SEP5 | 0.625 | 0.557 | 0.353 | 0.246 | 0.286 | 0.392 | 0.745 | 0.630 |
| SEP6 | 0.507 | 0.452 | 0.408 | 0.479 | 0.466 | 0.383 | 0.678 | 0.507 |
| SET1 | 0.433 | 0.437 | 0.285 | 0.460 | 0.305 | 0.303 | 0.603 | 0.708 |
| SET2 | 0.501 | 0.454 | 0.293 | 0.295 | 0.199 | 0.313 | 0.639 | 0.833 |
| SET3 | 0.551 | 0.477 | 0.324 | 0.334 | 0.328 | 0.366 | 0.619 | 0.778 |
| SET4 | 0.460 | 0.445 | 0.385 | 0.407 | 0.385 | 0.411 | 0.558 | 0.705 |
| SET5 | 0.494 | 0.439 | 0.209 | 0.179 | 0.115 | 0.333 | 0.592 | 0.734 |
STL, Sustainable transformational leadership; POS, Perceived organizational support; SE, Self-efficacy; OP, Optimism; HO, Hope; RE, Resilience; SEP, Sustainable exploratory innovation; SET, Sustainable exploitative innovation; PC, Psychological capital; SIA, Sustainable innovation ambidexterity.
Hypothesis results.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1: STL -> PC | 0.340 | 7.369 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H2: POS -> PC | 0.391 | 8.250 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H3: PC -> SIA | 0.606 | 16.369 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H4: STL -> POS | 0.651 | 20.621 | 0.000 | Supported |
STL, Sustainable transformational leadership; POS, Perceived organizational support; PC, Psychological capital; SIA, Sustainable innovation ambidexterity.
Figure 2Results of the inner model. ***p-value ≤ 0.001.
Indirect effects result.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| H5: STL -> PC -> SIA | 0.206 | 0.034 | 6.058 | 0.000 |
| H6: POS -> PC -> SIA | 0.237 | 0.035 | 6.699 | 0.000 |
| H7: STL -> POS -> PC | 0.255 | 0.033 | 7.740 | 0.000 |
STL, Sustainable transformational leadership; POS, Perceived organizational support; PC, Psychological capital; SIA, Sustainable innovation ambidexterity.