| Literature DB >> 35273578 |
Sourav Ghosh1, Susmita Nandi1, Tarakdas Basu1.
Abstract
Gradual emergence of new bacterial strains, resistant to one or more antibiotics, necessitates development of new antibacterials to prevent us from newly evolved disease-causing, drug-resistant, pathogenic bacteria. Different inorganic and organic compounds have been synthesized as antibacterials, but with the problem of toxicity. Other alternatives of using green products, i.e., the medicinal plant extracts with biocompatible and potent antibacterial characteristics, also had limitation because of their low aqueous solubility and therefore less bioavailability. Use of nanotechnological strategy appears to be a savior, where phytochemicals are nanonized through encapsulation or entrapment within inorganic or organic hydrophilic capping agents. Nanonization of such products not only makes them water soluble but also helps to attain high surface to volume ratio and therefore high reaction area of the nanonized products with better therapeutic potential, over that of the equivalent amount of raw bulk products. Medicinal plant extracts, whose prime components are flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, polyphenolic compounds, and essential oils, are in one hand nanonized (capped and stabilized) by polymers, lipids, or clay materials for developing nanodrugs; on the other hand, high antioxidant activity of those plant extracts is also used to reduce various metal salts to produce metallic nanoparticles. In this review, five medicinal plants, viz., tulsi (Ocimum sanctum), turmeric (Curcuma longa), aloe vera (Aloe vera), oregano (Oregano vulgare), and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), with promising antibacterial potential and the nanoformulations associated with the plants' crude extracts and their respective major components (eugenol, curcumin, anthraquinone, carvacrol, eucalyptus oil) have been discussed with respect to their antibacterial potency.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterials; major components; mechanism of action; medicinal plants; nanonization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35273578 PMCID: PMC8902597 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.768739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Schematic representation of active compound loaded nanoparticle.
FIGURE 2Chemical structure of eugenol.
FIGURE 3Chemical structure of curcumin.
FIGURE 4Chemical structure of (A) aloe-emodin, (B) emodin, and (C) chrysophanol.
FIGURE 5Chemical structure of carvacrol.
FIGURE 6Chemical structure of eucalyptol.
FIGURE 7Schematic representation of antibacterial mechanism of action of bioactive compound-loaded nanoparticles.
Nanonization of the major component of five different medicinal plants by different established methods of nanonization and their antibacterial potential on different bacteria.
| Major component of plant | Method of nanonization | Nanoformulation | Antibacterial action on | References |
| Eugenol | Ionic gelation and Schiff base reaction | Eugenol-grafted chitosan NPs | ||
| Curcumin | Wet milling | Curcumin NPs | ||
| Anthraquinone | Dropping method | AQ-CS-PLA |
| |
| Carvacrol | Solvent displacement | Carvacrol-loaded PLGA NPs | ||
| Eucalyptus oil | Sonication cavitation | Eucalyptus oil nanoemulsion |
FIGURE 8Schematic representation of antibacterial mechanism of action of plant extract stabilized metallic nanoparticle.
Green synthesis of different metal and metal oxide NPs, using five different medicinal plant extracts and different established methods of nanonization, having antibacterial potential on different bacteria.
| Name of the plant | Method of nanonization | Precursor metallic solution | Nanoformulation | Antibacterial action on | References |
| Tulsi | Phytoreduction | AgNO3 | AgNPs | ||
| Turmeric | Phytoreduction | AgNO3 | AgNPs | ||
| Aloe vera | Phytoreduction | AgNO3 | AgNPs | ||
| Oregano | Hot hydrothermal method | AgNO3 | AgNPs | ||
| Eucalyptus | Phytoreduction | AgNO3 | AgNPs |