Literature DB >> 35273437

Safety Time and Optimal Temperature of Unilateral Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Single-Center 15-Year Experience.

Meng-Ta Tsai1,2, Hsuan-Yin Wu3, Yu-Ning Hu1, Ting-Wei Lin3, Jih-Sheng Wen1, Chwan-Yau Luo3, Jun-Neng Roan1,4.   

Abstract

Background: The optimal level of hypothermia and safe time of unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (uACP) in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair remain controversial.
Objectives: To analyze the association of uACP time and circulatory arrest temperature with surgical outcomes of ATAAD.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 263 patients who had undergone ATAAD repair between 2006 and 2020 using uACP. The patients were stratified by three chronologically equivalent periods (period 1, 2006 to 2010; period 2, 2011 to 2015; period 3, 2016 to 2020) to demonstrate the decade-long evolution of surgical strategy and outcomes.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.4 ± 12.5 years, and 68.8% were male. The hospital mortality rates were 15.1%, 12.9%, and 11.0% from period 1 to 3 (p = 0.740). The median circulatory arrest temperatures were 20, 23, and 25 °C (p < 0.001), respectively, and the median uACP times were 72, 59, and 41 minutes (p < 0.001). The incidence rates of postoperative permanent neurologic deficits were 13.2%, 10.9%, and 18.3% (p = 0.312), and those of transient neurologic deficits were 9.4%, 10.9%, and 11.9% (p = 0.936), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that uACP time ≥ 60 minutes was an independent predictor of hospital mortality rather than postoperative stroke. ROC curve analysis estimated an optimal cutoff value of 52 minutes of uACP time when the circulatory arrest temperature was ≥ 25 °C to predict hospital mortality (area under the curve: 0.72). Conclusions: Unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion time was associated with hospital mortality after ATAAD surgery. A safe threshold of 50 to 60 minutes of uACP should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic dissection; Cerebral perfusion

Year:  2022        PMID: 35273437      PMCID: PMC8888319          DOI: 10.6515/ACS.202203_38(2).20211113A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin        ISSN: 1011-6842            Impact factor:   2.672


  24 in total

1.  Insufficient unilateral cerebral perfusion during emergent aortic arch surgery.

Authors:  Paul P Urbanski; Jörg Babin-Ebell; Steffen Fröhner; Anno Diegeler
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-15

2.  The impact of temperature in aortic arch surgery patients receiving antegrade cerebral perfusion for >30 minutes: How relevant is it really?

Authors:  Ourania Preventza; Joseph S Coselli; Shahab Akvan; Sarang A Kashyap; Andrea Garcia; Katherine H Simpson; Matt D Price; Jessica Mayor; Kim I de la Cruz; Lorraine D Cornwell; Shuab Omer; Faisal G Bakaeen; Ricky J L Haywood-Watson; Athina Rammou
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Postoperative Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Ting-Wei Lin; Meng-Ta Tsai; Yu-Ning Hu; Wei-Hung Lin; Wei-Ming Wang; Chwan-Yau Luo; Jun-Neng Roan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Selective cerebral perfusion: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  David Spielvogel; Masashi Kai; Gilbert H L Tang; Ramin Malekan; Steven L Lansman
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection type A: analysis of pre- and intraoperative risk factors from the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA).

Authors:  Lars Oliver Conzelmann; Ernst Weigang; Uwe Mehlhorn; Ahmad Abugameh; Isabell Hoffmann; Maria Blettner; Christian D Etz; Martin Czerny; Christian F Vahl
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Antegrade cerebral protection in thoracic aortic surgery: lessons from the past decade.

Authors:  Eva S Krähenbühl; Michel Clément; David Reineke; Martin Czerny; Mario Stalder; Thierry Aymard; Jürg Schmidli; Thierry Carrel
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and mild (28°C-30°C) systemic hypothermic circulatory arrest for aortic arch replacement: results from 1002 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Zierer; Ali El-Sayed Ahmad; Nestoras Papadopoulos; Anton Moritz; Anno Diegeler; Paul P Urbanski
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Moderate hypothermia during aortic arch surgery is associated with reduced risk of early mortality.

Authors:  January Y Tsai; Wei Pan; Scott A Lemaire; Paul Pisklak; Vei-Vei Lee; Arthur W Bracey; MacArthur A Elayda; Ourania Preventza; Matt D Price; Charles D Collard; Joseph S Coselli
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  Is unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion equivalent to bilateral cerebral perfusion for patients undergoing aortic arch surgery?

Authors:  Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Giuseppe Scrascia; Nicola Vitale
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-07-21

10.  A meta-analysis of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest versus moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion.

Authors:  David H Tian; Benjamin Wan; Paul G Bannon; Martin Misfeld; Scott A LeMaire; Teruhisa Kazui; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; John A Elefteriades; Joseph Bavaria; Joseph S Coselli; Randall B Griepp; Friedrich W Mohr; Aung Oo; Lars G Svensson; G Chad Hughes; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.