Literature DB >> 35273421

Machine learning assessment of the binding region as a tool for more efficient computational receptor-ligand docking.

Matjaž Simončič1, Miha Lukšič1, Maksym Druchok2,3.   

Abstract

We present a combined computational approach to protein-ligand binding, which consists of two steps: (1) a deep neural network is used to locate a binding region on a target protein, and (2) molecular docking of a ligand is performed within the specified region to obtain the best pose using Autodock Vina. Our in-house designed neural network was trained using the PepBDB dataset. Although the training dataset consisted of protein-peptide complexes, we show that the approach is not limited to peptides, but also works remarkably well for a large class of non-peptide ligands. The results are compared with those in which the binding region (first step) was provided by Accluster. In cases where no prior experimental data on the binding region are available, our deep neural network provides a fast and effective alternative to classical software for its localization. Our code is available at https://github.com/mksmd/NNforDocking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accluster; AutoDock Vina; deep neural network; machine learning; molecular docking

Year:  2022        PMID: 35273421      PMCID: PMC8903148          DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Liq        ISSN: 0167-7322            Impact factor:   6.165


  63 in total

1.  eFindSite: improved prediction of ligand binding sites in protein models using meta-threading, machine learning and auxiliary ligands.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Wei P Feinstein
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

3.  Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina.

Authors:  Robert Rentzsch; Bernhard Y Renard
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Integrating Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Lucianna H S Santos; Rafaela S Ferreira; Ernesto R Caffarena
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

5.  Computational methods and tools for binding site recognition between proteins and small molecules: from classical geometrical approaches to modern machine learning strategies.

Authors:  Gabriele Macari; Daniele Toti; Fabio Polticelli
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Protein-Ligand Scoring with Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Matthew Ragoza; Joshua Hochuli; Elisa Idrobo; Jocelyn Sunseri; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  GalaxyPepDock: a protein-peptide docking tool based on interaction similarity and energy optimization.

Authors:  Hasup Lee; Lim Heo; Myeong Sup Lee; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements.

Authors:  Kyle A Beauchamp; Yu-Shan Lin; Rhiju Das; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Paul Maragakis; Stefano Piana; Michael P Eastwood; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  YASARA View - molecular graphics for all devices - from smartphones to workstations.

Authors:  Elmar Krieger; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.