Literature DB >> 35273030

Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide is associated with disease burden in the German Asthma Net severe asthma cohort.

Christina Bal1, Marco Idzko1, Sabina Škrgat2,3,4, Andrea Koch5,6, Katrin Milger7,8,9, Christian Schulz10, Sonja Zehetmayer11, Eckard Hamelmann12,13, Roland Buhl14,13, Stephanie Korn15,16,13.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35273030      PMCID: PMC9202484          DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01233-2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   33.795


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a biomarker for type 2 asthma, reflecting the degree of local pulmonary inflammation linked to immune pathways, including interleukin (IL)-13 [1]. In clinical practice, FENO is a reliable marker for inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) responsiveness [2] and the efficacy of biological therapies, such as those targeting IL-4/IL-13 pathways [3, 4], as well as the detection of steroid nonadherence or resistance in severe asthma [2]. The prospective Severe Asthma Registry of the German Asthma Net (GAN) enrols patients with severe asthma for in-depth assessment of phenotypes, underlying mechanisms and therapeutic strategies; GAN has been approved by respective ethics committees, with all included patients having signed informed consent [5]. Prior studies of FENO either included patients with asthma of any severity [6] or did not involve a comprehensive analysis in a large cohort [7]. We therefore used cross-sectional data from GAN to determine the correlation of FENO with epidemiological, laboratory, clinical, lung function, or quality of life parameters and the need for oral corticosteroid (OCS) maintenance therapy in a carefully selected severe asthma cohort to better characterise the severe asthma subtype with high FENO values. At the time of data acquisition (October 2019), GAN included 1689 patients with severe asthma, as defined by the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society [1], from multiple tertiary referral centres, mainly in Germany, but also in Slovenia, Austria and Croatia [5]. FENO was measured using any available device, according to the manufacturer's instructions [8]. Patients were included in the analysis if a FENO measurement was available and excluded only if essential data were missing. Consistent with German and international guidelines [1, 9], FENO values ≥25 ppb were considered elevated; exacerbations were defined as events requiring OCS for ≥3 days, doubling of established OCS dose, or hospitalisation; and thresholds for lung function parameters and exacerbation frequency were established. Controlled asthma was defined by Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) score <1.5, or Asthma Control Test (ACT) score ≥20, with better asthma quality of life defined by mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mAQLQ) score ≥5.4 [1, 9]. Hypoxaemia was defined as partial pressure of oxygen in the blood (PO) <72 mmHg, and obesity as body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg·m−2. Total IgE cut-off was aligned with the German criteria for anti-IgE therapy of 75 U·mL−1 [9]. Information bias was addressed by requiring an online form to be completed on assessment of the patient. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK 1849/2019), as well as by further local committees as per local requirements. Since the registry was initiated as a longitudinal project, data acquisition was not selective or biased towards any hypotheses. The significance level for hypothesis testing was set to 0.05. Due to the exploratory character of the study no adjustment for multiple testing was performed and p-values should be interpreted in a descriptive manner. Analyses were performed in R 4.0.3 program (R Core Team 2021), SPSS version 26 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA), GraphPad Prism 8.3 (GraphPad, San Diego, USA), and Excel 2013 (Microsoft, Redmond, USA), using two-sample unequal variance t-tests, for FENO, as well as for patient characteristics as dichotomous variables. A sensitivity analysis was performed, and the predictive value of FENO on exacerbation rate was determined by calculating the positive predictive value. The influence of patient parameters on FENO was analysed with regression analysis. The target variable FENO was transformed through 10's logarithm to adapt to the deviation of the residuals’ distribution. For continuous patient parameters, univariate linear regressions and for dichotomous variables, t-tests were performed. A multiple covariance analysis was performed for all patient parameters with a p-value <0.05 and at least 90% non-missing values; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in L was excluded because of multicollinearity. Of the 1007 patients in GAN with available FENO data, 64% had high FENO measurements (i.e. ≥25 ppb), 58% were female, and 72% had uncontrolled asthma. The mean age was 50.3 years, BMI 27 kg·m−2, FEV1 2.04 L (67% predicted), and median FENO (interquartile range) 34 (18–66) ppb. Compared to patients with low FENO, those with FENO ≥25 ppb had a significantly higher rate of asthma exacerbations, had significantly lower PO, FEV1 (both absolute and % predicted) and FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio, and were significantly older (table 1). FENO ≥25 ppb had a sensitivity of 65% to predict the occurrence of ≥2 exacerbations per year, with a positive predictive value of 61%, and an area under the curve of 0.53 (95% CI 0.50–0.56). Furthermore, when patients were divided into categories, significantly higher FENO levels were associated with: BMI <30 kg·m−2, the presence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), age at asthma onset ≥12 years, PO <72 mmHg, lower lung function values (FEV1/FVC <70% or FVC/inspiratory vital capacity (IVC) <0.93 (the lower limit of normal [10])), poor asthma control (ACQ-5 ≥1.5 or ACT <20), worse asthma quality of life (mAQLQ <5.4), frequent exacerbations (≥2 per year), IgE ≥75 U·mL−1, and maintenance OCS use (table 1). These results were corroborated by linear regression analysis (table 1), and included in a multiple regression analysis. Here, age, CRSwNP, BMI, as well as FEV1/FVC, and exacerbations per year were independently significantly associated with FENO levels (table 1). Maintenance OCS therapy showed a borderline significance.
TABLE 1

Correlation between fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) values and patient parameters and demographics

Parameters associated with FENO ≥25 ppb
ParameterNFENO ≥25 ppbFENO <25 ppbFENO ≥25 ppb versus <25 ppb#
p-value95% CI
Age, years 100553±1545±17<0.001−10.02, −5.86
PO2, mmHg 44374±977±120.0021.22, 5.28
FEV1, % predicted 98166±2170±230.0330.26, 6.15
FEV1, L 9832.0±0.72.1±0.90.0060.04, 0.26
FEV1/FVC, % 95064±1468±16<0.0011.57, 5.59
Exacerbations per year 10073.5±4.52.9±3.40.019−1.09, −0.10

#: p-values and confidence intervals are for the mean difference between groups or categories from the t-test; other data are mean±sd. ¶: dichotomous independent parameters. PO: partial pressure of oxygen in blood; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; BMI: body mass index; CRSwNP: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis; IVC: inspiratory vital capacity; ACQ-5: Asthma Control Questionnaire-5; ACT: Asthma Control Test; mAQLQ: mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; OCS: oral corticosteroids. In the univariate regression analyses and t-tests with the target variable log(10) FENO, for continuous independent patient variables, regression estimate, t-statistic and p-value are reported, for dichotomous independent variables, t-test t-statistic and p-value are provided. In the multiple linear regression analysis with the target variable log(10) FENO, 64 patients were excluded due to missing data.

Correlation between fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) values and patient parameters and demographics #: p-values and confidence intervals are for the mean difference between groups or categories from the t-test; other data are mean±sd. ¶: dichotomous independent parameters. PO: partial pressure of oxygen in blood; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; BMI: body mass index; CRSwNP: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis; IVC: inspiratory vital capacity; ACQ-5: Asthma Control Questionnaire-5; ACT: Asthma Control Test; mAQLQ: mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; OCS: oral corticosteroids. In the univariate regression analyses and t-tests with the target variable log(10) FENO, for continuous independent patient variables, regression estimate, t-statistic and p-value are reported, for dichotomous independent variables, t-test t-statistic and p-value are provided. In the multiple linear regression analysis with the target variable log(10) FENO, 64 patients were excluded due to missing data. This real-life registry of a representative, carefully characterised, large, severe asthma cohort demonstrated the correlation of FENO with several epidemiological factors, lung function, asthma control and asthma quality of life. This broadens our insight into severe asthma and strengthens the role of FENO in identifying patients who are at risk of frequent exacerbations. Our data support the findings that patients with severe asthma with high FENO values and CRSwNP may be the ideal candidates for anti-IL-4/IL-13R therapy (dupilumab) therapy, which has been approved in Germany for treatment of severe asthma with type 2 inflammation, as well as CRSwNP that is inadequately controlled by nasal corticosteroids and surgery [3, 9]. Importantly, obesity, considered a hallmark of a non-type 2 phenotype in other cohorts [11], was associated with lower FENO values. In addition to altered airway mechanics [12], obesity is known to interfere with nitric oxide generation by inducible nitric oxide synthase through a lower ratio of L-arginine to asymmetric dimethylarginine, which could lead to reduced FENO but increased oxidative stress [13]. Regarding lung function parameters, our association of high FENO with hypoxaemia has not been described previously. We also observed high FENO to be associated with reduced FVC/IVC, marking compressive air trapping through reduced lung elastic recoil and increased peripheral airflow resistance [10]. Chronic local inflammation, as indicated by high FENO, could lead to airway remodelling over time, linking these two phenomena. These results warrant further evaluation. Some results corroborate those of existing studies [14, 15], including in smaller [7], or less selected asthma cohorts [6], such as the association with age, asthma control, quality of life, exacerbations, and maintenance OCS use. Whilst this cohort was skewed towards type 2 inflammation, cohorts such as the NOVELTY study included a larger portion of non-type 2 asthma patients, and showed similar age, sex and BMI values, but lower eosinophil count and FENO values [16]. The main strengths of our study in this regard were the careful selection of patients with severe asthma, and the large cohort size. Indeed, discrepant results versus previous analyses were mainly due to smaller sample sizes in those studies (suggesting that the findings of our study are more likely to be correct), such as our observations of significant associations of FENO with FEV1 % predicted and maintenance OCS use, in contrast to Mansur et al. [7], with our findings corroborated by others [6, 14], and the associations that we observed between FENO and age of asthma onset, compared to Dweik et al. [6], who recruited a younger population. In conclusion, this study involved a comprehensive evaluation of the biomarker, FENO, in a large, well-characterised cohort of patients with severe asthma. In severe asthma, FENO seems to be a sensitive marker for patients at increased exacerbation risk, with a good positive predictive value. Translating these results into clinical practice, we suggest that FENO can act as a marker of disease burden, and could be a useful parameter in the identification and management of patients with increased risk of complications associated with severe asthma, and those who may require intensified therapy. This one-page PDF can be shared freely online. Shareable PDF ERJ-01233-2021.Shareable
  16 in total

1.  [The German severe asthma registry].

Authors:  S Korn; M Hübner; E Hamelmann; R Buhl
Journal:  Pneumologie       Date:  2012-04-04

2.  Management of severe asthma: a European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline.

Authors:  Fernando Holguin; Juan Carlos Cardet; Kian Fan Chung; Sarah Diver; Diogenes S Ferreira; Anne Fitzpatrick; Mina Gaga; Liz Kellermeyer; Sandhya Khurana; Shandra Knight; Vanessa M McDonald; Rebecca L Morgan; Victor E Ortega; David Rigau; Padmaja Subbarao; Thomy Tonia; Ian M Adcock; Eugene R Bleecker; Chris Brightling; Louis-Philippe Boulet; Michael Cabana; Mario Castro; Pascal Chanez; Adnan Custovic; Ratko Djukanovic; Urs Frey; Betty Frankemölle; Peter Gibson; Dominique Hamerlijnck; Nizar Jarjour; Satoshi Konno; Huahao Shen; Cathy Vitary; Andy Bush
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 3.  FeNO as biomarker for asthma phenotyping and management.

Authors:  Fabio L M Ricciardolo; Valentina Sorbello; Giorgio Ciprandi
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.587

4.  [Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Asthma - Addendum 2020 - Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Atemwegsliga in Cooperation with the Paediatric Respiratory Society and the Austrian Society of Pneumology].

Authors:  R Buhl; R Bals; X Baur; D Berdel; C-P Criée; M Gappa; A Gillissen; T Greulich; P Haidl; E Hamelmann; F Horak; P Kardos; K Kenn; L Klimek; S Korn; H Magnussen; D Nowak; O Pfaar; K F Rabe; J Riedler; T Ritz; K Schultz; A Schuster; T Spindler; C Taube; C Vogelmeier; A von Leupoldt; F Wantke; J Wildhaber; H Worth; A Zacharasiewicz; M Lommatzsch
Journal:  Pneumologie       Date:  2021-03-16

5.  Prospective, Single-Arm, Longitudinal Study of Biomarkers in Real-World Patients with Severe Asthma.

Authors:  Roland Buhl; Stephanie Korn; Andrew Menzies-Gow; Michel Aubier; Kenneth R Chapman; Giorgio W Canonica; César Picado; Margarita Donica; Klaus Kuhlbusch; Stephan Korom; Nicola A Hanania
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-04-15

6.  Measurement of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide: Comparison of Three Different Analysers.

Authors:  Stephanie Korn; Maike Wilk; Stefanie Voigt; Stephan Weber; Thomas Keller; Roland Buhl
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.580

7.  Characterisation of patients with severe asthma in the UK Severe Asthma Registry in the biologic era.

Authors:  David J Jackson; John Busby; Paul E Pfeffer; Andrew Menzies-Gow; Thomas Brown; Robin Gore; Martin Doherty; Adel H Mansur; Simon Message; Robert Niven; Mitesh Patel; Liam G Heaney
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Heterogeneity within and between physician-diagnosed asthma and/or COPD: NOVELTY cohort.

Authors:  Helen K Reddel; Jørgen Vestbo; Alvar Agustí; Gary P Anderson; Aruna T Bansal; Richard Beasley; Elisabeth H Bel; Christer Janson; Barry Make; Ian D Pavord; David Price; Eleni Rapsomaniki; Niklas Karlsson; Donna K Finch; Javier Nuevo; Alex de Giorgio-Miller; Marianna Alacqua; Rod Hughes; Hana Müllerová; Maria Gerhardsson de Verdier
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Fractional exhaled nitric oxide for the management of asthma in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Munira Essat; Sue Harnan; Tim Gomersall; Paul Tappenden; Ruth Wong; Ian Pavord; Rod Lawson; Mark L Everard
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Physiological signature of late-onset nonallergic asthma of obesity.

Authors:  Anne E Dixon; Ubong Peters; Ryan Walsh; Nirav Daphtary; Erick S MacLean; Kevin Hodgdon; David A Kaminsky; Jason H T Bates
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2020-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.