| Literature DB >> 35272541 |
Peng Zhang1, Liang Ji2, Guomin Zhou1,3, Xuan Yao1.
Abstract
Shanghai University School of Medicine was a newly established medical college in 2018. It is founded on the national health development policies, international medical development trends and the close relationship between the advantages of new medical courses and medical artificial intelligence, it is dedicated to using intelligent medicine as the breakthrough point, training graduate students in two interdisciplinary medical engineering subjects as the priority, and implementing the integrated medical curriculum teaching reform. In this paper, we introduce the background of the integrated medical curriculum system at the Shanghai University School of Medicine, the horizontal and vertical integration of medical courses in interdisciplinary medical engineering subjects, the cross-integration of traditional integrated medical courses with other disciplines and specialties, and the transformation mode of medical science and technology innovation led by artificial intelligence under the support of three-dimensional curriculum integration, putting forward the prospect of the curriculum integration system and providing experiences and references for other medical schools.KEY MESSAGESThis paper introduces the necessity and feasibility of implementing integrated medical course teaching in a newly established medical college.This paper introduces the strategies and concrete measures we took to implement integrated medical course teaching.The analysis of examination papers and other evaluations revealed that the integrated medical teaching for graduate students with non-medical professional backgrounds is feasible.Entities:
Keywords: Interdisciplinary; Medical education; graduate student; integrated curriculum; medical engineering
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35272541 PMCID: PMC8920398 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2050421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med ISSN: 0785-3890 Impact factor: 4.709
Figure 1.Schematic diagram of integrated medical curriculum in SUSM.
Figure 2.Frequency distribution of scores for master‘s and doctoral students.
Basic descriptive analysis index of final examination paper score.
| Minimum score | Maximum score | Mean | Standard deviation | Skewness | Kurtosis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doctoral Students | 60 | 82 | 71.47 | 7.259 | −0.036 | −1.215 |
| Master’s Students | 60 | 90 | 78.26 | 6.698 | −0.701 | 0.210 |
Figure 3.Frequency distribution of scores for all students in two majors.