| Literature DB >> 35271649 |
Ntandazo Dlatu1, Benjamin Longo-Mbenza2, Teke Apalata3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the associations between socio-economic deprivation and tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes, alongside well-known TB risk factors. The effects of healthcare expenditures and their growth on trends in TB incidence from 2009 to 2013 were also assessed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35271649 PMCID: PMC8912244 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Map 1Map of OR Tambo district municipality.
Source: http://isrdp.dplg.gov.za/documents/IDP/ISRDP/OR_Tambo_IDP.pdf. (open access).
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Index of multiple deprivation | It is defined as the measure of deprivation. This is essentially the measure of poverty. The deprivation index and socio economic quantiles comprise a new index of multiple deprivation developed by Noble et al. (2013), according to basket of variables from South African Census 2011 and South African Index of Multiple Deprivation (SAIMD) with four domains: income and material deprivation, employment deprivation, education deprivation, and living environmental deprivation, individual or household using equal weights in terms of socio economic quantiles (SEQ): SEQ 1st = most deprived, SEQ 2 = deprived, SEQ 3 = intermediate, SEQ 4 = well off, and SEQ 5 = least deprived [ | • Statistics South Africa. 2017. Living Conditions of Households in South Africa, Pretoria: Statistics South Africa, p.13. Available at: |
| Population density | It is a measurement of the number of people in an area (Number of individuals per square kilometer). It is calculated by dividing the number of people by area. | • National Department of Health. 2017. National Indicator Data Set. Pretoria: NDoH; April 2017. |
| People living in Poverty | The number of people living below US $1.90 a day according to the 2015 definition by the World Bank (this was equivalent to $1.25 a day in 2008). This new international poverty line defined in October 2015 by the World Bank represents a value below which there is absolute poverty. Poverty is state or condition in which people lacks financial resources, essentials for a minimum standard of living. | • Statistics South Africa. 2017. Labour Market Dynamics in South Africa, Report No. 02-11-02 |
| Poverty gap index | The ‘poverty gap index’ takes the mean shortfall from the poverty line, and divides it by the value of the poverty line. It tells us the fraction of the poverty line that people are missing, on average, in order to escape poverty. It is simply given as the percentage of population that is below the poverty line. | • World Health Organization/World Bank Group. 2017. Tracking universal health coverage: 2017 global monitoring report. Geneva: WHO; 2017 ( |
| Supervision visit rate in primary healthcare (PHC) facilities | It is obtained by dividing the actual number of official visits performed to a PHC by a clinic supervisor to the intended number of official visits set at the beginning of the year or financial year. It aims to promote continuing improvement on the performance of health workers’ by ensuring that objectives of health programs are adequate by managing difficulties encountered by staff, motivating staff and by improving staff performance, including continuing education and planning for training. | • District Health Barometer 2013/14. Durban: Health Systems Trust; October 2014. |
| PHC work load | An estimate of the patient care-related nursing workload, determined by dividing the total sum of the nursing intensity points of patients by nursing resource units of the day. | • District Health Barometer 2013/14. Durban: Health Systems Trust; October 2014. |
| PHC Expenditure per capita | It is the total amount spent per person uninsured by medical aid at PHC excluding district health management and District hospitals. It is important measure of equity in resource distribution. | • District Health Barometer 2013/14. Durban: Health Systems Trust; October 2014. |
| Expenditure per patient day equivalent (PDE) | Expenditure per patient day equivalent is a composite process indicator that connects financial data with service-related data from the hospital admissions and outpatient records. This indicator measures how the resources available to the hospital are being spent, and is a marker of efficiency. | • District Health Barometer 2013/14. Durban: Health Systems Trust; October 2014. |
| Local government expenditure | A total amount of money spent on district health services per person without medical scheme coverage. | • District Health Barometer 2013/14. Durban: Health Systems Trust; October 2014. |
|
| ||
| TB death rate | It is defined as the estimated number of deaths due to TB, in one year per 100,000 populations. In this study, the obtained TB death rate was converted in proportion (%). | • The 2015 WHO End TB Strategy. |
| Index TB case | It is defined as the first culture-confirmed TB patient who already had at least two acid-fast bacilli (AFB)-positive smears [ | • The 2015 WHO End TB Strategy. |
| TB treatment failure | This is a TB patient whose sputum smear or culture remained positive at 5 months or later following anti-TB treatment [ | • District Health Barometer 2013/14. Durban: Health Systems Trust; October 2014. |
| HIV associated TB deaths | Cases or proportion (%) of HIV-positive patients co-infected with TB (either bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed) and who died from HIV associated TB [ | • The 2012 South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). |
| TB incidence | This is an estimated number of new cases of TB disease per 100,000 populations over one-year period. | • The 2015 WHO End TB Strategy. |
| TB defaulter rate | It is the proportion of TB patients whose treatment was interrupted for 2 consecutive months without medical approval and their sputum remains positive [ | • The 2015 WHO End TB Strategy. |
| New TB smear positive cases | TB patients who have never had treatment for TB or who have taken TB drugs for less than 4 weeks whose sputum microscopy test (acid fast bacilli) is positive in at least one sputum sample [ | • The 2015 WHO End TB Strategy. |
TB incidence and actual TB cases over a 5-year period (2009–2013).
| Year | TB cases | Population | TB incidence per 100,000 inhabitants |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 9,543 | 1,333,846 | 715.45 |
| 2010 | 2,999 | 1,339,680 | 223.86 |
| 2011 | 2,643 | 1,345,798 | 196.39 |
| 2012 | 2,567 | 1,352,097 | 189.85 |
| 2013 | 2,234 | 1,358,916 | 164.40 |
Number of population density, people in poverty, poverty gap, and TB incidences between 2009 and 2013.
| Year | Population Density | Number of people in poverty | Poverty gap (%) | TB incidence (per 100,000 populations) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 112.51 | 1,196,446 | 31.3 | 715.45 |
| 2010 | 113.61 | 1,183,517 | 32.8 | 223.86 |
| 2011 | 114.76 | 1,188,933 | 33.5 | 196.39 |
| 2012 | 115.84 | 1,186,284 | 35.2 | 189.85 |
| 2013 | 117.10 | 1,183,635 | 36.1 | 164.40 |
Number of supervision rate, PHC workload, PHC Expenditure per PDE, PHC expenditure per capita and local government expenditure between 2009 and 2013.
| Year | Supervision rate by district | PHC workload | PHC expenditure per capita (Rands) | Expenditure per PDE (Rands) | Local government expenditure (Rands) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 50.0% | 19.5% | 500 | 543 | 569.3 |
| 2010 | 87.3% | 16.9% | 500 | 1400 | 685.4 |
| 2011 | 89.6% | 39.8% | 595 | 1597 | 673.6 |
| 2012 | 83.0% | 43.7% | 626 | 1645 | 666.8 |
| 2013 | 80.8% | 45.7% | 647 | 1645 | 646.6 |
A 5-year average (mean ± SD) notification of TB indicators by levels of socio-economic deprivation from 2009 to 2013.
| TB control indicators | Quintile 1 (most deprived) | Quintile 3 | Quintile 4 | Quintile 5 (least deprived) | ANOVA P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB death rate | 12.64 ± 0.99 | 8.18 ± 0.25 | 8.61 ± 0.74 | 7.32 ± 0.45 | <0.0001 |
| HIV-associated TB death rate | 27.19 ± 5.39 | 26.08 ± 5.31 | 24.30 ± 4.09 | 13.76 ± 4.37 | 0.049 |
| New TB smear positive cases | 2602 ± 1074 | 1995 ± 406 | 2855 ± 425 | 4367 ± 144 | 0.001 |
| TB rate among the household contacts of the Index TB cases | 4.48 ± 0.92 | 3.16 ± 0.37 | 3.12 ± 0.29 | 2.39 ± 0.10 | <0.0001 |
| TB defaulter rate | 6.98 ± 1.24 | 8.85 ± 0.33 | 11.53 ± 1.44 | 1.25 ± 0.56 | <0.0001 |
| TB treatment failure rate | 1.06 ± 0.45 | 0.97 ± 0.10 | 1.90 ± 0.17 | 2.15 ± 0.28 | <0.0001 |
| TB and HIV co-infection rate | 79.45 ± 11.8 | 75.40 ± 16.83 | 76.22 ± 14.9 | 71.05 ± 11.73 | 0.57 |
| TB Rifampicin resistance rate | 5.88 ± 1.91 | 0.89 ± 0.39 | 1.22 ± 2.53 | 0.35 ± 5.18 | 0.71 |
Eigenvalue functions, % of variance, Cumulative variance (%), and Canonical Correlations during a CDA.
| Function | Eigen value | % of variance | Cumulative % | Canonical correlation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.954 | 84.5 | 84.5 | .964 |
| 2 | 2.142 | 14.0 | 98.5 | .826 |
| 3 | .232 | 1.5 | 100.0 | .434 |
CDA: Canonical Discrimination Analysis.
Wilks’ Lambda with test of functions during a canonical discrimination analysis.
| Test of Function(s) | Wilks’ Lambda | Chi-square | Df | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 through 3 | .019 | 137.615 | 15 | .000 |
| 2 through 3 | .258 | 46.681 | 8 | .000 |
| 3 | .812 | 7.188 | 3 | .066 |
Structure matrix following a canonical discrimination analysis.
| TB control indicators | Functions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| TB death rate | .763 | -.059 | .161 |
| TB rate among the household contacts of the Index TB cases | .302 | -.130 | .246 |
| TB treatment failure rate | -.230 | .578 | .093 |
| HIV-associated TB deaths | -.046 | -.224 | -.169 |
| TB defaulter rate | -.403 | .378 | .785 |
| New TB smear positive cases | -.087 | .412 | -.670 |
| TB and HIV co-infection rate | .123 | .137 | .211 |
*Largest absolute correlation between each variable and any discriminant function.
Classification of function coefficients during a canonical discrimination analysis.
| TB control indicators | Deprivation Quintiles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most Deprived Quintile 1 | Less Deprived Quintile 2 | Less Deprived Quintile 3 | Less Deprived Quintile 4 | Least Deprived Quintile 5 | |
| HIV-associated TB deaths |
| 1.174 | 1.165 | .959 |
|
| (Constant) | -24.481 | -16.033 | -15.986 | -11.330 | -10.105 |
Fisher’s linear discriminant functions.