| Literature DB >> 35271506 |
Sheikh Abdul Rahman1,2, James M Billingsley1, Ashish Arunkumar Sharma3, Tiffany M Styles1, Sakthivel Govindaraj1,3, Uma Shanmugasundaram1, Hemalatha Babu1,3, Susan Pereira Riberio3, Syed A Ali4, Gregory K Tharp1, Chris Ibegbu1, Stephen N Waggoner5, R Paul Johnson1,2,6, Rafick-Pierre Sekaly3, Francois Villinger4, Steve E Bosinger1,3, Rama Rao Amara1,2, Vijayakumar Velu1,3.
Abstract
The persistence of virally infected cells as reservoirs despite effective antiretroviral therapy is a major barrier to an HIV/SIV cure. These reservoirs are predominately contained within cells present in the B cell follicles (BCFs) of secondary lymphoid tissues, a site that is characteristically difficult for most cytolytic antiviral effector cells to penetrate. Here, we identified a population of NK cells in macaque lymph nodes that expressed BCF-homing receptor CXCR5 and accumulated within BCFs during chronic SHIV infection. These CXCR5+ follicular NK cells exhibited an activated phenotype coupled with heightened effector functions and a unique transcriptome characterized by elevated expression of cytolytic mediators (e.g., perforin and granzymes, LAMP-1). CXCR5+ NK cells exhibited high expression of FcγRIIa and FcγRIIIa, suggesting a potential for elevated antibody-dependent effector functionality. Consistently, accumulation of CXCR5+ NK cells showed a strong inverse association with plasma viral load and the frequency of germinal center follicular Th cells that comprise a significant fraction of the viral reservoir. Moreover, CXCR5+ NK cells showed increased expression of transcripts associated with IL-12 and IL-15 signaling compared with the CXCR5- subset. Indeed, in vitro treatment with IL-12 and IL-15 enhanced the proliferation of CXCR5+ granzyme B+ NK cells. Our findings suggest that follicular homing NK cells might be important in immune control of chronic SHIV infection, and this may have important implications for HIV cure strategies.Entities:
Keywords: AIDS/HIV; Immunology; Innate immunity; NK cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35271506 PMCID: PMC9089783 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.155601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JCI Insight ISSN: 2379-3708
Figure 1Accumulation of CXCR5+ NK cells in B cell follicles during SHIV infection.
(A) Gating strategy for CXCR5-expressing NK cells is shown. Frequency of NK cells (B) and CXCR5-expressing NK cells (C) in blood (n = 17) and lymph nodes (LNs) (n = 17) of uninfected macaques. Proportions of total NK cells (D), CXCR5+ (E), and CXCR5– NK cells (F) at preinfection day 0 (n = 11) and week 14 of SHIV infection (n = 21). (G–I) IHC images from 3 representative SHIV-infected (14 weeks after infection) macaques showing CD20 (blue), CD3 (green), NKG2A (red), and CXCR5 (gray) staining of LN sections (G). Mean number of NK cells per mm square area of B cell follicle (BCF) and T cell zone (TCZ) compartments of LN sections from 3 macaques (H). MFI ± SEM of CXCR5 on NKG2A+ cells (n = 46) in BCF and TCZ (I). P value was calculated using Mann-Whitney test. Scale bar: 50 μm. Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed rank test was used to compare the frequencies of CXCR5+ NK cells between blood and LN. Arrows indicate NK cells. ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 2Follicular CXCR5+ NK cells display activated phenotype and heightened functionality.
(A) Violin plots showing the expression of different indicated markers (CD56, CD16, BCL-6, CCR7, Ki-67, CD69, CD32a) on CXCR5+ and CXCR5– NK cells; data shown for week 14 after SHIV infection (n = 11). (B) Expression of chemokine receptors (CXCR3, CCR6, CCR4) and CD95, CCR5, FASL, PD-1 on CXCR5+ and CXCR5– NK cells (n = 6). (C) Cytokine expression and degranulation (CD107a+ staining) profiles of CXCR5+ and CXCR5– NK cells after 6 hours of ex vivo culture in presence (PMA) or absence (NS) of PMA and ionomycin determined by intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry (n = 6). (D) Similar assessment of functionality of CXCR5+ and CXCR5– NK cells after 6 hours of coculture with MHC class I–devoid K562 target cells (n = 8). Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed rank test was used to compare the frequencies of CXCR5+ and CXCR5– NK cells in the lymph nodes.
Figure 3CXCR5+ NK cells are transcriptionally distinct from CXCR5– NK cells during chronic SHIV infection.
(A) Purified NK cells from lymph nodes (LNs) at week 14 after infection were RNA sequenced, and volcano plots were analyzed for differentially expressed transcripts (n = 4). (B) Normalized enrichment scores for upregulated gene sets in CXCR5+ NK cells are depicted. Dashed line indicates normalized enrichment score cutoff of greater than 135 with FDR of less than 0.2. (C) GSEA plots comparing CXCR5+ and CXCR5– NK cells. (D) Global gene expression analysis showing gene expression profile for CXCR5+ and CXCR5– NK cells. The color intensity for heatmaps represents Z score of differential expression by CXCR5+ versus CXCR5– NK cells, calculated as described in Methods. (E) IHC images showing CD20 (blue), CD3 (green), NKG2A (red), and granzyme B (gray) staining of LN sections of SHIV-infected macaques. Scale bar: 50 μm. Arrow indicates NK cells.
Figure 4Combination IL-12 and IL-15 cytokine treatment improves proliferative and cytotoxic capacity of CXCR5+ NK cells.
(A and B) Pearson’s correlation between CXCR5+ NK cells (in LNs) and SHIV plasma viral RNA (n = 21) (A) and GC-Tfh (B) (n = 19). (C) GSEA revealed enriched cytokine signaling in CXCR5+ NK cells relative to CXCR5– counterparts. (D and E) Effect of in vitro stimulation with combination of IL-12 and IL-15 cytokines for 72 hours on NK cell functional properties (n = 4). (E) Frequency of NKG2A+ cells, cytokine expression, and degranulation. (F) Proliferation and granzyme expression on CXCR5+ NK cells in LNs are shown; data for 6 animals are indicated. (G) Correlation between plasma levels of IL-12 cytokines and SHIV RNA levels (n = 15). Correlation between plasma levels of IL-12 cytokines and CXCR5+ NK cells. To correct for multiple correlations, we performed Bonferroni’s correction. Assuming the overall significance level to be 0.05, the significance threshold for individual correction will be 0.05/2 = 0.025. Under this significance threshold, both comparisons are considered significant. For P value, Mann-Whitney test was used for in vitro analysis. Pearson’s correlation was used for correlation analysis.