| Literature DB >> 35270973 |
Weibin Wu1,2, Ting Tang1,2, Ting Gao3, Chongyang Han1,2, Jie Li1,2, Ying Zhang1,2, Xiaoyi Wang3,4,5, Jianwu Wang3,4,5, Yuanjiao Feng3,4,5.
Abstract
The application of agricultural robots can liberate labor. The improvement of robot sensing systems is the premise of making it work. At present, more research is being conducted on weeding and harvesting systems of field robot, but less research is being conducted on crop disease and insect pest perception, nutritional element diagnosis and precision fertilizer spraying systems. In this study, the effects of the nitrogen application rate on the absorption and accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in sweet maize were determined. Firstly, linear, parabolic, exponential and logarithmic diagnostic models of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents were constructed by spectral characteristic variables. Secondly, the partial least squares regression and neural network nonlinear diagnosis model of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents were constructed by the high-frequency wavelet sensitivity coefficient of binary wavelet decomposition. The results show that the neural network nonlinear diagnosis model of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content based on the high-frequency wavelet sensitivity coefficient of binary wavelet decomposition is better. The R2, MRE and NRMSE of nn of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were 0.974, 1.65% and 0.0198; 0.969, 9.02% and 0.1041; and 0.821, 2.16% and 0.0301, respectively. The model can provide growth monitoring for sweet corn and a perception model for the nutrient element perception system of an agricultural robot, while making preliminary preparations for the realization of intelligent and accurate field fertilization.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural robotics; binary wavelet algorithm; diagnosis model; hyperspectral image
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270973 PMCID: PMC8914903 DOI: 10.3390/s22051822
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Agricultural robot system of hyperspectral imager.
Figure 2Spectral graphs of 6 samples.
Hyperspectral characteristic parameters and description.
| Types of Spectral Characteristic Variables | Spectral Characteristic Variables | Parameter Description |
|---|---|---|
| Spectral position variable | Amplitude of blue edge | Maximum first-order differential spectral values at 490–530 nm |
| Location of blue edge | The wavelength position corresponding to the blue amplitude | |
| Amplitude of yellow edge | Maximum first-order differential spectral values at 560–640 nm | |
| Location of yellow edge | The wavelength position corresponding to the yellow amplitude | |
| Amplitude of red edge | Maximum first-order differential spectral value within 680–760 nm | |
| Location of red edge | The wavelength position corresponding to the amplitude of the red side | |
| Green peak reflectance | Maximum first-order differential spectral value at 510–560 nm | |
| Green peak position | Wavelength position corresponding to the green peak reflectivity | |
| Red valley reflectance | Minimum first order differential spectral value within 650–690 nm | |
| Red valley location | Wavelength position corresponding to red Valley reflectivity | |
| Spectral area variable | Blue edge area | The area enclosed by the original light spectrum curve at 490–530 nm |
| Yellow edge area | 560–640 nm spectrum curves surround the area of original light | |
| Red edge area | The area enclosed by the original spectral curve within 680–760 nm | |
| Green peak area | The area enclosed by the original light spectrum curve in 510–560 nm | |
| Vegetation index variable | Ratio of green peak reflectance to red valley reflectance | |
| Normalized values of green peak reflectance and red valley reflectance | ||
| Ratio of the area of the red side to the area of the blue side | ||
| Ratio of the area of the red side to the area of the yellow side | ||
| The normalized value of the red-side area and the blue-side area | ||
| The normalized value of the area of the red and yellow sides | ||
| Simple ratio index SRI | ||
| Red edge model REM | ||
| Correction of simple ratio index mSR705 | ||
| Revised normalized difference index mND705 |
Figure 3Significant analysis chart of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in maize under different nitrogen application treatments: (a) Significance results of nitrogen content in maize; (b) Significance results of phosphorus content in maize; (c) Significance results of potassium content in maize. Note: In the bar chart, “a, b, c” indicates that p < 0.05, they are arranged from large to small. Different letters indicate significant, and the same letters indicate insignificant.
Correlation coefficients of spectral characteristic variables with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents.
| Types of Variables | Nitrogen Content | Phosphorus Content | Potassium Content |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.725 ** | 0.905 ** | −0.543 ** |
|
| 0.732 ** | −0.882 ** | −0.507 ** |
|
| 0.722 ** | −0.908 ** | −0.546 ** |
|
| −0.713 ** | 0.863 ** | 0.485 ** |
|
| 0.735 ** | −0.908 ** | −0.528 ** |
|
| 0.753 ** | −0.826 ** | −0.371 ** |
|
| 0.722 ** | −0.908 ** | −0.546 ** |
|
| 0.735 ** | −0.880 ** | −0.495 ** |
|
| 0.742 ** | −0.899 ** | −0.521 ** |
|
| 0.442 ** | −0.569 ** | −0.349 ** |
|
| 0.696 ** | −0.913 ** | −0.577 ** |
|
| −0.654 ** | 0.896 ** | 0.579 ** |
|
| 0.734 ** | −0.901 ** | −0.519 ** |
|
| 0.697 ** | −0.903 ** | −0.558 ** |
|
| 0.343 ** | −0.410 ** | −0.171 |
|
| −0.742 ** | 0.881 ** | 0.506 ** |
|
| 0.210 | −0.228 | −0.125 |
|
| −0.406 ** | 0.545 ** | 0.291 |
|
| −0.725 ** | 0.899 ** | 0.529 ** |
|
| 0.674 ** | −0.899 ** | −0.568 ** |
|
| −0.009 | 0.016 | 0.014 |
|
| −0.139 | 0.468 ** | 0.427 ** |
|
| −0.219 | 0.504 ** | 0.409 ** |
|
| −0.223 | 0.508 ** | 0.413 ** |
Note: ** means significant at 0.01 level.
Results of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content diagnostic models.
| Index to Be Predicted | Spectral | Model | Coefficient of | Validation ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Nitrogen content |
| Linear | 0.606 | 5.18% | 0.090 | 0.8038 |
| Parabolic | 0.672 | 5.39% | 0.093 | 0.7298 | ||
| Index | 0.639 | 5.18% | 0.090 | 0.7643 | ||
| Logarithmic | 0.631 | 5.08% | 0.090 | 0.7731 | ||
|
| Linear | 0.641 | 5.59% | 0.091 | 0.7634 | |
| Parabolic | 0.667 | 9.32% | 0.132 | 0.7559 | ||
| Index | 0.667 | 6.05% | 0.093 | 0.7369 | ||
| Logarithmic | 0.644 | 5.58% | 0.090 | 0.7599 | ||
|
| Linear | 0.622 | 5.35% | 0.092 | 0.7851 | |
| Parabolic | 0.665 | 5.23% | 0.090 | 0.7359 | ||
| Index | 0.650 | 5.20% | 0.092 | 0.7524 | ||
| Logarithmic | 0.657 | 4.71% | 0.088 | 0.7424 | ||
| Phosphorus content |
| Linear | 0.820 | 11.78% | 0.119 | 0.6301 |
| Parabolic | 0.821 | 11.83% | 0.118 | 0.6294 | ||
| Index | 0.755 | 11.55% | 0.119 | 0.6784 | ||
| Logarithmic | 0.812 | 18.46% | 0.186 | 0.6715 | ||
|
| Linear | 0.820 | 11.70% | 0.119 | 0.6299 | |
| Parabolic | 0.820 | 11.70% | 0.119 | 0.6299 | ||
| Index | 0.755 | 11.39% | 0.118 | 0.6777 | ||
| Logarithmic | 0.813 | 11.80% | 0.126 | 0.6367 | ||
|
| Linear | 0.835 | 11.97% | 0.120 | 0.6208 | |
| Parabolic | 0.835 | 12.01% | 0.121 | 0.6210 | ||
| Index | 0.777 | 11.55% | 0.118 | 0.6606 | ||
| Logarithmic | 0.829 | 11.89% | 0.120 | 0.6247 | ||
| Potassium content |
| Linear | 0.310 | 12.11% | 0.132 | 1.5667 |
| Parabolic | 0.432 | 10.22% | 0.112 | 1.1329 | ||
| Index | 0.307 | 39.00% | 0.414 | 1.7285 | ||
| Logarithmic | 0.282 | 12.32% | 0.148 | 1.7200 | ||
|
| Linear | 0.296 | 11.68% | 0.129 | 1.6356 | |
| Parabolic | 0.324 | 11.05% | 0.121 | 1.4962 | ||
| Index | 0.293 | 11.39% | 0.127 | 1.6504 | ||
| Logarithmic | 0.315 | 11.31% | 0.125 | 1.5389 | ||
|
| Linear | 0.278 | 12.83% | 0.138 | 1.7430 | |
| Parabolic | 0.279 | 12.88% | 0.139 | 1.7372 | ||
| Index | 0.272 | 12.47% | 0.136 | 1.7784 | ||
| Logarithmic | 0.279 | 12.90% | 0.139 | 1.7373 | ||
Figure 4(a) Db5 wavelet analysis-low frequency information graph (b) Db5 wavelet analysis-high frequency information graph.
Figure 5Correlation analysis of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents with db5 low-frequency wavelet coefficients (A5) and high frequency wavelet coefficients (D5). (a) Correlation curve between nitrogen content and low frequency A5 wavelet coefficients. (b) Correlation curve between nitrogen content and D5 high frequency wavelet coefficient. (c) Correlation curve between phosphorus content and low frequency A5 wavelet coefficients. (d) Correlation curve between phosphorus content and high frequency D5 wavelet coefficients. (e) Correlation curve between potassium content and low frequency information A5. (f) Correlation curve between potassium content and high frequency information D5.
Results of the partial least squares diagnostic model for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents of sweet corn based on binary wavelet sensitivity coefficient.
| Index to Be Predicted | Partial Least Squares Regression Model | Coefficient of Determination of | Validation ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Nitrogen content | 0.906 | 2.01% | 0.0228 | 0.5244 | |
| Phosphorus content | 0.919 | 7.04% | 0.0835 | 0.5466 | |
| Potassium content | 0.807 | 3.92% | 0.0454 | 0.5712 | |
Results of neural network diagnosis model based on binary wavelet sensitivity coefficient for sweet corn nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents.
| Index to Be Predicted | Coefficient of Determination of | Validation ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Nitrogen content | 0.974 | 1.65% | 0.0198 | 0.4868 |
| Phosphorus content | 0.969 | 9.02% | 0.1041 | 0.5313 |
| Potassium content | 0.821 | 2.16% | 0.0301 | 0.5412 |
Comparison of spectral characteristic model, partial least squares model and neural network model results.
| Index to Be Predicted | Model Type | Coefficient of Determination of Modeling |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen content | 0.672 | 5.39% | 0.093 | 0.7298 | |
| Partial least squares regression model | 0.906 | 2.01% | 0.0228 | 0.5244 | |
| Neural network nonlinear model | 0.974 | 1.65% | 0.0198 | 0.4868 | |
| Phosphorus content | 0.835 | 11.97% | 0.120 | 0.6208 | |
| Partial least squares regression model | 0.919 | 7.04% | 0.0835 | 0.5466 | |
| Neural network nonlinear model | 0.969 | 9.02% | 0.1041 | 0.5313 | |
| Potassium content | 0.432 | 10.22% | 0.112 | 1.1330 | |
| Partial least squares regression model | 0.807 | 3.92% | 0.0454 | 0.5984 | |
| Neural network nonlinear model | 0.821 | 2.16% | 0.0301 | 0.5797 |