| Literature DB >> 35270963 |
Gaosheng Zhao1, Fengjian Chu2, Jianguang Zhou1,3.
Abstract
The misuse of pesticides poses a tremendous threat to human health. Excessive pesticide residues have been shown to cause many diseases. Many sensor detection methods have been developed, but most of them suffer from problems such as slow detection speed or narrow detection range. So, the development of rapid, direct and sensitive means of detecting trace amounts of pesticide residues is always necessary. A novel online sensor technique was developed for direct analysis of pesticides in complex matrices with no sample pretreatment. The portable sensor ion source consists of an MPT (microwave plasma torch) with desolventizing capability and an APCI (atmosphere pressure chemical ionization), which provides abundant precursor ions and a strong electric field. The performance which improves the ionization efficiency and suppresses the background signal was verified by using pesticide standard solution and pesticide pear juice solution measurements with an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantization (LOQ) of the method were measured by pear juice solutions that were obtained in the ranges of 0.034-0.79 μg/L and 0.14-1 μg/L. Quantitative curves were obtained ranging from 0.5 to 100 μg/L that showed excellent semi-quantitative ability with correlation coefficients of 0.985-0.997. The recoveries (%) of atrazine, imidacloprid, dimethoate, profenofos, chlorpyrifos, and dichlorvos were 96.6%, 112.7%, 88.1%, 85.5%, 89.2%, and 101.9% with the RSDs ranging from 5.89-14.87%, respectively. The results show that the method has excellent sensitivity and quantification capability for rapid and direct detection of trace pesticide.Entities:
Keywords: ambient mass spectrometry; high sensitivity; multi-mode ion source; online sensor; pesticide detection; portable
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270963 PMCID: PMC8914877 DOI: 10.3390/s22051816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(A) Schematic diagram of the online sensor structure. (B) Physical view of the ion source.
Characteristics of the six pesticides used in the study from the results of MS analysis of the standard pesticide samples.
| Compound | Molecular Formula | MW ( | Ion Form | Molecular Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrazine | C8H14ClN5 | 215.09 | [M + H]+ |
|
| Imidacloprid | C9H10ClN5O2 | 255.05 | [M + H]+ |
|
| Dimethoate | C5H12NO3PS2 | 229.00 | [M + H]+ |
|
| Profenofos | C11H15BrClO3PS | 371.93 | [M + H]+ |
|
| Chlorpyrifos | C9H11Cl3NO3PS | 348.92 | [M + H]+ |
|
| Dichlorvos | C4H7Cl2O4P | 219.94 | [M + H]+ |
|
Figure 2Mass spectra of methanol solutions of (A) 10 μg/mL atrazine and (B) 1 μg/mL dichlorvos in APCI-only, MPT-only and MPT-APCI modes, NL represents signal strength in the figure.
Figure 3The linear responses of (A) the profenofos analysis using m/z 374.94 and chlorpyrifos using m/z 349.93 in the 100, 50, 10, 5 and 1 μg/L range; and (B) the dimethoate, atrazine, dichiorvos and imidacloprid analyses in the 100, 50, 10, 5 and 0.5 μg/L range in pear juice.
Results for the analysis of the correlation coefficient (R2) of pesticides in pear juice, linear range, recovery rate (%), and limit of detection/quantitation (LOD and LOQ) of the method.
| Pesticides | Equation |
| Linear Range (μg/L) | RSD (%) | Recovery Rate * (%) | LOD (g/L) | LOQ (μg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profenofos | 0.988 | 1–100 | 10.5 | 85.5 | 0.74 | 0.98 | |
| Chlorpyrifos | 0.985 | 1–100 | 14.87 | 89.2 | 0.79 | 1.00 | |
| Dimethoate | 0.997 | 0.5–100 | 13.07 | 88.1 | 0.17 | 0.43 | |
| Atrazine | 0.987 | 0.5–100 | 5.89 | 96.6 | 0.034 | 0.14 | |
| Dichiorvos | 0.994 | 0.5–100 | 10.2 | 101.9 | 0.085 | 0.34 | |
| Imidacloprid | 0.986 | 0.5–100 | 8.74 | 112.7 | 0.077 | 0.26 |
* Using the concentration of 2.5 μg/L.
Performance of different ion source techniques for pesticide analysis.
| Technology | Sample Preparation | MS Analysis | Analytical Performance | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSI | Not required | Orbitrap-MS | LOD < 1.25 pmol | [ |
| PESI a | Not required | TOF-MS b | LOD < 50 pg | [ |
| DART | IT-SPME c | TOF-MS | LOQs: 0.06–0.46 μg L−1 | [ |
| DBD | Methanolic extraction | QqQ-MS | LODs: 10–1000 μg L−1 | [ |
| Photoionization | Not required | IT-MS d | LODs: 0.1–1 μg L−1 | [ |
| APCI-MPT | Not required | Orbitrap-MS | LODs: 0.034–0.79 μg L−1 | - |
a Probe electrospray ionization. b In-tube solid-phase microextraction. c Time-of-flight mass spectrometry. d ion trap mass spectrometry.