| Literature DB >> 35270663 |
Qingyun Tang1, Ke Gong1, Li Xiong1, Yuanxiang Dong2, Wei Xu3.
Abstract
Respiratory infectious diseases (RID) are the major form of infectious diseases in China, and are highly susceptible to climatic conditions. Current research mainly focuses on the impact of weather on RID, but there is a lack of research on the effect of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on RID. Therefore, this paper uses the system generalized method of moments (SYS-GMM) and the data of 31 provinces in China from 2007 to 2018 to construct a dynamic panel model to empirically test the causality between ENSO and RID morbidity. Moreover, this paper considers the moderating effects of per capita disposable income and average years of education on this causality. The results show that ENSO can positively and significantly impact RID morbidity, which is 5.842% higher during El Niño years than normal years. In addition, per capita disposable income and average years of education can effectively weaken the relationship between ENSO and RID morbidity. Thus, this paper is of great significance for improving the RID early climate warning system in China and effectively controlling the spread of RID.Entities:
Keywords: El Niño–Southern Oscillation; average years of education; climate change; per capita disposable income; respiratory infectious diseases
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270663 PMCID: PMC8910516 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Study area (data of Hong Kong, Macau and other regions are unobtainable).
Summary statistics of variables.
| Variable | Observations | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 372 | 162.293 | 76.675 | 54.276 | 626.743 |
|
| 372 | −0.055 | 0.621 | −1.067 | 1.433 |
|
| 372 | 20366.5 | 8579.501 | 9740 | 64183 |
|
| 372 | 8.825 | 1.166 | 4.222 | 12.555 |
|
| 372 | 1.586 | 1.612 | 0.273 | 8.623 |
|
| 372 | 13.105 | 2.946 | 6.7 | 22.7 |
|
| 372 | 0.781 | 0.17 | 0.134 | 1 |
|
| 372 | 705.097 | 443.279 | 93.155 | 3020.622 |
Pearson’s correlation matrix of variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.000 | |||||||
| (-) | ||||||||
|
| 0.092 * | 1.000 | ||||||
| (0.076) | (-) | |||||||
|
| −0.622 *** | 0.208 *** | 1.000 | |||||
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (-) | ||||||
|
| −0.536 *** | 0.087* | 0.644 *** | 1.000 | ||||
| (0.000) | (0.094) | (0.000) | (-) | |||||
|
| −0.524*** | 0.038 | 0.719 *** | 0.629 *** | 1.000 | |||
| (0.000) | (0.464) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (-) | ||||
|
| −0.367 *** | 0.101 * | 0.334 *** | 0.316 *** | 0.162 *** | 1.000 | ||
| (0.000) | (0.051) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.002) | (-) | |||
|
| −0.327 *** | −0.017 | 0.168 *** | 0.177 *** | 0.188 *** | 0.107 ** | 1.000 | |
| (0.000) | (0.741) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.000) | (0.039) | (-) | ||
|
| −0.256 *** | 0.386 *** | 0.547 *** | 0.199 *** | 0.314 *** | 0.084 | −0.012 | 1.000 |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.106) | (0.813) | (-) |
Note: The significance test for the Pearson’s correlation coefficient is the t-test, for which the null hypothesis is no relationship between the two variables, and corresponding p-values are in parentheses. Significance levels are *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1.
The panel Granger causality test results between ENSO and RID morbidity.
| Variable | W-Bar | Z-Bar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.619 | 4.507 | 0.000 | |
| 2.3307 | 0.9207 | 0.357 |
Note: W-bar is the mean Wald test statistic of the panel, and Z-bar is the standardized statistic of Wald test statistic. If the W-bar is greater than the critical value of the rejection domain corresponding to the significance level p, the null hypothesis is rejected: ENSO is not the Granger-cause for RID (RID is not the Granger-cause for ENSO).
Estimation results of the relationship between ENSO and RID morbidity by stepwise addition of control variables.
| SYS-GMM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
|
| 0.971 *** | 0.869 *** | 0.746 *** | 0.788 *** | 0.742 *** | 0.743 *** | 0.772 *** |
| (0.049) | (0.084) | (0.142) | (0.163) | (0.163) | (0.165) | (0.182) | |
|
| 0.028 ** | 0.031 *** | 0.028*** | 0.029 *** | 0.036 *** | 0.035 ** | 0.037 *** |
| (0.010) | (0.010) | (0.009) | (0.010) | (0.013) | (0.013) | (0.013) | |
|
| −0.130* | −0.134 * | −0.130 * | −0.148 * | −0.144 * | −0.134 * | |
| (0.069) | (0.073) | (0.076) | (0.080) | (0.078) | (0.077) | ||
|
| −0.311 * | −0.316 ** | −0.311 ** | −0.306 ** | −0.316 ** | ||
| (0.169) | (0.141) | (0.144) | (0.141) | (0.139) | |||
|
| 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.010 | |||
| (0.012) | (0.012) | (0.012) | (0.014) | ||||
|
| 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.007 | ||||
| (0.006) | (0.006) | (0.007) | |||||
|
| −0.055 | −0.047 | |||||
| (0.064) | (0.062) | ||||||
|
| −0.017 | ||||||
| (0.018) | |||||||
| Constant | 0.098 | 1.899 * | 3.241 * | 2.981 * | 3.477 ** | 3.460 * | 3.326 * |
| (0.259) | (1.083) | (1.601) | (1.656) | (1.685) | (1.703) | (1.830) | |
| Observations | 341 | 341 | 341 | 341 | 341 | 341 | 341 |
| Number of states | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 |
| Time fixed effect? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Hansen test | 0.120 | 0.117 | 0.078 | 0.117 | 0.111 | 0.107 | 0.103 |
| Arellano-Bond test for AR (1) | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Arellano-Bond test for AR (2) | 0.407 | 0.453 | 0.450 | 0.453 | 0.454 | 0.468 | 0.421 |
Note: Columns (1)–(7) are the SYS-GMM results of the stepwise addition of the control variables. Robust standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the province level [49]. Significance levels are *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1.
Estimation results of the moderating effect of per capita disposable income and average years of education on the relationship between ENSO and RID morbidity.
| SYS-GMM | ||
|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | |
|
| 0.756 *** | 0.764 *** |
| (0.168) | (0.161) | |
|
| 0.464 * | 0.519 *** |
| (0.151) | (0.187) | |
|
| −0.128 * | −0.130 * |
| (0.075) | (0.074) | |
|
| −0.304 * | −0.303 * |
| (0.149) | (0.168) | |
|
| 0.006 | 0.007 |
| (0.014) | (0.012) | |
|
| 0.007 | 0.007 |
| (0.007) | (0.007) | |
|
| −0.052 | −0.050 |
| (0.062) | (0.061) | |
|
| −0.015 | −0.012 |
| (0.019) | (0.019) | |
|
| −0.044* | |
| (0.036) | ||
|
| −0.221 ** | |
| (0.087) | ||
| Constant | 3.324 * | 3.265 * |
| (1.661) | (1.646) | |
| Observations | 341 | 341 |
| Number of states | 31 | 31 |
| Time fixed effect? | YES | YES |
| Hansen test | 0.116 | 0.127 |
| Arellano–Bond test for AR(1) | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Arellano–Bond test for AR(2) | 0.413 | 0.384 |
Note: Column (1) shows the SYS-GMM results of adding the interaction term between the Niño1 + 2 index and per capita disposable income. Column (2) shows the SYS-GMM results of adding the interaction term between the Niño1 + 2 index and average years of education. Robust standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the province level [49]. Significance levels are *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1.
Figure 2The moderating effect of per capita disposable income on the relationship between ENSO and RID morbidity.
Figure 3The moderating effect of average years of education on the relationship between ENSO and RID morbidity.
Robustness analysis considering the moderating effect of per capita disposable income (comparison of estimation results of OLS, FE, and SYS-GMM).
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLS | FE | SYS-GMM | |
|
| 0.958 *** | 0.560 *** | 0.756 *** |
| (0.043) | (0.098) | (0.168) | |
|
| 0.395 | 0.405 ** | 0.464 * |
| (0.251) | (0.010) | (0.151) | |
|
| −0.051 * | −0.077 | −0.128 * |
| (0.028) | (0.051) | (0.075) | |
|
| −0.185 *** | −0.651 *** | −0.304 * |
| (0.061) | (0.201) | (0.149) | |
|
| 0.014 *** | 0.084 * | 0.006 |
| (0.003) | (0.043) | (0.014) | |
|
| 0.004 * | 0.010 ** | 0.007 |
| (0.002) | (0.004) | (0.007) | |
|
| −0.015 | 0.008 | −0.052 |
| (0.034) | (0.042) | (0.062) | |
|
| −0.017 | −0.047 * | −0.015 |
| (0.013) | (0.026) | (0.019) | |
|
| −0.037 | −0.037 * | −0.044 * |
| (0.026) | (0.020) | (0.036) | |
| Constant | 1.197 ** | 4.874 *** | 3.324 * |
| (0.475) | (0.761) | (1.661) | |
| Observations | 341 | 341 | 341 |
| Number of states | 31 | 31 | 31 |
| Time fixed effect? | YES | YES | YES |
| r2 | 0.931 | 0.692 | |
| Hansen test | 0.116 | ||
| Arellano–Bond test for AR(1) | 0.007 | ||
| Arellano–Bond test for AR(2) | 0.413 |
Note: Columns (1) to (3) are the estimation results using, respectively, OLS, FE and SYS-GMM for model 3. Robust standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the province level [49]. Significance levels are *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1.
Robustness analysis considering the moderating effect of average years of education (comparison of estimation results of OLS, FE, and SYS-GMM).
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLS | FE | SYS-GMM | |
|
| 0.957 *** | 0.563 *** | 0.764 *** |
| (0.042) | (0.096) | (0.161) | |
|
| 0.434 *** | 0.403 *** | 0.519 *** |
| (0.131) | (0.008) | (0.187) | |
|
| −0.048 * | −0.068 | −0.130 * |
| (0.028) | (0.051) | (0.074) | |
|
| −0.179 *** | −0.652 *** | −0.303 * |
| (0.061) | (0.194) | (0.168) | |
|
| 0.013 *** | 0.083 * | 0.007 |
| (0.003) | (0.043) | (0.012) | |
|
| 0.004 * | 0.010 ** | 0.007 |
| (0.002) | (0.004) | (0.007) | |
|
| −0.016 | 0.006 | −0.050 |
| (0.033) | (0.042) | (0.061) | |
|
| −0.015 | −0.046* | −0.012 |
| (0.013) | (0.026) | (0.019) | |
|
| −0.184 *** | −0.167 *** | −0.221 ** |
| (0.062) | (0.050) | (0.087) | |
| Constant | 1.154 ** | 4.775 *** | 3.265 * |
| (0.466) | (0.780) | (1.646) | |
| Observations | 341 | 341 | 341 |
| Number of states | 31 | 31 | 31 |
| Time fixed effect? | YES | YES | YES |
| r2 | 0.932 | 0.696 | |
| Hansen test | 0.127 | ||
| Arellano–Bond test for AR(1) | 0.007 | ||
| Arellano–Bond test for AR(2) | 0.384 |
Note: Columns (1) to (3) are the estimation results using, respectively, OLS, FE and SYS-GMM for model 4. Robust standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the province level [49]. Significance levels are *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1.