| Literature DB >> 35270534 |
Eun-Hye Lee1, Sun-Hwa Shin1, Goo-Churl Jeong2.
Abstract
Although the smoking rate among women has been continuously increasing recently, it is very difficult to explore the actual situation because of negative social views. This study aimed to analyze the effects of smoking awareness and living environment on the intention to quit smoking among female smokers. After receiving approval from the Research Ethics Committee in September 2021, secondary data analysis was performed for this study. A total of 378 working women who smoked were included in this study. The mean age was 34.4 years. The results showed that women living alone had significantly lower intentions to quit smoking, and women with experience in smoking cessation education had significantly higher intentions to quit smoking. In addition, it was found that the group having awareness of smoking cessation policy and smoking cessation treatment had high intention to quit smoking. As a result of the analysis of decision trees using data mining techniques, the strongest predictor of the intention of female workers who smoke to quit smoking was their perception of smoking cessation policies. In addition, it was found that the state's policy support was important in that the group with the highest intention to quit smoking was the one with high awareness of both the smoking cessation policy and smoking cessation treatment. Finally, the risk group with the lowest intention to quit smoking was the group with low awareness of the anti-smoking policy, living alone, and having low awareness of the harmfulness of cigarettes. The importance of establishing policies for this vulnerable group, smoking cessation policies and treatment of female smokers, and improving awareness of the harmful effects of tobacco are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: awareness; decision making; female; intention; smoke-free policy; smokers; smoking cessation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270534 PMCID: PMC8910725 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Differences in the Intention to Quit Smoking according to the General and Workplace Characteristics of Participants (n = 378).
| Characteristics | Categories | Intention to Quit Smoking | χ2 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No ( | Yes ( | ||||
| Age (year) | 20–29 | 129 (34.1) | 17 (13.2) | 112 (86.8) | 3.12 (0.210) |
| 30–39 | 163 (43.1) | 34 (20.9) | 129 (79.1) | ||
| ≥40 | 86 (22.8) | 17 (19.8) | 69 (80.2) | ||
| Body mass index | ≤19 | 69 (18.3) | 12 (17.4) | 57 (82.6) | 0.27 (0.875) |
| 20–24 | 258 (68.3) | 48 (18.6) | 210 (81.4) | ||
| ≥25 | 51 (13.5) | 8 (15.7) | 43 (84.3) | ||
| Education level | Highschool diploma or lower | 95 (25.1) | 22 (23.2) | 73 (76.8) | 2.30 (0.089) |
| University degree or higher | 283 (74.9) | 46 (16.3) | 237 (83.7) | ||
| Marital status | Single | 207 (54.8) | 42 (20.3) | 165 (79.7) | 3.77 (0.151) |
| Married | 148 (39.2) | 20 (13.5) | 128 (86.5) | ||
| Other | 23 (6.1) | 6 (26.1) | 17 (73.9) | ||
| Cohabitant | Live alone | 77 (20.4) | 21 (27.3) | 56 (72.7) | 2.27 (0.044) |
| Non-smoking cohabitant | 137 (36.2) | 24 (17.5) | 113 (82.5) | ||
| Smoking cohabitant | 164 (43.4) | 23 (14.0) | 141 (86.0) | ||
| Workplace size | Large corporations/public institutions | 62 (16.4) | 10 (16.1) | 52 (83.9) | 0.45 (0.799) |
| Small and medium businesses | 232 (61.4) | 41 (17.7) | 191 (82.3) | ||
| Private businesses | 84 (22.2) | 17 (20.2) | 67 (79.8) | ||
| Workplace title | Employee | 307 (81.2) | 52 (16.9) | 255 (83.1) | 1.22 (0.174) |
| Manager/management position | 71 (18.8) | 16 (22.5) | 55 (77.5) | ||
| Employment type | Regular | 318 (84.1) | 57 (17.9) | 261 (82.1) | 0.01 (0.532) |
| Non-regular | 60 (15.9) | 11 (18.3) | 49 (81.7) | ||
| Number of smoking co-workers (number) | None | 53 (14.0) | 12 (22.6) | 41 (77.4) | 6.92 (0.074) |
| 1–2 | 111 (29.4) | 26 (23.4) | 85 (76.6) | ||
| 3–9 | 132 (34.9) | 22 (16.7) | 110 (83.3) | ||
| ≥ 10 | 82 (21.7) | 8 (9.8) | 74 (90.2) | ||
| Physical labor intensity | Low intensity | 161 (42.6) | 34 (21.1) | 127 (78.9) | 1.94 (0.379) |
| Neutral | 164 (43.4) | 25 (15.2) | 139 (84.8) | ||
| High intensity | 53 (14.0) | 9 (17.0) | 44 (83.0) | ||
| Emotional labor intensity | Low intensity | 28 (7.4) | 7 (25.0) | 21 (75.0) | 1.41 (0.495) |
| Neutral | 139 (36.8) | 22 (15.8) | 117 (84.2) | ||
| High intensity | 211 (55.8) | 39 (18.5) | 172 (81.5) | ||
| Pressure for work performance | Not pressured | 206 (54.5) | 38 (18.4) | 168 (81.6) | 0.33 (0.847) |
| Neutral | 90 (23.8) | 17 (18.9) | 73 (81.1) | ||
| Pressured | 82 (21.7) | 13 (15.9) | 69 (84.1) | ||
| Work hour autonomy | Not autonomous | 117 (31.0) | 24 (20.5) | 93 (79.5) | 3.65 (0.161) |
| Neutral | 183 (48.4) | 26 (14.2) | 157 (85.8) | ||
| Autonomous | 78 (20.6) | 18 (23.1) | 60 (76.9) | ||
| Job satisfaction | Unsatisfied | 60 (15.9) | 8 (13.3) | 52 (86.7) | 4.77 (0.092) |
| Neutral | 183 (48.4) | 28 (15.3) | 155 (84.7) | ||
| Satisfied | 135 (35.7) | 32 (23.7) | 103 (76.3) | ||
| Desire to smoke | Low | 171 (45.2) | 37 (21.6) | 134 (78.4) | 2.82 (0.062) |
| High | 207 (54.8) | 31 (15.0) | 176 (85.0) | ||
| Amount of smoking per instance (number) | 1–2 | 223 (59.0) | 40 (17.9) | 183 (82.1) | 2.69 (0.261) |
| 3–10 | 144 (38.1) | 24 (16.7) | 120 (83.3) | ||
| ≥11 | 11 (2.9) | 4 (36.4) | 7 (63.6) | ||
| Smoking type | Behavioral/dependent | 151 (39.9) | 33 (21.9) | 118 (78.1) | 4.99 (0.172) |
| Stress relief | 129 (34.1) | 16 (12.4) | 113 (87.6) | ||
| Stimulus-seeking/boredom relief | 65 (17.2) | 14 (21.5) | 51 (78.5) | ||
| Effect-seeking | 33 (8.7) | 5 (15.2) | 28 (84.8) | ||
| Smoking cessation education | No | 293 (77.5) | 59 (20.1) | 234 (79.9) | 4.07 (0.028) |
| Yes | 85 (22.5) | 9 (10.6) | 76 (89.4) | ||
| Smoking harmfulness awareness | Low | 200 (52.9) | 41 (20.5) | 159 (79.5) | 1.82 (0.183) |
| High | 178 (47.1) | 27 (15.2) | 151 (84.8) | ||
| Smoking cessation treatment awareness | Low | 214 (56.6) | 49 (22.9) | 165 (77.1) | 8.05 (0.005) |
| High | 164 (43.4) | 19 (11.6) | 145 (88.4) | ||
| Smoking cessation policy awareness | Low | 206 (54.5) | 54 (26.2) | 152 (73.8) | 20.76 (<0.001) |
| High | 172 (45.5) | 14 (8.1) | 158 (91.9) | ||
Descriptive Statistics and Correlation of Research Variables (n = 378).
| Variables | Smoking Awareness | Smoking Harmfulness Awareness | Smoking Cessation Treatment Awareness | Smoking Cessation Policy Awareness | Mean ± SD | Skewness | Kurtosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r ( | |||||||
| Intention to quit smoking | 0.32 (<0.001) | 0.02 (0.735) | 0.17 (0.001) | 0.38 (<0.001) | 2.36 ± 0.96 | 0.34 | −0.81 |
| Smoking awareness | 0.40 (<0.001) | 0.69 (<0.001) | 0.85 (<0.001) | 3.18 ± 0.37 | 0.64 | 0.95 | |
| Smoking harmfulness awareness | −0.12 (0.022) | −0.01 (0.873) | 2.58 ± 0.59 | 0.10 | 0.80 | ||
| Smoking cessation treatment awareness | 0.53 (<0.001) | 3.58 ± 0.41 | −0.01 | 0.89 | |||
| Smoking cessation policy awareness | 3.24 ± 0.66 | 0.27 | −0.23 | ||||
Figure 1Prediction model of smoking cessation intention of smoking female worker by smoking awareness.
Gains Index and ROI for Nodes (n = 378).
| Node | Node | Gain | Response | Gains Index | Profit | ROI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Percentage | n | Percentage | |||||
| 6 | 108 | 28.6% | 103 | 33.2% | 95.4% | 116.3% | 0.907 | 1960.0% |
| 11 | 41 | 10.8% | 39 | 12.6% | 95.1% | 116.0% | 0.902 | 1850.0% |
| 9 | 132 | 34.9% | 107 | 34.5% | 81.1% | 98.8% | 0.621 | 328.0% |
| 8 | 22 | 5.8% | 17 | 5.5% | 77.3% | 94.2% | 0.545 | 240.0% |
| 12 | 23 | 6.1% | 16 | 5.2% | 69.6% | 84.8% | 0.391 | 128.6% |
| 10 | 27 | 7.1% | 17 | 5.5% | 63.0% | 76.8% | 0.259 | 70.0% |
| 7 | 25 | 6.6% | 11 | 3.5% | 44.0% | 53.7% | −0.120 | −21.4% |
| ROI = Return on investment. | ||||||||