| Literature DB >> 35270335 |
Chunhua Ma1, Yongfeng Ma1, Xiaoyu Lan2.
Abstract
Applying an integrated theoretical model consisting of the socioecological theory, the self-determination theory, and the broaden-and-build theory, the present study tested a moderated mediation model of parental autonomy support, filial piety, and gratitude to study how these factors are jointly related to pathological Internet use (PIU) in Chinese undergraduate students. A total of 1054 Chinese undergraduate students (M age = 20.35, SD = 1.00, 34.7% females) aged between 16 and 24 years participated in this study. They were instructed to complete self-reported questionnaires on parental autonomy support, filial piety, gratitude, and PIU. The results showed that parental autonomy support was negatively associated with PIU, and filial piety partially mediated this relation. Specifically, parental autonomy support was positively related to filial piety, which, in turn, was negatively associated with PIU. In addition, gratitude moderated the first path of the indirect relation and the direct relation of this mediation effect. To be specific, undergraduate students with higher gratitude showed high filial piety and low PIU, in the context of low parental autonomy support, than those with lower gratitude. Taken together, the current study contributes to extant research by highlighting the vital role of parental autonomy support in mitigating undergraduate students' PIU and illustrating how filial piety explains the underlying mechanism of this association. This study also provides novel insights into intervention or prevention programs by demonstrating that gratitude alleviates the adverse effect of low parental autonomy support on students' PIU.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese undergraduate students; filial piety; gratitude; parental autonomy support; pathological internet use
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270335 PMCID: PMC8910346 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1A hypothesized model of the study associations.
Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations of study variables.
| Variable |
|
| Range | Skewness | Kurtosis | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. PAS | 3.49 | 0.85 | 1–5 | −0.79 | −0.23 | - | |||||
| 2. FP | 3.45 | 0.85 | 1–5 | −0.45 | −0.37 | 0.75 ** | - | ||||
| 3. Gratitude | 3.62 | 0.99 | 0–6 | −0.19 | −0.61 | 0.59 ** | 0.60 ** | - | |||
| 4. PIU | 2.74 | 0.76 | 1–5 | 0.42 | −0.55 | −0.68 ** | −0.66 ** | 0.26 *** | - | ||
| 5. Age | 20.35 | 1.00 | 16–24 | - | - | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | - | |
| 6. Gender a | - | - | 1–2 | - | - | −0.10 ** | −0.15 ** | −0.14 ** | 0.04 | 0.01 | - |
Note. N = 1054. a coded as 1 = male, 2 = female. PAS = parental autonomy support; FP = filial piety; PIU = pathological Internet use. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Mediating effect of filial piety.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIU | FP | PIU | ||||
| Predictor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gender a | −0.06 | −1.34 | −0.15 | −3.43 *** | −0.12 | −2.55 * |
| Age | 0.06 | 2.63 ** | −0.01 | −0.30 | 0.06 | 2.68 ** |
| PAS | −0.69 | −30.41 *** | 0.74 | 36.32 *** | −0.43 | −13.24 *** |
| FP | −0.35 | −10.87 *** | ||||
|
| 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.52 | |||
|
| 310.75 *** | 457.24 *** | 288.60 *** |
Note. N = 1054. a coded as 1 = male, 2 = female. PAS = parental autonomy support; FP = filial piety; PIU = pathological Internet use. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2A mediation model. Note. N = 1054. Path coefficients are shown close to the lines, whereas standard errors are displayed inside the brackets. *** p < 0.001.
Results of a moderated mediation model.
| Outcome | Predictor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP | Age | 0.78 | 0.61 | 329.09 *** | −0.01 | −0.39 | −0.05 | 0.03 |
| Gender a | −0.10 | −2.42 * | −0.18 | −0.02 | ||||
| PAS | 0.56 | 21.63 *** | 0.51 | 0.61 | ||||
| Gratitude | 0.24 | 10.02 *** | 0.19 | 0.29 | ||||
| PAS × Gratitude | −0.08 | −3.90 *** | −0.12 | −0.04 | ||||
| PIU | Age | 0.74 | 0.54 | 206.56 *** | 0.05 | 2.37 * | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| Gender a | −0.12 | −2.69 ** | −0.21 | −0.03 | ||||
| PAS | −0.39 | −11.50 *** | −0.46 | −0.32 | ||||
| FP | −0.35 | −10.38 *** | −0.41 | −0.28 | ||||
| Gratitude | 0.06 | 2.17 * | 0.01 | 0.11 | ||||
| PAS × Gratitude | 0.14 | 6.09 *** | 0.09 | 0.18 |
Note. N = 1054. a coded as 1 = male, 2 = female. PAS = parental autonomy support; FP = filial piety; PIU = pathological Internet use. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
The mediating effect of filial piety in the association of parental autonomy support and pathological Internet use at different levels of gratitude.
| Gratitude | Conditional Direct (Indirect) Effect | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.53 | 0.04 | −0.60 | −0.46 |
| (−0.22) | (0.03) | (−0.28) | (−0.17) | |
|
| −0.39 | 0.03 | −0.46 | −0.32 |
| (−0.20) | (0.03) | (−0.25) | (−0.14) | |
|
| −0.25 | 0.05 | −0.34 | −0.16 |
| (−0.17) | (0.03) | (−0.22) | −0.12) |
Note. N = 1054.
Figure 3Interaction between parental autonomy support and gratitude in predicting pathological Internet use.
Figure 4Interaction between parental autonomy support and gratitude in predicting filial piety.