| Literature DB >> 35270269 |
Jiewen Zhang1, Claudia Marino1, Natale Canale1, Lorena Charrier2, Giacomo Lazzeri3, Paola Nardone4, Alessio Vieno1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the relationship between problematic social media use (PSMU) and happiness has been already explored, less is known about the mechanisms that translate PSMU into lower happiness through lifestyle habits. Therefore, the current study focuses on the association between PSMU and happiness, exploring a mediating effect of lifestyle habits (e.g., difficulties in getting to sleep and frequency of physical activity) among Italian adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: happiness; path analysis; physical activity; problematic social media use; sleep
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270269 PMCID: PMC8909314 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Hypothesized model. The symbols for the expected relationships (“+” in the positive and “−” in the negative); POSI = preference for online social interaction, PSMU = problematic social media use.
Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analyses (PSMU = problematic social media use); POSI = preference for online social interaction, ** p < 0.01. M = mean.
| M | SD |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. PSMU | 2.32 | 2.16 | 53,292 | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| 2. Frequency of physical activity | 3.42 | 1.98 | 58,516 | −0.09 ** | 1 | - | - | - |
| 3. Difficulties in getting to sleep | 2.22 | 1.47 | 58,539 | 0.17 ** | 0.04 ** | 1 | - | - |
| 4. Happiness | 7.58 | 1.78 | 58,462 | −0.20 ** | 0.15 ** | −0.24 ** | 1 | - |
| 5. POSI | 5.79 | 3.17 | 55,916 | 0.30 ** | −0.04 ** | 0.11 ** | −0.16 ** | 1 |
| 6. Screen time | 1.83 | 1.51 | 57,638 | 0.18 ** | −0.08 ** | 0.07 ** | −0.12 ** | 0.12 ** |
Between group differences in problematic social media use (PSMU), frequency of physical activity, difficulties in getting to sleep and happiness. M = mean.
| Variables | PSMU | Frequency of Physical Activity | Difficulties in Getting to Sleep | Happiness | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) |
| η2 | M (SD) |
| η2 | M (SD) |
| η2 | M (SD) |
| η2 | |
| Male | 2.11 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 3.76 | 0.000 | 0.031 | 2.07 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 7.73 | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Female | 2.52 | 3.06 | 2.38 | 7.43 | ||||||||
| 11-year | 2.17 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 3.70 | 0.000 | 0.016 | 2.21 | 0.022 | 0.000 | 7.99 | 0.000 | 0.036 |
| 13-year | 2.50 | 3.44 | 2.21 | 7.55 | ||||||||
| 15-year | 2.25 | 3.08 | 2.25 | 7.16 | ||||||||
Figure 2Path diagram of the structural equation model 0 with significant pathways. All coefficients are standardized. POSI = preference for online social interaction, PSMU = problematic social media use. The above mediating effect refers to difficulties in getting to sleep while the bottom refers to physical activity. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3Path diagram of the structural equation model 1 with significant pathways. All coefficients are standardized. Females of model 2 is in brackets. POSI = preference for online social interaction, PSMU = problematic social media use. *** p < 0.001. The above mediating effect refers to difficulties in getting to sleep, while the bottom refers to physical activity.
Figure 4Path diagram of structural equation model 2 with significant pathways. All coefficients are standardized. The estimates from left to right are 11-year-olds of model 3, 13-year-olds of model 4 and 15-year-olds of model 5. POSI = preference for online social interaction, PSMU = problematic social media use. The above mediating effect refers to difficulties in getting to sleep, while the bottom refers to physical activity. *** p < 0.001.