| Literature DB >> 35270159 |
Gabriel Arroyo-Cosultchi1,2, Jordan Golubov3, Jonathan V Solórzano4, Maria C Mandujano5.
Abstract
Until recently, little research has focused on determination of the population dynamics of invasive species and evaluating their genetic variation. Consequently, not much is known of what drives clonal invasive species and their demography. Here, we describe the population dynamics of Kalanchoe delagoensis (Crassulaceae), considered invasive to several countries. We quantified the demography of a population in central Mexico using integral projection models (IPM) in a population that reproduced asexually exclusively through plantlets. The effect of clonal recruitment on population growth rate (λ) was evaluated by changing plantlet survival and simulating management scenarios that used previous data of watering and seven experimental herbicide treatments. The finite rate of population increase indicated that this Kalanchoe delagoensis population is growing (above one) and with water availability, growth rates will only accelerate. The IPM showed that plantlet survival and recruitment were the most critical steps in the cycle for the population, and simulations of different management scenarios showed that reducing plantlet survival significantly decreased λ only in two out of the seven herbicides used.Entities:
Keywords: Kalanchoe; herbicide treatments; integral population models; plantlet survival
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270159 PMCID: PMC8912375 DOI: 10.3390/plants11050689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Fitting of the survival, growth, reproduction probability, and fecundity of the K. delagoensis 2011 data. (a). The survival (s) data are plotted (0, death; 1, survival) as a function of individual size x (plant height in cm), along with a logistic regression fitted to the data. The fitted curve is log(s/(1 − s) = −1.904 + log(0.206)x (p < 0.05). (b) The data on year-to-year changes in size, along the regression fit for mean size at year t + 1 as a function of size in year t. The fitted line has = 0.327 + log(0.885)x (p < 0.05) and = −1.273 + log(0.269)x (p < 0.05). (c) The reproductive (r) probability is plotted (0, nonreproductive; 1, reproductive) as a function of individual size x (plant height in cm), along with a logistic regression fitted to the data. The fitted curve is log(r/(1 − r) = −4.316 + log(2.414)x (p < 0.05). (d) The fecundity as a function of individual size, along with the regression for the mean number of plantlets. The fitted line is = 2.955 + log(0.039)x (p < 0.05). The y-axis scales are different among the panels.
Probability of survival after water and herbicide treatments were applied and the resulting population growth rate with their confidence intervals (95%) and the elasticity sub-kernel contributions.
| Treatment 1 | Proportion |
| Pmatrix | Fmatrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| of Plantlet Survival | (Confidence Interval) | |||
| Control 2 | 0.12 | 1.28 (1.094–1.640) | 0.556 | 0.444 |
| 25% Water | 0.14 | 1.37 (1.228–1.836) | 0.545 | 0.455 |
| 50% Water | 0.25 | 1.81 (1.531–2.869) | 0.502 | 0.498 |
| 100% Water | 0.84 | 3.51 (2.234–5.142) | 0.399 | 0.601 |
| G/2-4D | 0 | 0.29 (0.282–0.415) | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| 2-4D | 0.01 | 0.55 (0.245–0.717) | 0.776 | 0.224 |
| Other herbicides | >0.33 | 2.08 (1.860–2.410) | 0.480 | 0.520 |
1 Survival probabilities from experiments performed in Guerra-García et al. 2018. 2 No water full sunlight.