| Literature DB >> 35270130 |
Caihong Jia1,2, Zhuo Wang2,3, Jingyi Wang2, Hongxia Miao2,3, Jianbin Zhang2, Biyu Xu2, Juhua Liu2,3, Zhiqiang Jin2, Jihong Liu1.
Abstract
WRKY transcription factors (TFs) play an important role in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress as well as in plant growth and development. In the present study, bioinformatics methods were used to identify members of the WRKY transcription factor family in the Musa acuminata (DH-Pahang) genome (version 2). A total of 164 MaWRKYs were identified and phylogenetic analysis showed that MaWRKYs could be categorized into three subfamilies. Overall, the 162 MaWRKYs were distributed on 11 chromosomes, and 2 genes were not located on the chromosome. There were 31 collinear genes from segmental duplication and 7 pairs of genes from tandem duplication. RNA-sequencing was used to analyze the expression profiles of MaWRKYs in different fruit development, ripening stages, under various abiotic and biotic stressors. Most of the MaWRKYs showed a variety of expression patterns in the banana fruit development and ripening stages. Some MaWRKYs responded to abiotic stress, such as low temperature, drought, and salt stress. Most differentially expressed MaWRKYs were downregulated during banana's response to Foc TR4 infection, which plays an important role in physiological regulation to stress. Our findings indicate that MaWRKY21 directly binds to the W-box of the MaICS promoter to decrease MaICS transcription and then reduce the enzyme activity. These studies have improved our understanding of the molecular basis for the development and stress resistance of an important banana variety.Entities:
Keywords: WRKY; banana; expression analysis; stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270130 PMCID: PMC8912484 DOI: 10.3390/plants11050662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree of WRKY TFs constructed based on WRKY domains from Arabidopsis (in green and prefised by At) and rice (in purple and prefised by Os), and M. acuminata (in red and prefised by Ma).
Figure 2Distribution and synteny analysis of MaWRKYs on the 11 chromosomes. The vertical black line indicates the position of MaWRKY. The segmental duplicate MaWRKYs are connected with green lines. Tandem duplicates were marked with red dots.
Figure 3WRKY gene family conserved domain, WRKYGQK conserved domain in the red box, red asterisk refers to zinc finger structure.
Figure 4Heatmap of differentially expressed MaWRKYs in five tissues during fruit development and ripening.
Figure 5Expression patterns of MaWRKYs in response to abiotic and biotic stress. (A) salt; (B) osmotic; (C) cold; (D) Foc TR4.
Figure 6The number of genes involved in two or three abiotic stresses at the same time.
Figure 7Expression patterns of nine MaWRKYs under Foc TR4 treatment by qRT-PCR. The data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. * and ** significantly different from the control at p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Figure 8The interactive networks of MaWRKY21 using Cytoscape.
Figure 9The interaction between MaWRKY21 and MaICS promoter by Y1H assay. (A) Schematic diagram vectors for Y1H assay. (B) Y1H assay.
Figure 10The interaction between MaWRKY21 and MaICS promoter by LUC/REN and GUS assay. (A) Schematic diagram vectors for LUC/REN assay. (B) Relative LUC/REN ratio. (C) Schematic diagram vectors for GUS assay. (D) GUS staining in banana fruits and GUS activity. (D1) Positive control; (D2) MaICS promoter; (D3) MaWRKY21 + reporter; (D4) GUS activity. * significantly different from the control at p < 0.05.