| Literature DB >> 35269050 |
Jianwei Yue1,2,3, Can Ma1, Limin Zhao1,2,3, Qingmei Kong1,2, Xiangchun Xu1, Zifa Wang1, Ying Chen1.
Abstract
Generally, brick buildings are in the open-air environment year round, and damage to them is aggravated by the effect of repeated freezing and thawing cycles. In order to determine freeze-thaw damage and deterioration mechanism, the initial moisture content of gray brick specimens was set as 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%. The effects of moisture content and the number of freeze-thaw cycles on the quality, mechanical properties and microstructure of gray brick were investigated by uniaxial compression tests and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) tests. Numerical simulations were applied to model the freezing and thawing process. The results showed that: as the number of freeze-thaw cycles increased, the mass loss rate and peak strength reduction rate of gray brick both increased. The initial moisture content had a greater impact on damage to gray brick due to freeze-thaw; ω = 80% was defined as the limit moisture content of gray brick. Under the repeated action of freeze-thaw cycles, the areas affected by thermal stress were mainly concentrated in the center of the outer surface and the center of the side of gray bricks. The maximum thermal stress after 55 freeze-thaw cycles was 1.522 × 10-2 MPa. This research results provide a theoretical basis for the prevention and protection of frost damage of brick buildings in a freeze-thaw environment.Entities:
Keywords: freeze–thaw cycle; freeze–thaw damage; gray brick; mechanical property; moisture content
Year: 2022 PMID: 35269050 PMCID: PMC8911964 DOI: 10.3390/ma15051819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical compositions of gray brick.
| Compound | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | MgO | K2O | Na2O | TiO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (%) | 59.290 | 17.630 | 8.690 | 5.230 | 3.200 | 2.740 | 1.950 | 0.683 |
Figure 1The minimum and maximum temperatures in winter in Kaifeng from 2010 to 2020.
Figure 2Temperature change during one freeze–thaw cycle.
Figure 3Images of the failure characteristics of gray brick specimens before and after freezing and thawing cycle: (a) the 0th freeze–thaw cycle; (b) the 55th freeze–thaw cycle.
Figure 4Relationship between mass loss rate and the number of freeze–thaw cycles of gray brick samples with different moisture contents.
Figure 5Change in the appearance of gray brick specimen during uniaxial compression.
Peak strength of the gray brick specimens with different moisture contents before and after freeze–thaw cycles.
| Moisture Content (%) | Peak Strength (MPa) | Strength Reduction Rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before Freeze–Thaw | After Freeze–Thaw | ||
| 20 | 7.41 | 6.06 | 18.22 |
| 40 | 5.86 | 4.49 | 23.38 |
| 60 | 2.81 | 2.14 | 23.84 |
| 80 | 8.84 | 6.53 | 26.13 |
| 100 | 6.13 | 4.24 | 30.83 |
Figure 6SEM images of a gray brick with a moisture content of 40% under different cycles: (a) the 0th freeze–thaw cycle; (b) the 30th freeze–thaw cycle; (c) the 55th freeze–thaw cycle.
Figure 7SEM images of a gray brick with a moisture content of 100% under different cycles: (a) the 0th freeze–thaw cycle; (b) the 30th freeze–thaw cycle; (c) the 55th freeze–thaw cycle.
Parameters of the gray brick.
| Density (kg/m3) | Elastic | Poisson’s | Coefficient of Thermal | Thermal | Specific Heat Capacity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1635 | 1807 | 0.15 | 5 × 10−6 | 0.81 | 1050 |
Figure 8Distribution state and overall change process of the temperature of gray brick from inside to outside during one freeze–thaw cycle: (a) the 1st hour; (b) the 1.7th hour; (c) the 6th hour; (d) the 6.7th hour.
Figure 9Thermal stress cloud in the last freeze–thaw cycle: (a) outer surface of the model; (b) profile of the model.