| Literature DB >> 35269012 |
Yunyun Li1,2,3, Wen Ni1,2,3, Wei Gao2,3,4, Siqi Zhang1,2,3, Pingfeng Fu1,2,3, Yue Li1,2,3.
Abstract
Blast furnace slag (BFS), steel slag (SS), and flue gas desulfurized gypsum (FGDG) were used to prepare metallurgical slag-based binder (MSB), which was afterwards mixed with high-antimony-containing mine tailings to form green mining fill samples (MBTs) for Sb solidification/stabilization (S/S). Results showed that all MBT samples met the requirement for mining backfills. In particular, the unconfined compressive strength of MBTs increased with the curing time, exceeding that of ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Moreover, MBTs exhibited the better antimony solidifying properties, and their immobilization efficiency could reach 99%, as compared to that of OPC. KSb(OH)6 was used to prepare pure MSB paste for solidifying mechanism analysis. Characteristics of metallurgical slag-based binder (MSB) solidified/stabilized antimony (Sb) were investigated via X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). According to the results, the main hydration products of MSB were C-S-H gel and ettringite. Among them, C-S-H gel had an obvious adsorption and physical sealing effect on Sb, and the incorporation of Sb would reduce the degree of C-S-H gel polymerization. Besides, ettringite was found to exert little impact on the solidification and stabilization of Sb. However, due to the complex composition of MSB, it was hard to conclude whether Sb entered the ettringite lattice.Entities:
Keywords: antimony; metallurgical slag; mine tailings; solidification/stabilization; steel slag
Year: 2022 PMID: 35269012 PMCID: PMC8911367 DOI: 10.3390/ma15051780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Raw material chemical components, physical properties, concentrations, and leaching concentration of Sb.
| Materials | Sb-MT | BFS | SS | FGDG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical composition | MgO | 0.99 | 8.94 | 6.00 | 1.04 |
| Oxide (wt. %) | Al2O3 | 4.45 | 15.43 | 6.24 | 0.78 |
| SiO2 | 40.34 | 24.76 | 18.16 | 2.03 | |
| SO3 | 17.31 | 0.83 | 0.29 | 44.97 | |
| CaO | 15.15 | 46.16 | 42.58 | 45.31 | |
| Fe2O3 | 17.52 | 2.52 | 17.66 | 0.48 | |
| Blaine fineness (m2/Kg) | - | 400 | 400 | 360 | |
| pH | 7.35 | 11.92 | 12.28 | 7.85 | |
| Leaching Sb concentration (μg/L) | 524 | ND | ND | ND | |
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of raw materials: (a) blast furnace slag (BFS); (b) steel slag (SS); (c) flue gas desulfurized gypsum (FGDG); (d) high Sb-containing mine tailings (Sb-MT).
Proportions of total solid waste S/S materials (MSB) components, including equivalent binder-tailings ratio and solid concentration of green mining fill (MBT) samples.
| Notation | MSB (Mass Fraction/wt. %) | Binders/Tailings ( | Solid Concentration a (wt. %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFS | SS | FGDG | |||
| MBT | 60 | 30 | 10 | ¼ | 86 |
| OPC b | 100(OPC) | ||||
a Solid concentration = (binders + tailings)/(binders + tailings + water). b OPC used as a cementitious material for the control group.
Figure 2Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) results of MBT and OPC at different curing times.
Figure 3(a) Evolution of pH and Sb release for each MBT and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) sample; (b) immobilization efficiency of Sb after 3 d, 7 d, 28 d, and 90 d of curing during horizontal vibration leaching method.
Figure 4Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of MBT with OPC at curing age of 28 days: (a) MBT (b) OPC.
Figure 5Area of MBT-C-S-H at curing age of 28 days.
Figure 6XRD patterns of pastes after 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d of aging. (a)MSB-Sb; (b) pure MSB. Here, phase designations are as follows: A: Alite (Ca3SiO5, C3S); B: Belite (Ca2SiO2, C2S); C: C-S-H gel; E: Ettringite (Ca6Al2(SO4)3(OH)12∙26H2O); G: Gypsum (CaSO4∙2H2O); R: RO phase.
Figure 7FT-IR spectra of pastes after 3 and 28 days of curing: (a) MSB with Sb; (b) pure MSB.
Changes in binding energies of main elements in Sb cured sample and blank group after 28 days of curing.
| Elements | Ca | Al | Si | O | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank group | 347.30 | 74.26 | 102.10 | 531.67 | 168.99 |
| Sb cured sample | 347.11 | 74.26 | 102.00 | 531.54 | 169.21 |
| Changes | −0.19 | 0 | −0.10 | −0.13 | +0.22 |
Figure 8Schematic diagram of curing mechanism of Sb in metallurgical-slag-based materials.