| Literature DB >> 35268710 |
Gabriel-Dănuț Mocanu1, Oana-Viorela Nistor1, Oana Emilia Constantin1, Doina Georgeta Andronoiu1, Viorica Vasilica Barbu1, Elisabeta Botez1.
Abstract
Green pickled tomatoes are a traditional fermented product in Romania. This study was focused on the effect of total substitution of NaCl with KCl and MgCl2 on physicochemical and microbiological quality; bioactive compounds; and microstructural, textural, and sensorial properties of fresh and pickled green tomatoes during 28 days of fermentation. By the means of physicochemical composition, the NaCl addition induced the most stable characteristics for the pickles compared to the other two types of salts. The content of total flavonoids in green pickled tomatoes with NaCl (34.72 ± 0.43 mg CE/g DW) was significantly lower compared with the control sample (63.80 ± 0.55 mg CE/g DW). The total number of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) at the final stage of fermentation varied between 4.11 and 4.63 log CFU for all variants. The textural analysis revealed that the NaCl has the lowest influence on the textural parameters. Finally, the overall acceptance of green pickled tomatoes containing KCl and MgCl2 was found to be proper to be consumed as a substitute for pickles with NaCl.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; microbiota; pickling; sensorial; texture
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35268710 PMCID: PMC8911622 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27051609
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Physicochemical analysis of the fresh and pickled tomatoes samples.
| Sample Code | Moisture, % | Salt, % | Ash, % | Protein, % | Lactic Acid, mg/100 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 93.65 ± 0.27 B | - | 0.37 ± 0.02 B | 1.50 ± 0.06 B | - |
|
| 88.90 ± 0.16 B | 0.55 ± 0.04 B | 0.84 ± 0.03 B | 1.26 ± 0.07 B | 647.38 ± 0.29 A |
|
| 90.35 ± 0.15 B | 0.73 ± 0.08 B | 0.87 ± 0.03 B | 1.71 ± 0.04 B | 1319.67 ± 0.46 A |
|
| 90.35 ± 0.12 B | 0.73 ± 0.05 B | 0.87 ± 0.04 B | 1.56 ± 0.07 B | 407.08 ± 0.19 A |
|
| 90.88 ± 0.22 B | 0.74 ± 0.06 B | 0.82 ± 0.05 B | 1.53 ± 0.03 B | 155.61 ± 0.13 A |
|
| 91.35 ± 0.12 B | 0.70 ± 0.05 B | 0.98 ± 0.07 B | 1.26 ± 0.07 B | 979.58 ± 0.37 A |
|
| 90.82 ± 0.16 B | 0.63 ± 0.04 B | 0.83 ± 0.05 B | 1.52 ± 0.04 B | 1572.77 ± 0.52 A |
|
| 91.64 ± 0.23 B | 0.57 ± 0.06 B | 0.69 ± 0.03 B | 1.58 ± 0.05 B | 565.22 ± 0.18 A |
|
| 91.47 ± 0.19 B | 0.59 ± 0.07 B | 0.61 ± 0.04 B | 1.79 ± 0.02 B | 219.28 ± 0.22 A |
|
| 91.97 ± 0.16 B | 0.66 ± 0.02 B | 0.88 ± 0.07 B | 1.43 ± 0.07 B | 405.21 ± 0.45 A |
|
| 91.15 ± 0.11 B | 0.66 ± 0.05 B | 0.79 ± 0.09 B | 1.56 ± 0.04 B | 1265.94 ± 0.58 A |
|
| 91.59 ± 0.14 B | 0.65 ± 0.07 B | 0.69 ± 0.05 B | 1.56 ± 0.08 B | 373.33 ± 0.26 A |
|
| 91.46 ± 0.12 B | 0.62 ± 0.04 B | 0.65 ± 0.04 B | 1.66 ± 0.09 B | 135.17 ± 0.15 A |
Values are represented as means ± SD (n = 3). Different superscript letters (A and B) mean a significant difference at (p > 0.05) among different samples.
Phytochemical profile of fresh and pickled tomatoes samples.
| Sample Code | Lycopene, | TPC, | TFC, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 51.01 ± 0.02 C | 34.21 ± 0.05 D | 71.66 ± 1.64 A | 63.80 ± 0.55 A |
|
| 95.23 ± 0.34 B,C | 59.18 ± 0.36 C,D | 46.89 ± 0.88 A | 9.66 ± 0.92 B |
|
| 200.15 ± 0.59 B | 105.09 ± 0.34 B,C | 59.42 ± 0.71 A | 20.23 ± 0.56 B |
|
| 211.69 ± 0.57 A,B | 135.17 ± 0.55 A,B | 96.35 ± 0.54 A | 34.48 ± 0.66 B |
|
| 284.95 ± 0.47 A | 162.82 ± 0.82 A | 128.03 ± 0.49 A | 34.72 ± 0.43 B |
|
| 128.45 ± 0.32 B,C | 83.22 ± 0.12 C,D | 45.41 ± 0.54 A | 1.80 ± 0.14 B |
|
| 164.63 ± 0.25 B | 115.58 ± 0.38 B,C | 57.65 ± 0.85 A | 2.81 ± 0.14 B |
|
| 171.87 ± 0.98 A,B | 132.89 ± 0.74 A,B | 72.49 ± 0.91 A | 6.41 ± 0.79 B |
|
| 243.11 ± 0.38 A | 172.67 ± 0.23 A | 72.57 ± 0.91 A | 11.87 ± 0.52 B |
|
| 62.04 ± 0.32 B,C | 48.18 ± 0.22 C,D | 45.59 ± 0.54 A | 1.79 ± 0.17 B |
|
| 137.21 ± 0.98 B | 70.39 ± 0.66 B,C | 57.88 ± 1.09 A | 1.81 ± 0.14 B |
|
| 138.72 ± 0.95 A,B | 83.11 ± 0.59 A,B | 72.78 ± 0.92 A | 3.81 ± 0.14 B |
|
| 220.53 ± 1.19 A | 124.76 ± 0.80 A | 72.79 ± 0.92 A | 6.42 ± 0.79 B |
Values are represented as means ± SD (n = 3). Different superscript letters (A, B, C, and D) mean a significant difference at (p > 0.05) among different samples.
Figure 1Antioxidant activity of fresh and green pickled tomatoes.
Microbiota of green pickled tomatoes samples during the fermentation.
| Type of Analysis | Mesophilic Aerobic Bacteria (log CFU/g) | Yeasts (log CFU/g) | Lactic Acid Bacteria (log CFU/g) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample/Fermentation Time, Days | PNa | PK | PMg | PNa | PK | PMg | PNa | PK | PMg |
| 0 | 1.31 | <1 | <1 | ||||||
| 7 | 1.91 | 2.25 | 1.69 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 1.01 | 1.11 | 1.21 |
| 14 | 2.05 | 2.88 | 1.95 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 1.56 | 1.67 | 1.72 |
| 21 | 2.34 | 3.14 | 2.62 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 3.23 | 3.56 | 3.34 |
| 28 | 3.66 | 3.97 | 3.76 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 4.11 | 4.63 | 4.32 |
Figure 2Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of the pickled tomatoes sections obtained with an objective lenses of 20×; scale bar, 50 μm.
Figure 3Evolution of textural parameters values during pickling: (a) firmness, (b) cohesiveness, (c) springiness, and (d) chewiness.
Figure 4Sensory profile of green pickles tomatoes PNa, PK, and PMg fermented for 28 days.