| Literature DB >> 35268603 |
Mariel Calderón-Oliver1, Edith Ponce-Alquicira2.
Abstract
Modern microencapsulation techniques are employed to protect active molecules or substances such as vitamins, pigments, antimicrobials, and flavorings, among others, from the environment. Microencapsulation offers advantages such as facilitating handling and control of the release and solubilization of active substances, thus offering a great area for food science and processing development. For instance, the development of functional food products, fat reduction, sensory improvement, preservation, and other areas may involve the use of microcapsules in various food matrices such as meat products, dairy products, cereals, and fruits, as well as in their derivatives, with good results. The versatility of applications arises from the diversity of techniques and materials used in the process of microencapsulation. The objective of this review is to report the state of the art in the application and evaluation of microcapsules in various food matrices, as a one-microcapsule-core system may offer different results according to the medium in which it is used. The inclusion of microcapsules produces functional products that include probiotics and prebiotics, as well as antioxidants, fatty acids, and minerals. Our main finding was that the microencapsulation of polyphenolic extracts, bacteriocins, and other natural antimicrobials from various sources that inhibit microbial growth could be used for food preservation. Finally, in terms of sensory aspects, microcapsules that mimic fat can function as fat replacers, reducing the textural changes in the product as well as ensuring flavor stability.Entities:
Keywords: fat substitute; functional food; microencapsulation; preservatives; sensory improvement
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35268603 PMCID: PMC8912024 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27051499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Advantages and disadvantages of some common microencapsulation techniques.
| Microencapsulation Technique | Process | Advantages | Disadvantages | Representative References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spray drying | Drying of particles in suspension or in emulsion using hot air. The solution, emulsion or suspension is atomized in the equipment. | High production rates and efficiency | Not recommended for thermolabile compounds | [ |
| Complex coacervation | Combination of 2 polymers, such as protein and carbohydrate at specific pH value and proportion | Heat-resistant | Different forms depending on materials | [ |
| Encapsulation in cyclodextrins | Inclusion molecular complex in a cyclic oligosaccharide | Controlled release of actives | Expensive material | [ |
| Spray chilling | Microcapsule made up of lipids and the compound of interest, which are atomized in a cold chamber, leaving a solid particle | Low operation cost | Scaling parameters (melting, atomizer air temperature and pressure, cooling temperature, feed flow) | [ |
| Extrusion | Physical–mechanical process that involves the extrusion of the material through a nozzle | Cost-effective method | Different sized and shaped products | [ |
| Freeze drying | Freezing, sublimation (lyophilization) and desorption | Good option for temperature-sensitive compounds | Slow process | [ |
Examples of microencapsulation techniques and their application in food.
| Microencapsulation Technique and Conditions | Wall Material | Core Material | Food System Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spray drying (150 °C inlet temperature; feed flow 7 mL/min and airflow 40 m3/h) | Maltodextrin and gum Arabic (50:50, | Artemide black rice extract (polyphenols 122 ± 4.6 mg/g extract) | Biscuit (0.32% microcapsules in formulation, total polyphenols 975 ± 13 µg/g biscuit) | [ |
| Complex coacervation (Oil/water emulsion, 50 °C, pH 4, and lyophilized) | Gelatin and gum Arabic (1:3) | Omega-3 fish rich oil | Pomegranate juice (0.04, 0.07, 0.1% powder microcapsules, i.e., 50, 100 and 150 mg DHA + EPA/L) | [ |
| Modified solvent evaporation (mix solution of core and coat material, sonication at 5 °C with 5-s pulse rate for 15 min, spray in chilled alcohol, and later evaporation) | Gum Arabic, maltodextrin, modified starch (4:1:1) | Ferrous sulphate hepta hydrate | Fresh cow and buffalo milk (1:1), iron salt 25 ppm | [ |
| Coextrusion (coextrusion equipment with inner (150 µm) and outer nozzles (300 µm), vibration frequency of 300 Hz, pressure 600 mbar, and voltage of 1.5 kV) | Sodium alginate (1.5% | Ambarella juice (more than 107 CFU/mL) and oligofructose (4%) | [ | |
| Electrospray + mineralization + freeze drying (equipment with stainless steel sterile needle and aluminium plate with collector dish, voltage 7.5 kV, flow 15 mL/h, followed by the addition of (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane and tetramethyl orthosilicate) and freeze drying at −85 °C for 20 h. | Sodium alginate (1.0% | 5.2 × 106 CFU/mL in apple juice (pH 3.6) and 5.2 × 106 CFU/mL in beer (5 vt% alcohol content) | [ | |
| Liposomes + spray drying. Lecithin solution at high-pressure homogenization (25,000 psi) followed by deposition of chitosan layers. Spray dryer conditions: 90 °C outlet temperature, 160 °C inlet temperature, 2.5 cm3/min feed rate and 0.67 m3/min air flow | Lecithin (2% w/w) and | Sour cherry extract | Stirred-type yogurt (pH 4.5; 4 mg GAE/100 g) | [ |
| Spray chilling + spray drying or spray drying + spray chilling | Gum arabic and β-cyclodextrin (9:1 | Cakes (cream-filled, marmalade-filled, and chocolate-coated; around 1 and 4.3 Log CFU/g after baking) | [ |
DHA—docosahexaenoic acid; EPA—eicosapenta-enoic acid; GAE—gallic acid equivalents.
Figure 1Main applications of microcapsules in food.