| Literature DB >> 35268216 |
Isa Mohammed Alkali1,2, Suleiman Omeiza Asuku1, Martina Colombo2, Muhammad Modu Bukar1, Mohammed Ahmed Waziri1, Gaia Cecilia Luvoni2.
Abstract
Populations of many galliform species have declined mainly due to habitat loss and over-hunting, notably the Congo peacock, which has been classified as a vulnerable species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The domestic turkey, being a species of least concern, which has been reported to be closely related to peacocks, could serve as a model for the optimization of assisted reproductive technologies for the Congo peacock. This study was aimed at developing a suitable turkey semen extender for artificial insemination in field conditions. Semen was collected using the dorso-abdominal massage technique from seven turkey toms and analyzed. Ejaculates with >70% motility and >80% live spermatozoa were pooled and divided into four aliquots (four treatments). Each of the four treatments was extended in a soybean-based extender or an egg yolk-based extender, with or without L-ascorbic acid. Two liquid preservation protocols (ambient temperature (35 °C) and chilled (4 °C)) were employed, and quality parameters including motility, viability and morphology were evaluated. The results show that the two extenders were similar with regard to semen quality parameters, and L-ascorbic acid supplementation of the turkey semen extenders improved semen quality during liquid storage.Entities:
Keywords: L-ascorbic acid; ambient temperature; chilling temperature; domestic turkey; egg yolk; extender; peacock; soybean; spermatozoa
Year: 2022 PMID: 35268216 PMCID: PMC8909083 DOI: 10.3390/ani12050648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Motility (%) of turkey spermatozoa during 7 h of storage at ambient temperature.
| Treatment Hroups | Time (Hours) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Egg yolk based (EYR) | 84.0 ± 8.4 a | 74.0 ± 8.4 a | 69.5 ± 7.6 a | 54.0 ± 13.5 a | 43.0 ± 13.4 a | 26.0 ± 19.6 a | 16.6 ± 19.0 a | 7.0 ± 13.4 a |
| Soybean based (SBR) | 81.2 ± 5.2 a | 73.5 ± 8.2 a | 67.0 ± 9.8 a | 54.0 ± 10.8 a | 43.0 ± 11.6 a | 29.0 ± 12.9 a | 17.0 ± 10.6 a | 4.0 ± 7.0 a |
| EYR + L-ascorbic acid | 87.1 ± 5.1b | 80.0 ± 9.4 b | 71.0 ± 9.9 a | 59.0 ± 4.0 a | 47.0 ± 14.9 a | 35.0 ± 16.5 a | 22.0 ± 14.0 a | 11.0 ± 8.8 a |
| SBR + L-ascorbic acid | 86.8 ± 7.4 b | 80.0 ± 8.2 b | 68.0 ± 9.2 a | 54.0 ± 11.7 a | 43.0 ± 15.7 a | 31.0 ± 17.3 a | 17.0 ± 13.4 a | 7.0 ± 9.5 a |
The data provided in the table are percentages (%) of the mean motility ± SD of the pooled turkey ejaculates included in the study. Values in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Motility (%) of turkey spermatozoa over 24 h at 4 °C.
| Treatment Groups | Time (Hours) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 12 | 24 | |
| Egg yolk based (EYR) | 64.0 ± 9.7 a | 45.0 ± 15.1a | 30.5 ± 14.6 a |
| Soybean based (SBR) | 61.0 ± 12.9 a | 46.0 ± 17.8 a | 29.0 ± 20.4 a |
| EYR + L-ascorbic acid | 77.5 ± 4.3 b | 64.0 ± 5.2 b | 47.0 ± 7.5 b |
| SBR + L-ascorbic acid | 76.5 ± 4.7 b | 63.0 ± 8.2 b | 42.0 ± 12.3 b |
The data provided in the table are percentages (%) of the mean motility ± SD of the pooled turkey ejaculates included in the study. Values in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Viability (%) of turkey spermatozoa during 7 h of storage at ambient temperature.
| Treatment Groups | Time (Hours) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Egg yolk based (EYR) | 94.0 ± 2.6 a | 90.6 ± 2.6 a | 85.7 ± 5.3 a | 83.0 ± 6.0 a | 78.9 ± 6.3 a | 74.6 ± 9.1 a | 70.4 ± 9.1 a | 61.8 ± 16.4 a |
| Soybean based (SBR) | 92.5 ± 3.1 a | 88.8 ± 5.5 a | 87.2 ± 5.4 a | 82.5 ± 5.9 a | 80.9 ± 7.5 a | 75.7 ± 9.2 a | 70.9 ± 14.0 a | 63.4 ± 17.8 a |
| EYR + L-ascorbic acid | 99.5 ± 0.9 b | 99.3 ± 1.0 b | 95.4 ± 3.3 b | 91.3 ± 3.2 b | 90.3 ± 4.9 b | 85.2 ± 6.0 b | 79.9 ± 8.6 b | 74.7 ± 9.2 b |
| SBR + L-ascorbic acid | 99.4 ± 1.1 b | 99.2 ± 0.9 b | 95.8 ± 2.7 b | 93.3 ± 3.3 b | 90.3 ± 3.1 b | 85.8 ± 6.2 b | 80.9 ± 7.1 b | 74.2 ± 5.6 b |
The data provided in the table are percentages (%) of the mean viability ± SD of the pooled turkey ejaculates included in the study. Values in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Viability (%) of turkey spermatozoa over 24 h at 4 °C.
| Treatment Groups | Time (Hours) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 12 | 24 | |
| Egg yolk based (EYR) | 94.5 ± 2.6 a | 90.0 ± 5.7 a | 85.6 ± 5.8 b |
| Soybean based (SBR) | 94.9 ± 3.2 a | 91.4 ± 4.5 a | 89.5 ± 3.9 b |
| EYR + L-ascorbic acid | 97.9 ± 2.5 b | 94.0 ± 3.9 b | 88.5 ± 5.0 b |
| SBR + L-ascorbic acid | 97.9 ± 2.9 b | 94.1 ± 3.4 b | 89.7 ± 3.7 b |
The data provided in the table are percentages (%) of the mean viability ± SD of the pooled turkey ejaculates included in the study. Values in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Morphological defects (%) of turkey spermatozoa during 7 h of storage at ambient temperature.
| Treatment Groups | Time (Hours) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Egg yolk based (EYR) | 7.7 ± 3.7 a | 10.2 ± 3.1 a | 12.2 ± 4.0 a | 17.9 ± 5.7 a | 23.6 ± 7.3 a | 24.2 ± 6.0 a | 26.0 ± 6.1 a | 37.2 ± 9.9 a |
| Soybean based (SBR) | 6.9 ± 3.1 a | 8.0 ± 2.9 b | 9.0 ± 2.7 b | 15.9 ± 3.1 a | 21.2 ± 7.2 a | 23.5 ± 6.3 a | 27.2 ± 6.9 a | 35.8 ± 8.2 a |
| EYR + L-ascorbic acid | 2.5 ± 1.2 b | 4.4 ± 2.0 c | 5.8 ± 2.7 c | 7.4 ± 1.9 b | 9.5 ± 2.7 b | 12.2 ± 3.3 b | 15.0 ± 3.6 b | 17.6 ± 2.7 b |
| SBR + L-ascorbic acid | 2.3 ± 1.2 b | 2.6 ± 1.1 d | 4.3 ± 1.5 d | 6.2 ± 2.3 b | 8.4 ± 2.0 b | 10.4 ± 2.4 b | 12.7 ± 3.4 b | 15.2 ± 1.9 b |
The data provided in the table are percentages (%) of the mean morphological defects ± SD of the pooled turkey ejaculates included in the study. Values in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Morphological defects (%) of turkey spermatozoa over 24 h at 4 °C.
| Treatment Groups | Time (Hours) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 12 | 24 | |
| Egg yolk based (EYR) | 10.2 ± 3.7 a | 11.3 ± 2.8 a | 16.4 ± 2.2 a |
| Soybean based (SBR) | 7.9 ± 4.6 a | 12.8 ± 3.5 a | 20.1 ± 5.4 b |
| EYR + L-ascorbic acid | 3.9 ± 1.0 b | 7.3 ± 3.1 b | 10.2 ± 3.3 c |
| SBR + L-ascorbic acid | 3.6 ± 1.2 b | 6.3 ± 2.0 b | 9.5 ± 2.1 c |
The data provided in the table are percentages (%) of the mean morphological defects ± SD of the pooled turkey ejaculates included in the study. Values in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Proportions of different sperm morphological defects in different preservation conditions applied to turkey semen.
| Preservation | Acrosome | Percentage (%) | Mid-Piece | Tail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh semen | 0.0 a | 11.8 a | 44.4 a | 43.8 a |
| Ambient temperature | 1.5 a | 15.4 a | 19.2 b | 63.8 b |
| Chilled (4 °C) | 3.6 b | 17.0 a | 20.5 b | 58.9 c |
N = total number of morphological defects. Values in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).