| Literature DB >> 35268160 |
Erika Csányi1, Tamás Tari1, Sándor Németh2, Gyula Sándor1.
Abstract
Detailed animal movement analysis can help understand spatial population processes as the ultimate consequences of individual behaviour and ecological impacts. The mating strategy of mammalian herbivores is adapted to the distribution of females; thus, it is important to observe the activity of animals during a rut. In this paper, we used a new approach to examine the relationship between red deer stags' movement activity and the fertile period of hinds. We presumed a relationship between stags' daily activity changes and the period when hinds are in heat. We determined temporal conception trends, including the first and last conception dates in the examined population and the conception peak. In the same period, i.e., in the interval of major ecological significance when mating takes place, the activity of stags was analysed by GPS telemetry. The data collected in the examined period indicate that 60% of the hinds were conceived between 31 August and 19 September. We demonstrated that conception rates differed significantly between the first and second half of the rutting period. At the beginning of the reproductive cycle, the high number of hinds on heat (oestrus synchrony) increased the activity of stags (harem herding) compared to the pre-rutting period. As the mating season progressed, the movement activity of stags increased more (searching behaviour), induced by the decreasing number of fertile hinds. Therefore, we found that the oestrus of hinds significantly influenced the movement activity of stags in red deer.Entities:
Keywords: GPS telemetry; activity; conception; mating behaviour; red deer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35268160 PMCID: PMC8909082 DOI: 10.3390/ani12050591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Figure 1The number of conceptions of red deer hinds and activity trends of stags in the study period. The maximum activity saturation curve is smoothed by 7-day moving averages.
Figure 2Grouping of activity data according to the results of PCoA (a—Before Rut (BR), 1 August–30 August; b—First Half of Rut (FHR) 31 August–9 September; c—Second Half of Rut (SHR) 10 September–19 September; d—After Rut (AR), 20 September–29 October).
Figure 3Activity and conception index values in the different study periods (“Before Rut” (BR), 1 August–30 August; First Half of Rut (FHR) 31 August–9 September; Second Half of Rut (SHR) 10 September–19 September; After Rut (AR), 20 September–29 October).
The result of analysis of average daily activity.
| Average Daily Activity (Meter) | Tukey’s HSD Results | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR | FHR | SHR | AR | ||||||||
| Before Rut (BR) | 2403 | BR |
|
|
| ||||||
| First Half of Rut (FHR) | 4870 | FHR | 7.379 |
|
| ||||||
| Second Half of Rut (SHR) | 6638 | SHR | 18.55 | 9.123 |
| ||||||
| After the Rut (AR) | 3972 | AR | 10.4 | 0.5199 | 12.06 | ||||||
Tukey’s Q below the diagonal, p above the diagonal, * significant difference.
The result of analysis of conception index.
| Conception Index | χ2 Test Results | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR | FHR | SHR | AR | ||||||||
| Before Rut (BR) | 0.47 | BR |
|
|
| ||||||
| First Half of Rut (FHR) | 4.1 | FHR | 19.822 |
|
| ||||||
| Second Half of Rut (SHR) | 1.7 | SHR | 0.356 | 15.264 |
| ||||||
| After the Rut (AR) | 0.28 | AR | 0.424 | 1.546 | 25.2 | ||||||
χ2 below the diagonal, p above the diagonal, * significant difference.
The result of analysis of average movement range.
| Average Movement Range | Tukey’s HSD Results | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR | FHR | SHR | AR | ||||||||
| Before Rut (BR) | 67.7 | BR |
|
|
| ||||||
| First Half of Rut (FHR) | 176.7 | FHR | 1.516 |
|
| ||||||
| Second Half of Rut (SHR) | 757.4 | SHR | 9.597 | 6.598 |
| ||||||
| After the Rut (AR) | 265.8 | AR | 4.167 | 1.281 | 7.065 | ||||||
Tukey’s Q below the diagonal, p above the diagonal, * significant difference.
Figure 4Detected positions of four marked red deer stags (1–4) and their movement range calculated by the Kernel method in the main periods First Half of Rut (FHR) and Second Half of Rut (SHR).