| Literature DB >> 35268132 |
Anita Zaworska-Zakrzewska1, Małgorzata Kasprowicz-Potocka1, Klaudia Ciołek2, Ewa Pruszyńska-Oszmałek3, Kinga Stuper-Szablewska4, Andrzej Rutkowski1.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate how the extrusion of faba bean seeds (var. Albus) and/or the addition of protease to pigs' diets affected the animals' growth parameters, digestibility of nutrients, selected physiological parameters of the digestive tract, and biochemical blood parameters. A 28-day experiment was conducted on 32 pigs weighing 9 ± 0.2 kg. The animals were allocated to four treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with the main effects of extrusion (raw or extruded) and effects of protease supplementation (0 and 0.05%). Extrusion reduced the levels of neutral detergent fibre, trypsin inhibitor, phytate-P, and resistant starch but did not improve the digestibility of protein and dry matter in faba bean seeds. The pigs' growth performance, ileal digestibility, enzyme activity, and morphometric parameters of the ileum were not significantly affected by extrusion, except for a higher feed intake between the 15th and 28th day of the experiment. The protease supplementation gave comparable results as the diet without protease, except the feed conversion ratio (in the periods of 15-28th day and 0-28th day), which was higher than in the groups without protease. The extrusion and protease increased acetate and acetoacetate contents in the cecal digesta, but propionate, butyrate, and isovalerate concentrations in the digesta of the pigs in this group were lower. Thanks to protease supplementation, protein and oil levels in the diet were reduced, which cut the cost of feed mixtures. The extrusion and protease additive combined together did not improve the pigs' growth performance in this experiment.Entities:
Keywords: digestibility; extrusion; faba bean; pigs; protease; protein
Year: 2022 PMID: 35268132 PMCID: PMC8908839 DOI: 10.3390/ani12050563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
The chemical composition, anti-nutritional factors, and amino acid profile of raw and extruded faba bean seeds (n = 4).
| Item (% DM) | Faba Bean |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extrusion − | Extrusion + | ||
| Crude protein | 34.7 ± 1.6 | 32.7 ± 1.9 | NS |
| ADF | 11.8 ± 1.0 | 11.4 ± 0.9 | NS |
| NDF | 19.8 ± 1.4 | 12.9 ± 0.9 | ≤0.001 |
| Starch | 41.7 ± 4.2 | 41.1 ± 3.3 | NS |
| RS | 18.3 ± 0.6 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | ≤0.001 |
| Antinutritional factors | |||
| Oligosaccharides | 3.03 ± 0.2 | 3.01 ± 0.1 | NS |
| Tannins | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | NS |
| TIA | 0.060 ± 0.001 | 0.020 ± 0.001 | ≤0.001 |
| Phytic-P | 0.50 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.001 |
| Total NSP | 15.36 ± 0.93 | 15.21 ± 0.78 | NS |
| Essential amino acids (g/16g N) | |||
| Lysine | 5.3 ± 0.3 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | NS |
| Threonine | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | NS |
| Methionine | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | NS |
| Cysteine | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | NS |
| Isoleucine | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | NS |
| Valine | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.1 | NS |
| Leucine | 6.5 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | NS |
| Phenylalanine | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | NS |
| Histidine | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | NS |
| Arginine | 8.3 ± 0.5 | 8.2 ± 0.2 | NS |
| Glycine | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | NS |
| Non-essential amino acids (g/16g N) | |||
| Tyrosine | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | NS |
| Alanine | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | NS |
| Aspartic acid | 9.4 ± 0.5 | 9.4 ± 0.5 | NS |
| Glutamic acid | 16.9 ± 0.9 | 16.8 ± 1.0 | NS |
| Serine | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | NS |
| Proline | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | NS |
ADF—acid detergent fibre; NDF—neutral detergent fibre; RS—resistant starch; TIA—trypsin inhibitors; NSP—non-starch polysaccharides; p—significance at p ≤ 0.05. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. NS—insignificant.
The composition and content of nutrients in the experimental diets (%).
| Treatments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extrusion | − | − | + | + |
| Enzyme | − | + | − | + |
| Ingredients (%) | ||||
| Soybean meal | 16.300 | 12.600 | 16.300 | 12.600 |
| Faba bean | 9.100 | 9.100 | 9.100 | 9.100 |
| Wheat | 40.000 | 40.000 | 40.000 | 40.000 |
| Triticale | 28.065 | 32.715 | 28.065 | 32.715 |
| Premix 0.5% * | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 |
| Phosphate 1-Ca | 1.150 | 1.150 | 1.150 | 1.150 |
| Limestone | 0.850 | 0.850 | 0.850 | 0.850 |
| NaCl | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.350 |
| Rapeseed oil | 2.500 | 1.500 | 2.500 | 1.500 |
| L-Lysine HCl | 0.440 | 0.440 | 0.440 | 0.440 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.150 | 0.150 | 0.150 | 0.150 |
| DL-Tryptophan | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 |
| L-Threonine | 0.270 | 0.270 | 0.270 | 0.270 |
| TiO2 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.300 |
| Protease | − | 0.050 | − | 0.050 |
| Feed nutritional value (calculated) in dry matter | ||||
| Dry matter (%) | 88.60 | 88.92 | 89.10 | 89.49 |
| ME (MJ/kg) | 13.72 | 13.72 | 13.72 | 13.72 |
| CP% | 17.90 | 16.88 | 17.90 | 16.88 |
| Dig. CP% | 14.82 | 14.82 | 14.81 | 14.82 |
| Dig. Lys% | 1.150 | 1.150 | 1.150 | 1.150 |
| Dig. Met% | 0.363 | 0.363 | 0.363 | 0.363 |
| Dig. Trp% | 0.259 | 0.259 | 0.259 | 0.259 |
| Dig. Thr% | 0.722 | 0.722 | 0.722 | 0.722 |
| Ca% | 0.759 | 0.759 | 0.759 | 0.759 |
| P% | 0.654 | 0.654 | 0.654 | 0.654 |
| Dig. P% | 0.433 | 0.433 | 0.433 | 0.433 |
| Na% | 0.152 | 0.152 | 0.152 | 0.152 |
‘‘−’’—no treatment or enzyme supplementation; ‘‘+’’—treatment or enzyme supplementation. * The mineral and vitamin premix contained the following amounts of components per 1 kg: choline chloride—40,000 mg, Fe—15,000 mg, Cu—4000 mg, Co—60 mg, Mn—6000 mg, Zn—15,000 mg, I—120 mg, Se—30 mg, antioxidants (butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene); vitamin A—1,500,000 IU, vitamin D3—300,000 IU; vitamin E—10,500 mg, vitamin K3—220 mg, vitamin B1—220 mg, vitamin B2—600 mg, vitamin B6—450 mg, pantothenic acid—1500 mg, nicotinic acid—3000 mg, folic acid—300 mg, vitamin B12—3700 µg, biotin—15,000 µg, Ca—260 g; ME—metabolisable energy; CP—crude protein; Dig.P—digestible phosphorus, Dig.—digestible.
Body weight, body weight gain, daily weight gain, daily feed intake, and feed utilisation of pigs (n = 8).
| Extrusion | − | − | + | + |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protease | − | + | − | + |
| Extrusion | Protease | Interaction |
| IBW 0d (kg) | 9.36 | 9.43 | 9.29 | 9.64 | 0.960 | 0.885 | 0.666 | 0.773 |
| BW 14d (kg) | 14.14 | 13.86 | 14.00 | 14.50 | 0.908 | 0.703 | 0.870 | 0.551 |
| FBW 28d (kg) | 23.43 | 22.79 | 24.57 | 24.71 | 0.595 | 0.196 | 0.830 | 0.737 |
| DWG (kg/day) | ||||||||
| 0–14 days | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.804 | 0.593 | 0.741 | 0.453 |
| 15–28 days | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.325 | 0.078 | 0.613 | 0.998 |
| 0–28 days | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.325 | 0.084 | 0.580 | 0.766 |
| DFI (kg) | ||||||||
| 0–14 days | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.349 | 0.109 | 0.427 | 0.897 |
| 15–28 days | 1.05 | 1.12 | 1.22 | 1.27 | 0.203 | 0.048 | 0.420 | 0.892 |
| 0–28 days | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.220 | 0.055 | 0.429 | 0.894 |
| FCR (kg/kg) | ||||||||
| 0–14 days | 1.85 | 2.09 | 2.08 | 2.06 | 0.454 | 0.419 | 0.368 | 0.285 |
| 15–28 days | 1.58 | 1.78 | 1.63 | 1.76 | 0.223 | 0.863 | 0.045 | 0.651 |
| 0–28 days | 1.67 b | 1.87 a | 1.75 a,b | 1.83 a | 0.035 | 0.735 | 0.008 | 0.221 |
The results in the table are expressed as mean values; ‘‘−’’—no treatment or enzyme supplementation; ‘‘+’’—treatment or enzyme supplementation; IBW—initial body weight; BW—body weight on the 14th day; FBW—final body weight; DWG–daily weight gain; DFI—daily feed intake; FCR—feed conversion ratio; a,b—the means in the rows marked with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
The apparent ileal digestibility coefficients of crude protein and dry matter in the diets (n = 8).
| Extrusion | − | − | + | + |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protease | − | + | − | + |
| Extrusion | Protease | Interaction |
| Crude protein (%) | 73.64 | 72.74 | 74.20 | 74.81 | 0.797 | 0.391 | 0.784 | 0.784 |
| Dry matter (%) | 76.43 | 77.15 | 77.36 | 77.45 | 0.942 | 0.636 | 0.623 | 0.623 |
The results in the table are expressed as mean values; AID—apparent ileal digestibility; ‘‘−’’— no treatment or enzyme supplementation; ‘‘+’’—treatment or enzyme supplementation; p—significance at p ≤ 0.05.
The physical parameters of the liver, digesta pH, ammonia concentration, dry matter content, and viscosity in the ileum and cecum (n = 8).
| Extrusion | − | − | + | + |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protease | − | + | − | + |
| Extrusion | Protease | Interaction |
| Liver weight (g) | 735.33 | 748.00 | 757.67 | 831.00 | 0.439 | 0.248 | 0.343 | 0.501 |
| Liver/BWG ratio (kg/kg) | 0.032 | 0.031 | 0.032 | 0.030 | 0.828 | 0.756 | 0.417 | 0.756 |
| pH | ||||||||
| Ileum | 5.90 | 5.56 | 5.79 | 5.56 | 0.647 | 0.796 | 0.225 | 0.958 |
| Cecum | 5.16 b | 5.13 b | 5.42 a | 5.53 a | ≤0.001 | ≤0.001 | 0.509 | 0.430 |
| Ammonia (µmol/g digesta) | ||||||||
| Ileum | 13.81 | 15.71 | 11.96 | 11.18 | 0.443 | 0.144 | 0.791 | 0.529 |
| Cecum | 15.80 | 16.42 | 18.92 | 18.13 | 0.059 | 0.209 | 0.897 | 0.622 |
| Dry matter (%) | ||||||||
| Ileum | 12.28 a | 11.53 a,b | 10.66 b,c | 9.97 c | 0.02 | 0.004 | 0.161 | 0.958 |
| Cecum | 9.14 | 10.73 | 10.08 | 10.30 | 0.605 | 0.763 | 0.298 | 0.430 |
| Viscosity (cP) | ||||||||
| Ileum | 1.11 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.19 | 0.758 | 0.702 | 0.553 | 0.423 |
The results in the table are expressed as mean values; ‘‘−’’—no treatment or enzyme supplementation; ‘‘+’’—treatment or enzyme supplementation; BWG—body weight gain; a,b,c—the means in the rows marked with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
The concentration of short-chain fatty acids (µmol/g digesta) in the pigs’ cecal digesta (n = 8).
| Extrusion | − | − | + | + |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protease | − | + | − | + |
| Extrusion | Protease | Interaction |
| Acetic acid | 55.17 b | 57.88 a,b | 58.65 a | 59.68 a | 0.033 | 0.016 | 0.085 | 0.475 |
| Propionic acid | 27.17 a | 23.55 b | 23.15 b | 21.00 b | ≤0001 | ≤0.0001 | 0.003 | 0.376 |
| Isobutyric acid | 2.75 | 2.70 | 1.90 | 1.80 | 0.396 | 0.094 | 0.882 | 0.960 |
| Butyric acid | 10.50 a | 8.70 b | 6.18 c | 4.73 d | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | 0.643 |
| Isovaleric acid | 1.75 a | 0.70 b | 0.62 b | 0.35 b | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | 0.072 |
| Valeric acid | 2.82 a | 1.55 b | 1.08 b | 3.37 a | ≤0.0001 | 0.901 | 0.140 | ≤0.0001 |
| Acetoacetic acid | 0.00 c | 5.20 b | 8.58 a | 9.35 a | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | 0.011 | 0.060 |
The results in the table are expressed as mean values; ‘‘−’’—no treatment or enzyme supplementation; ‘‘+’’—treatment or enzyme supplementation; a,b,c,d—the means in the rows marked with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1Enzyme activity (U/mg protein) in the pigs’ duodenum (n = 8). The effect of extrusion treatment and protease supplementation on amylase (A), lipase (B), trypsin (C), chymotrypsin (D), and maltase (E) activity in the duodenum content. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; ‘‘E−’’—no treatment; “P−“—“—no enzyme supplementation; ‘‘E+’’—treatment; “P+”–enzyme supplementation.
The morphometric parameters of the pigs’ ileum (n = 8).
| Extrusion | − | − | + | + |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protease | − | + | − | + |
| Extrusion | Protease | Interaction |
| Villus length (µm) | 413.31 | 449.51 | 393.18 | 409.08 | 0.707 | 0.393 | 0.462 | 0.773 |
| Villus width (µm) | 104.99 | 108.73 | 104.24 | 105.04 | 0.911 | 0.649 | 0.643 | 0.764 |
| Crypt depth (µm) | 160.47 | 163.43 | 168.16 | 166.07 | 0.901 | 0.506 | 0.956 | 0.744 |
| Villus/crypt ratio | 2.56 | 2.77 | 2.35 | 2.49 | 0.562 | 0.250 | 0.420 | 0.875 |
The results in the table are expressed as mean values; ‘‘−’’—no treatment or enzyme supplementation; ‘‘+’’—treatment or enzyme supplementation; p—significance at p ≤ 0.05.
The pigs’ blood biochemical indexes (n = 8).
| Extrusion | − | − | + | + |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protease | − | + | − | + |
| Extrusion | Protease | Interaction |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 61.10 b | 59.19 b | 69.86 a | 63.80 a,b | 0.030 | 0.013 | 0.122 | 0.424 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 76.94 | 80.71 | 85.39 | 73.52 | 0.270 | 0.886 | 0.358 | 0.082 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 91.13 | 84.90 | 92.33 | 87.95 | 0.658 | 0.644 | 0.253 | 0.841 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 2.96 | 2.89 | 3.11 | 2.92 | 0.329 | 0.315 | 0.156 | 0.524 |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 4.75 | 4.69 | 4.69 | 4.54 | 0.335 | 0.411 | 0.400 | 0.687 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 5.17 c | 7.21 b | 8.72 a,b | 9.31 a | ≤0.001 | 0.001 | 0.058 | 0.284 |
| AST (IU/L) | 28.88 | 27.84 | 30.5 | 33.59 | 0.515 | 0.205 | 0.719 | 0.474 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 88.17 | 91.72 | 91.58 | 102.38 | 0.591 | 0.367 | 0.358 | 0.640 |
| GGT (IU/L) | 14.37 a | 9.21 a,b | 4.79 c | 10.32 a,b | 0.043 | 0.069 | 0.935 | 0.024 |
| LDH (IU/L) | 283.21 | 286.67 | 283.21 | 306.86 | 0.711 | 0.551 | 0.424 | 0.551 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.890 | 0.581 | 0.581 | 0.999 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 16.26 | 15.16 | 17.58 | 15.00 | 0.370 | 0.616 | 0.119 | 0.524 |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 34.8 | 32.44 | 37.62 | 32.01 | 0.370 | 0.616 | 0.119 | 0.524 |
The results in the table are expressed as mean values; ‘‘−’’—no treatment or enzyme supplementation; ‘‘+’’—treatment or enzyme supplementation; TG—triglycerides; ALT—alanine aminotransferase; AST—aspartate aminotransferase; ALP—alkaline phosphatases; GGT—gamma-glutamyl transferase; LDH—lactate dehydrogenase; BUN—blood urea nitrogen; a,b,c—the means in the rows marked with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.