| Literature DB >> 35267822 |
Manuel Patricio da Silva Bisneto1, Julia Rocha Gouveia1, Leonardo Dalseno Antonino1, Lara Basílio Tavares1, Nathalie Minako Ito1, Demetrio Jackson Dos Santos1,2.
Abstract
Polypropylene (PP) is a multifunctional and widely applied polymer. Nevertheless, its low energy surface and poor adhesion are well-known and might impair some prospective applications. Aiming to overcome these limitations, PP composites can be applied as a tool to enhance PP surface energy and then increase its practical adhesion. In this work, Kraft lignin (KL) was chemically modified and blended with PP. In short, KL was hydroxypropylated and further reacted with acetic anhydride (A-oxi-KL) or maleic anhydride (M-oxi-KL). Lignin modifications were confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). PP-composites with different lignin contents, as well as pristine PP, were characterized in terms of their thermal behavior, morphology, surface energy, and practical adhesion by DSC, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), contact angle measurement, and peeling tests, respectively. Lignin incorporation did not affect the PP degree of crystallization. The lignin modifications led to a better compatibility with the PP matrix and surface energies up to 86% higher than neat PP. Increases of up to 66% in the peel strength were verified. Composites with M-oxi-KL showed the best adhesion performance, confirming the lignin functionalization is an efficient approach to improve the practical adhesion of PP films.Entities:
Keywords: lignin; practical adhesion; surface energy; wettability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35267822 PMCID: PMC8912489 DOI: 10.3390/polym14050999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Chemical reactions employed in the lignin modification: (a) Hydroxypropylation with propylene oxide; (b) Esterification with maleic anhydride; and (c) Acetylation with acetic anhydride.
Sample nomenclatures and compositions.
| Name | PP (%) | KL (%) | A-oxy-KL (%) | M-oxy-KL (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP | 100 | - | - | - |
| PP_KL_1 | 99 | 1 | - | - |
| PP_KL_2.5 | 97.5 | 2.5 | - | - |
| PP_KL_5 | 95 | 5.0 | - | - |
| PP_A_ Oxi_KL_1 | 99 | - | 1 | - |
| PP_A_Oxi_KL_2.5 | 97.5 | - | 2.5 | - |
| PP_A_Oxi_KL_5 | 95 | - | 5.0 | - |
| PP_M_Oxi_KL_1 | 99 | - | - | 1 |
| PP_M_Oxi_KL_2.5 | 97.5 | - | - | 2.5 |
| PP_M_Oxi_KL_5 | 95 | - | - | 5.0 |
Surface tension energy of the test liquids [7].
| Surface Tension | Water | Diiodomethane |
|---|---|---|
| Total (mN/m) | 72.8 | 50.8 |
| Polar (mN/m) | 51.0 | 0 |
| Disperse (mN/m) | 21.8 | 50.8 |
Figure 2Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of KL, A-oxy-KL and M-oxy-KL. (a) 3800–2600; (b) 1800–800.
Figure 3(a) Heat flow evolution with temperature of pristine lignin (KL) and its derivatives (A-oxy-KL and M-oxy-KL) (b) Weight loss (%) (left axis) and derivative of weight loss (right axis) curves of pristine lignin (KL) and its derivatives (A-oxy-KL and M-oxy-KL). Insert: zoom on the 40 to 100 °C range to highlight the differences in moisture loss.
Peak temperatures (°C) of the main thermal events observed during the cooling and second heating scan. The final column shows the crystallinity degree (χ %), obtained from the melting peak of the second heating scan.
| Sample | Tg (°C) | Tc (°C) | Tm (°C) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP | −13.24 | 130.76 | 165.1 | 9.86 |
| PP_KL_1 | −12.94 | 126.53 | 164.1 | 9.73 |
| PP_KL_2.5 | −13.04 | 128.50 | 163.8 | 9.89 |
| PP_KL_5 | −13.13 | 122.91 | 164.6 | 9.59 |
| PP_A_ Oxy_KL_1 | −12.35 | 130.86 | 164.2 | 10.16 |
| PP_A_Oxy_KL_2.5 | −12.45 | 126.22 | 163.5 | 9.71 |
| PP_A_Oxy_KL_5 | −12.15 | 126.22 | 164.0 | 9.96 |
| PP_M_Oxy_KL_1 | −13.13 | 124.10 | 164.2 | 9.54 |
| PP_M_Oxy_KL_2.5 | −13.04 | 131.81 | 164.3 | 10.02 |
| PP_M_Oxy_KL_5 | −12.84 | 126.62 | 164.2 | 9.78 |
Figure 4Heat flow evolution with temperature for pristine PP and PP/lignin and its derivative composites during (a) the second heating scan, featuring the glass transition and the melting peak, and (b) the cooling scan, featuring the crystallization peak.
Figure 5Cross-section scanning electron micrographs of pristine PP and PP composites contaning 5 wt% of lignin: (a) pristine PP; (b) PP/KL composite; (c) PP/A-Oxy-KL; (d) PP/M-Oxy-KL.
Contact angles for water and diiodomethane on PP and PP-lignin films.
| Sample | Water (°) | Diiodomethane (°) |
|---|---|---|
| PP | 78.17 | 36.87 |
| PP_KL_1 | 66.12 | 30.52 |
| PP_KL_2.5 | 63.25 | 33.82 |
| PP_KL_5 | 60.12 | 38.89 |
| PP_A_Oxi_KL_1 | 63.21 | 30.15 |
| PP_A_Oxi_KL_2.5 | 60.02 | 35.09 |
| PP_A_Oxi_KL_5 | 58.36 | 33.95 |
| PP_M_Oxi_KL_1 | 58.02 | 32.71 |
| PP_M_Oxi_KL_2.5 | 55.89 | 31.64 |
| PP_M_Oxi_KL_5 | 52.61 | 26.78 |
Figure 6Calculated surface energies of the PP and PP-lignin films. The surface free energy of the PP film without any lignin is represented as a black line for all lignin content % for comparison purposes.
Average peel strength of BOPP/PP and BOPP/PP-Lignin adhesively bonded joints.
| Sample | Average Peel Strength (N/m) |
|---|---|
| PP | 27.20 ± 0.84 |
| PP_KL_1 | 28.72 |
| PP_KL_2.5 | 29.15 |
| PP_KL_5 | 30.78 |
| PP_A_ Oxi_KL_1 | 35.26 |
| PP_A_Oxi_KL_2.5 | 37.68 |
| PP_A_Oxi_KL_5 | 39.58 |
| PP_M_Oxi_KL_1 | 39.74 |
| PP_M_Oxi_KL_2.5 | 42.80 |
| PP_M_Oxi_KL_5 | 45.15 |
Figure 7Proposed adhesion mechanism between PP-lignin composites and the adhesive.