| Literature DB >> 35267743 |
Abstract
The synergistic effect of applying hybrid nanoparticles in improving the fatigue property of fiber reinforced polymer composites has rarely been explored before. Hence the monotonic and fatigue flexure properties of the carbon fiber reinforced epoxy laminates with matrix modified by multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets were experimentally studied herein. The nanofiller ratio applied in the matrix modification was considered as a variable in the experimental program to investigate the effect of nanofiller ratio on the studied mechanical properties. A synergistic index has been employed to evaluate the synergistic effect of hybrid nanoparticles on the studied properties successfully. Experimental results show that the laminates with matrix modified under a nanofiller ratio (multiwalled carbon nanotube: graphene nanoplatelet) of 9:1 have the higher monotonic and fatigue strengths than those modified under other nanofiller ratios. The monotonic flexural strength and fatigue limit of the specimens modified under a nanofiller ratio of 9:1 are higher than the neat laminate specimens by 9.3 and 11.0%, respectively. The fatigue limits of the studied nano-modified laminates increase with the static strengths. Adding hybrid nanoparticles under proper nanofiller ratios in the matrix can suppress the degradation of the stiffness, further increase the resistance to fatigue damage. Examining the fracture surfaces of fatigued specimens reveals that the pullout/bridging effects of carbon nanotubes and the crack deflection effect of graphene nanoplatelets are the main reinforcement mechanisms in enhancing the fatigue strength of the composites.Entities:
Keywords: bridging effect; carbon fiber reinforced epoxy laminate; crack deflection effect; flexural fatigue strength; flexural monotonic strength; graphene nanoplatelet (GNP); multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT); synergistic effect
Year: 2022 PMID: 35267743 PMCID: PMC8912328 DOI: 10.3390/polym14050918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Specifications of the materials used in this study.
| Reinforcement | Matrix | Nanofillers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Fabric | Epoxy | MWCNT | GNP |
| Fiber count in tow: 12 K | Bisphenol A type | Diameter: ~9.5 nm | Diameter: ~5 µm |
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the procedure for specimen preparation.
Figure 2Photograph of all types of Cf/Ep specimens with matrix modified under various nanofiller ratios.
Figure 3FT-IR spectra for all types of Cf/Ep specimens with matrix modified under different nanofiller ratios.
Figure 4Setup of the three-point flexural test.
Figure 5Relationships between the applied loads and the displacements of the loading roller obtained in the monotonic flexural tests.
Experimental results of the flexural monotonic tests for the Cf/Ep laminate specimens with matrix modified under various MWCNT:GNP ratios.
| Nanofiller Ratios | Flexural Modulus | Flexural Strength |
|---|---|---|
| 0:0 | 76.57 ± 0.85 | 803.7 ± 13.5 |
| 10:0 | 79.64 ± 0.46 | 849.9 ± 3.3 |
| 0:10 | 78.16 ± 1.61 | 825.5 ± 1.9 |
| 5:5 | 76.98 ± 1.05 | 839.9 ± 11.3 |
| 9:1 | 79.70 ± 0.96 | 878.5 ± 14.2 |
| 1:9 | 78.29 ± 0.40 | 848.8 ± 4.0 |
Figure 6Variations of (a) flexural moduli and (b) strengths of the studied specimens with the MWCNT:GNP ratios applied in the preparation of matrix modification.
Figure 7Variations of synergistic index of (a) flexural moduli and (b) flexural strengths with the applied nanofiller ratios of hybrid-nano-Cf/Ep laminates.
Figure 8Edge views of the static-failed Cf/Ep specimens with matrix modified under different nanofiller ratios.
Experimental results of the flexural fatigue tests for the Cf/Ep laminate specimens with matrix modified under various MWCNT:GNP ratios.
| Nanofiller Ratio | Loading Level | Fatigue Life | Fatigue Strength | Fatigue Strength | Coefficient of Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0:0 | 80 | >1,000,000, >1,000,000, >1,000,000 | 845.6 | −0.021 | 0.96 |
| 82.5 | 98,449, 157,430, 87,937 | ||||
| 85 | 13,858, 10,041, 13,245 | ||||
| 90 | 3002, 3152, 3548 | ||||
| 95 | 200, 179, 197 | ||||
| 10:0 | 80 | >1,000,000, >1,000,000, >1,000,000 | 917.0 | −0.022 | 0.99 |
| 82.5 | 156,454, 175,215, 125,986 | ||||
| 85 | 35,017, 33,285, 40,137 | ||||
| 90 | 4863, 3468, 4862 | ||||
| 95 | 313, 354, 314 | ||||
| 0:10 | 80 | 1,000,000, 1,000,000, 500,484 | 909.8 | −0.024 | 0.98 |
| 82.5 | 156,606, 109,653, 146,599 | ||||
| 85 | 39,818, 23,845, 40,339 | ||||
| 90 | 4034, 4269, 4475 | ||||
| 95 | 622, 580, 600 | ||||
| 5:5 | 80 | >1,000,000, >1,000,000, >1,000,000 | 906.1 | −0.022 | 0.99 |
| 82.5 | 218,020, 208,795, 197,017 | ||||
| 85 | 48,388, 40,896, 32,602 | ||||
| 90 | 6015, 5683, 5503 | ||||
| 95 | 390, 250, 360 | ||||
| 9:1 | 80 | >1,000,000, >1,000,000, 899,403 | 977.9 | −0.024 | 0.99 |
| 82.5 | 229,099, 275,826, 127,150 | ||||
| 85 | 68,521, 66,892, 60,159 | ||||
| 90 | 7848, 7260, 6432 | ||||
| 95 | 752, 646, 751 | ||||
| 1:9 | 80 | 518,803, >1,000,000, 625,264 | 919.6 | −0.022 | 0.99 |
| 82.5 | 213,637, 210,586, 220,651 | ||||
| 85 | 39,594, 28,953, 41,634 | ||||
| 90 | 5680, 4064, 4752 | ||||
| 95 | 295, 362, 301 |
Figure 9Relationship between the maximum applied flexural stress and the fatigue lives for the Cf/Ep laminate specimens with matrix modified under various nanofiller ratios.
Figure 10Relationship between the applied loading levels and the fatigue lives for the Cf/Ep laminate specimens with matrix modified under various nanofiller ratios.
Figure 11Variation of fatigue strengths at (a) 103, (b) 104, (c) 105, and (d) 106 cycles with the nanofiller ratios applied in the matrix modification of the studied Cf/Ep laminate specimens.
Figure 12Variations of synergistic indices of the fatigue strength at (a) 103, (b) 104, (c) 105, and (d) 106 cycles with the nanofiller ratios applied in the matrix modification of the studied Cf/Ep laminate specimens.
Figure 13Relationship between the pseudo endurance limits and monotonic flexural strengths of the Cf/Ep laminates with matrix modified under various nanofiller ratios.
Figure 14Variations of normalized stiffness with the applied cycle ratios for the Cf/Ep laminate specimens with matrix modified under various nanofiller ratios.
Figure 15Representative variations of normalized mean displacements with the applied cycle ratios for the studied Cf/Ep laminate specimens with matrix modified under various nanofiller ratios.
Figure 16Edge views of the fatigue-failed Cf/Ep specimens with matrix modified under different nanofiller ratios.
Figure 17Schematic illustration of (a) fracture mechanisms of the neat Cf/Ep laminates subjected to cyclic flexural loading; (b) reinforcement mechanisms provided by the nanoparticles on the fatigue flexural strength of the hybrid nano-Cf/Ep laminates.
Figure 18(a) Fiber/matrix debonding observed on the fracture surface of the laminate specimen with neat epoxy matrix; (b) pullout and bridging effects of MWCNTs observed on the fracture surface of the laminate specimen with matrix modified under a MWCNT:GNP ratio of 5:5; (c) ripple-like fracture surface of the laminate specimen with matrix modified under a MWCNT:GNP ratio of 1:9; (d) crack deflection observed on the fracture surface of the laminate specimen with matrix modified under a MWCNT:GNP of 9:1.