| Literature DB >> 35267688 |
Saoussen Zannen1, Mohamed Taher Halimi2, Mohamed Ben Hassen1,3, Emad Hashim Abualsauod3, Asem Majed Othman4.
Abstract
A Posidonia oceanica waste marine plant was used to produce a wet-laid nonwoven web for multifunction applications. To study the effect of some parameters related to the web characteristics (sheet weight, binder ratio, and pulp ratio) on the mechanical and physical properties of the web, we used a Box-Behnken design plan with three levels. The diagram of the superposed contours graphic method was used to find the optimum parameters of the process for the application of the Posidonia nonwoven fiber on an insulation field. With the measurement of the thermal conductivity properties using the box method, the results demonstrated that the nonwoven fiber from Posidonia oceanica marine waste had good insulation properties in comparison with other classical natural fibers (hemp, flax) used in the field of insulation with the big advantage of being a natural product.Entities:
Keywords: Box–Behnken design; Posidonia oceanica fiber; insulation; thermal conductivity; wet-laid nonwoven
Year: 2022 PMID: 35267688 PMCID: PMC8912526 DOI: 10.3390/polym14050865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Characteristics of the nonwoven component.
| Component | Average Length (mm) | Average Diameter (µm) | Crystallinity Index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical fiber | 5 | 165.54 | 31.19 |
| Pulp | 0.5 | 20.35 | 49.91 |
Figure 1Wet nonwoven machine: Sheet Maker.
Figure 2Wet-laid nonwoven Posidonia fiber.
Figure 3Measurement of the thermal conductivity properties.
Levels of the Box–Behnken design.
| Levels | |
|---|---|
| Factors | −1 0 1 |
| Sheet weight (g/m2) | 15 22.5 30 |
| Percentage of binder (%) | 5 10 15 |
| Percentage of pulp (%) | 10 15 20 |
Absolute and normalized values of the operational variables.
| Test | S.W (g/m2) | B (%) | P (%) | XS.W | XB | XP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.0 | 15 | 15 | −1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 | 22.5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 22.5 | 5 | 10 | 0 | −1 | −1 |
| 4 | 22.5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 30.0 | 5 | 15 | 1 | −1 | 0 |
| 6 | 15.0 | 10 | 20 | −1 | 0 | 1 |
| 7 | 30.0 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 22.5 | 5 | 20 | 0 | −1 | 1 |
| 9 | 30.0 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 0 | −1 |
| 10 | 15.0 | 5 | 15 | −1 | −1 | 0 |
| 11 | 22.5 | 15 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 12 | 22.5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | 22.5 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 1 | −1 |
| 14 | 30.0 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | 15 | 10 | 10 | −1 | 0 | −1 |
Values of the coefficients for the different dependent variables.
| Coefficients and Statistical | Air Permeability | Strength at Break | Elongation |
|---|---|---|---|
| parameters | (−l L/m2/s) | (N) | (%) |
| b0 | 404.2 | 137.2 | 0.828 |
| b1 | −319.8 | 41.32 | 0.204 |
| b2 | −225.6 | 32.90 | −0.874 |
| b3 | −180.8 | −3.70 | −0.150 |
| b11 | 140.0 | −28.21 | 0.631 |
| b22 | 220.3 | −68.61 | 0.381 |
| b33 | −153.2 | −13.29 | −0.009 |
| b12 | −170.9 | +23.21 | 0.121 |
| b13 | 288.7 | −33.75 | 0.300 |
| b23 | 79.7 | −14.88 | −0.127 |
| R2 | 0.9430 | 0.969 | 0.791 |
Analysis of variance.
| Air Permeability (L/m2/s) | Strength at Break (N) | Elongation (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF | F | P | DF | F | P | DF | F | P | |
| S.W | 1 | 29.18 | 0.003 | 1 | 43.39 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.70 | 0.440 |
| P | 1 | 9.33 | 0.028 | 1 | 27.51 | 0.581 | 1 | 0.38 | 0.566 |
| B | 1 | 14.52 | 0.012 | 1 | 0.35 | 0.003 | 1 | 12.85 | 0.016 |
| S.W × P | 1 | 11.89 | 0.018 | 1 | 14.47 | 0.013 | 1 | 0.76 | 0.424 |
| S.W × B | 1 | 4.17 | 0.097 | 1 | 6.85 | 0.047 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.74 |
| P × B | 1 | 0.91 | 0.385 | 1 | 2.81 | 0.154 | 1 | 0.14 | 0.728 |
| S.W × S.W | 1 | 2.58 | 0.169 | 1 | 9.33 | 0.028 | 1 | 3.10 | 0.139 |
| P × P | 1 | 3.09 | 0.139 | 1 | 2.07 | 0.210 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.980 |
| B × B | 1 | 6.39 | 0.053 | 1 | 55.20 | 0.001 | 1 | 1.13 | 0.337 |
Figure 4Main effects plot for air permeability.
Figure 5Main effects plot for strength at break.
Figure 6Main effects plot for elongation at break.
Figure 7Diagram of the superposed contours.
Properties of the nonwovens obtained by the wet process under optimal manufacturing conditions.
| Properties | Optimal |
|---|---|
| Nonwoven Air permeability (L/m2/s) | 581.5 ± 34.12 |
| Tensile strength (N) | 80.65 ± 8.34 |
| Elongation (%) | 1.75 ± 0.15 |
Thermal conductivity of Posidonia fibers, nonwovens, and other materials [20,21,22,23,24].
| Material | Thermal Conductivity |
|---|---|
| Posidonia fiber | 0.038 ± 0.002 |
| Optimum Wet laid Nonwoven | 0.0291 ± 0.0016 |
| The air | From 0.024 to 0.026 |
| Polyurethane | 0.028 |
| Hemp | From 0.04 to 0.06 |
| Flax | From 0.04 to 0.046 |
| Mineral wool | 0.04 |
| Vermiculite | 0.058 |
| Perlite | 0.065 |
| Wood and derivatives | From 0.12 to 0.17 |
| Glass | 1 |
| Reinforced concrete | 1.7 |
| Natural stones | From 1.4 to 2.91 |
Figure 8Cross-sectional view of a raw Posidonia technical fiber.