| Literature DB >> 35267331 |
Liangyi Li1,2,3, Wenhua Zhou1,2,3, Anqi Wu1,2,3, Xin Qian1,2,3, Le Xie1,2,3, Xiaojie Zhou1,2,3, Lin Zhang1,2,3.
Abstract
Effects of ginkgo biloba powder (GBP) on the chemical, physicochemical properties and quality of dough and fresh wet noodles were investigated. Lower contents of gluten and starch, and higher contents of fibre, amylose and flavonoids in GBP than wheat flour, were detected. Water absorption of dough increased and the development time and stability time of dough were decreased with GBP addition. Meanwhile, the pasting properties results showed that the addition of GBP reduced the aging degree of starch and improved the thermal stability of dough. Scanning electron microscopy results showed that addition of GBP smoothed the surface of raw noodles while increasing the hole size of the cooked noodles. With increased GBP addition (0~40%), the chewiness and extensibility of the fresh wet noodles increased significantly (p < 0.05), and the sensory scores changed, ascending from 0~20% substitution, and then descending from 20~40% substitution. The digestibility and estimated glycemic index (eGI) values of the GBP fresh wet noodles decreased significantly (p < 0.05). In general, 20% GBP addition could improve the chewiness, extensibility, taste and nutrition of fresh wet noodles, and decrease the digestibility and eGI values of noodles. Thus, GBP has potential for application in the noodle industry.Entities:
Keywords: fresh wet noodles; ginkgo biloba; microstructure; rheological properties; textural properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 35267331 PMCID: PMC8909626 DOI: 10.3390/foods11050698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Sensory evaluation standard of GBN.
| Item | Full Score/Score | Marking Criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Color | 10 | Deep colour and bright 8–10; Light yellow and less bright 5–7; Light yellow 1–4 |
| Appearance | 10 | Smooth and irregular shape 8–10; Less smooth and in shape 5–7; Rough and unshaped 1–4 |
| Palatability | 20 | Suitable hardness 17–20; Harder or softer 12–16; Over-hard or soft 1–12 |
| Toughness | 25 | Elastic 21–25; Poor elasticity 16–20; Worse elasticity 11–15; Worst elasticity 1–10 |
| Viscosity | 25 | Non-sticky 21–25; Less sticky 16–20; Sticky hair 10–15; Very sticky 1–10 |
| Smoothness | 5 | Smooth 5; Less smooth 3–4; Coarse 1–2 |
| Flavor | 5 | Ginkgo flavor 5; Non-smell 3–4; Smell 1–2 |
| Total score | 100 | Refined grade wheat flour products score ≥ 85; ordinary wheat flour products score ≥ 75 |
Main chemical compositions of GBP/wheat flour mixtures.
| Item | 0% | 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 13.65 ± 0.44 a | 12.94 ± 0.09 b | 12.31 ± 0.04 c | 11.91 ± 0.06 d | 11.57 ± 0.12 d | 10.20 ± 0.11 e |
| Protein | 17.41 ± 0.41 a | 16.55 ± 0.08 b | 16.39 ± 0.08 b | 15.67 ± 0.10 c | 15.34 ± 0.12 c | 13.75 ± 0.10 d |
| Total sugar | 656.61 ± 1.37 a | 654.32 ± 0.56 b | 651.95 ± 0.85 c | 649.24 ± 0.65 d | 646.62 ± 0.92 e | 639.23 ± 0.71 fc |
| Starch | 63.59 ± 0.24 a | 60.73 ± 0.57 b | 57.30 ± 0.74 c | 54.68 ± 0.41 d | 52.20 ± 0.35 e | 34.83 ± 0.52 f |
| Amylose | 118.45 ± 2.00 f | 150.21 ± 7.22 e | 177.56 ± 1.77 d | 207.71 ± 2.31 c | 229.77 ± 0.55 b | 321.46 ± 3.33 a |
| Gluten | 32.39 ± 0.49 a | 29.31 ± 0.36 b | 23.80 ± 0.27 c | 19.94 ± 0.43 d | 15.82 ± 0.34 e | - |
| Fibre(mg/g) | 0.87 ± 0.01 f | 0.93 ± 0.01 e | 1.03 ± 0.03 d | 1.11 ± 0.02 c | 1.17 ± 0.01 b | 1.56 ± 0.04 a |
| Total flavonoids | - | 0.29 ± 0.02 e | 0.51 ± 0.03 d | 0.78 ± 0.03 c | 0.97 ± 0.02 b | 2.00 ± 0.05 a |
| Ginkgolic acid | - | 0.28 ± 0.03 e | 0.40 ± 0.02 d | 0.69 ± 0.04 c | 0.82 ± 0.04 b | 2.06 ± 0.09 a |
Note: means with different small letter superscripts within the same line are significantly different at p < 0.05. “-” indicates that the substance was not detected.
Farinograph properties of GBP/wheat flour mixtures.
| Sample | Water Absorption | Dough Development Time | Dough Stability Time | Mixing Tolerance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 53.94 ± 0.39 e | 0.92 ± 0.06 b | 3.55 ± 0.05 a | 231.31 ± 15.06 d |
| 10% | 54.9 ± 0.76 d | 1.03 ± 0.05 ab | 1.20 ± 0.14 b | 399.83 ± 14.69 c |
| 20% | 55.57 ± 0.40 c | 1.10 ± 0.14 a | 1.07 ± 0.12 bc | 426.50 ± 22.48 c |
| 30% | 57.08 ± 0.20 b | 1.17 ± 0.12 a | 0.93 ± 0.17 bc | 519.80 ± 12.25 b |
| 40% | 58.00 ± 0.17 a | 1.20 ± 0.28 a | 0.80 ± 0.08 c | 579.80 ± 14.72 a |
Note: means with different small letter superscripts within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Pasting properties of GBP/wheat flour mixtures.
| Sample | Peak Viscosity | Trough Viscosity | Breakdown | Final Viscosity | Setback |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 2621.00 ± 60.83 a | 1943.33 ± 69.81 a | 677.67 ± 11.90 a | 3091.67 ± 66.38 a | 1148.33 ± 46.02 a |
| 10% | 1997.00 ± 40.42 b | 1404.33 ± 20.43 b | 592.67 ± 30.92 b | 2470.00 ± 46.61 b | 1065.67 ± 34.34 b |
| 20% | 1762.05 ± 69.90 c | 1265.00 ± 44.86 c | 497.00 ± 25.39 c | 2226.67 ± 70.48 c | 961.67 ± 28.69 c |
| 30% | 1414.67 ± 40.89 d | 1001.33 ± 31.37 d | 413.33 ± 10.21 d | 1835.00 ± 67.94 d | 833.67 ± 36.57 d |
| 40% | 1268.67 ± 42.60 e | 894.67 ± 29.91 e | 374.00 ± 12.96 d | 1693.33 ± 49.09 e | 798.67 ± 19.60 d |
Note: means with different small letter superscripts within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Effects of wheat flour supplemented with different contents of GBP on dynamic rheological properties of dough. Storage moduli (G′) (A) and loss moduli (G″) (B).
Effect of different levels of GBP on power-law model parameters in dough frequency scan tests.
| Sample | G′ = K′ × Wn′ | G″ = K″ × Wn″ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K′ (Pa sn′) | n′ | R21 | K″ (Pa sn″) | n″ | R22 | |
| 0% | 20,951.70 ± 137.45 e | 0.159 ± 0.002 c | 0.996 | 8376.21 ± 213.92 d | 0.227 ± 0.008 c | 0.977 |
| 10% | 37,035.29 ± 186.07 d | 0.161 ± 0.002 b | 0.998 | 16,231.66 ± 278.27 c | 0.200 ± 0.005 c | 0.986 |
| 20% | 55,210.75 ± 228.67 c | 0.153 ± 0.001 b | 0.998 | 22,527.66 ± 524.78 b | 0.210 ± 0.007 b | 0.977 |
| 30% | 58,392.86 ± 445.39 b | 0.186 ± 0.002 a | 0.997 | 24,043.43 ± 634.59 a | 0.234 ± 0.008 b | 0.977 |
| 40% | 66,692.16 ± 316.67 a | 0.187 ± 0.001 a | 0.999 | 23,472.34 ± 353.38 a | 0.251 ± 0.004 a | 0.994 |
Note: means with different small letter superscripts within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Cooking properties of ginkgo biloba noodles.
| Sample | Optimal Cooked Time (s) | Water Absorption (%) | Cooking Loss (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 336.66 ± 3.43 e | 4.10 ± 0.05 e | 6.11 ± 0.10 e |
| 10% | 346.66 ± 4.22 d | 5.99 ± 0.13 d | 6.83 ± 0.10 d |
| 20% | 383.33 ± 4.51 c | 9.09 ± 0.07 c | 7.51 ± 0.09 c |
| 30% | 406.66 ± 2.45 b | 10.49 ± 0.48 b | 8.30 ± 0.06 b |
| 40% | 433.33 ± 5.27 a | 11.20 ± 0.34 a | 11.43 ± 0.09 a |
Note: means with different small letter superscripts within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Texture and tension properties of ginkgo biloba noodles.
| Sample | Hardness | Adhesiveness | Springiness | Chewiness | Tensile Strength (g) | Elasticity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 2588.13 ± 51.58 e | 64.73 ± 13.88 a | 88.01 ± 0.75 b | 1499.79 ± 25.24 d | 17.37 ± 0.32 e | 24.38 ± 0.33 a |
| 10% | 2715.46 ± 6.04 d | 74.73 ± 7.88 a | 88.45 ± 1.25 b | 1586.82 ± 76.00 d | 20.30 ± 0.89 d | 26.75 ± 1.16 b |
| 20% | 2923.57 ± 54.38 c | 81.54 ± 6.06 a | 90.44 ± 1.60 ab | 1728.82 ± 39.70 c | 24.42 ± 0.88 c | 28.08 ± 1.35 c |
| 30% | 3095.09 ± 9.32 b | 99.42 ± 12.14 b | 91.54 ± 2.21 a | 1838.01 ± 51.93 b | 28.09 ± 0.16 b | 30.32 ± 2.12 d |
| 40% | 3301.09 ± 45.36 a | 125.29 ± 1.45 c | 92.44 ± 1.78 a | 1981.41 ± 41.70 a | 32.26 ± 0.85 a | 35.08 ± 1.10 e |
Note: means with different small letter superscripts within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Sensory properties of ginkgo biloba noodles.
| Sample | Color | Appearance | Palatability | Toughness | Viscosity | Smoothness | Flavor | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 8.22 ± 0.19 b | 7.28 ± 0.13 bc | 18.02 ± 0.10 b | 20.14 ± 0.96 ab | 20.88 ± 0.53 ab | 4.38 ± 0.03 bc | 4.25 ± 0.09 c | 83.27 ± 2.09 bc |
| 10% | 8.27 ± 0.24 b | 7.40 ± 0.13 ab | 18.42 ± 0.21 a | 20.54 ± 0.45 a | 20.95 ± 1.20 ab | 4.60 ± 0.15 a | 4.35 ± 0.15 bc | 84.37 ± 2.40 ab |
| 20% | 8.57 ± 0.10 a | 7.50 ± 0.05 a | 18.08 ± 0.07 b | 20.93 ± 0.26 a | 21.76 ± 0.54 b | 4.55 ± 0.05 ab | 4.52 ± 0.15 ab | 86.33 ± 1.26 a |
| 30% | 8.17 ± 0.08 b | 7.20 ± 0.05 bc | 17.87 ± 0.21 b | 20.22 ± 0.50 a | 19.80 ± 0.40 bc | 4.43 ± 0.13 ab | 4.60 ± 0.04 a | 81.94 ± 1.45 c |
| 40% | 8.00 ± 0.05 b | 7.08 ± 0.15 c | 17.45 ± 0.18 c | 19.32 ± 0.22 b | 19.24 ± 0.38 c | 4.22 ± 0.08 c | 4.15 ± 0.05 c | 79.46 ± 1.11 d |
Note: means with different small letter superscripts within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Scanning electron micrographs of noodles substituted with different level of GBP.
Figure 3Starch digestibility of ginkgo biloba noodles.
In vitro starch digestion kinetics and glycemic index determination of GBN.
| Samples | Kinetics Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C∞(%) | K × 10−2 (min−1) | R2 | AUC | eGI | |
| White Bread | 59.22 ± 0.09 a | 4.24 ± 0.02 a | 0.9989 | 9068.42 ± 16.82 a | 94.40 ± 0.05 a |
| 0% | 50.89 ± 0.12 b | 4.13 ± 0.01 b | 0.9982 | 7766.10 ± 22.74 b | 82.02 ± 0.47 b |
| 10% | 48.82 ± 0.07 c | 4.01 ± 0.01 c | 0.9984 | 7421.16 ± 19.48 c | 78.74 ± 0.35 c |
| 20% | 47.17 ± 0.62 d | 3.98 ± 0.03 c | 0.9993 | 7166.85 ± 17.31 d | 76.32 ± 0.31 d |
| 30% | 44.85 ± 0.21 e | 3.75 ± 0.02 d | 0.9964 | 6752.25 ± 20.36 e | 72.38 ± 0.19 e |
| 40% | 42.83 ± 0.14 f | 3.73 ± 0.04 d | 0.9972 | 6444.32 ± 19.35 f | 69.45 ± 0.62 f |
Note: means with different small letter superscripts within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.