| Literature DB >> 35267289 |
Alioune Diop1,2,3,4, Jean-Michel Méot3,4, Mathieu Léchaudel4,5, Frédéric Chiroleu4,6, Nafissatou Diop Ndiaye2, Christian Mertz2,3,4, Mady Cissé7, Marc Chillet1,4.
Abstract
A previous study demonstrated that the color of 4 mm mango slices is altered very slightly by drying for 5 h at 60 °C, 30% RH and 1 m/s. The objectives of this complementary study were to determine the impact of various drying procedures encountered in the drying units on color alterations of sulfite-free mango slices from heterogeneous raw material due to variable maturity degrees of mangoes. Drying procedures with various temperature/humidity/duration combinations were performed to analyze their effects on the color of natural dried mangoes according to the degree of fruit maturity. They were dried at an air speed of 1.0 m/s for 5 h according to 3 schemes: standard drying (SD) at 60 °C and 30% RH; wet drying (WD) for 1 h at 60 °C and 60% RH, followed by 4 h SD; and finally, hot drying (HD) for 4 h SD, followed by 1 h at 80 °C and 30% RH. The color of the mango slices was analyzed before and after drying. SD preserves the color of fresh mangoes very well, whatever their maturity stage. A relatively slow drying onset corresponding to WD has a highly adverse impact, which becomes greater as the degree of maturity increases. There is already significant browning on mangoes with near-optimum quality (L* = 75; H* = 92). Applying high temperature at the end of the drying procedure (HD) for 20% of the time has a more limited adverse impact with immature mangoes that are the most sensitive. Linear regressions were assessed to represent the relationships of color differences between drying schemes according to mango maturity degrees. These statistical models showed a significant increase in color degradation in the case of WD and a decrease in color differences in the case of HD with the advance in fruit maturity.Entities:
Keywords: color; dried mangoes; mango; maturity stage; quality; ripening
Year: 2022 PMID: 35267289 PMCID: PMC8909022 DOI: 10.3390/foods11050656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Box plots of °Brix (a), titratable acidity: TA (b), pH (c), °Brix/titratable acidity (d), L* (e) and H* (f) as a function of ripening time at 20 °C. Dots represent individual measurements. Different letters indicate significant differences in mean values among three days with p < 5%.
Figure 2Linear regressions of color indices L* (a) and H* (b) measured on dried slices as a function of the same color indices measured on the same slices before drying, for each drying scheme. Grey dashed line: first bisector; dots: experimental data; solid lines with grey envelopes: regression lines with 95% confidence intervals. Different letters indicate significantly different regression lines at 5% threshold.
Figure 3Regressions of ΔL* as a function of physicochemical indices (°Brix (a), titratable acidity: TA (b), pH (c), °Brix/titratable acidity (d)) under wet and hot drying procedures. Solid lines with grey envelopes: regression lines with 95% confidence intervals. Different letters indicate significantly different regression lines at 5% threshold.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the ΔColor index of standard drying and wet or hot drying schemes for indices L* and H* and the physicochemical (PC) indicators. Statistical significance between slopes of the regression lines presented in Figure 2 is indicated.
| ΔColor Indices | ΔL* | ΔH* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drying Type/PCi Characteristics | Wet Drying (WD) | Hot Drying (HD) | Wet Drying (WD) | Hot Drying (HD) | ||
| °Brix | 0.71 | −0.63 | *** | −0.66 | −0.67 | *** |
| TA (meq/100 g) | −0.83 | 0.66 | *** | 0.90 | 0.71 | *** |
| pH | 0.86 | −0.71 | *** | −0.88 | −0.77 | *** |
| °Brix/TA | 0.84 | −0.64 | *** | −0.80 | −0.67 | *** |
*** Slopes are significantly different at 0.1% threshold.