Literature DB >> 35266792

Online support for all: Examining participant characteristics, engagement, and perceived benefits of an online harm reduction, abstinence, and moderation focused support group for alcohol and other drugs.

Frank J Schwebel1, Daniel G Orban2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Online support groups for individuals with substance use disorders are regularly used, yet little is known about participant engagement patterns. Preliminary research has examined utilization and perceived benefits of an abstinence-focused online social network. This study sought to extend these findings by examining participant characteristics, engagement, and perceived benefits of online support groups for individuals with broader personal substance use goals (Harm reduction, Abstinence, and Moderation Support [HAMS]).
METHOD: HAMS members were invited to complete an online survey about their HAMS engagement (N = 343). The average age of participants was 41.55 (SD = 12.61) and most identified as White (93.9%), female (78.8%), and cisgender women (70.1%). Participants completed measures of HAMS participation, substance use goal, quantity/frequency of substance use, mental health history, negative substance use-related consequences, and quality of life.
RESULTS: Most participants (67.1%) reported a substance use moderation goal and alcohol was the most commonly used substance (91.6%). Participants most frequently reported visiting HAMS on Facebook (89.5%), visiting HAMS daily (39.2%), and visits typically lasted up to 30 min (86.1%). Most participants somewhat or strongly agreed HAMS helped them feel better about changing their use of drugs/alcohol (87.1%; M = 4.41/5; SD = 0.81), increased their motivation for changing their use of drugs/alcohol (89.2%; M = 4.44/5; SD = 0.77), and increased their self-efficacy in reaching/maintaining the substance use goals (85.1%; M = 4.29/5; SD = 1.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Online support for broader personal substance use goals may be beneficial for individuals who seek to stop/limit their substance use. Online support is well suited for obtaining quick, inexpensive access to support. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35266792      PMCID: PMC9463399          DOI: 10.1037/adb0000828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  18 in total

1.  The role of Alcoholics Anonymous in mobilizing adaptive social network changes: a prospective lagged mediational analysis.

Authors:  John F Kelly; Robert L Stout; Molly Magill; J Scott Tonigan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  Social network variables in alcoholics anonymous: a literature review.

Authors:  D R Groh; L A Jason; C B Keys
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-08-07

Review 3.  Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lion Shahab; Andy McEwen
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Grieving online: newcomers' constructions of grief in an online support group.

Authors:  Mary Alice Varga; Trena M Paulus
Journal:  Death Stud       Date:  2013-12-19

5.  Building abstinent networks is an important resource in improving quality of life.

Authors:  Ashley Elizabeth Muller; Svetlana Skurtveit; Thomas Clausen
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Acceptance of non-abstinence goals by addiction professionals in the United States.

Authors:  Alan K Davis; Harold Rosenberg
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-10-22

7.  Beyond Abstinence: Changes in Indices of Quality of Life with Time in Recovery in a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Adults.

Authors:  John F Kelly; M Claire Greene; Brandon G Bergman
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 8.  Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Carol A Maher; Lucy K Lewis; Katia Ferrar; Simon Marshall; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Corneel Vandelanotte
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Can Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery Include Some Heavy Drinking? A Replication and Extension up to 9 Years Following Treatment.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; Matthew R Pearson; Adam D Wilson; Elena R Stein; Victoria R Votaw; Kevin A Hallgren; Stephen A Maisto; Julia E Swan; Frank J Schwebel; Arnie Aldridge; Gary A Zarkin; Jalie A Tucker
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 10.  What Is Recovery?

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; Kevin S Montes; Frank J Schwebel; Jalie A Tucker
Journal:  Alcohol Res       Date:  2020-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.