| Literature DB >> 35266577 |
Yagiz Pat1,2, Beate Rückert1, Ismail Ogulur1,3, Duygu Yazici1,4, Mario Pérez-Diego5, Ozan C Küçükkase1, Manru Li1, Cezmi A Akdis1,6.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: asthma; barrier; epithelium; interleukins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35266577 PMCID: PMC9311728 DOI: 10.1111/all.15279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Allergy ISSN: 0105-4538 Impact factor: 14.710
FIGURE 1Treatment of bronchial epithelial spheroids with IL‐13 recapitulates characteristic asthmatic epithelial cell differentiation phenotype. A, Representative light microscopy images from control and IL‐13‐treated bronchial epithelial spheroids on Day 16. The average number of spheroids and average spheroid size per well (µm2) (right panel). B, Representative light microscopy images on Day 16. Scale bar 50 µm. ‘Lumen‐to‐total spheroid area’ is shown on the right side. C, Quantitative RT‐PCR analysis of goblet cell (MUC5AC), ciliated cell (FOXJ1 and DNAI2), basal cell, (p63) club cell (SCGB1A1) markers and antimicrobial protein BPIFA1. Expression values calculated with 2 (−ΔCt) formula and represented as expression (x100) relative to housekeeping gene, POLR2A. D, Immunostaining of spheroids for DNA (blue), and markers of ciliated cells (acetylated α‐tubulin, red) and goblet cells (MUC5AC, green). Graphical representations of MUC5AC intensity at Days 8 and 16 of treatment are shown at right. Individual spheroids were represented as hollow dots and biological replicates (n:3) as black dots. Data are presented as means +/‐ SDs. For statistical analysis, two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test was used. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001
FIGURE 2Treatment of bronchial epithelial spheroids with IL‐13 impaired epithelial barrier development. A, Representative light and fluorescence microscopy images of the paracellular flux assay performed on Day 16 of culture. Each row of the spheroid pictures represents a biological replicate. EDTA used as a positive control for epithelial barrier impairment. Individual spheroids are represented as hollow dots and biological replicates (n:3) presented as black dots (right panel). B, Quantitative RT‐PCR analysis of tight junction proteins, occludin (OCLN), claudin‐1 (CLDN‐1), claudin‐4 (CLDN‐4) and claudin‐7 (CLDN‐7). Expression values calculated with 2 (−ΔCt) formula and represented as expression (×100) relative to POLR2A. C, Immunostaining of spheroids for DNA (blue) and ZO‐1 (green). Graphical representations of ZO‐1 intensity on Days 8 and 16 of culture are shown at right. Individual spheroids were represented as hollow dots and biological replicates (n:3) as black dots. Data are presented as means ±SDs. For statistical analysis, two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test was used. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001