Literature DB >> 35265863

Protocol for generating human immune system mice and hydrodynamic injection to analyze human hematopoiesis in vivo.

Deshan Ren1, Wei Liu1, Shuai Ding2, Yan Li1.   

Abstract

Human immune system (HIS) mice provide a valuable platform to investigate and modulate human hematopoiesis development in vivo. Here, we describe detailed protocols for the construction of HIS mice, modulation of human hematopoiesis in vivo using hydrodynamic injection of plasmids encoding cytokines of interest, and flow cytometry analysis of humanization levels and human immune subsets. This approach can be easily applied to screen or verify factors that regulate human hematopoiesis and immune system. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Cardoso et al. (2021) and Li et al. (2017).
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotechnology and bioengineering; Cell isolation; Flow Cytometry/Mass Cytometry; Immunology; Model Organisms

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35265863      PMCID: PMC8899045          DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  STAR Protoc        ISSN: 2666-1667


Before you begin

The following steps describe the construction of HIS mice using irradiated immune deficient pups and modulation of human hematopoiesis with hydrodynamic injected plasmids to express cytokines of interest. Over the years, we have successfully deployed this approach in different HIS mouse researches, such as to boost human macrophage cell development (Li et al., 2013), investigate the efficiency and toxicity of high dose IL-2 treatment (Li et al., 2017), or evaluate the influence of IL-10 on emergency hematopoiesis in vivo (Cardoso et al., 2021). Nevertheless, the function of genes of interest on murine hematopoiesis or immune cell development can also be investigated by the hydrodynamic injection approach.

Institutional permissions

Investigators should obtain necessary institutional approvals for procedures involving human samples and animals. The cell source of human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for creation of human immune system (HIS) mice could either be 14- to 20- week-old fetal liver tissues or cord blood. Adult HSCs could also be used for HIS mice generation, but HSCs from fetal liver or cord blood show better human immune cell reconstruction levels than adult HSCs (Drake et al., 2012; Lepus et al., 2009; Rongvaux et al., 2014). Human CD34+ HSCs described in this protocol were obtained from fetal liver tissues under clinical ethical approval from the ethical committee of Drum Tower Hospital with informed consent (protocol # 2021-488-01). All experiments involving the generation and characterization of HIS mice were approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Model Animal Research Center in Nanjing University (AP# LY-01).

CD34+ HSCs preparation

Timing: 3 h Open the UV light to sterilize the biosafety cabinet and make sure all the materials used are properly sterilized. Fetal liver tissue was cut into small pieces (1-2 mm in size) with a scalpel in DMEM. Gently mince the tissues through a 100 μm cell strainer on a 50 mL tube with a 5 mL syringe piston. Spin down the cells at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Resuspend the cells with DMEM and the mononuclear cells were further purified using Ficoll by centrifuge at 700 × g for 20 min at 20°C, with acceleration/deceleration rates of 5/1 (Eppendorf™ 5810R Centrifuge). Collect the white mononuclear cell layer and centrifuge at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C, then the cells are ready for CD34+ HSCs purification. CD34+ HSCs were enriched using human CD34 MicroBead Kit according to the manuals of the products. Count the live cells using 0.4% trypan blue solution (dilute the sample at 1:1 ration) with a KOVA™ Glasstic™ Slide under microscopy. And the HSCs were cryopreserved in FBS containing 7.5% DMSO at 3 × 106 cells/0.5 mL/tube in liquid nitrogen. It is necessary to obtain approval from the institutional review board for collection of human material before carrying out this protocol.

Endotoxin-free plasmids purification

Timing: 2 days Plasmids encoding genes of interest should be amplified in advance. Human IL-2 or IL-10 plasmids used for HIS mice hydrodynamic injection were purified from 400 mL E. coli cultured for 12 h using endotoxin-free plasmid isolation kits. The concentrations of plasmids were measured by Nano-300 Micro-Spectrophotometer. And the plasmids were stored at −20°C. CRITICAL: Plasmids should be endotoxin-free. Otherwise, it would lead to mouse death after injection.

Breeding immune deficient mice

Timing: Around 4 weeks The gestation time for mice is 19–21 days. When planning to construct HIS mice, the number of breeding cages needs to be estimated to get enough pups for human HSC injection. Currently, several widely available immunodeficient mouse strains for HIS mice generation have been developed based on BALB/c or NOD strain (Li and Di Santo, 2019; Saito et al., 2020). NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG)(Shultz et al., 2005), NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Sug/JicTac (NOG)(Ito et al., 2002), and NOD-Prkdcem26Cd52Il2rgem26Cd22/NjuCrl (NCG)(Cardoso et al., 2021) mice are similar immunodeficient strains created on NOD mice with different strategies to knockout Prkdc and common cytokine receptor γ chain gene. As such, this protocol is generally applicable for NOD based immunodeficient strains. When applying this protocol to BALB/c.Rag2–/–Il2rg–/–SirpaNOD mice (BRGS) (Li et al., 2018; Traggiai et al., 2004), precautions need to be taken for irradiation doses as this strain is more radioresistant. In our facility, NCG mice obtained from Gempharmatech (T001475) are routinely used. Usually, we put one male and two female NCG mice in one breeding cage, and expect to get 8 pups per litter. Newborn pups (4–6 days old) are used for HIS mouse construction.

Key resources table

Materials and equipment

FACS Buffer Prepare in a biological safety cabinet and store at 4°C up to 6 months. Cell Buffer Prepare in a biological safety cabinet and store at 4°C up to 6 months. Cell medium Prepare in a biological safety cabinet and store at 4°C up to 6 months. Injection medium Prepare in a biological safety cabinet and store at 4°C up to 6 months. Blocking buffer Prepare prior to use. Flow Cytometer The flow cytometry samples in this protocol were acquired by a 5 laser Agilent NovoCyte Penteon Flow Cytometer (405 nm Violet, 488 nm Blue, 561 nm Yellow, 637 nm Red, and Ultra violet 349 nm). Flow cytometers equipped with appropriate lasers available from the researcher’s facility, such as BD flow cytometers, Attune Flow Cytometer from Thermo fisher are also suitable for the analysis. Irradiator In this project, an RS-2000-PRO-225 X-ray irradiator (Rad Source) is shown as an example for mouse irradiation. Other irradiators, such as gamma-ray irradiator, are also typically employed for mouse irradiation.

Step-by-step method details

Mouse irradiation

Timing: Approximately 20 min This step describes the key operations for total body irradiation of NCG pups. Turn on and pre-heat the irradiator. 4–6 days old pups (no more than 15 pups) from a ventilated cage along with some bedding were transferred into one autoclaved plastic box, then close the box lid (Figures 1A and 1B).
Figure 1

The irradiation process of pups

(A) Transfer pups from a ventilated cage into an autoclaved box.

(B) A plastic box with the lid closed.

(C) Irradiate the pups using a RS-2000 Rad Source Irradiator.

The irradiation process of pups (A) Transfer pups from a ventilated cage into an autoclaved box. (B) A plastic box with the lid closed. (C) Irradiate the pups using a RS-2000 Rad Source Irradiator. CRITICAL: The operation should be conducted under a biological safety cabinet. And the following irradiation process should be finished within 30 min. Otherwise, pups would be suffocated. Wrap the individual box with autoclaved paper bags and take it out of the facility. If the irradiator is inside the animal facility, jump steps 3 and 7, and follow the procedure dictates of the facility. Put the plastic boxes one at a time into the irradiator (Figure 1C). Set the sub-lethal irradiation dose (63 s, 70 cGy X-ray for NCG mice) and start the irradiation process. Reference irradiation doses for different immunodeficient mouse strains CRITICAL: The immunodeficient mouse strains for HIS mice generation could be typically classified into SCID mice or Rag mice regarding to their mutation of Prkdc or Rag1/Rag2 respectively. SCID mice are sensitive to irradiation due to their mutation in Prkdc(Biedermann et al., 1991), whereas Rag mice are relatively resistant to irradiation. Thus, precautions need to be taken when choosing a starting irradiation dose for optimization. The reported sublethal doses of mouse pups from different strains are listed (Table 1). As indicated, for SCID mice, the sublethal irradiation dose test should be set between 60 and 110 cGy, e.g., 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110 cGy. While for Rag mice the initial dose for sublethal irradiation escalation test should start from 2 Gy, e.g., 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4 Gy.
Table 1

Reference irradiation doses for different immunodeficient mouse strains

MiceStrainsSublethal irradiation dosesReferences
SCID mice (Prkdc SCID mutation)NSG100 cGy(Li et al., 2013; Rongvaux et al., 2014)
NOG75 cGy(Andersen et al., 2020)
NCG70 cGy(Cardoso et al., 2021)
NSGW41No irradiation is required due to genetic mutation in Kit(Cosgun et al., 2014)
Rag mice (Rag1/Rag2 mutation)BRG3.3 Gy(Huntington et al., 2011)
BRGS/BRGST3 Gy(Li et al., 2017, 2018)
Take out the plastic box when the radiation process finishes and move on to irradiate the next one. Remove paper bags when entering the animal facility. Transfer the plastic boxes carrying irradiated pups into a biological safety cabinet and open the lids. Avoid introducing foreign scents or contaminations during the process. Otherwise, the parental mice may kill or stop feeding the pups.

Recovery of CD34+ HSCs from cryopreservation

Timing: 30 min Take out one vial of previously cryopreserved CD34+ HSCs from liquid nitrogen (put the tube in liquid nitrogen or dry ice if transfer process is required) and immediately put it into a 37°C water bath. Quickly thaw the cells by gently swirling the vial in the water bath. Take out the vial and spray it with 70% ethanol and then transfer it into a biological safety cabinet. Open the vial and transfer the cells into a centrifuge tube containing 10 mL pre-warmed cell medium. Count the live cells using 0.4% trypan blue solution (dilute the sample at 1:1 ration) with a KOVA™ Glasstic™ Slide under microscopy. Centrifuge the cells at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Carefully aspirate the upper supernatant and resuspend cells to the concentration of 105 cells/50 μL with RPMI 1640 injection medium.

Intrahepatic HSC injections

Timing: Approximately 1–2 h, about 2 min per mouse Load a 29 gauge 1 mL BD insulin syringe with resuspended HSCs. Take one pup and hold it head down with fingers applying gentle pressure to restrict the movement of pups and expose the abdomen. Then the red-colored liver can be seen just adjacent to the white-colored stomach (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Posture for intrahepatic injection

Posture for intrahepatic injection Hold the syringe with the other hand and insert the needle at a 45-degree angle into the pup’s liver about 3 mm depth. Always follow the role of handling sharps and needles during the process. Inject 50 μL medium slowly into the liver and hold still for 3 s. Release the pressure of your fingers from the injected pups, then pull out the needle slowly and put the pups back to the plastic box. Repeat the above steps until all the injections are finished. Wean HIS mice at 21 days old and wait for 10 weeks after the HSCs injection before further humanization level analysis. It takes effort and practice to be proficient at intrahepatic injection, starting from practicing with culture medium/PBS instead of HSCs.

Flow cytometry analysis of humanization level

Flow cytometry analysis of the blood of HIS mice is a convenient and standard approach to obtain the humanization information. This section describes the detailed steps on humanization level determination, including the blood collection and the further immune phenotype analysis using flow cytometry.

Facial vein bleeding of HIS mice

Timing: About 1 min per mouse This step describes the blood draw from HIS mice. Drawing blood from mouse facial veins is routinely employed in our facility. Alternative methods such as retro-orbital blood collection and blood collection from the tail are also applicable. We choose facial vein bleeding method over retro-orbital and tail vein bleeding as this approach causes less stress to the mice and cost less time than other approaches. Take one HIS mouse out of the cage and properly restrain it with one hand. Properly restraining the mice and applying adequate pressure to the maxillary vein is a prerequisite for a smooth blood draw. Visualize the mark of the maxillary vein: albino NCG mouse has an obvious mark for the maxillary vein, which is viewed as a small bald spot (shown in Figure 3A). The maxillary vein is just under this spot.
Figure 3

Drawing blood from the submandibular vein

(A) Red arrow indicates the bald area where the submandibular vein locates.

(B) Insert the needle directly into the bald area.

(C) Peripheral blood comes out of the submandibular vein.

Drawing blood from the submandibular vein (A) Red arrow indicates the bald area where the submandibular vein locates. (B) Insert the needle directly into the bald area. (C) Peripheral blood comes out of the submandibular vein. Puncture it with a 23 gauge needle, withdraw the needle quickly and then collect 50 μL blood using an anticoagulant tube (Figures 3B and 3C). Apply gentle pressure with an alcohol pad on the site of the puncture to stop the bleeding. Dispose the needle into a sharps/biohazard container. Repeat the above steps until the blood draw of all the mice is finished. Always use a new sterile needle to bleed each HIS mouse. Do not share needles for different mice to avoid cross-contamination.

FACS analysis of the blood samples

Timing: Approximately 1–2 h, it takes about 2 h for 20 mice Prepare fluorescent antibody cocktail containing the antibodies in Table 2.
Table 2

Example staining panel to detect the humanization levels of HIS mice

AntibodyDilutionAmount per sample
Anti-mouse CD45 BV5101:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD45 BV6051:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD3 BV6501:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD19 PECF5941:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD4 FITC1:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD8 BV7851:500.2 μg
Example staining panel to detect the humanization levels of HIS mice For a basic detection of human immune cell reconstruction level, antibodies against human CD45, human B cells (CD19/CD20), T cells (CD3) as well as mouse CD45 are necessary. The choice of antibody fluorochrome conjugates in this protocol is optimized for flow cytometer available in our facility. As such, antibody panels should be adjusted according to the parameter of the available flow cytometer. Add 6 μL/well antibody cocktail into a 96 well round bottom plate. Transfer 50 μL of blood from each blood sample to the 96 well round bottom plate and incubate for 30 min at 4°C, protecting from light. Dilute 10× BD FACS™ Lysing Solution to 1× with ddH20, then add 200 μL lysing buffer to each sample after the antibody staining process and incubate for 10 min at room temperature (20°C–25°C). Spin the plate at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Repeat the lysing process if there are red blood cells remaining. Alternatively, the red blood cells can be lysed with ACK (RBC lysis buffer) first and then proceed for antibody staining process. Resuspend the cell pellet in 200 μL of ice cold FACS buffer or cell buffer. Transfer the cell suspension into a flow tube by passing through a 70 μm cell strainer. Store the samples on ice and wait for further flow cytometry acquisition. Acquire the samples to collect the desired volume of sample using available flow cytometer. For detailed guidelines and description of flow cytometer set-up when performing flow cytometry experiments please refer to (Cossarizza et al., 2021; Prosser et al., 2021; Rico et al., 2021) Analyze FCS files using flow cytometry analysis software. We routinely use NovoExpress Software or FlowJo for flow cytometer data analysis (a gating strategy is shown in Figure 4).
Figure 4

Gating strategy for FACS analysis of blood samples from HIS mice

Gating strategy for FACS analysis of blood samples from HIS mice Determine the cell number of human CD45 (hCD45) per mL blood as: Here, 20 is the quotient of 1000 μl/50 μl blood. And calculate the humanization levels of the HIS mice using the following formula: The HIS mouse with a hCD45 cell number above 105/mL or a humanization level above 10% is used for further experiments. And HIS mice assigned to different groups should have matched gender and similar humanization levels.

Hydrodynamic injection

Timing: Steps 40–41 take about 20 min and steps 42–49 cost about 1 min per mouse Hydrodynamic injection is a procedure to express proteins of interest in mouse liver by rapid injection of large volume of plasmids DNA solution into the tail vein of mouse. The following steps describe the detailed procedures for hydrodynamic injection, including plasmids solution preparation and tips for the injection. Prepare the plasmid solution using a 50 mL tube as shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Guidance for plasmid solution preparation

Parameters
The number of mice: nThe amount of plasmids to be injected per mouse: A μg (usually between 10 and 50 μg)The concentration of plasmid stock: B μg/mL

The components of the plasmid solution

ComponentVolume
Plasmid stock(n+2) ∗ A/B ml
10× PBS0.1∗ (n+2) mL
ddH2O(n+2) (0.9-A/B) ml
Mix the ingredients evenly, then filter through a 0.22 μm sieve.
Guidance for plasmid solution preparation The values for A and B are determined follows: A- The amounts of plasmids injected positively correlate with protein expression levels. But the range of protein expression varies considerably and need to be individually determined. B- Typically, a maxi-prep would yield a stock plasmid concentration of 500 μg/ml to 1500 μg /ml. CRITICAL: Plasmids should be endotoxin-free. Otherwise, it would lead to mouse death after injection. Weigh the mice and prepare the injection solution as shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Guidance for injection solution preparation

Weight of the mouse WVolume
15 g ≤ W ≤ 25 g1 mL plasmid solution + (0.1∗W-1) mL 1× PBS
W>25 g1 mL plasmid solution+ 1.5 mL 1× PBS
Guidance for injection solution preparation Load the injection solution to a 2.5 mL syringe with a 26 gauge needle. CRITICAL: Tap the syringe to remove all the air bubbles in the syringe. Pre-heat the mice with a heat lamp for 15 min to increase the visibility of the lateral caudal veins. Put one HIS mouse in a restraining device and firmly immobilize the mouse (Figure 5A).
Figure 5

Hydrodynamic injection

(A) Ensure the mouse still can breathe freely after being restrained in the immobilizer.

(B) Insert the needle into the later tail vein and finish the injection within 7 s.

Hydrodynamic injection (A) Ensure the mouse still can breathe freely after being restrained in the immobilizer. (B) Insert the needle into the later tail vein and finish the injection within 7 s. Make sure the mouse still breathes freely. Pull and straighten the tail of the mouse with your non-dominant hand. Hold the syringe by the other hand with the bevel of the needle facing upward and nearly parallel to the lateral caudal vein, then insert the needle smoothly into the vein (Figure 5B). Inject the solution quickly within 7 s, otherwise, the transfection efficiency would be extremely low. Always start the injection from the tip of the tail to ensure that more attempts could be carried out. If the solution cannot be injected completely at a single injection, inject the remaining solution again into the other later tail vein immediately. If two injections cannot be finished within 1 min, the transfection will not be successful. And the mouse should not proceed for further experiments. Immediately release the mouse from the restrainer and put it back into the cage. CRITICAL: Remove the mouse from the restrainer immediately after the injection, or it may cause mouse death due to suffocation. The mouse may remain motionless for 10–30 min after hydrodynamic injection due to temporary arrhythmia. Usually, the mouse will recover within 10 min. On the condition that the breathing of the mouse turns out to be really shallow, gently massage the abdomen of the mouse to facilitate breathing. Collect 100 μL of blood from the submandibular vein 24 h after the hydrodynamic injection as described from steps 23–28. Centrifuge the blood at 2,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Transfer the blood plasma into a new sterilized 0.5 mL tube. Store the blood plasma at −80°C for ELISA analysis. ELISA analysis of the plasmid coding protein is done according to the manuals of the corresponding ELISA MAX™ Deluxe Set from Biolegend.

FACS analysis of human hematopoiesis and immune cells

Timing: Approximately 2–3 h, it takes about 3 h for 10 mice This part demonstrates the basic analysis of human hematopoiesis and immune cells after hydrodynamic injection. Here we take the HIS mice that receive phIL-10 hydrodynamic injection as an example. 7 days post hydrodynamic injection, mice are sacrificed and the spleens are harvested in a 6 well plate containing 5 mL FACS buffer or cell buffer. Gently mince the spleen through a 100 μm cell strainer with a 5 mL syringe piston. Transfer the splenocytes into 15 mL centrifuge tubes and spin at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in 1 mL Red Blood Cell Lysing Buffer Hybri-Max, incubating the cells at room temperature (20°C–25°C) for 10 min. Add 9 mL FACS buffer to stop the lysis and filter the cells into a new 15 mL tube by passing through a 70 μm cell strainer. Spin down the cells at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in 5 mL FACS buffer. Count live cells using 0.4% trypan blue solution (dilute the sample at 1:1 ration) with a KOVA™ Glasstic™ Slide under microscopy. Adjust cell concentration and transfer one million live cells per mouse in one well of a 96 well round bottom plate and spin down the cells at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Prepare the blocking buffer in 50 μL FACS buffer per sample during centrifugation. Discard the supernatant by flicking the plate over a sink. Resuspend the cells by adding 50 μL blocking buffer and incubate at 4°C for 15 min. Prepare the flow antibody mix as the panel in Table 5.
Table 5

Example panel to detect the myeloid progenitors of HIS mice

AntibodyDilutionAmount per sample
FACS buffer50 μL
Anti-human CD10 FITC1:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD38 PE1:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD45 PE-Cy71:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD123 APC1:500.2 μg
Anti-mouse CD45 APC-Cy71:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD34 BV4211:500.2 μg
Anti-human CD45RA BV7111:500.2 μg
Example panel to detect the myeloid progenitors of HIS mice Example cell subpopulations checked in this protocol The cell subpopulations are defined by cell surface markers according to Table 6.
Table 6

Example cell subpopulations checked in this protocol

Cell populationCell populationImmunophenotype
Plasmacytoid dendritic cellspDCsCD45+ CD34+ CD38+ CD10- CD45RA+ CD123+
Granulocyte-monocyte progenitorGMPCD45+ CD34+ CD38+ CD10- CD45RA+ CD123lo
Common myeloid progenitorCMPCD45+ CD34+ CD38+ CD10- CD45RA- CD123lo
Megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitorMEPCD45+ CD34+ CD38+ CD10- CD45RA- CD123-
Add 200 μL ice cold FACS buffer and spin down the cells at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Discard the supernatant, resuspend the cells with previously prepared 50 μL antibody mix and incubate at 4°C for 30 min, protecting from light. Add 200 μL ice cold FACS buffer and spin down the cells at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Discard the supernatant, resuspend the cells with 200 μL ice cold FACS buffer. Transfer the cells into a flow tube by passing through a 70 μm cell strainer. Acquire the samples to collect the desired volume of sample with a flow cytometer. Analyze FCS files using NovoExpress Software or FlowJo (representative results are shown in Figure 6).
Figure 6

Examples of human hematopoiesis or immune system modulation in HIS mice after hydrodynamic injection

(A) Emergency myelopoiesis in HIS mice after phIL-10 hydrodynamic injection.

(B) Extensive human T cells amplification in phIL-2 hydrodynamic injected HIS mice.

Examples of human hematopoiesis or immune system modulation in HIS mice after hydrodynamic injection (A) Emergency myelopoiesis in HIS mice after phIL-10 hydrodynamic injection. (B) Extensive human T cells amplification in phIL-2 hydrodynamic injected HIS mice.

Expected outcomes

Humanization level

Normally, 10 weeks after intra-hepatic injection with 105 CD34+ HSCs, more than 70% of the injected mice are expected with a humanization level over 10% or the CD45 cell number in the blood above 105/mL.

Human hematopoiesis and immune system modulation

1 week after plasmid hydrodynamic injection, phIL-10 will lead to emergency myelopoiesis in HIS mice (Cardoso et al., 2021). FACS analysis reveals that both GMP and myeloid cells are significantly increased as compared to the control group (Figure 6A). And for the HIS mice that receive phIL-2 hydrodynamic injection (Li et al., 2017), the population of spleen T cells will increase dramatically (Figure 6B).

Limitations

This protocol is convenient for investigating the regulation of human hematopoiesis or immune system by secreted factors such as cytokines and chemokines. It is not suitable to investigate the function of intracellular proteins, e.g., transcriptional factors and enzymes. Hydrodynamic injection is a much simpler and faster approach than transgenic or knock-in mouse models to achieve the expression of the gene of interest in vivo. Of note, the expression level is transient. To achieve a longer period of foreign protein expression, pLive plasmids are recommended (Huang et al., 2017). However, both of them result in systemic and supra-physiological expression level of plasmid coding proteins. Even worse, pLive plasmids may lead to human HSC exhaustion in the long-term. Hence, the experiments should be designed carefully to answer particular scientific questions in the right time window.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

Pups die before weaning (steps 5 and 8 of step-by-step method details).

Potential solution

If injected pups show growth retardation or die before weaning, it is likely due to the high irradiation dose. Then, the radiation dose escalation experiments should be performed to identify a sub-lethal dose that does not lead to pups’ death. In other cases, parental mice will not feed or kill their cubs when they are anxious, so be careful not to disturb the parental mice during the experiment. It’s recommended to take some bedding from the cage while transferring the pups and avoid introducing pathogens or foreign scents to the pups.

Problem 2

Variability in HIS reconstitution with different sources of CD34+ HSCs (steps 38 and 39). HSCs from different donors/sources used contribute most to the data variability. The humanization levels, lineage compositions, and responses to stimuli are relatively stable from HIS mice reconstituted from the same donor. Thus, it is critical to use the same HSC donor/source in the one experiment to minimize the variability, unless the purpose of the experiment is to compare donor to donor, or source to source differences after humanization. According to other researchers and our experience, HSCs from fetal liver show better human immune cell reconstruction level than cord blood and adult HSCs (Drake et al., 2012; Lepus et al., 2009; Rongvaux et al., 2014).

Problem 3

Low level of plasmid encoding gene expression in the serum (step 47). Make sure the plasmids injection is finished within 7 s, otherwise, the transfection efficiency would be extremely low. Secure the restrainer and straighten the mouse tail when injecting, so that the mouse holds still during the procedure. And a single hydrodynamic injection volume must reach at least 75% of mouse weight to be effective (Liu et al., 1999).

Problem 4

HIS mice die after hydrodynamic injection (steps 40 and 48). First verify all the plasmids injected are endotoxin-free, make sure endotoxin-free isolation kits are used for plasmids extraction. Ensure the mouse can breathe freely when they were in the mouse restrainer. On the other hand, inflammatory cytokines such as high levels of human IL-2 will lead to physiological toxicity after hydrodynamic injection (Li et al., 2017), chose the right dose of plasmid injection.

Problem 5

Short expression duration of plasmid encoding proteins in vivo (step 52). For a vector with CMV promoter, plasmid expression can be detected within one week after hydrodynamic injection. To achieve a longer expression period, pLIVE® In Vivo Expression Vectors are recommended.

Problem 6

Humanization levels decrease dramatically after hydrodynamic injection (step 53). If decreased humanization levels are caused by human HSCs exhaustion, the amount of plasmids should be reduced. In addition, for certain cross-species reactive cytokines, such as Flt3L, the injected DNA plasmids may favor the generation of mouse cells than human cells. This will finally lead to extensive abnormal murine hematopoiesis overriding the human hematopoiesis. In this situation, the host mouse genetic background is important. For example, using the Flt3 knockout strain to avoid the competition from mouse cells for supplemented Flt3L (Li et al., 2016).

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Yan Li (yanli@nju.edu.cn).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

Anti-human CD4 (Clone: OKT4) – FITC (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 317408
Anti-human CD19 (Clone: HIB19) – PE-CF594 (1:50 dilution)BDCat#: 562294
Anti-human CD38 (Clone: HIT2) - PE (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 303506
Anti-human CD34 (Clone: 581) - BV421 (1:50 dilution)BDCat#: 562577
Anti-mouse CD45 (Clone: REA737) - BV510 (1:50 dilution)Miltenyi BiotecCat#: 130-110-665
Anti-human CD45 (Clone: HI30) - BV605 (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 304042
Anti-human CD45 (Clone: HI30) - PE (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 304058
Anti-human CD3 (Clone: UCHT1) - BV650 (1:50 dilution)BDCat#: 563852
Anti-human CD8 (Clone: RPA-T8) - BV785 (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 301046
Anti-human CD10 (Clone: HI10a) - FITC (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 312208
Anti-human CD45 (Clone: 2D1) - PE-Cy7 (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 368532
Anti-human CD123 (Clone: 6H6) - APC (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 306012
Anti-mouse CD45 (Clone: HI30) - APC-Cy7 (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 103116
Anti-human CD45RA (Clone: HI100) - BV711 (1:50 dilution)BioLegendCat#: 304138

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Fixable viability dye eFlour506 (1:400 dilution)InvitrogenCat#: 65-0866-18
RPMI Medium 1640Biological IndustriesCat#: 01-100-1ACS
DMEMBiological IndustriesCat#: 06-1055-57-1ACS
Ficoll®-Paque PremiumGE HealthcareCat#:17544203
FBS (heat-inactivated)GibcoCat#: 10099141
100× Penicillin/Streptomycin SolutionGibcoCat#: 15140122
BD FACS™ Lysing Solution 10× ConcentrateBDCat#:349202
Red Blood Cell Lysing Buffer Hybri-MaxSigma-AldrichCat#: R7757
EDTALEAGENECat#: ND0081
Trypan blueBBI life scienceCat#: A601140-0010
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)Sigma-AldrichCat#: D2650
Human IgG (5 μg/μL, 1:50 dilution)Sigma-AldrichCat#: I8640

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

NOD-Prkdcem26Cd52Il2rgem26Cd22/NjuCrl (NCG)4–6 days old pups (regardless of gender) were used for HIS mice generation;12 weeks old HIS mice were used for hydrodynamic injection.GempharmatechT001475

Recombinant DNA

Human IL-10 expression plasmidOrigeneCat#:SC300099
Human IL-2 expression plasmidOrigeneCat#:SC125234

Software and algorithms

NovoExpress SoftwareAgilentVersion 1.5.6
FlowJoBDFlowJo 10.6.2

Other

CentrifugeEppendorf5810R
MicroscopyOlympusCX43RF-R
Micro-SpectrophotometerALLSHENGNano-300
Human CD34 MicroBead KitMiltenyi BiotecCat#:130-046-702
EndoFree Plasmid Maxi KitVazymeCat#: DC202-01
ELISA MAX™ Deluxe Set Human IL-2BioLegendCat#: 431805
ELISA MAX™ Deluxe Set Human IL-10BioLegendCat#: 430604
KOVA™ Glasstic™ Slide 10 with GridsKova International, IncCat#: 87144E
29 gauge 1 mL BD insulin syringeBDCat#: 328421
2.5 mL syringeShanghai Kindly Medical Instruments Co., LtdNA
23 gauge needleShanghai Kindly Medical Instruments Co., LtdNA
26 gauge needleShanghai Kindly Medical Instruments Co., LtdNA
1.5 mL anticoagulant tubeJiangsu Xinkang Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.NA
U-bottom 96-well plateJet Bio-FilCat#: TCP002096
Scissors and forcepsNANA
100 μm cell strainerJet Bio-FilCat#: CSS013100
70 μm cell strainerJet Bio-FilCat#: CSS01370
0.22 μm sieveMilliporeCat#: SLGPR33RB
15 mL centrifuge tubeJet Bio-FilCat#: CFT011150
50 mL centrifuge tubeJet Bio-FilCat#: CFT011500
FACS tubeBDCat#: 352008

FACS Buffer

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
PBSn/a483 mL
Fetal Bovine Serum2%10 mL
100× Penicillin/Streptomycin Solution1%5 mL
500 mM EDTA2 mM2 mL
Totaln/a500 mL

Prepare in a biological safety cabinet and store at 4°C up to 6 months.

Cell Buffer

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
RPMI 1640n/a483 mL
Fetal Bovine Serum2%10 mL
100× Penicillin/Streptomycin Solution1%5 mL
500 mM EDTA2 mM2 mL
Totaln/a500 mL

Prepare in a biological safety cabinet and store at 4°C up to 6 months.

Cell medium

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
RPMI 1640n/a445 mL
Fetal Bovine Serum10%50 mL
100× Penicillin/Streptomycin Solution1%5 mL
Totaln/a500 mL

Prepare in a biological safety cabinet and store at 4°C up to 6 months.

Injection medium

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
RPMI 1640n/a495 mL
100× Penicillin/Streptomycin Solution1%5 mL
Totaln/a500 mL

Prepare in a biological safety cabinet and store at 4°C up to 6 months.

Blocking buffer

ReagentDilutionAmount per sample
Fixable viability dye eFlour5061:4000.125 μL
IgG (5 μg/μL)1:501 μL
FACS buffern/a48.875 μL
Totaln/a50 μL

Prepare prior to use.

  22 in total

1.  Development of a human adaptive immune system in cord blood cell-transplanted mice.

Authors:  Elisabetta Traggiai; Laurie Chicha; Luca Mazzucchelli; Lucio Bronz; Jean-Claude Piffaretti; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Markus G Manz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A human immune system mouse model with robust lymph node development.

Authors:  Yan Li; Guillemette Masse-Ranson; Zacarias Garcia; Timothée Bruel; Ayrin Kök; Helene Strick-Marchand; Gregory Jouvion; Nicolas Serafini; Ai Ing Lim; Mathilde Dusseaux; Thierry Hieu; Franck Bourgade; Antoine Toubert; Daniela Finke; Olivier Schwartz; Philippe Bousso; Hugo Mouquet; James P Di Santo
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  IL-15 transpresentation promotes both human T-cell reconstitution and T-cell-dependent antibody responses in vivo.

Authors:  Nicholas D Huntington; Nuno L Alves; Nicolas Legrand; Annick Lim; Helene Strick-Marchand; Jean-Jacques Mention; Ariane Plet; Kees Weijer; Yannick Jacques; Pablo D Becker; Carlos Guzman; Patrick Soussan; Dina Kremsdorf; Hergen Spits; James P Di Santo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  NOD/SCID/gamma(c)(null) mouse: an excellent recipient mouse model for engraftment of human cells.

Authors:  Mamoru Ito; Hidefumi Hiramatsu; Kimio Kobayashi; Kazutomo Suzue; Mariko Kawahata; Kyoji Hioki; Yoshito Ueyama; Yoshio Koyanagi; Kazuo Sugamura; Kohichiro Tsuji; Toshio Heike; Tatsutoshi Nakahata
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Modeling Infectious Diseases in Mice with a "Humanized" Immune System.

Authors:  Yan Li; James P Di Santo
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2019-03

Review 6.  Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (third edition).

Authors:  Andrea Cossarizza; Hyun-Dong Chang; Andreas Radbruch; Sergio Abrignani; Richard Addo; Mübeccel Akdis; Immanuel Andrä; Francesco Andreata; Francesco Annunziato; Eduardo Arranz; Petra Bacher; Sudipto Bari; Vincenzo Barnaba; Joana Barros-Martins; Dirk Baumjohann; Cristian G Beccaria; David Bernardo; Dominic A Boardman; Jessica Borger; Chotima Böttcher; Leonie Brockmann; Marie Burns; Dirk H Busch; Garth Cameron; Ilenia Cammarata; Antonino Cassotta; Yinshui Chang; Fernando Gabriel Chirdo; Eleni Christakou; Luka Čičin-Šain; Laura Cook; Alexandra J Corbett; Rebecca Cornelis; Lorenzo Cosmi; Martin S Davey; Sara De Biasi; Gabriele De Simone; Genny Del Zotto; Michael Delacher; Francesca Di Rosa; James Di Santo; Andreas Diefenbach; Jun Dong; Thomas Dörner; Regine J Dress; Charles-Antoine Dutertre; Sidonia B G Eckle; Pascale Eede; Maximilien Evrard; Christine S Falk; Markus Feuerer; Simon Fillatreau; Aida Fiz-Lopez; Marie Follo; Gemma A Foulds; Julia Fröbel; Nicola Gagliani; Giovanni Galletti; Anastasia Gangaev; Natalio Garbi; José Antonio Garrote; Jens Geginat; Nicholas A Gherardin; Lara Gibellini; Florent Ginhoux; Dale I Godfrey; Paola Gruarin; Claudia Haftmann; Leo Hansmann; Christopher M Harpur; Adrian C Hayday; Guido Heine; Daniela Carolina Hernández; Martin Herrmann; Oliver Hoelsken; Qing Huang; Samuel Huber; Johanna E Huber; Jochen Huehn; Michael Hundemer; William Y K Hwang; Matteo Iannacone; Sabine M Ivison; Hans-Martin Jäck; Peter K Jani; Baerbel Keller; Nina Kessler; Steven Ketelaars; Laura Knop; Jasmin Knopf; Hui-Fern Koay; Katja Kobow; Katharina Kriegsmann; H Kristyanto; Andreas Krueger; Jenny F Kuehne; Heike Kunze-Schumacher; Pia Kvistborg; Immanuel Kwok; Daniela Latorre; Daniel Lenz; Megan K Levings; Andreia C Lino; Francesco Liotta; Heather M Long; Enrico Lugli; Katherine N MacDonald; Laura Maggi; Mala K Maini; Florian Mair; Calin Manta; Rudolf Armin Manz; Mir-Farzin Mashreghi; Alessio Mazzoni; James McCluskey; Henrik E Mei; Fritz Melchers; Susanne Melzer; Dirk Mielenz; Leticia Monin; Lorenzo Moretta; Gabriele Multhoff; Luis Enrique Muñoz; Miguel Muñoz-Ruiz; Franziska Muscate; Ambra Natalini; Katrin Neumann; Lai Guan Ng; Antonia Niedobitek; Jana Niemz; Larissa Nogueira Almeida; Samuele Notarbartolo; Lennard Ostendorf; Laura J Pallett; Amit A Patel; Gulce Itir Percin; Giovanna Peruzzi; Marcello Pinti; A Graham Pockley; Katharina Pracht; Immo Prinz; Irma Pujol-Autonell; Nadia Pulvirenti; Linda Quatrini; Kylie M Quinn; Helena Radbruch; Hefin Rhys; Maria B Rodrigo; Chiara Romagnani; Carina Saggau; Shimon Sakaguchi; Federica Sallusto; Lieke Sanderink; Inga Sandrock; Christine Schauer; Alexander Scheffold; Hans U Scherer; Matthias Schiemann; Frank A Schildberg; Kilian Schober; Janina Schoen; Wolfgang Schuh; Thomas Schüler; Axel R Schulz; Sebastian Schulz; Julia Schulze; Sonia Simonetti; Jeeshan Singh; Katarzyna M Sitnik; Regina Stark; Sarah Starossom; Christina Stehle; Franziska Szelinski; Leonard Tan; Attila Tarnok; Julia Tornack; Timothy I M Tree; Jasper J P van Beek; Willem van de Veen; Klaas van Gisbergen; Chiara Vasco; Nikita A Verheyden; Anouk von Borstel; Kirsten A Ward-Hartstonge; Klaus Warnatz; Claudia Waskow; Annika Wiedemann; Anneke Wilharm; James Wing; Oliver Wirz; Jens Wittner; Jennie H M Yang; Juhao Yang
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Humanized NOG Mice for Intravaginal HIV Exposure and Treatment of HIV Infection.

Authors:  Anna H F Andersen; Stine S F Nielsen; Rikke Olesen; Katharina Mack; Frederik Dagnæs-Hansen; Niels Uldbjerg; Lars Østergaard; Ole S Søgaard; Paul W Denton; Martin Tolstrup
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  Technical Improvement and Application of Hydrodynamic Gene Delivery in Study of Liver Diseases.

Authors:  Mei Huang; Rui Sun; Qiang Huang; Zhigang Tian
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Regulatory T cells control toxicity in a humanized model of IL-2 therapy.

Authors:  Yan Li; Helene Strick-Marchand; Ai Ing Lim; Jiazi Ren; Guillemette Masse-Ranson; Gregory Jouvion; Lars Rogge; Sophie Lucas; James P Di Santo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Flow cytometric characterization of tissue-resident lymphocytes after murine liver and heart transplantation.

Authors:  Amy Prosser; Sarah Dart; Irma Larma-Cornwall; Michaela Lucas
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.