| Literature DB >> 35265761 |
W A Nganfo1, C Kenfack-Sadem1, A J Fotué1, M C Ekosso1, S N Wopunghwo1, L C Fai1.
Abstract
In this paper, we study the dynamical properties of the exciton-polaron in the microtubule. The study was carried out using a unitary transformation and an approximate diagonalization technique. Analytically, the modeling of exciton-polaron dynamics in microtubules is presented. From this model, the ground state energy, mobility, and entropy of the exciton-polaron are derived as a function of microtubule's parameters. Numerical results show that, depending on the three vibrational modes (protofilament, helix, antihelix) in MTs, exciton-polaron energy is anisotropic and is more present on the protofilament than the helix and absent on the antihelix. Taking into account the variation of the protofilament vibrations by fixing the helix vibrations, exciton-polaron moves between the 1st and 2nd protofilaments. It is seen that the variation of the two vibrations induces mobility of the quasiparticle between the 1st and 15th protofilament. This result points out the importance of helix vibrations on the dynamics of quasiparticles. It is observed that the mobility of the exciton polaron and the entropy of the system are strongly influenced by the vibrations through the protofilament and helix. The effects of the one through the antihelix is negligible. The entropy of the system is similar to that of mobility. Confirming that the quasiparticles move in the protofilament faster than in the helix.Entities:
Keywords: Anisotropic; Antihelix; Exciton-polaron; Helix; Microtubule; Protofilament; Vibration frequency
Year: 2022 PMID: 35265761 PMCID: PMC8899671 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1(a) Model of the microtubule made up of 13 protofilaments and formed from αβ tubulin dimers. (b) Each filled circle represents a possible location of the electron with a corresponding quantum state |α〉 (upper) or 〈β| (lower) (Hiramatsu et al., 2008).
Figure 2a): exciton-polaron energy as a function of vibration frequency along the main helix ω and the vibration frequency along the antihelix ω. b): exciton-polaron energy as a function of vibration frequency along the antihelix and the vibration frequency along a protofilament ω. c): exciton-polaron energy as a function of the vibration frequency along the main helix ω and the vibration frequency along a protofilament ω.
Figure 3a): Mobility μ as a function of vibration frequency along a protofilament for different values of the helix frequency ω. b): Mobility as a function of vibration frequency along a protofilament for different values of the antihelix frequency ω.
Figure 4a): Tsallis entropy as a function of vibration frequency along a protofilament ω for different values of the helix frequency ω. b): Entropy as a function of vibration frequency along a protofilament for different values of the antihelix frequency ω.
Figure 5a): Mobility μ as a function of vibration frequency along a protofilament ω for the population of protofilament. b): Entropy as a function of vibration frequency along a protofilament for the population of protofilament. c): Mobility μ as a function of vibration frequency along a protofilament for the population of protofilament and for different values of the helix. d): Entropy as a function of vibration frequency along a protofilament ω for the population of protofilament and for different values of the helix ω.