| Literature DB >> 35265300 |
B Sumathy1, Pankaj Dadheech2, Monika Jain3, Ankur Saxena4, S Hemalatha5, Wenqi Liu6, Stephen Jeswinde Nuagah7.
Abstract
Background: The liver is one of the most significant and most essential organs in the human body. It is divided into two granular lobes, one on the right and one on the left, connected by a bile duct. The liver is essential in the removal of waste products from human food consumption, the creation of bile, the regulation of metabolic activities, the cleaning of the blood by sensitizing digestive management, and the storage of vitamins and minerals. To perform the classification of liver illnesses using computed tomography (CT scans), two critical phases must first be completed: liver segmentation and categorization. The most difficult challenge in categorizing liver disease is distinguishing the liver from the other organs near it. Methodology. Liver biopsy is a kind of invasive diagnostic procedure, widely regarded as the gold standard for accurately estimating the severity of liver disease. Noninvasive approaches for examining liver illnesses, such as blood serum markers and medical imaging (ultrasound, magnetic resonance MR, and CT) have also been developed. This approach uses the Partial Differential Technique (PDT) to separate the liver from the other organs and Level Set Methodology (LSM) for separating the cancer location from the surrounding tissue based on the projected pictures used as input. With the help of an Improved Convolutional Classifier, the categorization of different phases may be accomplished.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35265300 PMCID: PMC8898868 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4055491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Feature selection concerning liver image.
Figure 2Flow of proposed work.
Figure 3Feature Extraction using Dynamic Vector Warping (DVW).
Figure 4Proposed improved convolutional neural network.
Figure 5Partial Differential Technique with Input CT image of liver cancer cells.
Figure 6Level Set Technique with Input CT image of liver cancer cells.
The feature values that were picked for 7 images.
| Image | DVW | Local distance measure | Local cost measure | Entropy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 858.000000 | 858.000000 | 858.000000 | 858.000000 |
| 2 | 84.000000 | 26.820513 | 0.040793 | 0.086247 |
| 3 | 32.000000 | 8.497948 | 0.197925 | 0.280892 |
| 4 | 25.000000 | 13.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
| 5 | 13.000000 | 20.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
| 6 | 8.497948 | 25.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
| 7 | 26.820513 | 32.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
The classification results and performance with the existing classifiers.
| Techniques | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | ROC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 92.36 | 94.6 | 92.6 | 96.6 |
| KNN | 93.89 | 95.66 | 93.66 | 97.66 |
| Naïve Bayes | 94.36 | 95.98 | 96.98 | 98.98 |
| CNN | 95.6 | 95.36 | 97.36 | 97.36 |
| ICNN | 97.5 | 96 | 93 | 95 |
Figure 7Performance metrics.
Figure 8Confusion matrix obtained from training stage of input classifier.
Figure 9ROC of input classifier.