| Literature DB >> 35265109 |
Ahmad Ali AlZubi1, Shailendra Tiwari2, Kuldeep Walia3, Jazem Mutared Alanazi1, Firas Ibrahim AlZobi4, Rohit Verma5.
Abstract
Lyme disease is one of the most common vector-borne infections. It typically causes cardiac illnesses, neurologic illnesses, musculoskeletal disorders, and dermatologic conditions. However, most of the time, it is poorly diagnosed due to many similarities with other diseases such as drug rash. Given the potentially serious consequences of unnecessary antimicrobial treatments, it is essential to understand frequent and uncommon diagnoses that explain symptoms in this population. Recently, deep learning models have been used for the diagnosis of various rash-related diseases. However, these models suffer from overfitting and color variation problems. To overcome these problems, an efficient stacked deep transfer learning model is proposed that can efficiently distinguish between patients infected with Lyme (+) or infected with other infections. 2nd order edge-based color constancy is used as a preprocessing approach to reduce the impact of multisource light from images acquired under different setups. The AlexNet pretrained learning model is used for building the Lyme disease diagnosis model. To prevent overfitting, data augmentation techniques are also used to augment the dataset. In addition, 5-fold cross-validation is also used. Comparative analysis indicates that the proposed model outperforms the existing models in terms of accuracy, f-measure, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35265109 PMCID: PMC8901315 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2933015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Images of Lyme disease along with other similar diseases.
Figure 2The proposed automated Lyme disease diagnosis model.
Algorithm 1Second-order edge-based color constancy algorithm.
Figure 3The proposed ResNet-based classification architecture for Lyme diagnosis.
Hyperparameter setting of the proposed model.
| Parameter | Value/type |
|---|---|
| Gradient decay factor | 0.9 |
| Squared gradient decay factor | 0.99 |
| Epsilon | 1.00E-08 |
| Initial learning rate | 3.00E-04 |
| Learning rate drop factor | 0.1 |
| Learning rate drop period | 10 |
| L2 regularization | 1.00E-04 |
| Gradient threshold | L2-norm |
| Maximum epochs | 200 |
| Minimum batch size | 64 |
| Validation frequency | 50 |
Figure 4Training and validation analysis of the proposed model without using the 2nd order edge-based color constancy.
Figure 5Training and validation analysis of the proposed model with 2nd order edge-based color constancy.
Figure 6Confusion matrix analysis of the proposed model without 2nd order edge-based color constancy.
Figure 7Confusion matrix analysis of the proposed model with 2nd order edge-based color constancy.
Training analyses among the proposed and competitive Lyme rash classification models.
| Model | TP | FP | TN | FN | Accuracy | f-measure | Sensitivity | Specificity | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNN [ | 196 | 20 | 294 | 26 | 90.4306 | 91.5032 | 87.9069 | 93.3333 | 91.0679 |
| EDLP [ | 192 | 24 | 303 | 17 | 89.6551 | 94.3708 | 92.4444 | 92.2330 | 92.3221 |
| SqueezeNet [ | 194 | 22 | 294 | 26 | 89.3719 | 92.1921 | 87.6777 | 93.3130 | 91.1111 |
| LWADL [ | 210 | 6 | 295 | 25 | 97.0731 | 92.4471 | 88.8392 | 98.0769 | 94.2164 |
| Unet-dCNN [ | 184 | 32 | 297 | 23 | 86.0262 | 92.6282 | 89.5454 | 90.0311 | 89.8336 |
| ResNet-50 [ | 202 | 14 | 288 | 32 | 93.1372 | 89.8089 | 85.5855 | 95.2702 | 91.1196 |
| FADEM [ | 195 | 21 | 292 | 28 | 90.1408 | 91.3580 | 87.2727 | 93.3753 | 90.8752 |
| Ensemble CNN [ | 195 | 21 | 310 | 10 | 90.7894 | 96.633 | 95.3917 | 93.1818 | 94.0952 |
| Proposed without EBCC | 197 | 19 | 316 | 4 | 90.5940 | 98.6486 | 97.8609 | 93.8906 | 95.3815 |
| Proposed with EBCC | 213 | 3 | 316 | 4 | 98.6111 | 98.6711 | 98.1566 | 99.0000 | 98.6460 |