Literature DB >> 35263515

Resistance Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant after Sotrovimab Use.

Rebecca Rockett1, Kerri Basile2, Susan Maddocks3, Winkie Fong3, Jessica E Agius4, Jessica Johnson-Mackinnon4, Alicia Arnott2, Shona Chandra3, Mailie Gall2, Jenny Draper2, Elena Martinez2, Eby M Sim2, Clement Lee2, Christine Ngo2, Marc Ramsperger2, Andrew N Ginn2, Qinning Wang2, Michael Fennell2, Danny Ko2, H Ling Lim3, Nicky Gilroy3, Matthew V N O'Sullivan2, Sharon C-A Chen2, Jen Kok2, Dominic E Dwyer2, Vitali Sintchenko5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35263515      PMCID: PMC8929376          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2120219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Sotrovimab is a monoclonal antibody that is available under emergency use authorization for the treatment of patients who are at risk for progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) to severe disease.[1] Sotrovimab is thought to neutralize all sarbecoviruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), by binding to a highly conserved epitope within the receptor-binding domain.[2] However, the use of SARS-CoV-2–specific monoclonal antibodies to target a single viral epitope warrants caution because of the risk of rapid development of mutations that confer resistance after exposure to these antibodies.[2-4] Mutations at positions S:E340K/A/V and S:P337L/T (Figure 1A) have been associated with a reduction by a factor of 100 to 297 in neutralization by sotrovimab.[5]
Figure 1

SARS-CoV-2 Viral-Load Dynamics and Acquisition of Resistance Mutations after Sotrovimab Treatment.

The acquisition of mutations conferring a high level of resistance to sotrovimab and the dynamics of the viral load of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are shown. Panel A shows the N-terminal domain (NTD), receptor-binding domain (RBD), and receptor-binding motif (RBM) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the protein sequence and coordinates of mutations that were acquired in the RBD of the spike protein after sotrovimab treatment. We found five mutations (S:E340K/A/V and S:P337L/T) that have been reported to reduce susceptibility to sotrovimab by factors of 297, 100, 200, 192, and 10, respectively.[1,5] Panel B shows the global phylogeny of subsampled isolates of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant, a variant of concern, with the geographic region of sequences indicated in the outer ring. Panel C shows the findings in four patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who received sotrovimab. The acquisition and read frequency of mutations conferring high levels of resistance to sotrovimab and the SARS-CoV-2 load at each sampling point are shown. The asterisks indicate two sampling time points in which a high-quality SARS-CoV-2 genome could not be recovered (in Patient R002 on day 7 and in Patient R004 on day 19) and potential resistance mutations could not be revealed. All the patients in whom resistance mutations developed (Patients R001 through R004) were hospitalized during the sampling periods.

We reviewed the first 100 consecutive patients who received sotrovimab at health care facilities in the Western Sydney Local Health District in New South Wales, Australia, during the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant outbreak between August and November 2021 (Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). We identified 8 patients (Patients R001 through R008) with reverse transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assays that were persistently positive for SARS-CoV-2 and for whom respiratory tract specimens obtained before and after the use of sotrovimab were available. Genomic analysis showed that 4 of these 8 patients (Patients R001 through R004) acquired previously defined receptor-binding domain mutations within 6 to 13 days after they received sotrovimab (Figure 1C and Table S1). Mutations in S:E340 developed in all 4 patients, findings that are concordant with those in the Covid-19 Monoclonal Antibody Efficacy Trial–Intent to Care Early (COMET-ICE).[2] Cultures obtained from these patients remained positive for 23, 24, 12, and 15 days, respectively, after they received sotrovimab (Table S2). Read frequencies of S:E340K/A/V mutations increased over the course of infection; the proportion of the viral population carrying S:E340K/A/V exceeded 75% by day 7 in Patient R002, by day 13 in Patient R003, and by day 37 in Patient R004 (Figure 1C and Table S2). In addition, a minority variant developed in Patient R002 at position P337L after fixation of the S:E340K mutation. A retrospective review of 11,841 SARS-CoV-2 genomes in the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data database (a site for compiling sequence data on viruses) (Table S3) and reported in New South Wales, Australia, identified 4 additional patients with S:E340 mutations. In 1 patient, the SARS-CoV-2 genome was detected 5 days after sotrovimab treatment, and in another it was detected 11 days after treatment. These data show the persistence of viable SARS-CoV-2 in patients after sotrovimab infusions and the rapid development of spike gene mutations associated with high-level sotrovimab resistance in vitro. These findings underscore the importance of stewardship of monoclonal antibodies, particularly because sotrovimab is one of the few monoclonal antibodies with retained activity against the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant.[1] Postmarketing genomic surveillance of patients who receive monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection is prudent in order to minimize the risk of both treatment failure and the transmission of potentially resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants in health care settings and the community, given that SARS-CoV-2 may be isolated up to 24 days after sotrovimab treatment.
  26 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 on the liver and on the care of patients with chronic liver disease, hepatobiliary cancer, and liver transplantation: An updated EASL position paper.

Authors:  Thomas Marjot; Christiane S Eberhardt; Tobias Boettler; Luca S Belli; Marina Berenguer; Maria Buti; Rajiv Jalan; Mario U Mondelli; Richard Moreau; Daniel Shouval; Thomas Berg; Markus Cornberg
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 30.083

2.  Where is the next SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern?

Authors:  John J Dennehy; Ravindra K Gupta; William P Hanage; Marc C Johnson; Thomas P Peacock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 202.731

Review 3.  Antibody-mediated neutralization of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Henning Gruell; Kanika Vanshylla; Timm Weber; Christopher O Barnes; Christoph Kreer; Florian Klein
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 43.474

4.  Sotrovimab-emergent resistance in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron: A series of three cases.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Federica Novazzi; Andreina Baj; Francesca Drago Ferrante; Sara Boutahar; Angelo Paolo Genoni; Daniela Dalla Gasperina; Fabrizio Maggi
Journal:  J Clin Virol Plus       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  Vaccine-induced spike- and nucleocapsid-specific cellular responses maintain potent cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants.

Authors:  Flavia Chiuppesi; John A Zaia; Katelyn Faircloth; Daisy Johnson; Minh Ly; Veronica Karpinski; Corinna La Rosa; Jennifer Drake; Joan Marcia; Ann Marie Acosta; Shannon Dempsey; Randy A Taplitz; Qiao Zhou; Yoonsuh Park; Sandra Ortega Francisco; Teodora Kaltcheva; Paul H Frankel; Steven Rosen; Felix Wussow; Sanjeet Dadwal; Don J Diamond
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-11

6.  Tixagevimab-cilgavimab for treatment of patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 102.642

7.  Sotrovimab to prevent severe COVID-19 in high-risk patients infected with Omicron BA.2.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin-Blondel; Anne-Genevieve Marcelin; Cathia Soulié; Sofia Kaisaridi; Clovis Lusivika-Nzinga; Céline Dorival; Laura Nailler; Anaïs Boston; Cléa Melenotte; André Cabié; Christophe Choquet; François Coustillères; Jean-Philippe Martellosio; Géraldine Gaube; Albert Trinh-Duc; Anne-Marie Ronchetti; Valerie Pourcher; Marie Chauveau; Karine Lacombe; Nathan Peiffer-Smadja; Pierre Housset; Aurore Perrot; Gilles Pialoux; Aurélie Martin; Vincent Dubee; Mathilde Devaux; Jérôme Frey; Charles Cazanave; Roland Liblau; Fabrice Carrat; Youri Yordanov
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 38.637

Review 8.  Antibodies to combat viral infections: development strategies and progress.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pantaleo; Bruno Correia; Craig Fenwick; Victor S Joo; Laurent Perez
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 112.288

Review 9.  Monoclonal antibody therapies against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Scott McConnell; Arturo Casadevall; Emiliano Cappello; Giulia Valdiserra; Marco Tuccori
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 71.421

10.  COVID-19: Third dose booster vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough coronavirus infection, hospitalisations and death in patients with cancer: A population-based study.

Authors:  Lennard Y W Lee; Maria C Ionescu; Thomas Starkey; Martin Little; Michael Tilby; Arvind R Tripathy; Hayley S Mckenzie; Youssra Al-Hajji; Nathan Appanna; Matthew Barnard; Liza Benny; Alexander Burnett; Emma L Cattell; James J Clark; Sam Khan; Qamar Ghafoor; Hari Panneerselvam; George Illsley; Catherine Harper-Wynne; Rosie J Hattersley; Alvin Jx Lee; Oliver Lomas; Justin Kh Liu; Amanda McCauley; Matthew Pang; Jennifer S Pascoe; James R Platt; Grisma Patel; Vijay Patel; Vanessa A Potter; Amelia Randle; Anne S Rigg; Tim M Robinson; Tom W Roques; René L Roux; Stefan Rozmanowski; Harriet Taylor; Mark H Tuthill; Isabella Watts; Sarah Williams; Andrew Beggs; Tim Iveson; Siow M Lee; Gary Middleton; Mark Middleton; Andrew Protheroe; Matthew W Fittall; Tom Fowler; Peter Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 10.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.