| Literature DB >> 35263370 |
Nazgul Soltobekova1, Turatbek Kozukeev2, Ghirmai Yiehdego2, Fatah Labib2,3, Arax Hovhannesyan4, Rodolfo Rossi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis burden among the incarcerated population is generally higher than that of general population. Early diagnosis and prompt initiation of treatment are key strategies to contain disease transmission. The aim of this study was to determine the time to treatment initiation among inmates with new smear or Xpert MTB/RIF positive pulmonary tuberculosis and explore risk factors associated with delayed treatment initiation in prison settings.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35263370 PMCID: PMC8906629 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flowchart of study population based on exclusion criteria.
*WRD–WHO recommended rapid diagnostics.
Time (in days) from the date of specimen collection for microscopy or Xpert MTB/RIF) to TB treatment initiation by demographic and clinical characteristics.
| Characteristics | Number | (%) | Time to treatment initiation (day) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | (SD) | Median | IQR | Range | |||
|
| 406 | 16.2 | 37.9 | 7 | (2; 16) | (0–520) | |
|
| |||||||
| below 25 years | 67 | (16.5) | 9.6 | 14.3 | 5 | (1; 12) | (0–80) |
| 25–34 years | 155 | (38.3) | 19.5 | 39.9 | 7 | (2; 20) | (0–260) |
| 35–44 years | 122 | (30.1) | 14.4 | 20.7 | 8 | (2; 17) | (0–132) |
| 45–54 years | 47 | (11.6) | 20.0 | 75.0 | 6 | (1; 17) | (0–520) |
| over 55 years | 14 | (3.5) | 15.9 | 19.7 | 11 | (1; 20) | (0–72) |
| missing 1 | 1 | 7.0 | 7 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Female | 9 | (2.2) | 8.3 | 6.6 | 7 | (1;15) | (0–520) |
| Male | 397 | (97.8) | 16.4 | 38.3 | 7 | (2;19) | (0–260) |
|
| |||||||
| 2014–2015 | 156 | (38.4) | 19.7 | 52.5 | 6 | (1; 15) | (0–169) |
| 2016–2017 | 151 | (37.2) | 15.7 | 29.5 | 8 | (2; 18) | (0–260) |
| 2018–2020 | 99 | (24.4) | 11.6 | 13.8 | 6 | (3; 19) | (0–72) |
|
| |||||||
| < 18.5 kg/cm2 | 119 | (32.4) | 22.2 | 58.9 | 7 | (1; 16) | (0–520) |
| 18.5–24.9 kg/cm2 | 237 | (64.6) | 14.4 | 25.9 | 6 | (2; 16) | (0–260) |
| > = 25.0 kg/cm2 | 11 | (3.0) | 13.9 | 12.1 | 18 | (1; 23) | (0–32) |
| Missing | 39 | 9.6 | 10.6 | 8 | (1; 12) | (0–47) | |
|
| |||||||
| HIV negative | 319 | (80.6) | 12.9 | 21.8 | 6 | (2; 16) | (0–260) |
| HIV positive | 77 | (19.4) | 30.6 | 73.3 | 9 | (2; 19) | (0–520) |
| Unknown | 10 | 12.1 | 15.1 | 6 | (1; 16) | (0–47) | |
|
| |||||||
| None | 372 | (93.2) | 17.0 | 39.4 | 7 | (2;17) | (0–520) |
| Cavity | 27 | (6.8) | 6.4 | 8.5 | 2 | (0; 13) | (0–28) |
| Missing | 7 | 13.4 | 11.1 | 11 | (4–20) | (3–35) | |
|
| |||||||
| Negative | 204 | (50.2) | 20.8 | 46.6 | 9 | (3–20) | (0–520) |
| Positive | 202 | (49.8) | 11.6 | 25.6 | 4 | (1–13) | (0–260) |
|
| |||||||
| RIF and INH sensitive | 209 | (51.5) | 7.8 | 10.2 | 4 | (1–11) | (0–62) |
| INH resistance RIF sensitive | 77 | (19.0) | 15.4 | 18.9 | 7 | (2–20) | (0–76) |
| RIF resistance | 120 | (29.6) | 31.4 | 64.1 | 13 | (5–26) | (0–520) |
|
| |||||||
| No | 210 | (51.7) | 11.6 | 19.0 | 6 | (1; 14) | (0–188) |
| Yes | 196 | (48.3) | 21.2 | 50.4 | 8 | (2.5; 20) | (0–520) |
|
| |||||||
| Yes | 153 | (98.7) | 21.2 | 51.4 | 9 | (2; 20) | (0–520) |
| No | 2 | (1.3) | 15.5 | 10.6 | 16 | (8; 23) | (8–23) |
| Unknown | 251 | 13.2 | 26.3 | 6 | (0; 13) | (0–260) | |
SD = standard deviation
IQR = Interquartile range
Predictors of delay in TB treatment initiation by demographic and clinical characteristics.
| Characteristics | Total number | >10 days delays | Univariable | Multivariable | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | (%) | OR | (95% CI) | p-value | aOR | (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|
| 1.02 | (1.00–1.04) | 0.111 | 1.01 | (1.00–1.04) | 0.166 | |||
|
| |||||||||
| Female | 9 | 2 | (22.2) | 1 | |||||
| Male | 397 | 155 | (39.0) | 2.24 | (0.46–10.97) | 0.306 | |||
|
| |||||||||
| 2014–2015 | 156 | 60 | (38.5) | 1 | |||||
| 2016–2017 | 151 | 60 | (39.7) | 1.05 | (0.67–1.67) | 0.819 | |||
| 2018–2020 | 99 | 37 | (37.4) | 0.95 | (0.56–1.61) | 0.862 | |||
|
| |||||||||
| < 18.5 kg/cm2 | 119 | 49 | (41.2) | 1.16 | (0.74–1.83) | 0.509 | |||
| 18.5–24.9 kg/cm2 | 237 | 89 | (37.6) | 1 | |||||
| > = 25.0 kg/cm2 | 11 | 6 | (54.4) | 2.00 | (0.59–6.77) | 0.258 | |||
| Missing | 39 | 13 | (33.3) | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| HIV negative | 319 | 118 | (37.0) | 1 | |||||
| HIV positive | 77 | 35 | (45.5) | 1.42 | (0.86–2.35) | 0.172 | |||
| Unknown | 10 | 4 | (40.0) | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| No cavity | 372 | 146 | (39.2) | 1 | |||||
| Cavity | 27 | 7 | (25.9) | 0.54 | (0.22–1.32) | 0.170 | |||
| Missing | 7 | 4 | (57.1) | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Negative | 204 | 95 | (46.6) | 1 |
| ||||
| Positive | 202 | 62 | (30.7) | 0.50 | (0.34–0.77) |
| 0.44 | (0.28–0.68) | |
|
| |||||||||
| RIF and INH sensitive | 209 | 54 | (25.8) | 1 | 1 |
| |||
| INH resistance RIF sensitive | 77 | 35 | (45.5) | 2.39 | (1.37–4.17) |
| 2.57 | (1.47–4.50) | |
| RIF resistance | 120 | 68 | (56.7) | 3.75 | (2.28–6.19) |
| 4.09 | (2.50–6.70) | |
|
| |||||||||
| No | 210 | 74 | (35.2) | 1 | |||||
| Yes | 196 | 83 | (42.3) | 1.35 | (0.90–2.02) | 0.142 | |||
|
| |||||||||
| No | 2 | 1 | (50.0) | 1 | |||||
| Yes | 153 | 73 | (47.7) | 0.91 | (0.06–14.99) | 0.949 | |||
| Missing | 168 | 83 | (49.4) | - | - | ||||
*Chi2 p value
**Likelihood ratio test p value
OR = odd ratio
aOR = adjusted odd ratio
CI = confidence interval
Significant variables in sensitivity analyses for treatment delays using different cut-off points.
| Variables | Cut-off = 10 days | Cut-off = 7 days (median) | Cut-off = 17 days (3rd quartile) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aOR | (95%CI) | aOR | (95%CI) | aOR | (95%CI) | |
|
| ||||||
| Negative | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Positive | 0.44 | (0.29–0.68) | 0.39 | (0.26–0.60) | 0.37 | (0.22–0.61) |
|
| ||||||
| Sensitive | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| INH resistance RIF sen sensensitive | 2.61 | (1.49–4.56) | 1.81 | (1.05–3.14) | 3.09 | (1.63–5.87) |
| RIF resistance | 4.14 | (2.56–6.77) | 3.76 | (2.30–6.13) | 4.64 | (2.66–8.10) |
aOR = adjusted odd ratio
CI = confidence interval
*Adjusted for age, smear result and resistance to RIF and INH