| Literature DB >> 35262510 |
Yingxin Fang1, Pingping Dang1, Yue Liang1, Defa Zhao1, Ranran Wang1, Yue Xi1,2, Dan Zhang1,2, Wei Wang1, Zhongyan Shan1, Weiping Teng1, Xiaochun Teng1.
Abstract
Background: Proper thyroid hormone signaling via the TRα1 nuclear receptor is required for normal neurodevelopmental processes. The specific downstream mechanisms mediated by TRα1 that impact brain development remain to be investigated.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive deficits; hippocampus; hypothyroidism; thyroid hormone resistance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35262510 PMCID: PMC9066571 DOI: 10.1530/ETJ-21-0097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Thyroid J ISSN: 2235-0640
Figure 1Spatial and temporal expression of Thra1mRNA in mouse hippocampus by RNAscope. (A) RNAscope hybridization demonstrates the dynamic change of Thra1 mRNAs in mouse hippocampus during the embryonic period. Formalin-perfused, fixed mouse embryo (E10.5 and E14.5) and brain (E16.5, E18.5, P3, P7, P14, and P56) were dehydrated in gradient ethanol, transparent in xylene, embedded in paraffin, and cut at a setting of 5 µm in the sagittal plane. The cytoarchitecture of the hippocampus in b, d, f (100×) is corresponding to the red squares in the sagittal plane of brain (a, c, e, 10×), respectively. The cytoarchitecture of the hippocampus in h and i (100×) is corresponding to the red squares in the sagittal plane of brain (g, 10×), with h denoting CA1 and i denoting DG area. The red arrow shows the Thra1 mRNA hybridized to the probes. Scale bar: 200 μm for a, 1 mm for c, 100 μm for e, g, and 10 μm for b, d, f, h, i. (B) RNAscope hybridization demonstrates the dynamic change of Thra1 mRNAs in mouse hippocampus during the postnatal period. A1, B1, C1, and D1 show the overall structure of the hippocampus at P3, P7, P14, and P56. A2-A8, B2-B8, C2-C8, and D2-D8 show structure of the sublayers in the hippocampus at P3, P7, P14, and P56, respectively. Taking the hippocampal structure of P56 as an example, the names and boundaries of the layers of hippocampal CA and DG are marked in D1. The red arrow shows the Thra1 mRNA hybridized to the probes. E, embryonic day; P, postnatal day; CA1, cornu ammonis area 1; DG, dentate gyrus; so, stratum oriens; sp, stratum pyramidale; sr, stratum radiatum; slm, stratum lacunosum moleculare; mo, moleculare layer; sg, stratum granulosum; po, polymorph layer.
Figure 2Representative photomicrographs of Nissl-stained coronal sections of the hippocampus. (A) The cytoarchitecture of the hippocampus (A1-I1, 4×; A2-I2, 10×) at postnatal day (P) 0 (A–C), P7 (D–F), and P21 (G–I). A3-I3 and A4-I4 showing the cytoarchitecture of the DG and CA1 area of hippocampus, respectively, which is corresponding to the yellow rectangle area in A1-I1. The yellow arrow denotes subventricular zone. Scale bar: 200 μm for A1-I1; 100 μm for A2-I2; and 20 μm for A3-I3 and A4-I4. All the brain tissues were cut at a setting of 5 µm in the coronal plane, and n = 3 for each genotype male mice at P0, P7, and P21, respectively. (B) Quantitation of the hippocampal sublayer thickness and the cell numbers in the pyramidal cell layer of the CA1 and granular cell layer in the DG at postnatal day 21. The maximal coronal section at the hippocampal level (corresponding to −2.92 mm from Bregma in adult mice (Paxinos brain atlas)) was used to analyze the morphology of hippocampus. The measurement of the layer thickness and the cell number were performed in the region where the highest point of the outer arm of the DG area, and the corresponding CA1 area. Two slides of each mouse were selected for the measurement and cell count of each sublayer in the CA1 or DG region of the hippocampus, average as the final result of each mouse. Three male mice were used for this experiment for each genotype. The number of cells in CA1 pyramidal cell layer and DG granule cell layer were corrected for the area of the counting region: cell counts/mm2 at 40× objective. Data were presented as the mean ± s.e.m. Statistical analysis was calculated by one-way ANOVA. *Compared with Thra+/+, P < 0.05; #Compared with ThraE403X/+, P < 0.05.
Figure 3Impaired long-term potentiation. Long-term potentiation (LTP) was performed in the male ThraE403X/E403X mice (n = 7) and male WT mice (n = 5) at postnatal day 21. LTP was induced by HFS, measured as an increase in f-EPSP slope and amplitude, expressed as a percentage of the baseline of the f-EPSP slope and amplitude after HFS in mice. f-EPSP slope and amplitude were reduced in the ThraE403X/E403X group. Data are expressed as the mean ± s.e.m. *Compared with the Thra+/+, P < 0.05. Statistical analysis was calculated by the Student’s t test. f-EPSP, feld excitatory postsynaptic potential; HFS, high-frequency stimulation; TET, tetanic high-frequency stimulation.
Figure 4Behavioral abnormalities of hippocampal origin. (A) Learning and memory performance in Morris Water Maze test. Morris water maze (MWM) test was performed in the ThraE403X/+mice and Thra+/+mice at 16 weeks. n = 11 for male ThraE403X/+ mice and male Thra+/+mice, respectively. (A) (a) Time of escape latency. (b) Times of crossing of target quadrant and platform area in the spatial probe trial. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m..Statistical analysis was calculated by the Student’s t test. Compared with the Thra+/+mice: *P < 0.05; **P< 0.01; ***P< 0.001. (B) Anxiety-like behavior in Elevated zero maze test. Elevated Zero Maze Test was performed in the ThraE403X/+ mice and Thra+/+ mice at 16 weeks. n =11 for male ThraE403X/+mice and male Thra+/+mice, respectively. (B) (a) Total distance of traveling. (b) Latency to visit the open arms. (c) Percentage of freezing time. (d) Number of entries into the open arms. (e) Percentage of time spent in the open arms. (f) Number of rearing and head dipping events. Data are expressed as the mean ± s.e.m. Statistical analysis was calculated by the Student’s t test. Compared with the Thra+/+ mice: *P < 0.05; **P< 0.01; ***P< 0.001.
Figure 5Transcriptomic changes induced by ThraE403X. (A) Volcano plot for differentially expressed gene mRNAs. (B) Hierarchical clustering analysis for differentially expressed gene mRNAs. Pheatmap is the abbreviation of pretty heatmap (a function of R). (C) Gene ontology analysis for differentially expressed gene mRNAs. (D) KEGG pathway analysis for differentially expressed gene mRNAs. The lower q-value indicates the more significant enrichment. Point size indicates DEG number (The bigger the ball, the more numbers the detected genes). Rich Factor refers to the value of enrichment factor, which is the quotient of foreground value (the number of DEGs) and background value (total gene amount). The larger the value, the more significant enrichment. Eight samples were codified as follows: HOM_3W, hippocampus sample from male ThraE403X/E403Xmice at 3-week-old (n = 4); WT_3 W, hippocampus sample from male Thra+/+ mice at 3-week-old (n =4).
Figure 6Validation by qPCR analyses. Relative mRNA levels of 25 DEGs were evaluated in Thra+/+(n = 4) and ThraE403X/ E403X mice (n = 4). The results were calculated using the comparative Ct method formula 2−ΔΔCt method and normalized against the housekeeping gene Gapdh. Data were presented as the mean ± s.e.m.Thra+/+ control was set to 1. Statistical analysis was calculated by the Student’s t test. *P< 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.