Literature DB >> 35262400

A Mini-Pig Mandibular Defect Model for Evaluation of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration.

Bart A J A van Oirschot1, Edwin J W Geven2, Antonios G Mikos3, Jeroen J J P van den Beucken1, John A Jansen4.   

Abstract

Craniomaxillofacial bone defects represent a clinical challenge in the fields of maxillofacial surgery and (implant) dentistry. Regeneration of these bone defects requires the application of bone graft materials that facilitate new bone formation in a safe, reliable, and predictive manner. In addition to autologous bone graft, several types of (synthetic) bone substitute materials have become clinically available, and still major efforts are focused on improving such bone substitute materials by optimizing their properties. Given the regulatory necessity to evaluate the performance of new bone substitute materials for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration in a large animal model with similarity to human bone before clinical application, we here describe a mini-pig mandibular bone defect model that allows for the creation of multiple (critical-size) bone defects within the mandibular body of a single animal. As examples of bone substitute materials, we utilize both the clinically used BioOss granules and an experimental calcium phosphate cement for filling the created defects. Regarding the latter, its advantages are the injectable application within the defect site, in which the material rapidly sets, and the tailorable degradation properties via the inclusion of hydrolytically degrading polymeric particles. For both bone substitute materials, we show the suitability of the bone defect model to assess bone regeneration via histology and micro-computed tomography. Impact statement Given the regulatory necessity to evaluate the performance of new bone substitute materials for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration in a large animal model with similarity to the human bone before clinical application, we here describe a mini-pig mandibular bone defect model that allows for the creation of multiple (critical-size) bone defects within the mandibular body of a single animal that can be used for the evaluation of the bone regenerative capacity of new bone grafting materials as well as tissue-engineered products for alveolar bone regeneration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone defect; bone regeneration; mandibula; mini-pig model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35262400      PMCID: PMC9271328          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2022.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.273


  28 in total

Review 1.  Bone repair techniques, bone graft, and bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  C R Perry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Growth factor-loaded scaffolds for bone engineering.

Authors:  J A Jansen; J W M Vehof; P Q Ruhé; H Kroeze-Deutman; Y Kuboki; H Takita; E L Hedberg; A G Mikos
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2005-01-03       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?

Authors:  Tadashi Kokubo; Hiroaki Takadama
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Bone formation in mono cortical mandibular critical size defects after augmentation with two synthetic nanostructured and one xenogenous hydroxyapatite bone substitute - in vivo animal study.

Authors:  Michael Dau; Peer W Kämmerer; Kai-Olaf Henkel; Thomas Gerber; Bernhard Frerich; Karsten K H Gundlach
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  A simple method for preparing thin (10 microM) histological sections of undecalcified plastic embedded bone with implants.

Authors:  H B van der Lubbe; C P Klein; K de Groot
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1988-05

Review 6.  Swine as models in biomedical research and toxicology testing.

Authors:  M M Swindle; A Makin; A J Herron; F J Clubb; K S Frazier
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.221

Review 7.  Animal models for periodontal regeneration and peri-implant responses.

Authors:  Alpdogan Kantarci; Hatice Hasturk; Thomas E Van Dyke
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

8.  Critical size defect in the canine mandible.

Authors:  Jin-Young Huh; Byung-Ho Choi; Byung-Young Kim; Seoung-Ho Lee; Shi-Jiang Zhu; Jae-Hyung Jung
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-09

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmentation.

Authors:  T Starch-Jensen; H Aludden; M Hallman; C Dahlin; A-E Christensen; A Mordenfeld
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Histological characterization of the early stages of bone morphogenetic protein-induced osteogenesis.

Authors:  J W M Vehof; H Takita; Y Kuboki; P H M Spauwen; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.