| Literature DB >> 35262332 |
Rob A Lehane1,2, Alonso Gamero-Quijano1,2, Sigita Malijauskaite1,2, Angelika Holzinger1,2, Michele Conroy1,3, Fathima Laffir1, Amit Kumar4, Ursel Bangert1,3, Kieran McGourty1,2,5, Micheál D Scanlon1,2,6.
Abstract
Conducting polymers (CPs) find applications in energy conversion and storage, sensors, and biomedical technologies once processed into thin films. Hydrophobic CPs, like poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), typically require surfactant additives, such as poly(styrenesulfonate) (PSS), to aid their aqueous processability as thin films. However, excess PSS diminishes CP electrochemical performance, biocompatibility, and device stability. Here, we report the electrosynthesis of PEDOT thin films at a polarized liquid|liquid interface, a method nonreliant on conductive solid substrates that produces free-standing, additive-free, biocompatible, easily transferrable, and scalable 2D PEDOT thin films of any shape or size in a single step at ambient conditions. Electrochemical control of thin film nucleation and growth at the polarized liquid|liquid interface allows control over the morphology, transitioning from 2D (flat on both sides with a thickness of <50 nm) to "Janus" 3D (with flat and rough sides, each showing distinct physical properties, and a thickness of >850 nm) films. The PEDOT thin films were p-doped (approaching the theoretical limit), showed high π-π conjugation, were processed directly as thin films without insulating PSS and were thus highly conductive without post-processing. This work demonstrates that interfacial electrosynthesis directly produces PEDOT thin films with distinctive molecular architectures inaccessible in bulk solution or at solid electrode-electrolyte interfaces and emergent properties that facilitate technological advances. In this regard, we demonstrate the PEDOT thin film's superior biocompatibility as scaffolds for cellular growth, opening immediate applications in organic electrochemical transistor (OECT) devices for monitoring cell behavior over extended time periods, bioscaffolds, and medical devices, without needing physiologically unstable and poorly biocompatible PSS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35262332 PMCID: PMC8949726 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c12373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Chem Soc ISSN: 0002-7863 Impact factor: 15.419
Figure 1The mechanism of PEDOT interfacial electrosynthesis at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES). (a) The mechanism is schematically shown as five distinct steps with time: (i) interfacial electron transfer (IET) at a positive externally applied interfacial Galvani potential difference (Δowϕ = +0.4 V) between the aqueous Ce4+ oxidant and organic EDOT monomer to form cationic EDOT oligomers, (ii) interfacial adsorption of the cationic EDOT oligomers at a more negative Δowϕ (−0.1 V) through an ion-pairing and interchange interaction with the aqueous SO42 – anions, (iii) autocatalytic IET between Ce4+ and EDOT at adsorbed EDOT oligomer sites that act as interfacial bipolar electrodes, (iv) adsorbed EDOT oligomer coalescence to form a highly compact 2D PEDOT thin film at the ITIES that is flat on both sides and heavily doped with aqueous SO42– anions, and (v) continued IET leading to a secondary growth process into the organic phase and the formation of a porous 3D structure on the organic-facing side as the thickness of the PEDOT thin film increases. (b) Four-electrode electrochemical cell (i) before and (ii) after interfacial electrosynthesis. The acidic aqueous phase, containing the yellow Ce4+ oxidant, is on top and the more dense α, α, α-trifluorotoluene (TFT) organic solution containing the EDOT monomer is on the bottom. PEDOT forms exclusively as a thin blue film at the polarized liquid|liquid (L|L) interface. (c) A PEDOT thin film removed from a large ITIES and stored in an acetone/0.2 M H2SO4 mixture to minimize gradual undoping.
Figure 2Electrochemically initiating, controlling, and monitoring PEDOT thin film interfacial electrosynthesis. (a) Electrochemical cell configuration of the four-electrode electrochemical cell employed. For blank experiments x and y are both 0 mM. For interfacial electrosynthesis experiments, x and y are 5 and 2 mM, respectively. In this four-electrode configuration, the organic Pt and Ag/AgCl electrodes were connected to the counter and reference terminals, respectively, while the aqueous Pt and Ag/AgCl electrodes were connected to the working and sensing terminals, respectively. All experiments were carried out under aerobic conditions. (b) Current–time transients recorded during double-potential step chronoamperometry (DPSCA) cycles 5 to 10 in the presence of aqueous Ce4+ and organic EDOT. The first potential step was held at Δowϕ = +0.4 V for 10 s, and the second step was held at Δowϕ = −0.1 V for 10 s. (c) Differential capacitance (C/μF) measurements performed at a bare aqueous|TFT interface (red line) and after DPSCA cycles 2 to 6 (black lines) in the presence of aqueous Ce4+ and organic EDOT. The frequency was 10 Hz, the amplitude was 10 mV, and the scan direction was from positive to negative potential. (d) Control DPSCA experiments. Current–time transients recorded during a DPSCA cycle with (black lines) and without (dashed blue lines) the aqueous Ce4+ oxidation present during PEDOT interfacial electrosynthesis. (e) Plot of the charge (Q/μC·cm–2) for each potential step recorded for the first 18 DPSCA cycles. All electrochemical experiments were performed using the cell configuration outlined in panel (a) under aerobic conditions.
Figure 3Microscopic analysis of the PEDOT thin film. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of a free-standing 2D PEDOT film electrosynthesized at the ITIES, showing the distinct morphologies of the “smooth” aqueous-facing side and “rough” organic-facing side. Additional SEM images are provided in the Supporting Information. (b) Sessile drop contact angle measurements recorded on each side of the PEDOT thin film, highlighting the influence of the morphology on the measured hydrophobicity. (c) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis of (i) the topography of a PEDOT thin film folded back on itself and (ii, iii) the thickness of a PEDOT thin film on a flat gold substrate after 50 DPSCA cycles. (d) Schematic of the different stages of PEDOT thin film growth from 2D to 3D as a function of continued DPSCA cycling. (e) SEM images showing the organic-facing side of the PEDOT thin film, demonstrating the controllable growth on the organic-facing side of the thin film from 2D to 3D as a function of DPSCA cycling. The thickness (t) of each thin film was determined by AFM (Figure S17). (f) (i) Bright-field and (ii, iii) dark-field mode transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging shows that the film is a compact network of PEDOT nanofibers that have diameters that range from <5 nm up to 50 nm. The arrows in (iii) point to PEDOT nanofibers with a diameter of ca. 5 nm. All PEDOT thin films analyzed were prepared by DPSCA cycling using the cell configuration outlined in Figure a.
Figure 4Biocompatibility of PEDOT thin films prepared at the ITIES and drop-cast PEDOT:PSS films with and without collagen functionalization. (a) Cell proliferation analysis. (b) Cell area analysis for each sample film. Scale bar, 50 μm.