Literature DB >> 35261713

Effects of the Medicare Part D Comprehensive Medication Review on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Medication Adherence.

Xiaobei Dong, Chi Chun Steve Tsang, Shirong Zhao, Jim Y Wan, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, Marie A Chisholm-Burns, Samuel Dagogo-Jack, William C Cushman, Lisa E Hines, Junling Wang.   

Abstract

Background: Substantial research has documented inequalities between US minorities and whites in meeting the eligibility criteria for the Medicare Part D medication therapy management (MTM) program. Even though the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services attempted to relax the eligibility criteria, a critical barrier to effective MTM reform is a lack of stronger evidence about the effects of MTM on minorities' health outcomes. Objective: To examine the effects of comprehensive medication review (CMR), an MTM core component, on racial and ethnic disparities in adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia medications among Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years.
Methods: This study used full-year 2017 Medicare Parts A, B, and D claims data, including MTM data, linked to the Area Health Resources Files. Racial and ethnic disparities in nonadherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia medications were compared between CMR recipients and nonrecipients matched by their propensity scores. To determine the changes in racial and ethnic disparities after receiving CMR, a difference-in-differences framework was applied, by including in logistic regression analyses interaction terms between dummy variables for CMR receipt and each racial or ethnic minority group.
Results: Compared with CMR nonrecipients, CMR recipients had significantly lower racial and ethnic disparities across the 3 outcome measures, with the exception of the difference between whites and blacks in nonadherence to diabetes medications. For example, compared with CMR nonrecipients, among CMR recipients the differences in the odds of nonadherence to hypertension medications were reduced, respectively, by 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.96) between whites and blacks; by 18% (95% CI, 0.78-0.86) between whites and Hispanics; by 16% (95% CI, 0.77-0.91) between whites and Asians; and by 9% (95% CI, 0.85-0.98) between whites and other racial and ethnic groups.
Conclusion: Receiving a CMR reduced the racial and ethnic disparities in adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia medications among Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years. These findings provide critical empirical evidence that may inform the future design of the Medicare Part D MTM program, which is valuable for improving pharmacotherapy outcomes and could further realize its potential when additional people from racial and ethnic minorities are enrolled.
Copyright © 2021 by Engage Healthcare Communications, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; comprehensive medication review; medication adherence; medication therapy management; racial/ethnic disparity

Year:  2021        PMID: 35261713      PMCID: PMC8845523     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits        ISSN: 1942-2962


  33 in total

1.  The Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations: application to medical care use and outcomes for homeless people.

Authors:  L Gelberg; R M Andersen; B D Leake
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Medication adherence beliefs of community-dwelling hypertensive African Americans.

Authors:  Lisa M Lewis; Pheobe Askie; Shirley Randleman; Brenda Shelton-Dunston
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 3.  Women and vulnerability to HAART non-adherence: a literature review of treatment adherence by gender from 2000 to 2011.

Authors:  Cathy M Puskas; Jamie I Forrest; Surita Parashar; Kate A Salters; Angela M Cescon; Angela Kaida; Cari L Miller; David R Bangsberg; Robert S Hogg
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.071

4.  Patterns and predictors of older adult Medicare Part D beneficiaries' receipt of medication therapy management.

Authors:  Antoinette B Coe; Omolola A Adeoye-Olatunde; Deborah L Pestka; Margie E Snyder; Alan J Zillich; Karen B Farris; Joel F Farley
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2019-12-09

5.  Disparity Implications of Proposed 2015 Medicare Eligibility Criteria for Medication Therapy Management Services.

Authors:  Junling Wang; Yanru Qiao; Christina A Spivey; Christine Li; Caroline Clark; Yuewen Deng; Flora Liu; Jeffrey Tillman; Marie Chisholm-Burns
Journal:  J Pharm Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-05-26

6.  Factors affecting Medicare Part D beneficiaries' decision to receive comprehensive medication reviews.

Authors:  William R Doucette; Yiran Zhang; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Jane F Pendergast; Brand A Newland; Karen B Farris; Jessica Frank
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

Review 7.  Disparity implications of the Medicare medication therapy management eligibility criteria: a literature review.

Authors:  Kiraat D Munshi; Ya-Chen T Shih; Lawrence M Brown; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Jim Y Wan; Junling Wang
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Impact and Feasibility of Implementing a Systematic Approach for Medication Therapy Management in the Community Pharmacy Setting: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marie E Murray; Jamie C Barner; Nathan D Pope; Mark D Comfort
Journal:  J Pharm Pract       Date:  2018-06-04

9.  Accounting for clinical action reduces estimates of gender disparities in lipid management for diabetic veterans.

Authors:  Varsha G Vimalananda; Donald R Miller; Timothy P Hofer; Robert G Holleman; Mandi L Klamerus; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.