Osthole Regulates Secretion of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines and Expression of TLR2 and NF-κB in Normal Human Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts.

Introduction: Osthole (OST), an active compound isolated from Cnidium monnieri, is used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat a variety of human diseases. Although OST has a good therapeutic effect, the underlying mechanism of its action in inflammatory skin diseases in humans is still unknown. Purpose: The present study aimed to test the hypothesis that OST can be used as an herbal substance that minimizes skin inflammation and barrier dysfunction. In this study, histamine and LPS were used to induce inflammation in skin keratinocytes and fibroblasts to test whether OST can inhibit their responses.
Methods: Cell migration was analyzed using a wound healing assay. Changes in cell monolayer integrity were assessed by the measurement of transepithelial electrical resistance. Secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, CCL2/MCP-1, CCL5/RANTES, and COX-2 was measured by ELISA, while expression of TLR2, NF-κB, and COX-2 was analyzed by qPCR.
Results: OST decreased the level of IL-1β, TNF-α, CCL2/MCP-1 and CCL5/RANTES, and expression of TLR2, NF-κB and COX-2 during histamine/LPS-induced inflammation in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. OST also improved cell migration and cell barrier function.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that OST suppresses inflammatory responses via regulation of IL-1β, TNF-α, CCL2/MCP-1 and CCL5/RANTES secretion, and TLR2, and COX-2 expression.

Introduction

Osthole (OST) (7-methoxy-8-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)coumarin) is a natural compound isolated from Cnidium plants and commonly used in Chinese medicine to improve immune system functions.1 OST possesses a broad spectrum of pharmacological properties: anti-allergic,2 anti-inflammatory,2 anti-tumor,3–5 hepatoprotective,6–8 neuroprotective9,10 and osteoprotective.11 In our previous research, we have shown that OST exhibits anti-inflammatory effects in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from children with autism spectrum disorder and diagnosed allergy or asthma.2,12–17 In the model of human colon epithelium co-cultured with neutrophils or macrophages, the anti-inflammatory effects of OST were confirmed by changes in the expression of inflammation-associated genes and proteins.18 However, its anti-inflammatory properties in inflammatory skin diseases have not yet been demonstrated.

The skin is the main barrier protecting from inflammation as it is composed of different cell types that respond to bacterial pathogenic factors (lipopolysaccharide – LPS, other pathogenic lipoproteins or peptides) and trigger inflammatory responses19–21 In recent years, keratinocytes have been shown to play an active role in the development and expression of protective immune responses and immunopathological reactions in the skin.22 In keratinocytes stimulated by environmental, physical or chemical stimuli, a release of proinflammatory mediators is observed in vitro and in vivo.23 Fibroblasts, identified as a cells responsible for the production and organization of the extracellular matrix, are also considered as an active players of the immune system.24,25

Inflammation is associated with the development of skin diseases,26,27 and histamine is a known mediator of acute inflammation and immediate hypersensitivity reactions.28 Histamine is released by mast cells located in upper dermis, when tissues are inflamed or stimulated by allergens or LPS.29 Elevated histamine level has been described in eczematous skin disease and psoriasis, and can reach concentrations as high as approximately 100 µg/mL during immediate hypersensitivity reactions following mast cell degranulation.30 In addition to its involvement in immediate-type allergies and dendritic cell maturation, histamine also stimulates human keratinocytes via histamine receptors to increase the expression of antimicrobial peptides, cytokines (CKs), chemokines (ChKs), and matrix metalloproteinases.31,32 Mast cell activation and histamine release also contribute to skin barrier dysfunction in inflammatory skin diseases.33

The above findings led to use histamine and LPS to stimulate inflammation in human keratinocyte and fibroblast cell lines. In order to compare the effect of OST as a substance counteracting the immune overactivity of the skin caused by histaminic or bacterial inflammation, the cells were stimulated with clobetasol propionate (CP) – glucocorticosteroid, and fexofenadine (FXF), a selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist.

This study involves the analysis of the anti-inflammatory properties of OST in normal human epithelial keratinocytes (NHEK) and normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) cell lines. These cell lines were selected to analyze the response of skin components to the tested substance under inflammatory conditions and to compare its effect with drugs commonly used for inflammatory skin diseases – CP and FXF. To induce skin inflammation, the NHEK and NHDF cell lines were incubated with histamine or LPS and the changes in gene and protein expression, as well as proliferation, epithelial barrier function and wound healing ability were studied.

The hypotheses examined in this study are:

(i) the compounds tested in this study (histamine, LPS, OST, FXF, CP) have no cytotoxic effect on NHEK and NHDF cell lines,

(ii) histamine or LPS induce changes in pro-inflammatory CKs (IL-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha - TNF-α) and ChKs (IL-8, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5/ Regulated on Activation, Normal T-cell Expressed and Secreted – CCL5/RANTES and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2/ Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 – CCL2/MCP-1) and expression of the genes encoding Toll-Like Receptor 2 (TLR2), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) in NHEK and NHDF cells,

(iii) OST successively reduces histamine- or LPS-induced inflammation and its corresponding effects,

(iv) OST does not affect the integrity of tight junctions in the keratinocyte monolayer and prevents histamine- or LPS-induced disruption of tight junctions,

(v) OST improves the wound healing process that occurs in persistent inflammation of skin diseases.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Histamine (CAS 51-45-6), LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4 (EC 297-473-0), FXF (CAS 153439-40-8), OST (CAS 484-12-8) and CP (CAS 25122-46-7) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA, cat. no. Y0001779, L4391, Y0000789, Y0001207 and Y0000559, respectively). Histamine (1 mg/mL) and LPS (0.8 mg/mL) were dissolved in water, FXF (5 mg/mL), and CP (25 mg/mL) in DMSO (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, cat. no. D8418), while OST (10 mg/mL) was dissolved in 96% ethanol (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland, cat. no. 653964200). The solutions were filtered through 0.22 µm pore filters, aliquoted and stored at −20°C.

Cell Culture

The NHEK cell line was purchased from PromoCell GmbH (Heidelberg, Germany, cat. no. C-12005) and cultured in T-75 flasks in keratinocyte medium (Keratinocyte Growth Medium 2 ready to use, PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany, cat. no. C-20011) prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. NHEKs were incubated at 37°C in a 95% humidified atmosphere and 5% CO2. The culture medium was changed every 2–3 days, and cells were passaged when confluence reached approximately 80%. Only early passages (3–7) were used in this study.

The NHDF cell line (PromoCell GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany, cat. no. C-12300) was cultured in a T-75 flask in the recommended culture medium (PromoCell GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany, cat. no. C-23010) containing 1% of penicillin/streptomycin solution (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, cat. no. P4333). Cells were incubated at 37°C in a 95% humidified atmosphere and 5% CO2. The culture medium was changed every 2–3 days, and cells were passaged when confluence reached approximately 80%.

Analysis of Cell Proliferation

The proliferation of NHEK and NHDF cells in the presence of various concentrations of the tested substances was analyzed using the Cell Proliferation ELISA, BrdU (colorimetric) kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland, cat. no. 11647229001). Cells were seeded in culture medium in 96-well plates at a concentration of 5×103 cells per well. After 24 h, medium was removed and replaced with solutions of the tested substances (0.1–100 µg/mL histamine, 0.05–2 µg/mL LPS, 0.0625–0.5 mg/mL FXF, OST or CP; alone and in the mixtures) and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) in a final volume of 100 µL. Cells were incubated for 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. After incubation, the medium was removed by flicking off and the cells were dried at 60°C for 1 h. The plates were coated with parafilm and stored at 4°C for up to 3 days. Then the procedure was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The percentage of cells was calculated in comparison to the control (100%, cells seeded in the recommended medium).

Migration Analysis

NHEKs and NHDFs (5x103 per well) were seeded in each well of the Culture-Insert 4 well located in the center of a 35 mm culture dish (Ibidi, Martinsried, Germany, cat no. 80466). After 24 h, the culture insert was removed with sterile tweezers, the cells were washed with 1xPBS to remove non-adherent cells, and fresh media containing the tested substances were added to the culture dish. Images of the wound were taken after at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 h and analyzed using ImageJ software. The results were presented as percentage of wound coverage.

Assessment of Cell Barrier Function

To investigate the barrier function of cultured NHEK and NHDF cells before and after incubation with the tested compound, 1×105 cells per well were seeded in 12-well cell culture plates in inserts with a pore size of 0.4 µm and surface area of 1.13 cm2 (Merck St. Louis, MO, USA, cat. no. MCHT12H48). When the cells reached confluence, the medium for keratinocytes (Lifeline Cell Tech LLC) with low calcium concentration (0.06 mM) was replaced with the medium with high calcium concentration (1.8 mM) to induce keratinocyte differentiation and tight junction maturation. The medium for NHEK and NHDF was changed every second day for 10 days until the cells were fully differentiated and the monolayer reached an appropriate transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) value (at least 250 Ω × cm2). The inserts containing the confluent differentiated keratinocytes and fibroblasts were then transferred to new 12-well plates, and the medium containing the tested substances was added (1 mL of medium into the insert and 2 mL of medium into the well outside the insert). TEER was measured at 7 time points (1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h) using a Millicell ERS-2 volt-ohm meter (Merck St. Louis, MO, USA, cat. no. MERS00002, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The TEER value was calculated according to the formula described by Srinivasan et al.34 TEER values at different time points were expressed as a percentage of the TEER value at time 0 (100%).

Incubation of NHEK and NHDF Cells with the Investigated Compounds for Analysis of Gene and Protein Expression

Cells were seeded in culture medium in 24 well-plates at a concentration of 2.5×104 cells per well.35,36 After 24 h, the medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium with the tested compounds in a volume of 1 mL. The cells were cultured for 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. Thereafter, the medium was collected and total RNA was isolated and reverse transcribed.

RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription

Total cellular RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, cat. no. 15596026) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the protocol described by Kordulewska et al.13 RNA concentration and purity (A260/A280) were determined using NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Tech., Inc. Wilmington, DE, USA). Total RNA was reverse transcribed using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, cat. no. 4368814) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in a Master Cycler Gradient Thermocycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany).

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) and Data Analysis

The changes in the expression of TLR2, NF-κB and COX-2 were investigated. Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase (YWHAZ) was used as a reference gene to normalize the disproportion in mRNA quantity. The oligonucleotide primers specific for each gene are listed in . The qPCR was performed in the QuantStudio™ 3 Real-Time PCR System using the FastStart Essential DNA Green Master Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland, cat. no. 06402001). For each reaction, 5 ng of cDNA was given and qPCR was performed in triplicates as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, amplification and quantification repeated 45 times (95°C for 20s, 60°C for 20s and 72°C for 20s with a single fluorescence measurement), melting curve at 60–95°C with 0.1°C per second heating rate and continuous fluorescence measurement, final cooling to 4°C. A negative control without cDNA and an inter-run calibrator were included in each assay. Gene expression was analyzed according to Pfaffl.37 Results were scaled to the expression level of the control, which was determined as one.

Analysis of Cytokine and Chemokine Levels

The levels of IL-1β, −6, −8, TNF-α, CCL2/MCP-1, and CCL5/RANTES were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) supplied by Diaclone (Besancon Cedex, France; IL-1β – cat. no. 851.610.001, TNF-α – cat. no. 851.570.001), Mabtech (Nacka Strand, Sweden; IL-6 – cat. no. 3460–1H-20), BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA; IL-8 – cat. no. 555244) and Abcam (Cambridge, UK; CCL5/RANTES – ab100633, CCL2/MCP-1 – ab179886) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were tested in quadruples. Results were standardized by comparison with a standard curve.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis and visualization was performed using GraphPad Prism software version 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and presented as mean ± standard deviation. Ordinary two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons tests were used to examine differences between quantitative values. The statistical significance level was set at a p-value < 0.05.

Results

Osthole Prevents Histamine- or LPS-Induced Cell Proliferation

The proliferation of NHEK and NHDF cell lines was analyzed after treatment with the investigated compounds to avoid excessive cell mortality during the main experiments. Cell proliferation was analyzed at 6-time points, and it was assumed that the maximum inhibition of proliferation in both cell lines could reach a maximum of 50% of control. Histamine did not increase proliferation in the NHEK cell line (), but this effect was observed in the NHDF cell line from 12 h of experiment (). In contrast, LPS increased proliferation in both cell lines (). Considering the mixtures of histamine or LPS with FXF, CP, and OST, all inflammation inhibitors decreased proliferation, but significance was observed in different time points in the tested variants (). FXF, CP, and OST alone also inhibited cell proliferation at all tested concentrations (). Maximum inhibition of proliferation was observed when 0.5 mg/mL of CP was applied for 72h (63.3% in NHEK, 71.6% in NHDF; p < 0.0001 for both; ). Since this CP concentration is used in the drugs for the treatment of psoriasis, eczema and other skin disorders,38,39 we decided to compare the analyzed compounds in furthered experiments at o concentration of 0.5 mg/mL.

Osthole Improves Migration of Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts

The migration of cells after treatment with OST was evaluated using a wound healing assay, which based on the ability of cells to migrate through a gap created by the insert. OST at all tested concentrations significantly accelerated the migration of NHEKs and NHDFs from 9 and 12 h of experiment, respectively (Figure 1A and B). Indeed, in NHDF cell line migration was initially slowed (from 3 to 9 h of experiment) compared to the control (Figure 1B).

Figure 1

Changes in migration of Normal Human Epithelial Keratinocytes (NHEK; (A) and Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts (NHDF; (B) after incubation with osthole (OST). Symbols show the mean and bars show the standard deviation. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test) are shown in rectangles with dotted edges.

Osthole Prevents Histamine- and LPS-Induced Disruption of Tight Junction in NHEK and NHDF Cell Lines Monolayer

The tight junction integrity of NHEK and NHDF cell lines monolayer was determined by TEER measurement to evaluate the effect of OST on barrier function. In keratinocytes both histamine and LPS improved cell barrier integrity at the beginning of the experiment to reach the level of control after 6 and 12–24 h, respectively (Figure 2A and C). At the next measurement points, the TEER values were significantly lower compared to the control. In fibroblasts, a significant decrease in TEER value was observed after 24 h (Figure 2B and D). OST, like the reference compounds, significantly improved the integrity of NHEK and NHDF cell lines monolayers treated with histamine and LPS (Figure 2), indicating its anti-inflammatory properties. This effect appears to be directly related to the concentration of OST, as the TEER value increases in a concentration-dependent manner when cells were treated with OST alone ().

Figure 2

Changes in the integrity of Normal Human Epithelial Keratinocytes (NHEK) and Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts (NHDF) monolayers after incubation with histamine (Hist; (A and B)) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS; (C and D)) alone or in mixtures with fexofenadine (FXF), osthole (OST), and clobetasol propionate (CP), indicated by measurement of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER). Symbols indicate the mean and bars indicate the standard deviation. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test) are shown in rectangles with dotted edges.

Osthole Decreases the Secretion of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines in Histamine- or LPS-Treated NHEK and NHDF Cell Lines

The changes in the secretion of selected CKs (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and ChKs (IL-8, CCL5/RANTES, and CCL2/MCP-1) in NHEK and NHDF cell lines were examined after incubation with histamine and LPS. Inflammatory mediators significantly increased IL-1β levels in both cell lines at each time point, while OST significantly decreased IL-1β secretion (Figures 3A, B and 4A, B). For the most part, there was no statistically significant difference in IL-1β levels between cells treated with histamine/OST and histamine/CP. It is worth to notice that in the NHDF line no IL-1β secretion was observed in the control group (Figure 4A and B). Importantly, OST not only prevented IL-1β secretion under inflammatory conditions (histamine/OST treatment), but also decreased secretion in the NHEK cell line alone in a concentration-dependent manner (). IL-1β secretion was not observed in the FXF-, OST-, and CP-treated NHDF cell line (data not shown). A different trend was observed in the secretion of IL-6, as it was higher or similar when cell lines were treated with a mixture of histamine/LPS and an anti-inflammatory drugs compared to histamine/LPS alone (Figures 3C, D and 4C, D). In addition, LPS has been found to increase secretion of IL-6 twofold compared to histamine (Figures 3C, D and 4C, D). No statistically significant difference was found between the IL-6 levels in cell lines treated with OST and CP (Figures 3C, D and 4C, D), but the IL-6 level was slightly decreased when cells were treated with OST alone (). The highest IL-8 levels were measured in NHEK and NHDF cell lines stimulated with histamine/LPS and FXF, while mixtures with OST and CP increased IL-8 secretion compared with histamine/LPS alone, but the IL-8 levels in these two groups were comparable (Figures 3C, D and 4C, D). Again, no statistically significant difference in IL-8 secretion was found between the cells supplemented with the mixture of histamine/LPS and CP or OST (Figures 3C, D and 4C, D). OST significantly decreased IL-8 secretion, but a concentration-dependent manner was observed only in the NHEK cell line (). On the other hand, both histamine and LPS significantly increased TNF-α levels in the NHEK and NHDF cell lines, while FXF, and especially OST and CP attenuated this effect (Figures 3G, H and 4G, H). There was no statistically significant difference in TNF-α levels in cells treated with histamine/LPS and CP or OST (Figures 3G, H and 4G, H). TNF-α was not secreted, when cells were treated with FXF, OST, and CP alone (data not shown). OST significantly reduces the secretion of CCL2/MCP-1 and CCL5/RANTES (Figure 5) caused by histamine or LPS treatment. Importantly, no statistical significance was found between the OST and CP groups.

Figure 3

The level of IL −1β (A and B), IL-6 (C and D), IL-8 (E and F) and TNF-α (G and H) after incubation with histamine (Hist; 100 µg/mL), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; 2 µg/mL) alone and in mixtures with fexofenadine (FXF), osthole (OST) and clobetasol propionate (CP; 0.5 mg/mL) in Normal Human Epithelial Keratinocytes (NHEK). The horizontal line shows the mean and the bars show the standard deviation. Statistically significant differences (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) compared to control (*p <0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001) and to cells treated with histamine or LPS (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001, ####p < 0.0001) are marked; ns – non- significant.

Figure 4

The level of IL-1β (A and B), IL −6 (C and D), IL-8 (E and F), and TNF-α (G and H) after incubation with histamine (Hist; 100 µg/mL), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; 2 µg/mL) alone and in mixtures with fexofenadine (FXF), osthole (OST) and clobetasol propionate (CP; 0.5 mg/mL) in Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts (NHDF). The horizontal line shows the mean and the bars show the standard deviation. Statistically significant differences (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) compared to control (****p < 0.0001) and to cells treated with histamine or LPS (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001, ####p < 0.0001) are marked; ns – non-significant.

Figure 5

CCL2/MCP-1 and CCL5/RANTES levels after incubation with histamine (Hist; 100 µg/mL), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; 2 µg/mL) alone and in mixtures with fexofenadine (FXF), osthole (OST) and clobetasol propionate (CP; 0.5 mg/mL) in Normal Human Epithelial Keratinocytes (NHEK; (A and C)) and Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts (NHDF; (B and D)). The horizontal line shows the mean and the bars show the standard deviation. Statistically significant differences (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) compared to control (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001) and to cells treated with histamine or LPS (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001, ####p < 0.0001) are marked; ns – non-significant.

Osthole Downregulates TLR2, NF-κB, and COX-2 Expression in Histamine/LPS-Induced NHEK and NHDF Cell Lines

Overexpression of Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) has been reported to mark an active inflammatory response and trigger downstream NF-κB signaling.40 NF-κB is a crucial regulatory transcription factor involved in major inflammatory pathways and regulates the expression of many inflammatory genes, including IL-6, and the production of CKs.41 NF-κB exists in the cytoplasm in an inactive form, bound to the NF-κB inhibitor alpha (IκBα). Upon stimulation, the NF-κB subunit separates from IκBα and migrates to the nucleus, where it triggers the transcription of several inflammatory genes.42 Therefore the effect of OST on TLR2, NF-κB, and COX-2 expression were investigated in NHEK and NHDF cell lines treated with histamine and LPS. Histamine and LPS significantly increased the expression level of TLR2 (Figures 6A, B and 7A, B). A 10.3- and 13.8-fold increase was observed in the NHEK cell line compared to control (Figures 6A and B), while a 7.1 and 12.4-fold increase was observed in the NHDF cell line after 12 h of incubation (Figures 7A and B). It should be underlined that the mixtures of LPS and FXF, caused an even greater increase of TLR2 expression in both cell lines than LPS alone (Figures 6A, B and 7A, B). OST significantly decreased TLR2 expression at each of the time points in NHEK and NHDF cells. Importantly, its effect was comparable to that of CP, as no significant difference was observed between cells treated with the mixtures of histamine/LPS and OST or CP (Figures 6A, B and 7A, B). The tested inflammatory inducers also increased the expression level of NF-κB, as in the NHEK cell line 12.1- and 13.2-fold (Figures 6C and D), and in NHDF cells 6.5- and 12.0-fold increases were observed (Figure 7C and D). Again, OST significantly reduced inflammatory mediators-induced NF-κB expression in both cell lines at each time point. A significant difference in NF-κB levels after treatment with histamine/LPS and OST and CP were observed only in the NHEK cell line after 12 and 24 h of the experiment (Figure 6C and D). Expression of COX-2 increased 9.2- and 7.8-fold in NHEK and 4.9- and 7.7-fold in NHDF treated with histamine (Figure 6E and F) and LPS (Figure 7E and F), respectively. Similar to the previously described results, OST significantly reduced the expression of the COX-2 gene, which increased after stimulation with inflammatory mediators. This time, its effect was comparable to that of CP, as the expression of COX-2 was higher in cells treated with OST, especially in cells stimulated with histamine (Figures 6C, D and 7C, D).

Figure 6

TLR2 (A and B), NF-κB (C and D) and COX-2 (E and F) genes expression level after incubation with histamine (Hist; 100 µg/mL), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; 2 µg/mL) alone and in mixtures with fexofenadine (FXF), osthole (OST) and clobetasol propionate (CP; 0.5 mg/mL) in Normal Human Epithelial Keratinocytes (NHEK). The horizontal line shows the mean and the bars show the standard deviation. Statistically significant differences (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) compared to control (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001) and to cells treated with histamine or LPS (#p < 0.05, ###p < 0.001, ####p < 0.0001) are marked; ns – non-significant.

Figure 7

TLR2 (A and B), NF-κB (C and D), and COX-2 (E and F) genes expression level after incubation with histamine (Hist; 100 µg/mL), lipopolysaccharides (LPS; 2 µg/mL) alone and in mixtures with fexofenadine (FXF), osthole (OST) and clobetasol propionate (CP; 0.5 mg/mL) in Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts (NHDF). The horizontal line shows the mean and the bars show the standard deviation. Statistically significant differences (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) compared to control (*p < 0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001, ****p < 0.0001) and to cells treated with histamine or LPS (#p <0.05, ###p < 0.001, ####p < 0.0001) are marked; ns – non-significant.

Discussion

The present study provided two new findings: i) OST alleviates skin inflammation in keratinocytes (NHEK) and fibroblasts (NHDF), ii) the inhibitory effect of OST in keratinocytes and fibroblasts might be related to decreased TLR2/NF-κB gene expression. A growing number of studies have shown that natural products from traditional medicinal plants are becoming an important source for the discovery of anti-inflammatory drugs.43,44

Overreaction of the skin’s immune system due to chronic inflammation can lead to dry skin blemishes and severe itching.45 The complex interplay of barrier dysfunction and activation of skin inflammation contributes to the ability of microbes and allergens to penetrate through damaged skin and to the progression of inflammatory skin diseases.46 Skin barrier dysfunction results in increased irritability47,48 characterized by persistent inflammation leading to uncontrolled proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes48 that produce large amounts of CKs and promote a deviation of type 2 immunity.49,50

Currently, CP is a potent corticosteroid most commonly used in dermatology, mainly for the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions such as psoriasis, AD or skin manifestations of autoimmune diseases.51,52 Despite the CP effectiveness, its continued use is associated with many side effects,53 therefore it is so important to search for new natural agents with a smaller spectrum of action and a selected target of inhibition of skin inflammation. The herbal medicines have experienced a renaissance in recent years, because they have few side effects compared to chemical drugs.54 In our study, one of the reference compounds is CP, which is prescribed as first-line therapy for inflammatory skin diseases.55,56 Since histamine and LPS were used to stimulate the inflammatory response in the research model, an antihistamine that has highly selective antagonistic activity at peripheral histamine receptors, FXF, was included as positive control in the study.

Previously, the use of natural products was considered very reliable in the treatment of diseases caused by immune inflammation of the skin.57 Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that OST is a promising therapeutic agent for inflammatory skin diseases caused by bacterial infections and by sudden histamine release due to contact allergies.

The literature indicates that OST possesses various biological activities:58 anti-inflammatory2,59,60 antibacterial,61 antiviral,6 antifungal,62,63 antioxidant,64,65 antithrombotic,66 antidiabetic,67 antispasmodic,68,69 and anti-tumor.4,70,71 Coumarins are considered as drug candidates with diverse pharmacological activities benefiting from their attractive properties such as low molecular weight, simple structure, high solubility, low side effects, low drug resistance, high bioavailability, broad spectrum of activity, and better curative effect.58,72

In the present study, we confirmed that none of the tested compounds at different concentrations caused inhibition of proliferation in the NHEK and NHDF cell lines, allowing us to continue the experiments. Proliferation decreased to 74% in the NHEK cell line and 89% in NHDF compared to the control after 24 h of incubation with the highest concentration (0.5 mg/mL – 2 mM) of OST (). Our results suggest that the maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) of OST is higher for NHEK and NHDF than for other cell lines. Chou et al showed that the IC50 of OST for the epithelial HeLa cell line was 64.9 μM compared with 168 μM for normal cervical fibroblasts.73 Moreover, the IC50 for the human leukemia HL-60 cell line was 100 μM, while it was 164 µM for PBMCs.74 Accordingly, no significant inhibition of proliferation was observed in PBMCs until 72 h after treatment with OST at 1.84 μM.12 Moreover, treatment with 200 μM OST for 24 and 48 h had no significant cytotoxic effect on normal ovarian IOSE80 cells, whereas ovarian cancer cell lines (A2780, OV2008) were sensitive to treatment with OST at a dose of 200 μM for 24 and 48 hours.75 In addition, we investigated the influence of histamine and LPS on the proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts, since these mediators are present in increased concentrations in the skin of patients with inflammatory skin diseases.76,77 Jensen et al demonstrated that proliferation of keratinocytes was increased 5-fold in the skin of patients with AD,78 while Glatzer et al showed that this effect was mediated by the histamine 4 receptor.79 In our study, LPS (), but not histamine () significantly increased the proliferation of NHEK compared with control, while a significant increase in proliferation was observed in NHDF when cells were treated with both inflammatory mediators (). These results are consistent with data from the literature indicating the proliferation-promoting effect of histamine in keratinocytes from AD patients.78,79

Another hypothesis confirmed in our research was that histamine and LPS induce changes in pro-inflammatory CKs and ChKs secretion, and OST successively reduces these effects. TNF-α and other CKs (IL-1β, IL-6) involved in the inflammatory response play a central role in numerous acute and chronic inflammatory diseases.80–83 Therefore, suppressing the production of inflammatory mediators and inhibiting the secretion of pro-inflammatory CKs may reduce the inflammatory response,84–86 which is an important therapeutic target. The current study is the first which investigate the anti-inflammatory effects of OST on histamine/LPS-induced inflammation in NHEK and NHDF cell lines. We demonstrated that IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, CCL2/MCP-1 and CCL5/RANTES were significantly increased after histamine/LPS stimulation, but their levels decreased after stimulation with OST (Figures 3–5). Therefore, treatment with OST could be a reliable strategy to inhibit the inflammatory mediators in histamine- or LPS-induced inflammation of the skin. These results are consistent with previous studies by Wu, in which the author demonstrated that OST significantly decreased the secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and CCL2/MCP-1 in the HepG2 cell line. In addition, OST regulated the expression of genes encoding IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and CCL2/MCP-1.60 The presented results are also consistent with those of Li et al, where the authors showed that OST activated macrophages in ovalbumin-induced asthma in a mouse model,87 and significantly decreased the level of IL-1β and TNF-α in bronchoalveolar lavage87 and serum.88 OST stimulation also downregulated proinflammatory mediators (TNF-α, IL-1β, COX-2, and iNOS) expressed in the ischemic cortex89 and persistent lung inflammation.90 These results suggest that OST may be a potential therapeutic agent to minimize inflammation in the several diseases.

Gene expression analysis showed that OST inhibited the expression of TLR2, NF-κB and COX-2 (Figures 6 and 7). The obtained results suggest that OST suppresses the expression of genes involved in inflammation and reduces the secretion of pro-inflammatory CKs in histamine or LPS-stimulated cells. LPS is known to activate NF-κB and COX-2 signaling in human keratinocyte cell lines,91–94 what we also confirmed. Literature indicate that OST exerts anti-inflammatory effects via blocking the NF-κB pathway59 and may inhibit histamine H1 receptor activity and reverse the increase in COX-2 mRNA expression induced by histamine.2 Similar results were obtained by Wu in the HepG2 cell line,95 where the author showed that OST increased the expression of heme oxygenase 1, modulated COX-2 and effectively suppressed the secretion of pro-inflammatory CKs. In vitro OST decreased COX-2 expression in LPS-stimulated macrophages96 and in rat model of sciatica inhibited the expression of COX-2 in the spinal ganglion.97 In addition, the author found that OST inhibited inflammation-associated signaling pathways, including NF-κB and MAP kinases. OST was also shown to alleviate pulmonary arterial hypertension in monocrotaline-treated rats, which is closely associated with disruption of NF-κB signaling.98 NF-κB is a multidirectional nuclear transcription factor99 and TLRs receptors play a critical role in protecting the host from a variety of exogenous and endogenous pathogens.100,101 In response to activation of TLR, NF-κB translocates to the nucleus and induces expression of a numerous genes that mediate immune regulation, cell adhesion and inflammatory response.102 NF-κB activates IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, all of which play key roles in the inflammatory response.103 When keratinocytes are stimulated via TLRs, these cells produce CKs and ChKs (IL-1β, TNF-α, GM-CSF, IL-6, and IL-8) as a result of innate immunity function.104,105 In the present study, TLR2 expression was constitutively expressed in NHEK and NHDF cell lines, which is consistent with the previously published result.106 The final hypothesis we wanted to test was how OST affects wound healing, which is a complex process that includes inflammation, proliferation, and new tissue formation and remodeling.107 After skin injury, a cellular response occurs involving fibroblasts, keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and macrophages.108 OST significantly improved wound healing in NHEK and NHDF cell lines (Figure 1). Therefore, we hypothesize that OST contributes to tissue normalization at the end of the proliferative phase.

Pattern recognition and transmembrane receptors play a central role in triggering the immune response caused by inflammatory triggers. One of them, TLR2, senses the noxious stimuli and recruits the coordinated activation of transcription factors, including NF-κB.109

Typical triggers of inflammatory signals such as TLR ligands and CKs like TNF-α and IL-1β, which are known to activate NF-κB, are translocated to the nucleus and facilitate the transcription of genes encoding pro-inflammatory CKs (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) and chemokines (IL-8, CCL2/MCP-1, CCL5/RANTES).110 We hypothesize that OST may act as a regulator of mRNA expression. Therefore, further studies are needed to uncover the molecular basis of its anti-inflammatory effect.

We are aware of the limitations of our study, including the lack of signal transduction analysis to confirm the direct link between TLR2, COX-2, and NF-κB signaling. We also plan to perform an in vivo study in a mouse model in the future to confirm our findings.

Conclusion

In this study, we found that OST suppressed the secretion of CKs and ChKs and the expression of genes encoding TLR2, NF-κB and COX-2 in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts treated with histamine or LPS. OST also had a positive effect on cell viability, migration, and barrier function. Our results support the potential use of OST as a therapeutic agent in inflammatory skin diseases caused by bacterial infections and by sudden histamine release due to contact allergies. Moreover, the obtained results confirm the research hypotheses and may be an inspiration for further research, including preclinical and in vitro (3D organotypic skin model) studies allowing to test OST as a blocker of negative immune responses in skin diseases. The use of novel in vitro models has a highly desirable ethical aspect, as the animals used so far are subjected to constant pain and are kept in an unnatural environment. Such treatment of living beings should be kept to a minimum. Understanding the mechanisms of action and interactions of skin cell lines is also crucial for identifying potential molecular targets for future pharmacological interventions to prevent and treat pathological conditions in dermatoses.