| Literature DB >> 35261204 |
Shiro Horisawa1, Kotaro Kohara1, Taku Nonaka1, Atsushi Fukui1, Tatsuki Mochizuki1, Mutsumi Iijima2, Takakazu Kawamata1, Takaomi Taira1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neurosurgical ablation of Forel's field H1 for cervical dystonia, which is currently abandoned, was formerly used in the 1960s-1970s. Regardless of the lack of neuroimaging modalities and objective evaluation scales, the reported efficacy was significant. Although recent studies have reappraised the ablation of the pallidothalamic tract at Forel's field H1 for Parkinson's disease, the efficacy for cervical dystonia has not been investigated well.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35261204 PMCID: PMC8994978 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol ISSN: 2328-9503 Impact factor: 4.511
Patient characteristics.
| Number of patients | 35 | |
| Male | 22 | |
| Female | 13 | |
| Age at onset | 44.6 ± 10.7 | (Range: 26–72) |
| Age at surgery | 54 ± 10.3 | (Range: 33–75) |
| Distribution of dystonia | ||
| Cervical dystonia | 21 | |
| Segmental dystonia | 10 | |
| Generalized dystonia | 4 | |
| Movement type of cervical dystonia | ||
| Tonic | 25 | |
| Phasic | 10 | |
| Side of surgery | ||
| Right | 16 | |
| Left | 19 | |
| Follow‐up period | 13.8 ± 6.6 | (Range: 5–36) |
The type of cervical dystonia and the surgical side.
| Type of cervical dystonia | The number of affected patients | Side of surgery |
|---|---|---|
| Rt torticollis | 6 | Left |
| Rt torticollis, Rt laterocollis | 3 | Left |
| Rt torticollis, Lt laterocollis | 2 | Left |
| Rt torticollis, Anterocollis | 1 | Left |
| Rt torticollis, Retrocollis | 3 | Left |
| Rt laterocollis | 1 | Left |
| Rt laterocollis, Retrocollis | 1 | Left |
| Lt torticollis | 5 | Right |
| Lt torticollis, Lt laterocollis | 1 | Right |
| Lt torticollis, Rt laterocollis | 1 | Right |
| Lt torticollis, Anterocollis | 2 | Right |
| Lt torticollis, Retrocollis | 4 | Right |
| Lt laterocollis | 2 | Right |
| Anterocollis, Rt arm dystonia | 1 | Left |
| Retrocollis, Lt arm dystonia | 2 | Right |
Figure 1Pre‐ and postoperative TWSTRS and BFMDRS scores. Total, severity, disability, and pain scores of pre‐ and postoperative TWSTRS (A) and BFMDRS (B) were significantly improved after the surgery. Asterisks denote statistical significance (*p < 0.0001, **p = 0.0029).
Clinical outcomes of unilateral pallidothalamic tractotomy.
| Number of affected patients | Pre | Post | % improvement |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWSTRS | |||||
| Total | 35 | 34.3 ± 14.0 | 18.4 ± 16.5 | 47.5% | <0.0001 |
| Severity | 35 | 17.6 ± 6.5 | 8.6 ± 7.5 | 51.1% | <0.0001 |
| Disability | 35 | 12.3 ± 7.1 | 7.3 ± 7.4 | 40.7% | <0.0001 |
| Pain | 21 | 7.7 ± 3.3 | 4.6 ± 5.0 | 40.3% | 0.0029 |
| BFMDRS | |||||
| Total | 35 | 14.2 ± 9.9 | 7.0 ± 7.6 | 50.7% | 0.0001 |
| Neck | 35 | 6.2 ± 2.8 | 2.8 ± 2.8 | 54.8% | 0.0001 |
| Eyes | 11 | 5.8 ± 7.1 | 3.2 ± 3.9 | 44.8% | |
| Speech/Swallowing | 8 | 3.5 ± 3.6 | 2.4 ± 2.4 | 31.4% | |
| Mouth | 7 | 3.1 ± 2.3 | 1.7 ± 1.4 | 45.1% | |
| Trunk | 13 | 5.5 ± 2.5 | 2.1 ± 2.4 | 61.8% | |
| Contralateral arm | 11 | 6 ± 4.0 | 1.1 ± 2.1 | 81.7% | |
| Ipsilateral arm | 7 | 4.1 ± 2.0 | 5.6 ± 4.6 | −36.6% | |
| Contralateral leg | 6 | 4.5 ± 6.0 | 0 | 100% | |
| Ipsilateral leg | 4 | 3 ± 2.4 | 3 ± 2.4 | 0% | |
Figure 2Distribution of improvement rate of TWSTRS total score. Improvement of TWSTRS total scores by 80%–100%, 60%–80%, 60%–40%, 40%–20%, and 20% was confirmed in nine patients (25.7%), eight patients (22.9%), four patients (11.4%), four patients (11.4%), and 10 patients (28.6%), respectively.
Adverse events.
| Dysarthria | 4 |
| Hypophonia | 5 |
| Reduced hand dexterity | 7 |
| Executive dysfunction | 1 |
| Transient amnesia | 1 |
| Transient somnolence | 2 |
Figure 3Pre‐ and postoperative MRI (day 0 and 3 months). (A–C) (successful case): Arrow showing left mammillothalamic tract (MTT) on the T2‐weighted MRI before the surgery. (A) Postoperative T1‐weighted MRI on the day of the surgery showing correct lesion location. (B) The 3‐month postoperative T2‐weighted MRI showing old lesion (arrowhead) and MTT (arrow). (C) D–F (hemorrhage case): Arrow showing left MTT on the T2‐weighted MRI before the surgery (D). Postoperative T1‐weighted MRI on the day of the surgery showing hemorrhage medially deviated. (E) The 3‐month postoperative T2‐MRI showing old scar involved MTT. (F) G–I (transient amnesia case): Arrow showing left MTT on the T2‐weighted MRI before the surgery. (G) Postoperative T1‐weighted MRI on the day of the surgery showing lesion medially deviated. (H) The 3‐month postoperative T2‐MRI showing old scar (arrowhead) and MTT is invisible (I).
Lesion evaluation.
| Total lesion volume, mm3 | 47.1 ± 16.9 |
| Lesion localization | |
| Mediolateral plane (distance from lesion to the midline), mm | |
| Medial target | 8.9 ± 1.5 |
| Lateral target | 11.5 ± 1.2 |
| Anteroposterior plane (distance from lesion to midcommissural point), mm | |
| Medial target | −0.3 ± 0.6 |
| Lateral target | −1.0 ± 0.8 |
| Dorsoventral plane (distance from lesion to anterior–posterior commissure plane), mm | |
| Medial target | −2.0 ± 0.8 |
| Lateral target | −1.0 ± 1.0 |
Summary of DBS and ablation for cervical dystonia.
| DBS | Ablation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPi | STN | PTT | GPi | STN | PTT (Present study) | |
| Efficacy | ||||||
| TWSTRS | 60.4% (Bilateral) | 22.8–80.3% (Bilateral) | Not reported | 47.9% (Unilateral) | Not reported | 46.4% (Unilateral) |
| BFMDRS |
50% (Unilateral) 73.1% (Bilatreal) | 54.8% (Unilateral) | ||||
| Target‐specific adverse events | ||||||
| Bradykinesia, Gait disturbance, Postural instability | Dyskinesia, Weight gain, Depression | Delayed cerebral infarction, Bradykinesia, Postural instability, Gait disturbance | Amnesia, Executive dysfunction | |||
| Common adverse events | ||||||
| Dysarthria, Dysphonia, Dysphagia | ||||||
DBS, deep brain stimulation; GPi, globus pallidus internus; STN, subthalamic nucleus; PTT, pallidothalamic tract; TWSTRS, Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale; BFMDRS, Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale.
Clinical outcomes reported by pooled meta‐analysis.