| Literature DB >> 35260454 |
Shuang Zang1, Meizhen Zhao2, Yalan Zhu3, Ying Zhang4, Yu Chen5, Xin Wang6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe and explore women's medical expenditures during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium at the beginning of the universal two-child policy enactment in China.Entities:
Keywords: health economics; health policy; maternal medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35260454 PMCID: PMC8905967 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
The health financing of women during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium in Dalian city (million ¥)
| Year | CCE | Public financing scheme | Voluntary financing scheme | OOP payments | Ratio of OOP payment/CCE (%) | Ratio of public financing scheme/CCE (%) | ||
| Social health insurance | Government financing scheme | Voluntary health insurance programme | Enterprise financing plan | |||||
| 2015 | 263.28 | 109.33 | 23.81 | 10.59 | 16.18 | 103.37 | 39.26 | 50.57 |
| 2016 | 260.29 | 110.85 | 22.49 | 10.35 | 14.87 | 101.74 | 39.09 | 51.23 |
| 2017 | 288.65 | 123.20 | 29.13 | 10.72 | 16.74 | 108.86 | 37.71 | 52.77 |
CCE, current curative expenditure; OOP, out-of-pocket.
Figure 1Sankey diagram of the average CCE in 2015–2017 flowing from different financing schemes to diverse health institutions. CCE, current curative expenditure; OOP, out-of-pocket.
Figure 2The proportion of CCE for each age group stratified by years. CCE, current curative expenditure; CNY, Chinese yuan.
Median expenditure and group differences for inpatients (N=32 390)
| Variables | Variable abbreviations | n | Inpatient expenditure | H | P value | Post hoc test* |
| Hospital level | HL | 183.175 | <0.001 | HL4>HL2 (p=0.002); HL4>HL3 (p<0.001); HL1>HL4 (p<0.001); | ||
| Provincial | HL1 | 708 | 7468.01 (5362.22–12 642.35) | |||
| Municipal | HL2 | 16 919 | 5262.20 (3150.17–9053.13) | |||
| District | HL3 | 7924 | 5208.75 (3124.89–8885.33) | |||
| County | HL4 | 6839 | 5505.53 (3850.45–6346.63) | |||
| Hospital type | HT | 1678.642 | <0.001 | HT1>HT2 (p<0.001); | ||
| Specialised hospital | HT1 | 3052 | 3673.14 (566.66–7320.34) | |||
| Traditional Chinese medicine hospital | HT2 | 2188 | 4145.63 (2883.82–5884.92) | |||
| Maternal and childcare hospital | HT3 | 10 665 | 5375.32 (3488.39–6419.05) | |||
| General hospital | HT4 | 16 485 | 6053.01 (3634.96–9898.26) | |||
| Year | Y | 2093.309 | <0.001 | |||
| Y1 | 17 464 | 5243.21 (3119.24–7615.38) | Y1>Y2 (p<0.001) | |||
| Y2 | 4185 | 3656.04 (2713.35–5440.71) | Y3>Y1 (p<0.001) | |||
| Y3 | 10 741 | 6293.51 (4275.12–9984.97) | Y3>Y2 (p<0.001) |
*Post-hoc test: Dunn-Bonferroni pairwise comparison.
Summary of the estimated coefficients for explanatory variables
| Variables | Estimate | SE | t value | 95% Wald CI | P value | |
| Lower | Higher | |||||
| Intercept | 8244.545 | 144.519 | 57.048 | 7961.286 | 8527.803 | <0.001 |
| Hospital level | ||||||
| 935.853 | 268.257 | 3.489 | 410.067 | 1461.638 | <0.001 | |
| 115.775 | 107.034 | 1.082 | −94.012 | 325.561 | 0.279 | |
| 1072.700 | 128.280 | 8.362 | 821.271 | 1324.129 | <0.001 | |
| 0† | ||||||
| Hospital type | ||||||
| −1851.923 | 134.112 | −13.809 | −2114.783 | −1589.064 | <0.001 | |
| −2750.444 | 154.829 | −17.764 | −3053.910 | −2750.444 | <0.001 | |
| −2688.849 | 98.955 | −27.173 | −2882.800 | −2494.898 | <0.001 | |
| 0† | ||||||
| Year | ||||||
| −2865.814 | 85.143 | −33.659 | −3032.693 | −2698.934 | <0.001 | |
| −4494.304 | 125.227 | −35.889 | −4739.748 | −4248.860 | <0.001 | |
| 0† | ||||||
| Length of stay | 256.313 | 8.103 | 31.633 | 240.432 | 272.194 | <0.001 |
| Reimbursement ratio | −607.055 | 144.483 | −4.202 | −890.241 | −323.869 | <0.001 |
*Reference value.
†This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.
Figure 3Path diagram of the structural equation modelling for medical expenditure.