| Literature DB >> 35259183 |
Ying Li1, Abdul Hameed Pitafi2, Haoning Li1.
Abstract
The significant effect of enterprise social media (ESM) usage has been extensively researched. However, recent studies and analysis have also emphasized the importance of understanding the negative aspects of ESM's use. By applying uses and gratifications theory (UGT), this study proposes a research model that tests how employees' ESM usage (hedonic, social, and information values) leads to ESM-related strain through perceived information overload. The study collected data from 315 Chinese employees using a survey method and analyzed the results using AMOS 21.0 software. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to analyze the proposed hypothesis. The results indicate that perceived hedonic, social, and information values are significant predictors of perceived information overload. Such overload is also significantly associated with ESM-related strain. The results also indicate that ESM visibility strengthens the significant relationship between perceived information overload and ESM-related strain. Furthermore, managers can also train individuals to use ESM appropriately. We recommend that employees can better control and manage their ESM usage by recognizing the causes of excessive use.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35259183 PMCID: PMC8903258 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Conceptual model.
Demographics.
| Variables | N | Percentage | Variables | N | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Male | 187 | 58.40 | Under-graduate | 95 | 30.20 |
| Female | 128 | 40.60 | Graduate | 100 | 31.70 |
|
| Masters or Above | 120 | 38.10 | ||
| Between 21–30 | 78 | 24.80 |
| ||
| Between 31–40 | 88 | 27.90 | Less than- 1 year | 97 | 28.60 |
| Between 41–50 | 89 | 28.30 | 1–2 years | 99 | 29.20 |
| >50 year old | 60 | 19.00 | >2years | 113 | 42.20 |
CFA analysis.
| Constructs | Items | Cronbach α | Composite Reliability | AVE | MSV | ASV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived Social Value | 3 | 0.770 | 0.881 | 0.713 | 0.110 | 0.061 |
| Perceived Information Value | 4 | 0.866 | 0.862 | 0.611 | 0.135 | 0.051 |
| Perceived Hedonic Value | 3 | 0.858 | 0.840 | 0.637 | 0.275 | 0.120 |
| ESM-Strain | 4 | 0.859 | 0.862 | 0.611 | 0.135 | 0.046 |
| Perceived Information overload | 4 | 0.895 | 0.889 | 0.669 | 0.275 | 0.136 |
| ESM visibility | 3 | 0.853 | 0.882 | 0.715 | 0.197 | 0.102 |
Note: AVE = average variance extracted; MSV = maximum shared variance; AVE = average variance extracted; ASV = average shared variance; discriminant validity = ASV < MSV.
Cross-loading.
| Construct | Items | PIO | PIV | ESM-S | ESMV | PSV | PHV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived Information Overload |
|
| .137 | -.014 | -.089 | -.083 | -.058 |
|
|
| -.077 | .028 | -.107 | -.049 | .081 | |
|
|
| -.037 | -.012 | .138 | .097 | -.069 | |
|
|
| .020 | -.015 | .127 | .078 | .069 | |
| Perceived Information Value ( |
| -.101 |
| .027 | .051 | .009 | .031 |
|
| .070 |
| -.053 | .102 | .020 | -.052 | |
|
| .014 |
| -.010 | -.005 | .013 | .058 | |
|
| .073 |
| .084 | -.163 | -.038 | -.007 | |
| ESM-Strain ( |
| -.024 | .024 |
| .083 | .000 | -.091 |
|
| -.068 | .051 |
| -.012 | -.018 | .062 | |
|
| .126 | -.031 |
| -.018 | .016 | .001 | |
|
| -.027 | -.006 |
| -.021 | .015 | .007 | |
| ESM visibility |
| -.006 | .023 | -.071 |
| -.125 | .077 |
|
| .024 | -.094 | .041 |
| .019 | -.051 | |
|
| -.052 | .087 | .065 |
| .064 | .004 | |
| Perceived Social Value ( |
| -.010 | .069 | -.062 | -.011 |
| .000 |
|
| .015 | -.018 | -.048 | .093 |
| -.050 | |
|
| -.021 | -.042 | .117 | -.126 |
| .073 | |
| Perceived Hedonic Value |
| -.047 | .112 | -.019 | -.005 | -.042 |
|
|
| -.014 | -.003 | -.065 | -.020 | .087 |
| |
|
| .133 | -.118 | .089 | .090 | -.012 |
|
Correlation matrix and mean, standard division.
| Construct | Mean | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Perceived Social Value | 3.031 | 0.943 |
| |||||||||
| 2- Perceived Information Value | 4.038 | 0.601 | 0.088 |
| ||||||||
| 3- Perceived Hedonic Value | 3.553 | 0.791 | 0.331 | 0.191 | 0.798 | |||||||
| 4- ESM-Strain | 3.998 | 0.655 | 0.019 | 0.368 | 0.088 |
| ||||||
| 5- Perceived Information overload | 3.643 | 0.770 | 0.321 | 0.259 | 0.524 | 0.200 |
| |||||
| 6- ESM visibility | 3.720 | 0.831 | 0.286 | 0.099 | 0.415 | 0.218 | 0.444 |
| ||||
| 7- Experience |
|
| 0.015 | 0.010 | -0.100 | 0.026 | -0.054 | -0.012 |
| |||
| 8- Education |
|
| 0.090 | 0.041 | 0.040 | -0.106 | 0.108 | -0.072 | 0.463 |
| ||
| 9- Age |
|
| -0.037 | -.010 | 0.084 | 0.021 | 0.017 | 0.012 | -0.083 | -0.053 |
| |
| 10- Gender |
|
| -0.044 | -0.111 | 0.036 | -0.021 | 0.068 | 0.110 | -0.022 | -0.016 | 0.024 |
|
Note:
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01.
Comparison measure model and structural model.
| Absolute fit measures | Incremental fit measures | Parsimonious fit measures | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | X 2/DF | SRMR | RMSEA | NFI | PNFI | CFI | IFI | TLI |
| MM | 3.083 | 0.053 | 0.078 | 0.874 | 0.873 | 0.910 | 0.911 | 0.890 |
| SEM | 3.520 | 0.061 | 0.079 | 0.870 | 0.870 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.885 |
Fig 2Structural model.
Note: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Fig 3Moderating effect of ESM visibility in the relationship between perceived information overload and ESM-strain.
Note: PIOV = Perceived Information Overload, ESM-V = ESM-Visibility.