Literature DB >> 35258993

Integrating Medical Genetics Into Precision Oncology Practice in the Veterans Health Administration: The Time Is Now.

Anthony Scott1,2, Arathi Mohan2,3, Sarah Austin1,2, Erika Amini1, Shelby Raupp2, Brittany Pannecouk2, Michael J Kelley4, Goutham Narla1,2, Nithya Ramnath2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Increased access and utilization of tumor profiling of cancers in our veteran population uncovered a modest number of potentially pathogenic germline variants (PPGVs) that require genetics referral for follow-up evaluation and germline sequencing. Challenges identified specific to the veteran population include paucity of genetics providers, either at a veteran's VA facility or nearby non-VA facilities. We sought to investigate the number of veterans who would benefit from having such resources at both local and national levels.
METHODS: Annotated clinical reports of mutations identified by tumor-only profiling and medical records of veterans with solid tumors at the Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System (VA AAHS) between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. PPGVs were identified according to society recommendations (such as ESMO and American Board of Medical Genetics and Genomics), expert review, and/or previously published criteria. After the analysis of our local VA population, these same criteria were then applied to veterans in the National Precision Oncology Program (NPOP).
RESULTS: Two hundred eight veterans underwent tumor profiling at the VA AAHS over the defined time period. This included 20 different primary tumor sites with over half (n = 130) being advanced cancer at diagnosis. Of these, 18 veterans (8.5%) had mutations suggestive of a PPGV. Applying these criteria to the larger NPOP database (n = 20,014), a similar percentage (6%) of PPGVs were identified.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate a PPGV frequency (6%-9% of veterans) consistent with the prevalence of inherited cancer predisposition syndromes in the general population, underscoring the need for medical genetics as part of standard oncologic care for veterans. We explore current and future care delivery models to optimize incorporation of medical genetics and genetic counseling to best serve veterans needing such services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35258993      PMCID: PMC9191304          DOI: 10.1200/OP.21.00693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract        ISSN: 2688-1527


  28 in total

Review 1.  Mismatch repair genes founder mutations and cancer susceptibility in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  G Ponti; E Castellsagué; C Ruini; A Percesepe; A Tomasi
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 2.  The evidence framework for precision cancer medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Moscow; Tito Fojo; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Clinical cancer genomic profiling.

Authors:  Debyani Chakravarty; David B Solit
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Integrating Germline Genetics Into Precision Oncology Practice in the Veterans Health Administration: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Maren T Scheuner; Kenute Myrie; Jane Peredo; Lori Hoffman-Hogg; Margaret Lundquist; Stephanie L Guerra; Douglas Ball
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2020-08

Review 5.  Impact of Precision Medicine in Diverse Cancers: A Meta-Analysis of Phase II Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Maria Schwaederle; Melissa Zhao; J Jack Lee; Alexander M Eggermont; Richard L Schilsky; John Mendelsohn; Vladimir Lazar; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Do founder mutations characteristic of some cancer sites also predispose to pancreatic cancer?

Authors:  Marcin R Lener; Rodney J Scott; Wojciech Kluźniak; Piotr Baszuk; Cezary Cybulski; Anna Wiechowska-Kozłowska; Tomasz Huzarski; Tomasz Byrski; Józef Kładny; Sandra Pietrzak; Agnieszka Soluch; Anna Jakubowska; Jan Lubiński
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  When Should Tumor Genomic Profiling Prompt Consideration of Germline Testing?

Authors:  Kim DeLeonardis; Lauren Hogan; Stephen A Cannistra; Deepa Rangachari; Nadine Tung
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Points to consider for reporting of germline variation in patients undergoing tumor testing: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Marilyn M Li; Elizabeth Chao; Edward D Esplin; David T Miller; Katherine L Nathanson; Sharon E Plon; Maren T Scheuner; Douglas R Stewart
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Tuya Pal; Michael P Berry; Saundra S Buys; Patricia Dickson; Susan M Domchek; Ahmed Elkhanany; Susan Friedman; Michael Goggins; Mollie L Hutton; Beth Y Karlan; Seema Khan; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison W Kurian; Christine Laronga; Jennifer K Litton; Julie S Mak; Carolyn S Menendez; Sofia D Merajver; Barbara S Norquist; Kenneth Offit; Holly J Pederson; Gwen Reiser; Leigha Senter-Jamieson; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Rebecca Shatsky; Kala Visvanathan; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Myra J Wick; Kari B Wisinski; Matthew B Yurgelun; Susan D Darlow; Mary A Dwyer
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.

Authors:  James X Sun; Yuting He; Eric Sanford; Meagan Montesion; Garrett M Frampton; Stéphane Vignot; Jean-Charles Soria; Jeffrey S Ross; Vincent A Miller; Phil J Stephens; Doron Lipson; Roman Yelensky
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.