| Literature DB >> 35258744 |
Emmanouil Dimitrakakis1, Holly Aylmore2, Lukas Lindenroth3, George Dwyer3, Joshua Carmichael2, Danyal Z Khan3,4, Neil L Dorward4, Hani J Marcus3,4, Danail Stoyanov3.
Abstract
Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is a promising alternative to transcranial approaches. However, standard instruments lack articulation, and thus, could benefit from robotic technologies. The aim of this study was to develop an ergonomic handle for a handheld robotic instrument intended to enhance this procedure. Two different prototypes were developed based on ergonomic guidelines within the literature. The first is a forearm-mounted handle that maps the surgeon's wrist degrees-of-freedom to that of the robotic end-effector; the second is a joystick-and-trigger handle with a rotating body that places the joystick to the position most comfortable for the surgeon. These handles were incorporated into a custom-designed surgical virtual simulator and were assessed for their performance and ergonomics when compared with a standard neurosurgical grasper. The virtual task was performed by nine novices with all three devices as part of a randomised crossover user-study. Their performance and ergonomics were evaluated both subjectively by themselves and objectively by a validated observational checklist. Both handles outperformed the standard instrument with the rotating joystick-body handle offering the most substantial improvement in terms of balance between performance and ergonomics. Thus, it is deemed the more suitable device to drive instrumentation for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery; Handheld robotics; Medical robotics; Robotic-assisted minimally invasive neurosurgery; Surgical ergonomics
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35258744 PMCID: PMC9001398 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02942-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Biomed Eng ISSN: 0090-6964 Impact factor: 3.934